Rebuilding Life After The 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Disaster | One Day That Changed Asia | Full Episode 

Maybe because this is also in Netflix? So people might already recognize this one that is in Netflix. But still I agree with you, it is better if more people will watch this.

Actually no one should have been evacuated in the first place: medium.com/generation-atomic/for-the-first-time-world-learns-truth-about-risk-of-nuclear-6b7e97d435df

@@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk can u please explain why no one should have been evacuated?

@@fitrox4921 I just did.

@@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk Well that's on me. I'm to lazy to read debunk theorys.

@@fitrox4921 I showed you science. Good luck wallowing in your fear porn.

But no one died from Fukushima radiation. No increases in cancers either. And even despite Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and Fukushima, the Japanese still have the longest life expectancy on the planet.

@@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk Lies. www.theguardian.com/world/2018/sep/05/japan-admits-that-fukushima-worker-died-from-radiation

zolikoff To be fair, nobody still fully understand what the radiation are (thanks to the government keeping their mouths shut) and what it can do. Better safe than sorry.

Anyone with a $30 detector can measure the open air levels. They are not dangerous. You see journalists do it all the time, they always exclaim that it's "higher than normal" so it is implied to be dangerous, but those journalists are exposed to more radiation on their flight over to Japan. Flying isn't dangerous either (well, not radiologically, I mean). It takes very high radiation levels for actual health effects to develop. This is very well documented. Living in a higher than average radioactive background area has no health risks. Many such populated areas with naturally high radiation exist - with no health impacts. Better safe than sorry can't be applied here. The forced evacuation of this area caused around 2000 premature deaths and brought permanent life pain to tens of thousands. The needless halt of Japan's nuclear reactors since 2011 has also caused thousands of premature deaths from air pollution (because electricity was provided by coal and gas instead). These measures to be "better safe than sorry" have led to thousands of deaths - there would've been no deaths if the measures hadn't been taken.

@@zolikoff Not only that, new studies show no one in Japan should have been evacuated in the first place: medium.com/generation-atomic/for-the-first-time-world-learns-truth-about-risk-of-nuclear-6b7e97d435df

@@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk new

They did not abandon it out of not reason at all. After the earthquake and the tsunami, the era was not a good place to stay. This houses must be crawling with moulds and neglect probably make them expensive to return there. It can not be from a radiological perspective but if you look at the job perspectives I would run away from this place too. More people are dying that there are birth in Japan for years now. So there is not a lack of place to leave. For all it worth I would let this place abandoned. Most people have found new jobs and new places to live.