@@killer-py6wc yea customisable wise but if you compared to 65 rpm and 200 ms ads snipers its not that good (you can't 1 hit people to the stomach with ballista)
Both the MW2 Intervention and Barrett .50cal make you feel unstoppable. In fact, the current state of MW2 has more snipers going for clips than OMA toobers!
@@wesleyknott6498 I have Xbox 360, an open NAT type, no map packs installed, good internet, manual IP address, USA CST, have my friends list full of MW2 players where I can join a session if I need to. Patience is key when waiting for a lobby! There’s also a Discord server that makes it easy to join sessions through sending chat invites
I don't see a difference between the two other than the intervention reloads faster and is bolt. I'd say barret overall is better but the intervention is definitely more satisfying lol
Nah imo he should save them for last as a special finale, he should do LMGs, rocket launchers/explosive guns, Marksman rifles, melee weapons, laser weapons or special weapons next since there’s so many assault rifles. Maybe even tacticals or lethals
The dsr is not “really slow” have you seen the damn Barrett from Cold War? That thing is “Really Slow” the dsr was at most just “slow” but not “really slow” as you say
i wouldnt be surprised, that being said, i've played since day one. tbt,ballista doesnt deserve number 1, a skilled xpr player could easily outclass it in most situations. same with the dsr.
Saying the MORS didn't do too well as it was in a "Jet-packing" game doesn't carry weight when the game launched with Classic Mode. Just because that's what most people remember AW for, doesn't mean it was all it had. Also, the P-06 ranked above the MORS AND the DSR-50? I'm sorry but you needed some more sleep before making this list Chaos.
Jimmy i think you missed one thing that made the ballista even better than the intervention. The iron sight attachment. This attachment alone made me love the ballista.
I think the po6s power viability and placement of the grand scheme of all snipers is somewhat overestimated i really don’t think it’s better than the dsr50
I dunno man. I used it religiously in the BO2 days and it was damn good… super spammy. You could put 4 shots into someone before they even ADS, and it had NO recoil. It was lowkey broken but people hated it.
Did anybody notice when he did the best bolt action snipers in the previous videos that the intervention was the number one but now he changed his mind to the ballista in this video lmao
I personally would never put the intervention behind the ballista but it is pretty fair considering the intervention had FMJ and Stopping power to assist it. Whereas the ballista might have stopping power (don’t know, skipped Bo2) but it definitely didn’t have stopping power! Great choice
I agree with you that the balista is better since if you add the TTk in effect, it's a sliver better but there was just something amazing about getting kills with it from somebody who can't snipe
Intervention: 200ms to ADS Ballista: 350ms to ADS Intervention: 1HK stomach up Ballista: 1HK chest up Intervention: 65 RPM Ballista: 47 RPM Were the extra 2 bullets really worth being worse in every meaningful statistic?
A Dragunov variant at number 19? @Chaos you surprise me, the way you bash the Drag, I love to see you putting one so high on the list, come join us in BuffNerdGaming
Maybe I'm crazy but the Ballista does not outrank the DSR, purely because of the fact that it was a hitmarker machine meanwhile the DSR had nothing but stopping power.
I cant agree with this... The Ballista got WAY too many hitmarkers when you compare it to other rifles, MSR, MW2 Barrett or intervention. But fair enough you list.
Though I was expecting the Intervention to be no.1, but I’m still pretty glad that the Ballista was no.1 and Intervention no.2 I loved it and used it a ton in BO2 as much as the Intervention back in the hay days of me playing MW2, so I’m quite satisfied tbh
I honestly think that the PSG-1 is a better sniper than the L96-A1. Better fire rate, not as much idle sway, felt like it ads'd a little bit faster, all for slightly less damage.
Personally I think the ballista would be better in the 10-5 range . I agree that the intervention should be #2, but honestly I think anybody that's been playing COD long enough kinda agrees that the m40A3 just did the best job the most consistently. Idk. Was just perfect.
