حسن بھائی نے آخر میں جو بات کہی ہے میرے خیال کے مطابق زاویہ غامدی کی اقساط جہاں ختم ہوئی تھی اور اک ربط ٹوٹ گیا تھا، اگلی نشست اسی کا تسلسل معلوم ہو رہی ہے ۔
Very wonderful 5 series of sunnat..i listen them all carefully .how these sunnat have reached to us by step by step..alao i knew these terminologies Ilmul Aamah..Ijma ..Tawatur..etc..Really Ustad is a great legend & Asset for the Muslims..
Regarding the question of brother Hasan about the modern scientific method which involves a lot of modern devices. We apply the same critical review to the devices as we do with human beings. Sometimes we trash a thermometer observing that it often gives the wrong temperature. Second, the instruments provide data. Then there is a huge amount of human logic and algorithms saved in the form of a computer program which processes and interprets the observed data. Often the inventors of those devices and the programmers find mistakes in their work and correct it. So they are not flawless and absolutely perfect.
اٹھائیسویں منٹ پر حسن بھائی نے جو سوال اٹھایا ہے اس کا ایک جواب یہ ہے۔ ہم جو آنکھوں سے مشاہدہ کرتے ہیں اس کو ہمارا دماغ پرانے تجربات کی روشنی میں interpret کرتا ہے لیکن پھر عقل کی مدد سے اس کی تحلیل کرکے حقیقت کی تلاش کرتا ہے۔ کیونکہ اکثر آنکھیں دھوکا دیتی ہیں اور عقل اس پر اعتراض اور شبہات اٹھاتی ہے اور تجزیہ کر کے حقیقت کی طرف رہنمائی کرتی ہے۔
From Adam pbuh to Isa pbuh , Hebrew language was the language of all prophets, is it right i like n love this beautiful language and i am trying to learning this language.please explain abt this . thanks
It's not true. Aramaic is the oldest written down language. I think even Sanskrit is older than Hebrew. I don't think anyone can say that with certainty what language was spoken at the time of Adam A.S
generation to generation every one says that knowledge is not only acquire by physical senses but also internally spirituality received. only the modern age says that there is no knowledge which can be received internally spiritually only those who's qibla is in west they among the Muslims today say the same.
Sir u said at 24.00 minutes saleeb were given one of Hazrat Esa one sahaba, God neither killed or saleeb God taken him up, but in your hazrat Esa u said he died n God lifted.
AI generated Timestamps to help the viewers. 00:00:00 Javed Ahmed Ghamidi addresses the doubts and anxieties that modern and educated Muslims have about the source of knowledge, Sunnah. He emphasizes the importance of critically analyzing the sources of knowledge and understanding how it is transmitted. Ghamidi explains that knowledge is acquired through observation and reasoning, and it is then transmitted through individuals. He compares the transmission of knowledge to the use of devices in modern technology, where it is the voices of individuals that are being transmitted. Therefore, he argues that the transmission of Sunnah is also reliant on individuals. 00:05:00 Ghamidi discusses the role of individuals in transmitting knowledge and information. He uses the example of the 9/11 attacks to illustrate that even with advanced technology and devices, it is ultimately the individual who witnesses and transmits the information. He emphasizes that while cameras and other tools can enhance the transmission process, it still relies on the credibility and trustworthiness of the individual. Ghamidi also mentions that in some cases, personal experience and observation play a crucial role in confirming the authenticity of the information. He suggests that even though GPS technology may provide location information, it is still dependent on individuals for inputting and maintaining the data. Overall, Ghamidi emphasizes the significance of individuals in the process of transmitting knowledge and highlights their role as the ultimate source of reliability in our current world. 00:10:00 The speaker discusses the process of ascertaining the truth of information and the role of individuals in its transmission. He notes that while modern technology may be used to present information, it still ultimately relies on individuals for authenticity. The speaker emphasizes the need for analysis and investigation to confirm the veracity of claims, highlighting the importance of individual testimonies and the role of trust in accepting transmitted knowledge. Ultimately, the speaker asserts that all sources of information, whether historical or contemporary, are dependent on individuals for verification. 00:15:00 Javed Ahmed Ghamidi discusses the concept of transmission of knowledge and information through individuals. He explains that just like we depend on individuals to relay weather predictions or news, the early transmission of religious knowledge also relied on individuals who observed and experienced certain events. Ghamidi argues that the acceptance of the Prophet Muhammad as a Prophet was based on his truthfulness and reasoning, rather than solely on the people's acceptance. He further emphasizes that the transmission of knowledge and information will always be through individuals, whether it is scientific discoveries or religious teachings. Ghamidi acknowledges the possibility of manipulation or fake presentations in modern means of transmission but argues that the witnessing of events occurs at the place of incidence, and it is from there that the transmission begins. 