Notebook LM is probably the only AI tool that I really have a meaningful use for. I don't have the time for reading 53 pages of dozens of legal documents after the chilean millitary coup, and this makes it accesible, at work, or anywhere else.
That AI CS thing is very interesting. Maybe in the future we will have games that completely evolve while you were playing it. Enviroment, NPCs, dialogues, even the story itself will develop in realtime. A living virtual world.
It reminds me of quite a bit how dreams are. Vague and kinda nonsensical, things keep changing for no apparent reason but there is still some coherence. I wonder how these games will look in 5-10 years.
yes, i don't understand how AI works in code and in detail, but I know AI could and will be able to create an entire world for you to play in the near future, the problem is sound. however, we can do something about it. for example, if someone combines ChatGPT's advanced voice mode (when it will be a bit more advanced), it could voice characters in different voices, and the sound effects, for example maybe music, or falling glass can be created too. today there is already a very advanced AI music generator. and also, there is a new video generator model called movie Gen by meta, and it can generate sounds I think with the video.
I am University Student from Hong Kong. About the permission of using AI tools in our assignment, my school actually allow us to use generative AI like Chatgpt. However, we have to declare in the works about what we have used for, with screenshot of the AI response and mine.
8:42 Honestly I can see this being the main catalyst for the indie Animation Revolution before the end of the decade. Using the Control Net tools in conjunction with something like Blender or Unreal to animate the poses of your characters. And just have the AI tools take care of the visual and lighting with prompts.
@@vi6ddarkking i understand, but still, i do not understand the use case for this in animation, as most animation frameworks already have this feature. it would be easier to just use that feature rather than exporting the animation and reanimating it with ai. it's easier to make rigs, and the embedded rig tools can be hastened with ai, and it would be better to use an embedded feature in an animation software than letting ai control the image, which can result in continuity errors in the background behind the animatee.
@@nnoxie.a Time. Sure you can spend weeks or months in post processing. Or you can spend days fine tuning AI and tweaking prompts and settings to get the same result.
How did you get that. I tried and failed a few times including uploading a paper in French and asked them to talk in French. Of course, the fact that they could translate it in the first place was impressive
The game example is crazy, all they needed to interact with it is information about the input. Now what happens if you apply that to real life and real life INPUT. Matrix. Input from motion capture suit.
@@baltasar4936 That's true, "the matrix" is a simulation. But you might be able to restrict it into something with rules. Instead of a motion capture suit for input. The controls on a drone could be used.
28:30 I'm currently in college and had an English class last semester. We had four major essays due through the term so I utilized Chatgpt strictly for error corrections(spelling, grammer, punctuation etc) just by copy and pasting the essays I typed myself in word. My best advice for those of you still studying utilize AI as you would a calculator. Meaning you need to still need to understand the formula and why you got the output presented. Don't use it as a crutch while you learn nothing. Another example of utilizing AI properly would be to take a problem you don't quite understand on your assignments and prompt it to explain the question as if you were a 5 year old. 2024 and on is not about what you know but rather what's the correct question/prompt to ask and I think that's fascinating!
i'm genuinely fine with ai becoming better, as ling as ai-generated images/videos are not used for commercial purposes, especially when the creators claim that they created it themselves. thus, i feel like ai-generated works should be obligated to be licensed under something likr CC-BY-NC under the AI's company.
I'm still waiting for the day we get AI astronauts that can rebuild themselves and explore the outskirts of the universe for hundreds of years... something humans cannot do
holy shit bro, I haven't seen your channel since your very first videos when you had a few thousand subs and now you have 218k, that's insane keep it up
Teachers should give work that can't be automated, like a presentation, or interview the students 1 on 1 to see if they need help with any of the topics.
School students are so lucky to have these tools at their hand . They can keep their curiosity alive without only relying on teacher . This AI revolution is definitely help introvert students who are not able to speak freely. It can be helpful for teachers as well . ❤
Make your own logic puzzle based on the text but it's a 32 digit code instead of a 4 digit code and translate it into german: 9285 one number is correct but in the wrong position 1937 two numbers are correct but in the wrong positions 5201 one number is correct and in the right position 6507 nothing is correct 8524 two numbers are correct but in the wrong positions Can you figure out the 4 diget code?
I just used NotebookLM on my first novel. It's amazing the things it got right (even drawing my attention in minor ways to things I hadn't considered), the weird things it gets wrong (It stated that a creature explicitly said to be a wildcat about twice the size of a house cat was an "herbivore" of immense size that conjured up images of wooly mammoths), and the places where it obviously interpreted it with the lens of modern politics in ways I'd expect from real people. Fascinating, sometimes hilarious, and terrifying all at the same time. Then I did it with an autobiography of sorts, and the woman had a noticeable dismissiveness and boredom in her voice. Can't help but feel a bit offended by that, hahaha!
It should be said that these AI generated games are trained on existing games. At the current moment they can only make worse looking and worse performing games that already exist after training on said games for a long time. I'm not sure if AI generated games will ever be as good as a human made ones since they will most likely be recycled generic games like call of duty and the like.
