Reform UK’s Manifesto Explained 

😂

Reform's policies are CONTRACTS, so when he fails to deliver you can sue this complete MORON

Now this does put a smile on my face

You mean the greens and the Tories.

This was funny the first time you posted it, not the second or third.

You mean if you're a politician.

@@rogerbennett9641 same thing really XD

Labour voter

It's amazing how many people think all of these Reform promises are extremely well costed and funded, it's pretty mental.

What would you do?

Maybe at least parts of "the media" still try to resort to numbers, that can be proven? But maybe you were also shocked, by the 350 million pounds figure on the red bus.

Msm hide and disregard any statistics about mass influx and results of unvetted men entering the country

800 yesterday alone. The French navy escorts the boats to British waters, and then sends them on their way just before said illegal immigrants throw their passports and iphones in the sea.

Well contrary to other media narratives, people's concerns are genuine and not fuelled by a hatred for outsiders but the other parties fully addressing it would mean they have to do something about it, unless you're a Tory in which case you'd pretend to do something about it and not do it, because crony capitalism wants and needs cheap labour.

It’s basically a rounding error when it comes to the number of people already in the country

Fantasy. Who makes the laws. 🤣

Fine but remember your part of the contract is to actually vote them into power. You can't nudge them over the edge with a one seat majority and then expect them to pass every piece of legislation without issue.

@@FeathersMcGraw_ disagreed. if they have a one seat majority, that's still a majority, and every single point in the manifesto should be implemented. every MP that votes against the manifesto of their party should be tried and imprisoned for lying after signing a contract saying they'd implement their manifesto if elected. Politicians need to be held accountable. there's no reason for manifesto's to just be promises rather than legally binding policy.

@@Anon-nv7bp MPs are accountable to their constituants, not their parties. The MP of Hartlepool and the MP of Tottenham might both be Labour but they'll have very different priorities because their constituants have different demands. Additionally a party with a small majority has a large opposition which has more tools too disrupt the government's agenda. For example if the Conservatives want to build a train line through Tory constituencies they'll have little problem, but if they want to go through Lib Dem or Labour constituencies they're going to face much more opposition from those MPs or councils.

I agree that the party should be held responsible for broken promises. What is the point in them making claims about what they will do and then never fulfilling them. Basically, we're rewarding the ones who tell the sweetest lies.

Thames water bosses shake in the Thames mud

He is with reform, mate

we have it already. Thames Water bosses shake in Thames mud. Phoebe Waller Bridge. Claudia Winklemans fringe gets Grade 1 listed. Croissants price capped at £1.10 to account for inflation.

@@illuminati1568 knew they weren't serious

​@@illuminati1568Reform can't buy Count Binface.

I totally get the draw for the refugees, you want the best life for your family, so likely we would each do the same if in their situation. But equally we should (as current citizens) be able to say no without it being taboo. Open to other opinions :)

The problem is that individually, migrants are, probably enlarge those you describe, those looking for a better life - and like a queue at the local council, it's no great sin to pick up a ticket from the floor for a single person to jump ahead a bit - but when the entire queue starts doing that, those individual, very minor and even admirable intentions turn into chaos. One person withdrawing money from a bank is regular, and even beneficial economic activity, but when everyone does it, it's a run on the bank and economic collapse. I personally think this is something where we are failed be our biology - we are highly emotionally intelligent, and many can easily empathise with wanting the best shot at life for your family, but we don't naturally have a mind for statistics, which is where issues start to arise around migration. And then there's the issue of contribution - many here have paid tax since they were 16, and "open" immigration allows individuals to receive the allotted privileges (healthcare, infrastructure, standard government programs) without having taken the calculated costs for that system prior to its use. Less money in than money out, there's a leak in the ship and while that won't sink it immediately, it won't cease to be a drain on the proverbial ship of state. Personally, I just feel bad for the many families in the camps on the Syrian/Turkish border who had been waiting upwards of a decade for legal asylum processing. From a simple standpoint of fairness, it's wrong to rewards those that skipped the line than those who have waited incredibly patiently for their own spot in the line.

That's what happens when your language is one of the most commonly spoken around the world. You'd rather claim asylum in a country where you speak the language better than learning a whole new one.

They probably want to leave the EU too.

