Rammstein - Ausländer (React/Review) 

Younger people in particular no longer know some words. But then look into a dictionary. 😂

Isn’t this song about sex tourism?

Wow

@@lupuswarrior6785 In a way, yes, but I also think it's about bad behavior.

Rammstein is German poetry to me.

Yes, I was just about to suggest that. CA twist and also a meaning that does not really represent a hate for foreigners, which one might assume fron the title.....

Yes, it's like a forgotten song.

I don't get why they haven't done it yet 🤔

Yes, mein land , please please

@@motorlife7037 Because it's a single, or at least not from any studio album

I take the take that Rammstein sees so many beautiful places but they can never put down roots. They just blow their load and go.

The concert was incredible...Rammstein blew me away...i have video clips i posted on instagram THEY ARE THE BEST STADIUM...LIVE ACT...PERIOD...

Videos cannot come close to seeing them live...its a experience that you just have to be there...to see..hear ..

Sorry you missed it...i was thinking of yall

In his book, he says that when he is offended, he always wants to go home. This time he was unlucky. 😂🤣😂

I imagine they hate it because it's not what Rammstein usually plays, it's more pop, but it's good, I really like it 👍 😌 😁

Itd only be because of it being more "dancey" music. But Pussy is the same. But those sounds are very typical of German music id say, techno music and dance music is big in Germany and Europe so I don't find out of place. Considering their music genre is considered "Dance-metal" its very on point. Their older stuff has tons of synth so its not out of place for their sound. It's one of my favourites

Yes definitely one I did not appreciate. It caught me off-guard when I first listenned to the latest album, and not in a good way. Unlike "Was ich liebe" which I enjoy more and more each time I listen to it, "Auslander" never grew on me, it's still maybe my least favorite of the album.

@@guitou706 Funny! For me it's the other way around.

I love this song! Great! 🤘😊

Radio is just a little bit better

I like this one, Radio, and Was Ich Liebe

@@bornslippy9208 Radio is great, too.

They already did it, if I'm not mistaken. I think it got taken down by youtube...

Wenn die anderen einfach abhauen. 😢

Still up months later ...

song is about european imperialism and how they go in and leave after taking what they need. thats why it sounds eurodance and speak in multiple languages - that sound is required for the subject.

We did Radio but it got blocked.

Yet the British were the biggest colonialists on the planet at one time and closely followed by the French. We grew up accepting it seeing all those countries coloured in pink on the globe to denote the British Empire. We were told that we had brought civilisation to those parts of the world and in return got spices, cotton, tobacco, tomatoes and potatoes yet it's only more recently Westerners realised that they could learn from these tribal cultures as well.. Spain, France and Britain colonised parts of what is now the USA. Britain created the USA from a small part of what it is now and it was governed from Britain by George III who never visited it and who lost the war of independence. Once free of Britain the USA then expanded into the Spanish and French colonies.

"I'm not a man for one night... ...I'll be here for a few hours at most."

they reacted to it. And maybe (fingers crossed) they will see it live this year.

They have already done several Jinjer songs

Especially as colonialists in the past. There's a line where Italian, French, English and Russian is also used to show that most of Europe was colonising the world at one time. Even the Netherlands colonised countries so Indonesia, Suriname and South Africa became their colonies. Italy colonised Ethiopia. When I flew into Bari in southern Italy for the first time I saw planes from Ethiopia at the airport.

Britain, France and Spain colonised North America and Britain then created the USA which once independent spread across to the west coast and now the USA is colonising parts of the world as it did Cuba in the 1950's and now the Middle East. In the 60's and 70's the USA forced the ideas from the Chicago School of Economics on most of South America starting with Chile and Argentina and because the people there resisted neo-liberalism the countries became fascist. Originally the Romans conquered all of Western Europe and forced Christianity on it which originated in Palestine also occupied by the Romans. More and more people in Europe are rediscovering their pagan roots and rejecting Christianity.

To Western European society as well in the 16th to 20th centuries when Western European countries were colonising the world and fighting each other over their colonies. Because they needed natural resources from those countries. The British fought the Dutch in South Africa for example. Britain has invaded, either successfully or unsuccessfully, all but 22 countries in the world. I only learned that recently and it came as a shock to me.

​@@lemsip207 They gave it a retro look, but I really see the reference to modern German society of the last few decades. That Europe colonized to exploit natural resources is a myth. For Germany, it was a question of national prestige. The colonies never made economic sense. The Dutch wanted a global trade network more than anything else. The English took over from the Dutch. Maybe the ones who set out with the goal of specifically pillaging gold were the Spanish in South America. Remember, that in those times trade blocks like the European Union did not exist. You needed your own empire in order to establish a free trade zone.

@@mrnice1976 I get the impression Germany did that so as not to get left out. There was a lot of colonisation as there was very little trade between your own country and the colonies of other European countries so you relied upon your own empire. Trade grew during the 19th century when colonising countries collaborated more and traded between each other. Also there was colonisation going on because populations were expanding rapidly in Europe with industrialisation and people (especially from Britain) needed to live elsewhere which is why they tried to settle in places such as India and Kenya before being kicked out so they weren't just making lightening visits. And they successfully settled in parts of North America such as Newfoundland, New England and Nova Scotia and in Australasia. The Spanish did likewise in the Caribbean, west coast of what is now the USA, bottom part of north America and South America. More Germans than anyone else emigrated to the USA in the 19th century once the British created it, lost it in a war of independence under George III and it expanded westards. At school I only learned about the British Empire and only found out about other European countries colonising the rest of the world since leaving school through books, newspapers, travel, TV, films and museums. There is an African museum in Tervuren just outside of Brussel focused mostly on the Belgian Congo.

​@@lemsip207 Yes, there has been demographic pressure in Europe for a long time, many people and little space. That led to emigration to the colonies. In a way, the reverse is happening now. Africa is feeling demographic pressure and Europe is building fences against the people trying to get in. Australia is a penal colony, a nation of convicts :D They were just sent as far away as possible. But at the base of it all, the British had a trade rivalry with the Dutch which played out along the maritime trade routes. Controlling the Cape, for example, was strategic. The Dutch controlled India before the British and the Dutch East India Company's wealth built brands like Heineken. The British East India Company was the successor and the British took over the Dutch trade. The Germans had missed all of that and essentially just held some colonies as trophies for national pride. Pretty useless. Of course, securing trade was not a European invention. The maritime global trade network east (Americas were not on the map) had previously been established by the great islamic empires (Ottomans, Berbers etc), so the Europeans entered an already competitive turf and ascended as those empires declined. The British took it a notch higher than most had in the past. Hyper-competitive so it seems, but they also coincided with the age of industrialization, so maybe they just went with the times and scaled on an industrial level... limitless economic growth is with us as a doctrine to this day.

@@mrnice1976 Britain was the first industrialised nation followed closely by Germany straight after. The USA came close after that.

they already reacted to it.

Ciao Regazza

They did

Da verstehst du das aber ziemlich falsch

@@wdererste9310 nö, er hat da schon den kern getroffen.