Unlimited user customization will be the selling point. If you could easily make a game that's worse than a proper game made by a studio, but you could arbitrarily define all kinds of things about the game without knowing a single thing about game making, that for sure has value, even if some hand crafted video game with those features would be better. Like having an army of personal modders. Besides, the logic of "it is trained on existing games, hence it can never make anything better than that." does not hold up. That's like saying that the student can never surpass the master. If AI finds a way to combine the old stuff in new and interesting ways, it will be better.
@MidWitPride what I mean by that is that yes it looks legible to some degree now but that's because it's trained on so much data on that specific game. Kinda like telling an artist "hey draw a match of csgo" after showing them 80 hours of csgo footage. I haven't really looked too much into this but the main issue with the doom one is memory. The AI has no clue what is actually being displayed and the memory is short. That means if you don't look at something for 3 seconds, that something is lost and replaced with something else. It is also incredibly incredibly expensive. To the point where it wouldn't become commercialized. I believe EA or something was teasing a game making AI but it was all pre-made curated footage with no actual AI involvement. The AI itself doesn't draw the frames, but rather places the obstacles or implements a feature. Even that isn't possible atm. So yeah. Atm there is no user customization. It's generated frames with data from a specific game. Data that tells it exactly how the maps look, the textures, the POVs. Due to a lack of memory you'll most likely get some really weird lsd trip game if it was trained on more than just an existing game. That was my point. Even then it is a bit like an LSD trip.
If you’re creative you realize this is a Goldmine for synthetic data. For instance the talking head talk. You can create powerful contrastive pairs to vastly improve say LM video generator performance. Take source real talking head video(positive), extract first frame and audio and generate a talking head video(negative)…boy o boy the possibilities.
Very interesting. I have thought a lot about AI in science, probably it will lead to massive breakthroughs in years to come. Could they discover more than we know about, for example, room temperature superconductivity? Could they predict the properties of some new materials in given condition? Could they help in neuroscience, undersanding some patterns of the brain we miss? These are all mond blowing questions, but it's all a matter of time😊
It like, "Oh my student life will become so much easier with all that new fancy AI models", then "Oh god how I'm suppose to sort out all these new ones AI models, that came out every week!"
Give it 2-3 years and we will get actually playable and good looking AI games. However if this technology gets big and easy to work with, it will destroy gaming companies.
It will become good (much better actually, because it will be personalized), and it will destroy the entire game developing industry, but this is not bad given its current state.
This stance parallels the infamous calculator ban in classrooms. However, as we've since discovered, having a calculator at our fingertips has become an indispensable tool. The same principle applies here - we must consider the rapidly evolving landscape of tools and resources available to our students.
Optimus is the gentle and methodical butler. Unitree is the hyperactive intern who has to run from office to office to get everyone's coffee orders. Please do not get either of them angry, the Optimus generals will send out the Unitree soldiers to jump on you to death.
11:17 "we might not need motion capture anymore" - I think AI will help with that but it won't replace mocap soon "you can just take a video of yourself" - that's also motion capture
UGH. The AI male podcast voice virtually "sucked teeth" and said word stuffed in "you know." This is exactly what I wish real humans never did due to my misophonia, and now the future is making models that do these things too?
I wonder if you could use the game AI to create a more detailed perspective for a complex game. Like a first person action rpg ui that overlays a complex rpg like dwarf fortress.
I recently saw a school on the news that banned smartphones from classes because girls (kids) got over 80 DMs from men all over the world during a single class. The AI homework problem is much worse with younger kids that have to learn simple math or simple writing first. When they do scientific writing, they already know how to write.
@28:00 - We went through the same thing with calculators and then computers in schools. AI companies need to do what Jobs did and partner with schools.
When do you think systems will be available that can translate audio from various sources on the fly (with minimal delay) and speak the answer (also with minimal delay)? At this moment Google Translate is not useful (slow, wrong translations, weak conversation mode).
@@theAIsearchHow do you do this without wanting to eat a bullet? There will be nothing to accomplish as a human, nothing to control. Even if we have a matrix, deep down, we'll know it's pointless. Humans can't live without the hope of overcoming our struggles with our intellegence, our power. We will become cattle, incapable of accomplishing any meaningful change.
I think schools need to have an extra step when you turn in a paper on something... the teacher should ask them random questions from what they wrote to see if they know what they wrote and how well they understand the subject.
Practically everything uses AI now, from the word correction on your phone to Photoshop, in case you hadn't noticed, android phones now not only correct words, but also give suggestions for better words or forms of a word showing that word prediction ability that AI has as it references the context of what you type, with AI in everything it's practically impossible for a student not to use AI in some way, if you just search for information on Google, you've already used AI, punishing a student for using AI for research would've been like punishing a student for using an encyclopedia in the past.
I use AI almost daily whenever it's GPT or Suno but for schools i would forbid it even if it seems too conservative students should be forced to use their head instead of relying on technology constantly.
They should attach sensors (with all senses) to 10000 people and let them explore and experiment with everything. Then they can feed that data into an AI model like the one that copied Counter Strike and Doom. Reality simulator!
28:04 Wrong. You can not use AI as a source for academic research. AI will often spit a bunch of wrong information that "makes sense" for its language model. Its like citing wiki but 100 times worst. You can use AI as a starting point to search* for valid researches/sources. *Search and research are different things. One is asking for directions and the other is real objects of study.