@@briainappressed698 totally, because it's done Britain so much good 😂

Let's not forget, that Farage is a friend of Trump, while Trump is a friend of Putin

​@@KSzkodaGames let's not forget that when you reach that far you start eating your own ass

Trump and Putin are friends?

​@@KSzkodaGamestrump is friends with putin because cnn told u

I'd never heard politicians policies called "manifestos" before. I'd always associated that word with the wall of text mass criminals write to try and justify their actions.

No one knows if it was a good one as it was scrapped immediately after people panicked seeing the pound devalue. They should've stuck to it for it to be judged fairly.

@@abuibu You can not cut taxes and at the same time not cut the Budget with her plan which required a lot of borrowing to compensate for it. Her plan was stupid it could have worked if she was honest and said that she also had to cut healthcare the school budget and much more to afford it but she did not she only canceled stuff that was already in progress but she did not cut anything. She would have had to borrow a lot of money to afford her budget so the market reacted negatively and her Government collapsed its as simply as that no one sabotaged her she was just incompetent.

@@abuibuthe U.K. lost £1 trillion from its pension funds due to the mini budget crashing the £, increasing bond yields making government debt more expensive. It was unfounded tax cuts for the most wealthy at a time where normal people were struggling and public services have been decimated. Why would anyone keep those policies in place when we know trickle down economics doesn’t work.

@@kevinh4869it shouldn’t have been allowed to happen in the first place.

​@@kevinh4869 Okay, have a look to see how Argentina's economy is doing under their nutjob ancap leader. It's basically the same as what Truss was trying to do

Older than a decade. They flooded englands cities first with Jamaicans and other Caribbean males straight after ww2. Thr middle east was first flooded in 1970. They strategically spread them equally.

​@@NsnnsBabnamost Caribbeans came to the UK legally because they were colonial citizens

​@@NsnnsBabnaMost find better places to go and don't blame them. Not that many stay long. Why would you?

@@janetmalcolm6191 not that many stay long ?? Is that your way of justifying why millions have been flooded in ? Your roach. Go to London. Birmingham. Manchester. Leeds. Bradford. Luton. Peterborough. Leicester. Bournemouth. Portsmouth. Southampton. Coventry. The list goes on, and tell me they "don't stay long" You creature

That's why we need Cons and Labour OUT!! Both WAR parties and they are hollowing out the fabric of this country too

I'm vaguely horrified by the thought.

"Mister Mayor" needs the money...

​@@bluebelle8823Only if you think putting people behind is against their human rights... Oh wait, you do?

​​​@bluebelle8823 Only because you associate him with Trump administration. He was highly respected for the way he turned New York around. What do you mean vaguely horrified as well? Do you mean 'slightly horrified'? Either way, stop being so English and say what you really mean.

@@jackster2568 Straw man argument moment

I read that in the 'it aint much but its honest work' voice

We can hope

People should have to take what's available and if there not happy with it continue to apply for other positions in the mean time. Personally I think job seekers benefits should be stopped if 1 position is refused unless its unfeasible logistically to take it

​@@ricardosmythe2548do you think that people prefer to live on whatever little welfare can get them, rather than have a proper job that has them better off and prepares their resumé for tough times? Would you be? Would anyone you know be? It's more of a thing you fall into... And feeling that your fall doesn't include punishment from outside may be key to feeling hope and trying to find a way to work rather than live with welfare. Whether it's physical disability, mental, results of undiscovered depression or a plethora of other things. Also, do you know of a shortage in jobs you think they should fill? And if so, won't asylum seekers make up for that? Unemployed people aren't just lazy bums. That's a myth. It may be true for a young adult for 2 months total but beyond that there are good reasons for that unfortunately

And I know, though I live in another country, several people with a high level of disability (100% or close to it) getting welfare from social services - so we both will agree they deserve that - who go and seek work not necessarily even for the money. Their lives would have been nicer if they didn't feel like failures on top of their major depression, PTSD, inability to walk etc. But they do try to work and even excel at what they do better. And I see them fail and try again. Because even someone with 100% disability usually prefers to have a job over being dependent. So those people who can't get a job? They tried and life kicked them in the face. Luckily aiding them is not what countries' budgets are spent on

@@ailaG I don't think unemployed people are lazy bums but I do know from personal experience alot of people are happy to claim jobseekers specifically just to top up there dealing or cash in hand money. Other benefits are a different matter but if your on job seekers and your offered a job its not unreasonable to be expected to take the position and continue to apply for others until your in a position your happy with. In some localities it is difficult to get a position and that's fine, you should be able to continue to claim until you can find a position. I'm not blind to reality I was out of work for 6 months years ago but because I had gaps in my employment history where I didn't claim and had shortfalls in NI over that period I wasn't eligible but If I had signed on and claimed those shortfalls should of been met. The benefits system is broken. There are to many people who abuse it and to many who slip through the net who should be able to get help but cannot.

