Second version of the GX35 video without pixelation, the first version was made quickly without expecting to receive so many views 😃: • Rc plane with motor Ho... Wing span : 2,4m Weight : 7,5 Kg Thrust : 5,4 Kg Propeller : 18X10
at least you build, design, fly and its not electric. 42yrs for me and most at my field have turned into electric foamy's ... I love to actually build and fly everything. Good Job !!!
Nothing wrong with foam. Don't be a hater because of change. IL tell you just how nice it is to charge a battery and know it's gonna fly that day and not mess with oily gas and hope it starts and runs well. Also using foam gets people into the hobby and makes things cheaper if you want to try an air frame that otherwise would cost way too much or be too hard to build, also crashing and gluing a whole wing back in 5 min is great. I've built wooden planes and foam planes and they both are fun and that's the point.
@@Ryan-re1rs I didn't say there was anything wrong with them. I don't hate them. I just don't like them. I agree with all your points, but for now I'll stick with turbines. Electric foamies? Still YUK!
Excuse me for the pixelation of some photos.. it comes from the video editing software. I made this video quickly for my friends.... I didn't expect to have so many views.. Second version of the GX35 video without pixelation 😃: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-P_W-zambZUY.html
Bravo. Vive le 4 temps, pour son bruit plus réaliste et quand il fonctionne à l'essence c'est encore plus économique que le méthanol donc c'est très bien. En plus bravo pour l'idée du moteur pas prévu pour à la base. 👍
Merci Guy 😁.. avantages, huile à part et essence sans huile ajoutée, Je m'attendais au bon fonctionnement mais pas 'a tant de poussée.. 5,4 kg c'est génial, il arrache... plus lourd qu'un 35cc classique bien sûr, mais pas tant que ça ( 2,3 kg)
Thanks, we're true modeler with endless imagination about inovation and discovery, thanks God gave us the knowledge and perseverance that we enjoy the true spirit of being happy modeler
thats some brutal flywheel modification... just thinking about its dynamic balance and burst strength... am sure you static balanced it, that still aint dynamic... personally, i woulda chased the ali hub with magnets approach... otherwise, theyre great engines, ideal for the job...
@@druda1039 i can see it works! just looks a bit rough... and as i say... burst hazard. even a stock flywheel can and will happily explode... you just took all its circumferential support away... and that rough hacksaw finish does nothing for removing stress raisers? and aluminium has no fatigue limit... you may very well find it grenading with a few hours of use on it. be wary. not criticising... just pointing out a certain part that may very well turn into a lethal weapon unexpectedly. NEVER under estimate the power of spinning objects!
@@paradiselost9946 I balanced by mounting the steering wheel on a free axis... the aspect of the cut does not matter.. it already works several hours without problemI balanced by mounting the steering wheel on a free axis... the aspect of the cut does not matter.. it already works several hours without problem
I can give it to you but the fuselage is very simple, it can be done without plans, you only need a bit of aeronautical knowledge or copy another plane...
16.5 lbs and 11.9 lbs thrust on 1.1 hp at 7000 rpm and 1.2 lb-ft torque APC published data 18 x10 prop. at 7000 16.37 thrust 4.67 hp 42.08 inch lb torque. I want this magic prop you're using.
@@druda1039 Einstein said once. Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. I understand you Albert...
