Ranveer Singh Best Acting - Part 1 | Bajirao Mastani | Deepika Padukone & Priyanka Chopra 

Koun bola Rana Pratap Singh apne Bachpan se hi aisi niti apnai hai eya bhi veeron kveer hai against of muslims ruller, against of India

Dono apne apne time ke lion h

Jiyo mere sher

हरी सिंह नलवा भी

🤣🤣

Jay maharashtra

Bahadur hi bahudur ki izzat karata hai,aap ke vachar ki hum kadar karate hai,maratha -Sikh bhai bhai

As a hindu me too

Sir mai personally aapake dharm ki bahut samman karata hu. But pichhale one year se aapke dharm ko bhi sak ki nazar se dekha jane laga. Isako thik karane ki jarurat hai.

Kam se kam log bajirao ko janne to lage!! Usse pahle kisi kisi ko hi pata tha

Mahesh Manjarekar Sir Marathi Actor

Ranveer and Priyanka acted out of their skins don't put Deepika anywhere near the same category

Bajirao peshwa never lost a single battle in his entire life and Bollywood makes a movie on his lovestory and u are saying it's a best movie strange!

Historic? It is fictional lovestory from Marathi literature. The movie does not corroborate with history.

@@youtubeonly7271 ye tu nhi tere andar ka bhakt bol rha hai...

@@ftadventure716 kya be khiladi dushman ki nari

its not the shitty acting of ranveer jhatu .. its the bgs that's making the scene so impactful

Koi esha film Bhagwan Sri Krishna kabhi bare main bana 😢 mare se pehle dekhna chahta ho

Man ig you think that performance was shitty then and there you proved you don't know shit about acting​@@sabkafather

@@swaralipawar2079 I am an actor and i know what acting is all about . STFU now and get lost

It was well organize brain wash by Our education policy . And we know every thing about Mughals but not about any hindu Samrajy like maratha mewar maurya

You can talk to Government to have a lesson in school books on Ranveer Singh.

@@riyasudheenm3556 don't worry our historians are alreday in process of rewriting the history the way it was happened. Our successors shall surely be reading the new and untold-real story. HRD ministry has ordered historians.

@@executiveofficer2902 al

@@riyasudheenm3556 q

बहुत सही कहा आपने

Right

@@myrecipebookwithreshma4002 thnk u🙂

ru-vid.com/show-UCAeGY67V1Ja1I4Au231i_qg

@Sai music ok I just want clearity and truth. Thank u.

@Sai music thnk u

Bite huye ko hi itihas kahte

20 yrs 40 war all win

Trotter tuft try TRG try trtt trigger rttt

Right Kuch aur din jinda rehte toh Entire Mughal Sultanate ko mitti me mila dete

@@mohdzafar7609 Itna din toh jinda raha aur kitna din jiyenga Aurang jeb,Last stage me Sirf Skeleton ke sahare uska sarir khada tha phir bhi lalach nahi choda,kam age me Death hua tha Bajirao @ 40 isse kehte kam age me jyada success achieve Karna

Senapati bro

Bro he wasn't king , he was peshwa (senapati )

jitne bhi young actors hai ajkl ke ume sbse tgda actor ranveer hai 🔥🔥🔥

More so from Priyanka

Don't know why no one admired him. He supported so well.

No Doubt Mind Blowing Acting

Mastani ke dialoge Chapriyon jaise hai

True

Acting can also be done simply with eyes without any extravagant expressions. Everyone isn't wise enough to realise that. SLB definitely understands that

@@letsplaywithgrammar5061 Yeah! Priyanka acted both by eyes, she had some Marathi accent too and her dialogues have a separate fanbase.

Right

Ranveer singh bhai

Ranveer Singh not ranbir

And what group ? If its a good movie , everybody not petty and simplistic will go see it , whether its of Karan Johar or Kangana Ranaut .

@@Akshay-tq6zk its of sanjay leela bhansali

he was above average in ramleela, good in bajirao mastani and superb in padmaavat. But he gets more credit shahid was better than ranveer in padmaavat and he should not have got any award for bajirao and gully boy salman should have won that in 2015 and hrithik or shahid in 2019 but ranveer got paid award.

रणदीप नहीं भाई रणबीर

Bro Napoleon won more than 1200 battles and holds the world record

@@knightofgodserventofholymo7500 Bro.. Napoleon fought total 81 battles in his lifetime won 70 and lost 11.. His last fight was at Waterloo, where he lost and was caught hold of by the British army. (Where he breathed his last.)

​ L00l00000000⁰⁰00

Teri ma. Aa ka chakkar

Ladki ka chakkar nhi ladko ka hawas or niyat... Aisa nhi krna chahie tha

nepal apna hi hai alag mat maano nepal ko

Definitely not.. he did gross overacting in this scene..

@@rajnish8918 seriously?

@@rajnish8918 🤡

@@rajnish8918 That's your opinion but more people love his acting

My guess is that ur this perspective has been built after watching nitish rajput video

But name of the movie is Bajirao Mastaani which is a love affair considering that they did show quite a few fight scenes

Agreed

Whole movie didn't show proper and truth

It's was not love it was an extra marital affair. A great warrior not doubt but also a A cheater who cheated on his wife.