This is a bad point. If a job isnt safe or doesnt have things you need for disability or want to work with your schedule or for a whole list of other reasons, you should loose benefits. It doesnt make sense to try to force people to get a job doesnt have good pay or benefits. It just allows companies to be worse to its workers.

Definitley has a left-wing bias, but far less so than the vast majority of news channels

It's hard not to be biased against those twats, but It's good he can pull it off.

Its pretty much impossible to be truly unbiased, so its always impressive when people can do their best to remove as much of it as they can.

Reality has a left wing bias​@@marklastname1993

@@marklastname1993 Exactly it's less egregious. Like it's not "they want to stop the migrants because they are a bunch of racists" it's "they want to stop the migrants because they feel there are too many of them" and that's refreshing.

because they pay eachother with imaginary money. its just a government form of laundering. which massively increases inflation. its so much fun

It doesn't. Might need a reform.

It is true. Educate yourself on the history of central banking and how central banks work. The Bank of England is not part of government, it is an independent public body. It was given the power in 1844 to create pound sterling out of thin air. The bank of england then lends this new created money to the Treasury(a government department) AT INTEREST. Thus explaining why the treasury pays the bank of England. It sounds absurd but its true, look into it for yourself. That's why the majority of Western nations have ludicrous amounts of national debt which they will never be able to pay, because the value of debt is higher than the total value of money in circulation. If you have any questions let me know, but i highly encourage you to do your own research:) Henry Ford himself said: "It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."

If the average person understood our banking system there'd have been a revolution by now...

@@Truth_above_everythingthat was a great fucking comment

Because people vote for the same two parties . Nothing will get better . They are all selfish ignorant greedy pigs .

Well the alternative would be Stalinism

@@rickclaark8459 Didn't know Labour plans to open Gulags in the Scottish Highlands

@@rickclaark8459 because obviously reform's plan of hiring loads of new police and harsher sentences doesn't sound more authoritarian than what most other parties offer?

​@@rickclaark8459Reform would probably be closer to Stalinism since the ideology was pretty right wing.

English is the most common second language to know. Easier to move to a country with the language you speak than learning a new language from scratch especially without the resources to do so

Cambridge university is still one of the best tech universities in the world.

That's why we get an incredible number of illegal immigrants who are a net drain on the economy and then resent the UK after a generation or two. U N D E S I R A B E. 🇬🇧

What's the betting that my comment gets deleted. 😐

@@ProsecutorZekrom Thats the key point - and there are many millions of people in the world still being educated in systems and on principles derived from the U.K and therefore much more familiar with it than any other country, a kind of lingering “soft power” of Empire. Anyone who has spent any time in any former colonies in eg Africa (I have) could tell you that.

Not quite sure why this is a surprise to anyone. Farage and his previous parties have always supported PR over FPtP. Reform would also benefit massively from a PR system as they have a lot of country-wide support, but its spread out rather than concentrated in particular areas. Under PR Reform could probably pick up over 100 seats, but in FPtP they probably wont even reach 10. Similarly to how in 2015 UKIP were the 3rd largest party by vote share, but only got 1 seat, meanwhile the SNP and Lib Dems got far more seats whilst having less votes.

@@numberproof7228 guess I missed his earlier calls to replace FPTP.

@@numberproof7228 Guess I missed his previous expressions of opinion regarding FPTP

Proportional Representation sounds great until the party you like ends up in power, then it ceases to sound like a good thing. It also leads to weak governments. Not a good thing imo.

Must have missed his previous mentions of FPtP.

