Reform will GET RID of NHS and Civil Service WASTE, and AXE Net Zero, to save Brits BILLIONS | Tice 

She's a graduate of the Piers Morgan School of Television Interviewing.

He appeals to greedy and stupid boomers > In short: Liz Truss on steroids. There would be cuts to personal tax worth £70bn a year, including scrapping income tax below £20,000, and big cuts to stamp duty and inheritance tax. Cuts to business levies including corporation tax would cost £18bn a year. >Reform says this would be paid for by scrapping plans to reach net zero carbon emissions (more on that below), plus £50bn a year from cutting government departments and quangos, and £35bn from the technical process of making the Bank of England stop paying interest on commercial bank deposits created through quantitative easing. >All this could be filed under “fiscally bold”. The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank termed the package “problematic”, saying: “Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up.” Basically 1 person in 5 is voting for someone who would willingly crash the economy by announcing even crazier fiscal plans than Liz Truss. And who are probably in bed with some hedge fund managers who can make bank from it like Kwarteng. Not that I had high expectations on Reform voters, but lmfao

Because they don’t want to give reform any credibility

Frappage is a common or garden con man who is funded by and for American hedge fund bankers in 55 Turton Street in that London, he's going to crash the economy harder and faster than lizzy truss > In short: Liz Truss on steroids. There would be cuts to personal tax worth £70bn a year, including scrapping income tax below £20,000, and big cuts to stamp duty and inheritance tax. Cuts to business levies including corporation tax would cost £18bn a year. >Reform says this would be paid for by scrapping plans to reach net zero carbon emissions (more on that below), plus £50bn a year from cutting government departments and quangos, and £35bn from the technical process of making the Bank of England stop paying interest on commercial bank deposits created through quantitative easing. >All this could be filed under “fiscally bold”. The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank termed the package “problematic”, saying: “Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up.” Basically 1 person in 5 is voting for someone who would willingly crash the economy by announcing even crazier fiscal plans than Liz Truss. And who are probably in bed with some hedge fund managers who can make bank from it like Kwarteng. Not that I had high expectations on Reform voters, but lmfao

Major lost power in 1997 so he has (@£115,000) received £3,105,000 for doing nothing ...

WELL SAID

I only watch Patrick Christys but even then I can't stand the token lefties.

Agreed….she’s a lefty. Still can’t believe gbnews got rid of Mark Styne and Dan Wotton for her.

Jab damage 😅

Child

Frappage is a con man funded by and for American hedge fund bankers, he's going to crash the economy harder and faster than lizzy truss > In short: Liz Truss on steroids. There would be cuts to personal tax worth £70bn a year, including scrapping income tax below £20,000, and big cuts to stamp duty and inheritance tax. Cuts to business levies including corporation tax would cost £18bn a year. >Reform says this would be paid for by scrapping plans to reach net zero carbon emissions (more on that below), plus £50bn a year from cutting government departments and quangos, and £35bn from the technical process of making the Bank of England stop paying interest on commercial bank deposits created through quantitative easing. >All this could be filed under “fiscally bold”. The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank termed the package “problematic”, saying: “Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up.” Basically 1 person in 5 is voting for someone who would willingly crash the economy by announcing even crazier fiscal plans than Liz Truss. And who are probably in bed with some hedge fund managers who can make bank from it like Kwarteng. Not that I had high expectations on Reform voters, but lmfao

It's all of them at gb news if you pay attention. Its not alt media its controlled opposition

HEAR HEAR

So sick of greedy and stupid fucking boomers > In short: Liz Truss on steroids. There would be cuts to personal tax worth £70bn a year, including scrapping income tax below £20,000, and big cuts to stamp duty and inheritance tax. Cuts to business levies including corporation tax would cost £18bn a year. >Reform says this would be paid for by scrapping plans to reach net zero carbon emissions (more on that below), plus £50bn a year from cutting government departments and quangos, and £35bn from the technical process of making the Bank of England stop paying interest on commercial bank deposits created through quantitative easing. >All this could be filed under “fiscally bold”. The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank termed the package “problematic”, saying: “Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up.” Basically 1 person in 5 is voting for someone who would willingly crash the economy by announcing even crazier fiscal plans than Liz Truss. And who are probably in bed with some hedge fund managers who can make bank from it like Kwarteng. Not that I had high expectations on Reform voters, but lmfao