00:20:00 The speaker discusses the transmission of information and the importance of rationality in accepting claims. He emphasizes that human beings are the primary source of transmitting information and that their testimonies and rational analysis are crucial in determining the validity of a claim. He gives the example of how information can be falsely transmitted, even in the presence of a large number of witnesses, and highlights the need for critical analysis. The speaker also mentions a historical example from the Bible to illustrate how claims can be confirmed through analysis and reasoning. Ultimately, he emphasizes the importance of relying on rationality and evidence when evaluating claims rather than blindly accepting them. 00:25:00 Ghamidi discusses the process of analysis and reasoning when evaluating different sources of information. He explains that when contradictory news arises, both claims should be analyzed and evaluated based on their sources and evidence. Ghamidi emphasizes the importance of using rational arguments and reasoning in this process. He also highlights the role of intellect in understanding and interpreting information. Ultimately, he suggests that the intellect should be used to assess and validate the knowledge that is acquired. 00:30:00 Ghamidi discusses the role of intellect in making decisions and refuting disputes through reasoning. He argues that tangible evidence and scientific facts should be given more weight than testimonies of people when determining historical events or religious practices. He also emphasizes that the Quran, although requiring knowledge and understanding to access, is not as complex as claimed, as it can be memorized and transmitted by young children. Ghamidi suggests that the transmission of knowledge is based on memorization and passing it on, which is similar to the process of publishing books with careful proofreading and checking. 00:35:00 Ghamidi discusses the transmission of religious texts and rituals, emphasizing that they are not complex or difficult to understand. He explains that the Quran is copied and memorized by individuals, both literate and illiterate, and is easily transmitted from one person to another. Similarly, the performance of Salah (prayer) and the rituals of Hajj and Umrah are simple and practical, observed and learned by Muslims from a young age. Ghamidi argues that there is no need for intricate understanding or scholarly knowledge to practice these aspects of Islam, as they can be learned and transmitted through observation and regular practice. 00:40:00 Ghamidi explains how historical events and practices are transmitted through time. He emphasizes that the beginning, middle, and end of an incident or practice should be in the light of history in order to be considered valid. Using the example of religious innovations, Ghamidi explains that if a person investigates various mosques in his city, he will find scholars who reject such innovations and provide historical context to refute them. Therefore, the claim that a large number of people transmitting a practice makes it true is invalid, as historical evidence and scholarly research are crucial in determining the validity of any belief or practice. 00:45:00 The discussion revolves around the concepts of Ijma and Tawatur and their relevance in determining the authenticity of transmitted knowledge. The speaker gives an example of the transmission of knowledge about the existence of planets, highlighting that the generations that passed on this information are no longer present. He emphasizes the importance of individual observation and investigation and argues that the number of individuals transmitting the knowledge is not as significant as their collective agreement and rationality. The speaker also questions the basis on which people accept historical facts and highlights the role of individual testimony in establishing them. Ultimately, he suggests that the number of individuals becomes irrelevant when the collective agreement and rationality of the group are taken into account. 00:50:00 Ghamidi discusses the idea of transmission of information and how it applies to the spread of religion. Ghamidi explains that a large number of people claiming a certain belief or event is not sufficient evidence to prove its authenticity. He compares it to everyday situations where people relay information without verifying its accuracy. Ghamidi emphasizes the importance of having clear evidence and knowing the origin and end of a piece of information. He also addresses the possibility of governments manipulating consensus and emphasizes the role of news in spreading information. Ultimately, Ghamidi suggests that the transmission of religious beliefs and innovations should be examined in the light of their historical context. 00:55:00 In this section, the speaker discusses the origin and transmission of Sunnah, highlighting how its entire history has been transmitted by individuals, regions, communities, and the whole of humanity. The speaker defends the reality and strength of Sunnah against scholarly doubts in modern times, emphasizing that this source of knowledge cannot be dismissed. They describe it as a great fort that cannot be razed down, as negating it would require denying the realities of the world. The discussion on the Deen given by the Prophet (pbuh) through Sunnah will be continued in further levels.