I completely agree with you! My first 100k took a long time and wasn't that special to be honest with you. Once I hit 300K that is the game changer in my opinion. At this point my money is basically making me a pretty good yearly salary. When I go to sleep at night I know my money is making decent money with the help of my FA

Nice. People often underestimate financial advisors' importance. Over 50 years of data reveal that those who work with advisors typically earn more than those who go it alone. I've been fortunate to work with one for 13 years, resulting in a $1 million portfolio, largely from early investments in AI and other growth stocks.

I've been considering but haven't been proactive. Can you recommend your advisor? Could really use some assistance.

Angela Lynn Schilling is the licensed advisor I use. Just research the name. You’d find necessary details to work with to set up an appointment.

I looked up her name online and found her page. I emailed and made an appointment to talk with her. Thanks for the tip

Almost no court has ever had any real power over any government.

Yeah, good thing because on Forced Entry & Settlement they side with the criminal (by national law and reasonable ethics), they only care about about the offender, and give no practical alternative solution, just getting in the way.

Like they are armchair polticans, except people listen to them. They have no democratic legitimacy either - I doubt they would be voted for it came to it.

This is also how the ICC works. Technically the US Supreme Court doesn’t have the powers it uses to decide if laws are unconstitutional but because the US government abides by their rulings, the Supreme Court effectively has those powers. Just like countries that are part of the ICC, they give the court powers.

@@ianpokemon04 the Supreme Court has a mechanism to enforce its rulings because it’s a real court enforcing real laws. International law is just a legal fiction

@@Andrew-tx9jy Do you have a specific justification for accusing Farage of corruption, or do you just not like him?

@@Andrew-tx9jy Okay, what justification do you have to suggest that Farage would embezzle government funds were he ever to become PM?

I can't help but think their approach to welfare waste is fundamentally flawed though, 38% of UC claimants are already in work, when you subtract the 29% of claimants that are disabled and unable to work, that only leaves 33% of claimants that are out of work but could work potentially, so the change only targets a minority of UC claimants and does nothing to address the majority of UC claimants. What would actually have a positive effect would be investing into upskilling people who are unemployed by not suspending UC for them whilst they retrain making it a much easier and realistic process, as well as closing loopholes that allow benefit scams to exist. Furthermore would be reviewing long time claimants' eligibility for welfare if they clearly have no interest in working and don't have a disability that prevents them from working. There's no reason why Natalie down the road should live off welfare payments because she wants to pump out five kids and has managed to convince the local authority she's not actually with her man because he only comes over on the weekends.

There is no welfare waste, and immigration is the only thing keeping Britain's economy... I wouldn't say afloat, but not at the bottom of the ocean.

@@captainweekend5276 33% is still a third of all claimants. Getting them into work will save the government hundreds of millions. Retraining isn't really necessary. Unskilled labour doesn't require training, by definition, which is the sort of profession most UC claimants ought to be pursuing. Plus, training millions of Brits will cost billions more in taxpayer money. Another major problem is that mass immigration is filling out all of the low-skill jobs and driving down wages, which is partly why Reform wants to stop mass immigration. Removing this obstacle will make employers more desperate to be competitive in order to hire native workers, thereby relieving the strain on UC.

No

​@@franziskagottwaldYes

They won't do any of it because they won't get into power. Anyone can promise the earth when they know they don't have to deliver it.

No

@@franziskagottwald yes

At the very least we need an alternative vote, or selective vote.

Proportional Representation is the only fair, democratic and representative electoral system, FPTP is an antiquated quasi democratic process kept in place by those whom it favours. The UK population in general are unaware that most sophisticated modern democracies us PR electoral systems, these processes produce very varied representative Parliaments which elect effective Governments that have very clear programs for their tenure.

​@@steveminecraft6353steve in a Single Transferable vote, you'd vote for a large group of MPs proportionally over a large region, such as Wales or maybe south and north wales, so parties like Plaid Cymru would still get MPs, more than they currently do in fact

I don’t, I’m getting flashbacks to 2010.

the trouble will be that so many people have been duped by right wing bullshit

obviously ALL medical staff.

Probably only doctors, as far right snobs see nurses and any care jobs as beneath them and filthy

@@burnsnight1 Yeah, thing is, in politics, most "medical staff" are patient facing staff as people in the labs often get forgotten about as we're not seen by the public. So I somehow believe I would fall through the cracks...