Frappage is a common or garden con man, funded by and for American hedge fund bankers based at 55 tuffton Street London, he's going to make a lot of money crashing the uk economy harder and faster than lizzy truss, he is the opposite of any form of patriot > In short: Liz Truss on steroids. There would be cuts to personal tax worth £70bn a year, including scrapping income tax below £20,000, and big cuts to stamp duty and inheritance tax. Cuts to business levies including corporation tax would cost £18bn a year. >Reform says this would be paid for by scrapping plans to reach net zero carbon emissions (more on that below), plus £50bn a year from cutting government departments and quangos, and £35bn from the technical process of making the Bank of England stop paying interest on commercial bank deposits created through quantitative easing. >All this could be filed under “fiscally bold”. The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank termed the package “problematic”, saying: “Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up.” Basically 1 person in 5 is voting for someone who would willingly crash the economy by announcing even crazier fiscal plans than Liz Truss. And who are probably in bed with some hedge fund managers who can make bank from it like Kwarteng. Not that I had high expectations on Reform voters, but lmfao

Frappage is the exact opposite of any kind of patriot, he's a common or garden con man who plans to make a lot of money crashing the economy for American hedge fund bankers based in 55 Tufton Street London, > In short: Liz Truss on steroids. There would be cuts to personal tax worth £70bn a year, including scrapping income tax below £20,000, and big cuts to stamp duty and inheritance tax. Cuts to business levies including corporation tax would cost £18bn a year. >Reform says this would be paid for by scrapping plans to reach net zero carbon emissions (more on that below), plus £50bn a year from cutting government departments and quangos, and £35bn from the technical process of making the Bank of England stop paying interest on commercial bank deposits created through quantitative easing. >All this could be filed under “fiscally bold”. The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank termed the package “problematic”, saying: “Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up.” Basically 1 person in 5 is voting for someone who would willingly crash the economy by announcing even crazier fiscal plans than Liz Truss. And who are probably in bed with some hedge fund managers who can make bank from it like Kwarteng. Not that I had high expectations on Reform voters, but lmfao

I don't know how she gets on the TV she doesn't have a clue about anything we are bancrupt 150 percent of debt to GDP banks are in real trouble no deals no loans and no deposits and no one is talking about this only keep enough cash In the bank to cover direct debits and mortgage payments and put any spare funds in to pms to protect your wealth

I think the phrases are Bitter, Biased and rude.Must be from the BBC......... hmmm

I dunno if you understand how fptp works but it's designed to stop fascists, St.nigel is looking increasingly unlikely to even be in opposition given the latest polls

Happy to pay then if you are ill . Cancer no house to sell ,💀

Because our health system is SO good, that Not a single country has copied us,,, wait that doesn't make sense either the whole worlds mad or we are

You should see the things we throw out that is never used in the hospital i work in.

Tice definitely shows he knows what he's talking about in economics. Reminds me a little bit of a nicer more cuddly Thomas Sowell

Me too. I wholeheartedly agree.

Same

She actually believes she is a reporter. Bless.

> In short: Liz Truss on steroids. There would be cuts to personal tax worth £70bn a year, including scrapping income tax below £20,000, and big cuts to stamp duty and inheritance tax. Cuts to business levies including corporation tax would cost £18bn a year. >Reform says this would be paid for by scrapping plans to reach net zero carbon emissions (more on that below), plus £50bn a year from cutting government departments and quangos, and £35bn from the technical process of making the Bank of England stop paying interest on commercial bank deposits created through quantitative easing. >All this could be filed under “fiscally bold”. The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank termed the package “problematic”, saying: “Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up.” Basically 1 person in 5 is voting for someone who would willingly crash the economy by announcing even crazier fiscal plans than Liz Truss. And who are probably in bed with some hedge fund managers who can make bank from it like Kwarteng. Not that I had high expectations on Reform voters, but lmfao

When trying to be the hard nosed interviewer goes wrong.

Could you please take the wealth of the elite children who have contributed nothing to society, an have inherited millions, sometimes billions. If they refuse a job which offers them basic minimum wages. You know, to level the playing field. yyyy

She has to get lots in, she is only trying to be fast. And she is making questions, that really boost reform, thst is her purpose.

Given that the 17 pensioners who watch gbnews might disagree but given that frappage might struggle to get into opposition with his 5 seats ,isn't it labour who are the voice of the people with 450 seats majority?