Sujata Shreshtha Love story comes out of Marathi literature and way different than the actual history. History definitely shows us that Bajirao took some efforts to support Mastani out of love or his duty, whatever may be the reason. But lovestory is based on kalpanik bhakadkatha to fool the audience. 1- Mastani was Bajirao's wife - There is no evidance of their marriage at least in Marathi documentation. If she was married to him in Rajput tradition, such marriage was never accepted in Marathi samaj. Banirao never dared to establish her as his wife anywhere bcz he knew that she was unacceptable here. Bajirao never took her to any military expedition, never to Satara, even did not give her jagir. ( Mastani got only income- mahsul of 2 villages) So historic Bajirao himself was confused about her status like how to keep her. The foremost proof is Shahu maharaj's letter in which he called Mastani a mistress. At least till Bajirao's time, Mastani was his mistress only. 2- Mastani was tortured and there was threat to her life- This is another blatant lie from fiction. Bajirao was a busy man and travelled frequently for military expeditions. How she survived all these years? If anyone tried to kill her, why the conspirator's name never appeared in history. Fiction never gives the name of the culprit so this is wild imagination. Second thing, if Bajirao was so much afraid of her safety, why he never wrote a single letter to her asking for her wellbeing? On the other hand, he wrote regularly to his wife from almost every military expedition. 3- Kashi was neglected by her husband after Mastani's arrival- Mastani came to Pune around 1731 ( exact records are not available but most probably she was sent after Chhatrasal's death in 1731) Now from 1731-35, Kashi got pregnant thrice. A still born child in 1731 but after that Raghav in 1733 and Janardan in 1735. Samsher was born in 1734. But still fiction says- Kashi was neglected. In 1736, when Bajirao travelled to Rajputana, he took Kashi only with him. It is Kashi who always accompanied him to Satara. There are letters exchanged between husband and wife regularly ( in contrast to no letter written to Mastani) but still according to fiction, Kashi was neglected. In fact, Kashi was the only support of her husband in Mastani's case. Bajirao wanted emotional support from his family to keep Mastani as she was his political responsibility and he got that only from his wife. In my opinion, Kashi perfectly knew what was Bajirao's stand about Mastani. The fact that she took care of Samsher and her determination to hand over jagir of Banda to Samsher before her death, actually indicates the strong bond she had with her husband. But fiction makes its own imaginary tales. 4- Brahmins of Pune did not allow Samsher to become Hindu- This is another fraud in fiction that Bajirao wanted to carryout upanayan of Samsher. Absolutely no evidance for this in history. Bajirao perfectly knew that Samsher could not become Hindu that is why he named him Samsher. ( Mastani named the child Krishnasinh). Bajirao did not give his legacy to Samsher. Samsher was given Banda as jagir, a province of Bundelkhand, nothing from Bajirao's jagirs in Maharashtra, nothing even from Maratha kingdom. But people get mesmerised by the dialogue ' chala mohor lava' Are mohor kispar lagai wo to dekho. In 18 th century, hindu muslim marriage was not possible, there was no concept of conversions either. People forget- why Mastani was named Mastani in Bundelkhand if her father was Hindu? Why she was not given a Hindu name? Why any Rajput did not marry her? Why she remained kuwari for so long? The reason was- you must be born of Hindu parents to become a Hindu. All these are bhakadkatha made by fiction to make it lovestory and people are fooled years after years. Bajitao has not done any sacrifice for Mastani. He could give only monetary benefits to her, nothing else. Ghar provide karna Peshwake liye badi bat nahi thi. Bajirao got Zansi, Kalpi, Banda and Sagar provinces of Bundelkhand and also gold worth 5 lakh rupees from Chhatrasal but ofcourse that was price of the freedom that Bundelkhand got bcz of Bajirao. But still 5 lakh rs. ke badle 1-2 ghar banana badi bat nahi hai.( Cost of construction of Shanivarwada in 1730 was about 17500 rs. so you can compare now.) Bajirao agar use samman de sakte to badi bat hoti par Bajirao khud confused hai throughout ke how to keep her. Bajirao had all the powers in his hand. If he had wished, he could have separated himself along with Kashi and Mastani from his family but he could never take decision of his life. So for me, Bajirao can not be called a lover.

@@goodhuman5452 truee

@@goodhuman5452 Thanks for writing this. Really helped to understand the real history behind this story

@@sujatashrestha1329 ganja fukna thoda kam kar de

@@AngelKumari448 padh liya tune kya likha hai...

Every actor in the movie overshadowed Deepika 😂

Exactly!!!

Peshwa Bajirao Balad Bhatt

Who told that Maharaj bajirao was brahmin

@@afnanahmednajmi3325 Peshwa Bajirao Balad Bhatt from Chitpawan Brahmin Clan

Yes brother he was a Brahmin I referred few books. Sorry for the question I asked.

Pehli baat to Peshwa Bajirao raja Nahi the Peshwa the (Prime Minister).

Source batao Bhai societal pressure ya phir Mastani ko maar Diya Aisa konse bhi history text Mai nhi hai this movie is the pure propoganda against Hindus. I know the reality because I am punekar.