Reforms idea of medical staff is British trained staff that give good jobs to British people. Simple really

​@@illuminati1568 lets be honest, farage just means white immigrants

Only on a Gold Standard, all of which have historically failed and not been fit for purpose.

Mine too. Won't be Reform.

​@@janetmalcolm6191🐑

A small loss against what was an establishment led push across all form of media and 3/4 of parliament would have been a solid result. For leave to actually win the 2016 referendum was undeniably successful

@@Taffsmanlive Unfortunately Cameron & Osborne conducted a negative campaign, failing to make capital of all the advantages of having a seat at the top table where we were actually nett beneficefies of membership. Improved road lighting, farming and Humberside regeneration to name but a few. Perhaps Mr. Frage should consider that if he takes votes from the conservatives he may open the door to Ed Davey to emerge as leader of the main opposition.

Which ideas do you consider good?

Reform has changed my ideas on PR. When Tice, the former leader, reckons climate change is down to volcanos, it tells you all you need to know about the party's grasp of data. Lack of PR keeps these anti-science nutjobs out of power.

@@basterstw cutting inheritance tax and tax in general. stopping ILLEGAL migration, getting rid of regulations. there are quite a few things that i disagree with.

​@@Tannhauser62So you're an authoritarian who doesn't want people who disagree with your personal opinion to have any power?

@@andymccallum8090 I think inheritance tax should be a very large proportion, like 80% or something, or even 100%. Because inheritance is the main reason for unfairness. Also, why cut tax? If you're even paying a significant amount of income tax then you're doing alright in life and probably don't need help from politics.

Why man? They are families from war torn countries trying to be safe, You’re lucky enough to be born somewhere safe, but if I placed you in the middle of Afghanistan you’d give You’re left bollock to go back to the UK, quit being so close minded and have some humanity

What's more disgrace that it's possible to create a whole political party and movement around it XD ahhh 2024

​@atilla4352 That's a honour not a disgrace. Immigration/high pop growth is the main cause of the Housing and NHS crisis. Also increased crime, and treats the country like a doormat, for what? I also believe in only essential Immigration, and I am an immigrant from my childhood.

​@@atilla4352 What's pathetic are people like you defending illegal actions from a violent demographic

​@@pebblepod30it absolutely isnt

Why is it a good idea?

​@@allaamrauf8214It isn't, it's just what people who haven't done any research think.

@@DaBIONICLEFan educate me xD

@@geewoods6590 well have you seen how many hoops governments in Europe have to jump through just to pass legislation? Olaf Scholz leads a *3 party coalition* and is struggling to get a migrant bill through due to opposition from the German Greens. This is what you get with PR; constant coalitions and weak, ineffectual governments that are unable to do anything.

@@DaBIONICLEFan Here's the idea: I vote for party A, but party B get the win in my area. So everyone that didn't vote for party B -> their vote is completely wasted and thrown in the bin. Actually, also everyone Extra that voted for party B, their vote is wasted too. I mean party B won by 100,000 votes in my area, 99,999 B votes are thrown in the bin. Now we have something like Reform, a party with massive support across the entire country, but not enough support concentrated in certain areas for some reason, probably because people vote for the same party no matter what happens, like it's a fkn football team. I mean, people still vote conservative right now after they ruined the country, for example. So Reform end up getting like 30% of the country's votes, and like 5% of the seats in parliament. Excuse me??? How is this democracy? How is this fair at all? It isn't. Hence the support for removing FPTP. In what world can you just throw peoples votes in the bin and still call it a democracy? You could say, "but it means you always get an MP in your area that most people wanted" - and all I can say is that an MP isn't even a councillor, they don't control the area they "represent." Almost none of them live in the areas they represent. So there's no point on it at all.

"Cutting waste". As though successive governments over the past 40 years haven't been saying they'd do exactly that, only to oversee government spending increase, especially on stuff that goes directly to line the pockets of their supporters.

Cut the waste in the public sector…

far right party making unrealistic promises, blaming foreigners and the poor, and hoping the general public are gullible enough to fall for it? (and it actually working) yeah thats another space off my bingo card.

Stop believing there lies

@@aaronhuggett1893 You seem knowledgeable from your ability to spell. I trust you have a deep understanding of UK politics. You probably know better than everyone else how the Conservative and Labour party are in-fact wholly different parties; not two sides of the same coin working to game the country to maximise profits for corporations and their friends. Only THEY would never lie to the people, which of course you know. Because you're so knowledgeable, you've done your research into topics beyond your daily field of vision and experience.

