I hate to be rude but this comment is not well thought out to say the least and it’s annoying me. There is basically zero reason to think Pete rose would’ve hit a double in 7 consecutive games just because he had 44 games with a hit. All you’re really doing is saying during one of his six 7 game hitting streaks (42 games but close enough) one of those should’ve been with doubles. I’m gonna take a guess here and say most good mlb players have six 7-game hit streaks over a season. They have the same exact odds of hitting a double in 7 games in a row as Pete did during his 44 game streak. These are completely different stats and my autism does not permit this abuse of math and numbers. Sorry if this came off harsh, I don’t mean anything by it I’m just a math nerd who has to correct things like that.
⚾️#7 India, 11 game hitting streak! 7 games with a double a new Reds record in which he broke Paul O’Neil 6 games with a double in 1990!! India 8 games straight with atleast 2 hits!!!! That’s getting it done as a leader!!! Way too go India👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
Only way for the Reds to score is seemingly with extra base hits. Can't sacrifice or bunt when required. Most games are close folks. Good job India, I am a bit surprised he wasn't traded last winter due to the fact he wasn't a planned opening day starter. With McClain, De La Cruz, Steer, Marte, Encarnacion-Strand, Krall usually flips guy's like India for PROSPECTS.
It’s about time they wake up! Still need to play the whole game and not make mistakes. I still don’t trust bell always makes bad decisions in major games!😊
As a fan of the Reds, I maintain that St. Louis is and always has been the pride of the National League. St. Louis is a baseball town... Cincinnati has never topped 2.7 million in attendance and they have decades upon decades of futility. Only Philadelphia, historically, has had more dry spells.