Gb news is controlled opposition

Could you please take the wealth of the elite children who have contributed nothing to society, an have inherited millions, sometimes billions. If they refuse a job which offers them basic minimum wages. You know, to level the playing field. rrrrrrrr

Think that’s where she was from.

you poor gullible gammon.

what for doing her job?

Just waiting for the daily wail and torygraph to call economists 'woke ' as St Nigerian refuses to have his unfunded tax cuts analysed, which are by the way twice as bad as mad lizzy

Hope you got a ton of money,you will need it if you become ill,because they will get rid of our NHS.

Patrick is good as is Martin and Neil Other than that I concur

Can't stand Nana Akua. They have Sophia Wenzler and Tatiana Chavez who are GBN Presenters, but they only show up for a very brief time on the live TV segments. Everything else, it's always the same dull faces.

@@PhilipMarcYTh

I like Nana, Patrick Christy, and his Fiancée Emily is lovely, too, and a few others. I used to like Mark Dolan but went of him big time when he kept laying into our beautiful English Rose Catherine, the Princess of Wales, all because she tweaked an old photo of her and her three gorgeous children, to put out for us British Mums for Mother's Day, as she was unable to get an official photo done, as she had major abdominal surgery. He used to call Meghan Markle Yoko Moano he then started to stick up for Harry and Meghan Markle, even saying she was beautiful, I found Mark Dolan was being too faced.

@@PhilipMarcYThow do you know if they are any good they don’t have shows!!!

Errr what about us SCOTTYS did u forget lol

lol to enact all Reforms policys it would take over 2 trillion pounds every year

... and N. Ireland and Scotland.

Hello, 👋 Scotland and Northern Ireland, this is the type of crap that pisses us off and stokes the nationalists BS!

@@Bananas13178 Most scots are brain washed into voting nothing but SNP even know they have done nothing for this country

> In short: Liz Truss on steroids. There would be cuts to personal tax worth £70bn a year, including scrapping income tax below £20,000, and big cuts to stamp duty and inheritance tax. Cuts to business levies including corporation tax would cost £18bn a year. >Reform says this would be paid for by scrapping plans to reach net zero carbon emissions (more on that below), plus £50bn a year from cutting government departments and quangos, and £35bn from the technical process of making the Bank of England stop paying interest on commercial bank deposits created through quantitative easing. >All this could be filed under “fiscally bold”. The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank termed the package “problematic”, saying: “Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up.” Basically 1 person in 5 is voting for someone who would willingly crash the economy by announcing even crazier fiscal plans than Liz Truss. And who are probably in bed with some hedge fund managers who can make bank from it like Kwarteng. Not that I had high expectations on Reform voters, but lmfao

She is a dreadfully rude person.

Because her career depends on it.

GbNews will be stopped if she didn't.

@@robinsharp1515 agree and she never lets people finish what they are saying.

Because she's a Leftie.

GB News have been told by Ofcom they need to employ some presenters like her as they are too biased, otherwise they'll get shut down.

don't get giddy

​@@johnhankinson1929 Speak English mate.. Or are you one of the MANY illegals that can't?

@@rizbotube She's a bloody Tory ffs and GB News is full of them and it's also over filled with benders and pillow munchers , maybe a few more Reform supporters would be a good move

Same here.

Same here she fucking annoying

She is asking questions

​@@deusexmachinawlyou ask a question.....then wait for an answer to refute, dismantle or agree with. She pulls faces and interrupts constantly. The best interviewers appear to remain impartial.

Yep, not just Net zero immigration but minus immigration. A strong, unrelenting, program of repatriation for the many that are here, should be drawn up and implemented.

@@S-North 💨Yes, well said! Britain for the British people🔩

@@S-North it should be but it won't

Abolish net zero and net zero immigration sounds good ,

@S-North Less people would equal less emissions, Reform are the real Green Party.

I noticed a bit of mask slipping myself.

> In short: Liz Truss on steroids. There would be cuts to personal tax worth £70bn a year, including scrapping income tax below £20,000, and big cuts to stamp duty and inheritance tax. Cuts to business levies including corporation tax would cost £18bn a year. >Reform says this would be paid for by scrapping plans to reach net zero carbon emissions (more on that below), plus £50bn a year from cutting government departments and quangos, and £35bn from the technical process of making the Bank of England stop paying interest on commercial bank deposits created through quantitative easing. >All this could be filed under “fiscally bold”. The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank termed the package “problematic”, saying: “Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up.” Basically 1 person in 5 is voting for someone who would willingly crash the economy by announcing even crazier fiscal plans than Liz Truss. And who are probably in bed with some hedge fund managers who can make bank from it like Kwarteng. Not that I had high expectations on Reform voters, but lmfao

Me to.