@@SpaaaaceMaan sorry, their. I have lost trust in the ability of all our parties. And it’s on them to rebuild that trust because it is an absolute shit show. And also me watching this video is me doing my research, because their manifesto is littered with racism. Our nation is built on migration because the current government have been unable to focus money on teaching our own people to do these jobs.

im 100% going to avoid voting reform

Now *_that_* is an experiment I'd like to see the courts try

If it's a contract, there should be penalty fees for failure to implement within timeframes for each policy 😂⏳️📘📑

That's how it should work. All parties should be able to be sued for not following through on their manifestos

That's the point, yes. That would be contractually accountable to the Public.b

@@orestesmitas the idea is that you wouldnt vote for them again... but, well, the general public arent exactly the brightest bunch

@is4c_ I’m only old enough to remember Brexit party and UKIP but I can looking before that, what am I looking for?

You want the NHS privatised so that no one can afford treatment? I don’t know if you’re deaf but the manifesto clearly states that’s what they’re trying to do

not to me. i think it sounds like an awful way to appeal to gullible people

you know... they said a similar thing about brexit

@@DodgeThatAttack I’m not that knowledgeable on brexit to be honest so I don’t have any counter arguments for that.

One child policy? 👶😅 Deport all people with the name starting with Muhammed? Completely random. Not sus at all. 😂

World population is gonna go down in this century, underpopulation is literally the threat that Europe faces, look at Japan and SK

But migrants contribute more to the tax money and take out less benefits than an average Brit, meaning they could use the excess money to improve infrastructure and grow the economy, meaning everyone benefits

You do realise it's very much a bad thing to have a lowering/stagnant population, right? It's a problem which most likely will start to affect many developed economies in the next few decades, and means more old people who don't work, and less young people that do work, meaning more pressure on said young people. Immigration is a key element of economies, especially in the latter stages of population growth. Also, "The UK already has the highest population it has ever had in its entire history", this is literally the case in any part of the world for almost every country; I don't see why you mentioned this, because of course population has increased every year, that's how population growth works.

But immigrants contribute more to taxes than a British while taking less benefits than a British person meaning you could use the excess money they generate to help fund public services and grow the economy, win win

They lose their jobs it's registered as a limited company making them more liable. Than any otheir party

@@MrCalz86 Erm... and who enforces this? Will they fire themselves, do you think?

@@MrCalz86 Being a limited company means they can wind it up and walk away. As they inevitably will when they've sold enough magic beans.

​@@MrCalz86you think Farage is going to fire himself for not sticking to his own false promises?? It's a Limited company, he's the majority shareholder. He can't be voted out. There is no accountability. Think of it like the private water companies.

Has anything happened to the Uniparties when they lie & lie again

UKIP got 4 million votes. Opinion polls indicate they'll well exceed that, hitting at least 6.

@@ionlyfearphobophobia great news!

They're a limited company, not a political party, of which Farage is their largest shareholder. Their policies on tax cuts literally aid the richest most. They want to privatise the NHS. Barely anything supports the working class, they just pretend.

I’m so torn for this election 😂. In some instances I agree with reform as they seem to be the only party that actually put immigration as a major issue however I’m very much skeptical about their plans for tax cuts and also the vouchers for private health care. Funnily enough I seem to be torn between voting for the Lib Dems and reform 😂😅

@@benwratha6628 What's the issue with the tax cuts and Reforming the health service to be more like the French?

Reforms policy is eminently sensible. It is simply that if you are fit and able, and have two job offers and turn BOTH down in favour of staying on benefits, and furthermore if a 4 month period has elapsed , then your benefits would be cut. So the presupposition in your question doesn't work at all because in the scenario where your benefits are cut it would be because YOU have turned down the offer of paid.employment twice. Would you instead say that people who are fit and well and are turning down multiple job offers should continue to be allowed to live a free life that other people work and pay for on their behalf through taxation?

My point exactly. Many will also be pensioners unable to get their pension till 66 and going up.Hard to get a job within 4 months. Where are all these jobs? Money will stop. Sanctioned. Better hope none become unemployed!

