I think in away biruh metsai has some points for all the undemocratic leadership in meda was some of the indications what makes EPLF non populace. Now, we know what the leadership did and still doing but we cannot deny all what people have contributed during struggle and therefore the big picture of biruh metsai will not be acceptable at this stage for now the only option is unity to dismantle the existing dictatorship..no, we don't carry EPLF from here on forward but create new constitution based on existing platform not create new ones....we can do it for we are just as humans as anyone else...
In struggle the most successful way of a movement or organization is to alter the political landscape and prepare a new political ground first . Then in its second stage assemble its parts and sail on and leads them to victory . This is exactly what is or has happened in
@@mercy9051 eti xhfetka keman yearyo temehar hawey bruk lomi arbi sqlet eu Christian entekonka malet eu temehar anbib ane sekram entekonku nska tmehar hager tiqyir kuluna hade aynkin sesenayu neaka bruk fasika ygberelka
Thank you all 3 of u for your costractive ideas for justice. The target is the same. But argument on the methods and techniques. my question is for bright future , is it necessary to condemn the struggle for independence for the sake of ruining the values of EPLF? Or how can we conclude that there was no reason for struggle against the ethiopian regimes ? By the way I agree that there are confusions between the current authority and Eritrea as a country. Every one agree the group that controls the country are below bandits.
solomon ,you are doing great job the only idea which can represent Eritrean people is one natian,the guy who represent (ቡሩህ መጻኢ)ጹልማት መጻኢ is going no where they are already condemned by our people,they are against our history.
BRIGHT FUTURE or ONE NATION Hmmm ? I LIKE BOTH TITLE . In my point of view both have olmost the same IDEOLOGY , but what skiers me is ERITREAN ARE DRIVEN BY SENTIMENTAL ,so probably they will like ONE NATION .ERITREA IS ALREADY ONE NATION . BRIGHT FUTURE IS FOR THE FUTURE OF NEW GENERATION AND NEW IDEA AND NEW ERITREA. SO YOU YOUNG PEOPLE IT IS UP TO YOU TAKE THE COUNTRY AND USE YOUR BRIGHT MIND .
Both Yonas and Solomon have found a common ground in that they agree on the radical change of higdef by democratic forces. They differ though in the case of martydom and veteran fighters whom Yonas adamantly sees as victims of the propagada machine employed by EPLF whereas Solomon separates EPLF from higdef. According to Yonas, he cannot tell the one from the other. If it is to establish a bright future, argues Yonas, then the very mindset that prevailed in the minds of its members, will have to be denounced, renounced, condemned; Solomon, while recognising the misdeeds committed during the struggle for liberation and in the aftermath, in fact up until today, sounds to defend the very cause of the combat and the legacy of those whose lives were put to martydom. I for one think that their differences are not one of kind but that of degree. In other words, they differ in form but they resemble in substance. Somehow Yonas also makes sense in that you cannot employ the same method or approach over and over again when you know that the way you have gone has led nowhere. So why not alter and bring about another course of action. At the same time, I can see the perspective on which Solomon insists on dwelling: our martyrs, our people, our glory of the past while he is aware of the fact that our martyrs have been the means by which Isaias and his cohorts have been clinging on to the public power to which they are not legitimised. So if we are to glorify our martyrs and reward them, then we must embark on a new way of paradigm along the lines of Yonas.