2nd that. 👍

I couldn't vote for anyone who employs rayner and Abbott

How will they generate the 2 trillion each year needed to honour their PROMISES. I know Tice is a very very rich man, but even this is beyond him.

Reform is funded by American hedge fund bankers, he's a con man who is going to crash the economy harder and faster than lizzy truss > In short: Liz Truss on steroids. There would be cuts to personal tax worth £70bn a year, including scrapping income tax below £20,000, and big cuts to stamp duty and inheritance tax. Cuts to business levies including corporation tax would cost £18bn a year. >Reform says this would be paid for by scrapping plans to reach net zero carbon emissions (more on that below), plus £50bn a year from cutting government departments and quangos, and £35bn from the technical process of making the Bank of England stop paying interest on commercial bank deposits created through quantitative easing. >All this could be filed under “fiscally bold”. The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank termed the package “problematic”, saying: “Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up.” Basically 1 person in 5 is voting for someone who would willingly crash the economy by announcing even crazier fiscal plans than Liz Truss. And who are probably in bed with some hedge fund managers who can make bank from it like Kwarteng. Not that I had high expectations on Reform voters, but lmfao

Frappage is the polar opposite of any form of patriot, he's a common or garden con man funded by and for American hedge fund bankers based in 55 Tufton Street that London, he's going to make a lot of money crashing the uk economy harder and faster than lizzy truss > In short: Liz Truss on steroids. There would be cuts to personal tax worth £70bn a year, including scrapping income tax below £20,000, and big cuts to stamp duty and inheritance tax. Cuts to business levies including corporation tax would cost £18bn a year. >Reform says this would be paid for by scrapping plans to reach net zero carbon emissions (more on that below), plus £50bn a year from cutting government departments and quangos, and £35bn from the technical process of making the Bank of England stop paying interest on commercial bank deposits created through quantitative easing. >All this could be filed under “fiscally bold”. The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank termed the package “problematic”, saying: “Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up.” Basically 1 person in 5 is voting for someone who would willingly crash the economy by announcing even crazier fiscal plans than Liz Truss. And who are probably in bed with some hedge fund managers who can make bank from it like Kwarteng. Not that I had high expectations on Reform voters, but lmfao

I notice she's trying to think what to say next .they are telling her what to say in her ear peice.

@@cordoroy9515 Oh dear. You have the same listening skills as the camel.

> In short: Liz Truss on steroids. There would be cuts to personal tax worth £70bn a year, including scrapping income tax below £20,000, and big cuts to stamp duty and inheritance tax. Cuts to business levies including corporation tax would cost £18bn a year. >Reform says this would be paid for by scrapping plans to reach net zero carbon emissions (more on that below), plus £50bn a year from cutting government departments and quangos, and £35bn from the technical process of making the Bank of England stop paying interest on commercial bank deposits created through quantitative easing. >All this could be filed under “fiscally bold”. The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank termed the package “problematic”, saying: “Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up.” Basically 1 person in 5 is voting for someone who would willingly crash the economy by announcing even crazier fiscal plans than Liz Truss. And who are probably in bed with some hedge fund managers who can make bank from it like Kwarteng. Not that I had high expectations on Reform voters, but lmfao

I took out my first mortgage in January 1986, £17,000, and in was paying 16%. Interest rates in this country have been kept artificially low for years.

Was 15% at the northern rock in 1978...Cos I remember it

I was paying 12.35% in November 1986 with The Leeds Permanent Building Society

I remember when rates were 15 percent we didn't have the debt then we are bancrupt

And 15 million quid a day housing, feeding, healthcare,pocket money. The Conservatives are a joke and don't give a hoot for us BRITS.

IPhones, clothes, etc etc. Shameful

Yep lol a right old sp¥n€k€R 😅

She's has to be impartial. Not her fault.

She irritates me in that she keeps interrupting those they have invited to speak. She asks a question, and then won't give them chance to answer it. At times, it is so bad, I can't watch her interviews any more. Perhaps she just likes the sound of her own voice.

@@doford1 It's the stupid interruptions and refusal to let an answer happen that give away her lack of impartiality.

@@doford1 This is verging away from impartial to aggressive interviewing.