​@@DanPhillips-in6qnJobs don't grow on trees. Sometimes takes ages though loads applied for. The younger ones had better think about that! More tents will be the result.

@@DanPhillips-in6qn if only it were that simple. I mean, I wish I had job offers flying through my door every day

At least spell "contract" correctly,

@@royalcrowntowing2464 what do you mean, at least? I'm using a keypad with auto "correct." Fixed it now. Are you happy now buttercup? 🌼

Why is that out of interest?

@@professorlean3733 because public transport actually helps people and prevents car dependant dystopia

because 'real' parties apparently screw everything up, ref, last 30 years!

It will get far worse if Reform are allowed anywhere near public money. I guarantee it. It's easy to promise the world when you don't have to deliver it. They would erode workers rights, kill off the NHS as we know it, lower taxes for corporations and billionaires and public services will be destroyed for private capitalists to swoop in and profit.

Well for a start every working person earning 20k or more gets £1.5K per year in their pocket due to the tax-free allowance being raised to 20k. Anyone on over 12.5k per year sees some benefit from it. As for the rest of it, I don't recall anything about removing benefits for those who are working but still need it?

the word "need" should be removed from political discourse.

Yeah unmanaged decline's way better.....

@@swngwyrdd3552 just keep voting for the same parties then expect things to change. Say what you will about Farage but he's definitely anything but business as usual.

@@brazilianmegaman258 there won't be any business left in the UK under reform, because there won't be a UK anymore

As someone who leans right, yes I agree it's the stupidest part of their manifesto. We should be building out HS2, then 3, 4 and 5. Infrastructure investments almost always yield enormous returns to a country.

I can't think of many things that have provided less economic growth than HS2

Ah yes, a singular train line...I do get your point, but at this point and billions down the drain with minimal progress, nah.

@@DutchTulipStonks the issue isn't with the rail its with poor planning and the bureaucratic nightmare that building in the UK is. it would be wiser to pause HS2 construction make bureaucracy more efficient then finish the building else all the money already spent would just be lost

@@FeathersMcGraw_ I can't think of many things that have provided economic growth BEFORE THEY HAVE BEEN FINISHED!

They won't get in and they won' fix anything. They would make everything worse.

How old are you?

@@DrApocalyptus Just turned 30.

Why do you think voting an even farther right-wing party will be good for the UK? What'll happen when Reform ruin the country even more? Do you plan to go even farther right? Sheep being sheep as always.

​@@allaamrauf8214 They're all left wing. UK took the most immigrants out of any European countries under tory rule. Labor and tory is both left

Don't do it. They'll wreck our country and make our European neighbours hate us even more.

Great idea. 👍

Must include the monster raving loony party manifesto 😂

🥓

As an American, I think of Gingrich’s policy from the 90s.

Sheep being sheep as usual.

I dislike Nigel Farage, but be better than this. Make an argument, back it up,.

@@almasomerville1070 I’m just stating facts for people to interpret and do what they want with

@@almasomerville1070this is true though, there’s video evidence

I genuinely have no idea what any of those words mean.

@@clairee4939 good, you’re better off not knowing

I thought it was decent until the end when they called it "undeniably radical" at around 7:05. I get there are radical elements to it, eg leaving the ECHR or pushing back immigrants to France. But the rest of it seemed pretty decent and helps out the majority of Brits, especially their plans on freezing income tax on health workers and then raising tax allowance to 20k and higher tax bracket to 70k.

@@abuibu "radical" doesn't imply "bad" - this manifesto IS undeniably radical, and I'm sure Farage would agree.

They won’t. We will.

A lot are addressing it. Perhaps not the DM et al., but everyone with a brain knows this is economic illiteracy of the worst kind.

@@Jan-se1nd >Economic illiteracy From someone who is voting for one of the parties who contributed to putting the UK in 2 trillion debt

A lot of bad services do need to be cut.

@@orestesmitassuch as?

There is sizeable wastage in the public sector. Employment in HR and “transformation” service departments has been increasing year-on-year. Cutting that across local and central authorities could save billions. You could probably save £1-3m per local authority. Plus, tax cuts for working people encourage people to work harder and go for promotions. Some people are denied legal support in domestic abuse cases if they earn too much. More people are moving into higher tax brackets, simply because of inflation. You’re literally preventing economic growth by having such high tax rates, which in-term increase tax revenues if you create growth via incentives for people to work more. Please don’t pretend like anyone suggesting a reduction in tax is economically illiterate, just because you’ve read an A-level economics book on Keynesian Theory

Of course he wants to move to the right of the Tories, if Tories were satisfying traditionally conservative voters with proportionally rightwing policies Reform wouldn't have a leg to stand on

It's not hard to be more right wing than Blairites.