That would be great but there's no party in England that will do it.

Reform will

Given that as labour are set for the biggest landslide in UK history doesn't that mean that they are the voice of the people rather than a possible 5 seats for the swivels and fascists?

She was BBC that's where she did her training ... shocking rude presenter 👎

Reform is funded by and for American hedge fund bankers frappage is a con man who is going to crash the economy harder and faster than lizzy truss > In short: Liz Truss on steroids. There would be cuts to personal tax worth £70bn a year, including scrapping income tax below £20,000, and big cuts to stamp duty and inheritance tax. Cuts to business levies including corporation tax would cost £18bn a year. >Reform says this would be paid for by scrapping plans to reach net zero carbon emissions (more on that below), plus £50bn a year from cutting government departments and quangos, and £35bn from the technical process of making the Bank of England stop paying interest on commercial bank deposits created through quantitative easing. >All this could be filed under “fiscally bold”. The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank termed the package “problematic”, saying: “Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up.” Basically 1 person in 5 is voting for someone who would willingly crash the economy by announcing even crazier fiscal plans than Liz Truss. And who are probably in bed with some hedge fund managers who can make bank from it like Kwarteng. Not that I had high expectations on Reform voters, but lmfao

Frappage is funded by and for American hedge fund bankers based in 55 truffton Street, he's a common or garden con man who is going to crash the economy harder and faster than lizzy truss > In short: Liz Truss on steroids. There would be cuts to personal tax worth £70bn a year, including scrapping income tax below £20,000, and big cuts to stamp duty and inheritance tax. Cuts to business levies including corporation tax would cost £18bn a year. >Reform says this would be paid for by scrapping plans to reach net zero carbon emissions (more on that below), plus £50bn a year from cutting government departments and quangos, and £35bn from the technical process of making the Bank of England stop paying interest on commercial bank deposits created through quantitative easing. >All this could be filed under “fiscally bold”. The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank termed the package “problematic”, saying: “Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up.” Basically 1 person in 5 is voting for someone who would willingly crash the economy by announcing even crazier fiscal plans than Liz Truss. And who are probably in bed with some hedge fund managers who can make bank from it like Kwarteng. Not that I had high expectations on Reform voters, but lmfao

bbc has been never liked her

@simonlaw9234 HEAR HEAR What is happening to GB News?

She's trying to be the hard nosed interviewer but it's just cringe and annoying. GB News - do better.

​@@JACB006they're terrified of ofcom

Smirking woke numty

She's ex BBC 🫣

She’s a bit of a Pratt. Why ask a question then constantly cut off the answer!

She’s a scorned woman 😅

A conservative Remoaner she puts my blood pressure up and so snotty its beyond bad manners.what a haradan.

He didn't rule out joining the tories just said it was unlikely.

Really Tice is full of BS, he's a Zionist Neo Liberal WEF Globalist puppet, .Watch alternative media, Professor Richard Wolff for all finance info.

so the Reform 'contract' in a nutshell boats bad Private better than NHS the Empire was good Meghan Markle boo money grows on trees

GBN sound like the BBC left-wing trying to put down the reform UK party you make me sick

If you believe this you need some medical help it's just pie in the sky just like reform ltd formed by millionaires"supported by millionaires" the clue is in millionaires.

You’d save £0 from unemployment benefits if you sent every illegal immigrant back. The clue is in unemployment. They can’t get unemployment benefit as they can’t work as they don’t have a work visa nor the right to stay in UK.

Just benefits then..

You forget to mention Starmer is a very left wing Trotskyist much worse than Corbyn. Once Labour has power they will change the constitution which will be irreversible. Careful what you wish for Labour voters. Don't believe me, then don't be lazy do your own simple internet research to find the truth. This is the Labour final agenda plan.

You obviously have not seen the list of candidates for George Galloway's Workers Party of Britain. It is on their website.

It doesn’t matter how many Votes Reform gets, they could get more votes than both Labour and the Conservatives combined. However Labour are still going to win.

I am so sick of greedy and stupid boomers > In short: Liz Truss on steroids. There would be cuts to personal tax worth £70bn a year, including scrapping income tax below £20,000, and big cuts to stamp duty and inheritance tax. Cuts to business levies including corporation tax would cost £18bn a year. >Reform says this would be paid for by scrapping plans to reach net zero carbon emissions (more on that below), plus £50bn a year from cutting government departments and quangos, and £35bn from the technical process of making the Bank of England stop paying interest on commercial bank deposits created through quantitative easing. >All this could be filed under “fiscally bold”. The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank termed the package “problematic”, saying: “Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up.” Basically 1 person in 5 is voting for someone who would willingly crash the economy by announcing even crazier fiscal plans than Liz Truss. And who are probably in bed with some hedge fund managers who can make bank from it like Kwarteng. Not that I had high expectations on Reform voters, but lmfao

@@gaztambo139 👏👏👏👏👏👏

They already are.

> In short: Liz Truss on steroids. There would be cuts to personal tax worth £70bn a year, including scrapping income tax below £20,000, and big cuts to stamp duty and inheritance tax. Cuts to business levies including corporation tax would cost £18bn a year. >Reform says this would be paid for by scrapping plans to reach net zero carbon emissions (more on that below), plus £50bn a year from cutting government departments and quangos, and £35bn from the technical process of making the Bank of England stop paying interest on commercial bank deposits created through quantitative easing. >All this could be filed under “fiscally bold”. The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank termed the package “problematic”, saying: “Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up.” Basically 1 person in 5 is voting for someone who would willingly crash the economy by announcing even crazier fiscal plans than Liz Truss. And who are probably in bed with some hedge fund managers who can make bank from it like Kwarteng. Not that I had high expectations on Reform voters, but lmfao

> In short: Liz Truss on steroids. There would be cuts to personal tax worth £70bn a year, including scrapping income tax below £20,000, and big cuts to stamp duty and inheritance tax. Cuts to business levies including corporation tax would cost £18bn a year. >Reform says this would be paid for by scrapping plans to reach net zero carbon emissions (more on that below), plus £50bn a year from cutting government departments and quangos, and £35bn from the technical process of making the Bank of England stop paying interest on commercial bank deposits created through quantitative easing. >All this could be filed under “fiscally bold”. The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank termed the package “problematic”, saying: “Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up.” Basically 1 person in 5 is voting for someone who would willingly crash the economy by announcing even crazier fiscal plans than Liz Truss. And who are probably in bed with some hedge fund managers who can make bank from it like Kwarteng. Not that I had high expectations on Reform voters, but lmfao

Nah , she's a lefty.

NEVER

True

Amen!!

This is the same bs he sold you on Brexit and is the country more British?

So what ...you think starmmer is going to do better .. remember labour communists hate this country ❤

@@londoncalling1757 no I think starmer is useless. A proper tool. He will give all the money away to imigrants. Labour run city's are like 3rd world. I dread a Labour government

American ancaps behind frappage are going to destroy anything of value in the uk, most pensioners will be killed by his economics,his tax cuts are completely unfunded and twice as bad as mad lizzy

Yes we are, especially since that man of a mouse, David Cameron, sneaked back into Conservative, after abandoning Britain for 7 years, after he didn't like the referendum result. He actually said that we need to give more money to Foreign aid, as if Britain doesn't give enough all ready.

@@sharonseed Last time I looked we were giving money to China and India. Both with a space program and nukes! 🤣

vote reform get bnp.

@@FRANKIECULLEN-r3g Oh ffs. Stop with that crap.🙄

That's so stupid lol you should be trying to persuade people to vote reform or conservatives instead of Labour lol.

I bloody don't. I hate these armholes.

I am so sick of greedy and stupid boomers > In short: Liz Truss on steroids. There would be cuts to personal tax worth £70bn a year, including scrapping income tax below £20,000, and big cuts to stamp duty and inheritance tax. Cuts to business levies including corporation tax would cost £18bn a year. >Reform says this would be paid for by scrapping plans to reach net zero carbon emissions (more on that below), plus £50bn a year from cutting government departments and quangos, and £35bn from the technical process of making the Bank of England stop paying interest on commercial bank deposits created through quantitative easing. >All this could be filed under “fiscally bold”. The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank termed the package “problematic”, saying: “Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up.” Basically 1 person in 5 is voting for someone who would willingly crash the economy by announcing even crazier fiscal plans than Liz Truss. And who are probably in bed with some hedge fund managers who can make bank from it like Kwarteng. Not that I had high expectations on Reform voters, but lmfao

​@@ReinholdBinder-d9n With a user name like ​user-lh3si8sl8o you sound like a bot

@@ReinholdBinder-d9n Let's take a guess at which non-job you do !

Nhs? Is that because they want to make it profitable Busines where we have to buy health insurance from their mates?