Do you really think the tories would invest in public services? Tho I do agree that with labour coming in thy could invest that 40 billion into funding the NHS plus on renewable energy and fixing our infrastructure

​Giving more funding to the current NHS would be like fixing a car with ductape. It needs massive reform not more money ​@@StrikeBolteafc

@@StrikeBolteafc why renewable energy when investing in nuclear would be so much better though. Minimal waste and tons of energy

@@GeorgeT96 you can do both, renewables can be installed quickly and cheaply while nuclear can be for the baseline when their is energy fluctuations

​@@Lockflywe're already pouring over 200 billion a year into the NHS I believe. The problem I've been told by every ex NHS worker I've spoken to is that there are far too many people in management positions, and thanks to Brexit, the NHS is now being forced to pay thousands of pounds per day to hire a single agency worker to cover the shortfall in staff.

There'll only be one thing in it. Welsh independence.

Plaid's two policies; 1. Bum more sheep. 2. Be more Welsh.

@@jameswright4236 The Plaid leader seems to want more immigration so let's send the 700k immigrants to Wales.

@aidy6000 haha sheep joke we are all cackling at this imaginative insult

Would love for TLDR to cover the Scottish manifestos, starting with the SNP's manifesto would be interesting to see their collapse or decline with bald Sweeney at the top, a Scottish Greens manifesto after the fall of the Bute House agreement and their plans and even Alba with Salmond's vendetta in the background.

Most of this honestly sounds like just sensible responses to the bevy of problems in the UK. I don’t agree with scrapping HS2 or some parts of the environmental platform, but this is hardly radical.

Because we currently live in a country that has none.

What's common sense about it? It's largely uncosted nonsense and not achievable Explain it to the everyman because, the 3 main clems in charge of Reform haven't been able to

​@@editorrbr2107 Country can't afford HS2 right now, I think there are bigger issues, maybe when the country has some money we can afford some big projects, need to fix the foundations first and gain more foreign investment.

The place looks like that because no one has any money. The government is sitting on it like a dragon sits on his gold. Why don't you weigh in on matters you understand instead of making comments that highlight how little you know

The Tories have been 'tightening belts' since 2010, and it's the reason society has 'deteriorated' so much. Austerity doesn't work.

You're telling us to keep doing what the government has been doing for 14 years. We're in this state because the tories don't have the average person's interest in mind and all the money is flooding into the hands of a wealthy few (not unlike russia). Please don't make such stupid comments

@@hybrit9881 You don't have to belong to any political ideology, or have heaps of money, to bend over and pick-up garbage blowing around in front of your house/flat, you just need to have some personal pride.

Farage literally wants to give more private contracts out. The NHS is failing due to this very problem. The tories have given out contracts to donors like Frank Hester worth hundreds of millions. It doesn't matter how much money you put into the NHS if it's being syphoned off to private companies who want profits rather than good health outcomes. Farage will increase this, and give cuts to the private companies. The NHS will fail, and you'll have a private insurance system proposed as a solution to a problem they created. Then you'll end up bankrupt if you get ill. Look at the USA, millions of people are ruined to ill health and their ridiculous system.

@@silvafox7719 Tony Blair started selling off the NHS and you let him get away with it just like you'll let his protégé do it when he gets' in.

They have a Funding section at the end of their manifesto if you get a chance to read it.

@@Gearshift__ yeah I read it..... The numbers don't add up

@@StuHolland fair enough but it is backed by people much smarter then you or i when it comes to money.

@@Gearshift__ No it hasn't. I have not seen one economist back up Reforms figures.

​@@hustlinmagicbecause it was released less than a day ago?

bot 🤖

Your right the country does need change. But only vote reform if your desperate to have change for the worse. This is the guy who’s pedalling hate and lies facilitated the rise of Johnson.

Don't worry, Farage will make sure no one will want to come here. He'll also make you want to leave, but don't worry about that