As Joseph Lombard once said when an orientalist with zero or little knowledge of Arabic comes along to judge and question the 1400yr old vibrant Islamic scholarship marked by self-scrutiny at every stage, he is not being completely honest with his motives.
حسن بھائی نے آخر میں جو بات کہی ہے میرے خیال کے مطابق زاویہ غامدی کی اقساط جہاں ختم ہوئی تھی اور اک ربط ٹوٹ گیا تھا، اگلی نشست اسی کا تسلسل معلوم ہو رہی ہے ۔
Javed Ghamidi proclaims that Prophet Muhammad’s is our primary source of knowledge about the Islam and worship rituals such as prayers, fasting and hajj are “the foundation of Deen.” In other words, the Qur’an just serves as a reminder pointing to these traditions which are to be found in the Prophet’s sunnah. This is a typical view of traditional muslims who have set aside the Qur’an and taken “ghair Qurani” sources as the primary source of a religion which is pre-occupied with worship rituals and duas for salvation. However, such a view is not supported by the Qur’an which declares itself to be the only source of guidance for mankind, complete in every detail, without contradictions and preserved from human corruption. Nowhere does the Qur’an mention “sunnah of the Prophet”, nor that worship rituals are the foundation of Islam. According to Ghamidi, such traditions were started by Prophet Abraham but had become lost or corrupt with time, so Prophet Muhammad came to revive them. But the Qur’an does not support this view- it tells us that Prophet Muhammad had no knowledge of the teachings of previous Prophets or Books and he was told to follow ONLY what was revealed to him. Ghamidi’s only authority for such claims are imams from the 3rd century or self-styled scholars who quote hadith books based on hearsay passed down from generation to generation. Ghamidi insists that such “knowledge” in completely reliable and without contradictions. However, anyone who’s grown up in a Muslim community will know about the constant arguments over practical details of ritual acts of worship such as prayer and fasting and what makes them valid or invalid. All the religions claim to pass on traditions of their ancestors yet they all have a different version of “the truth”. Muslim themselves are divided into many sects depending on which traditions they follow. However, the Qur’an warns us against blind-following of traditions or “holy men” who only serve to mislead themselves and others.
who did these false flags, this is where knowledge begins this is where research begins show us if you have ever done such research or your followers did such research show us.
جاوید غامدی روایتی اسلام کا پرچار کرتے ہیں جس میں محمد رسول کی ذات کو دین کا ماخذ سمجھاجاتا ہے اور رسمی عبادات یعنی نماز، روزہ، حج وغیرہ کو دین کی بنیاد مانا جاتا ہے۔ اسلئے دین کا علم روایات پر مبنی ہے نہ کہ قرآن پر۔ اس نظریہ سے قرآن محض ان رسومات کی نشاندہی کرتا ہے لیکن عملی تفصیلات رسالت مآب کی روایات سے ملتی ہیں ۔ یعنی دین کا مقصد خدا کو پرستش یا پوجا پاٹ سے خوش کرنا ہے تاکہ وہ ہمارے گناہوں کی بخشش کردے۔ یہ اسلام کا تصور آج مسلمانوں میں عام ہے جوکہ قرآن کو چھوڑ کر غیر قرآنی ذرائع کو دین کا منبع سمجھتے ہیں۔ حالانکہ یہ تصور قرآن میں کہیں نہیں ملتا۔ نہ تو وہاں سنت محمدی کا ذکر ہے، اور نہ ہی عبادتی رسومات کو دین کی بنیاد کہا گیا ہے۔ قرآن تو خود کو اللہ کی ہدایت، جو مکمل، مفصل، محفوظ اور لا متضاد پیش کرتا ہے۔ یہاں تو دین کا مقصد خدائی قانون کے مطابق ایک اجتماعی نظام کو وضع کرنا ہے جس میں انسانی زندگی کی نشوونما ہو سکے۔ تاکہ دنیاوی زندگی کی کامیابی آخرت کی کامیابی کا سبب بن سکے۔ غامدی کے مطابق مذہبی روایات حضرت ابراہیم نے شروع کیں لیکن بعد میں عربوں نے انھیں بھلا دیا، پھر آخری نبی نے انھیں دوبارہ اجاگر کردیا۔ لیکن اس کے برعکس قرآن کہتا ہے کہ حضرت محمد کو پہلے انبیاء کی تعلیمات کا کچھ علم نہیں تھا۔ اور انھیں حکم دیا گیا کہ صرف اسکی پیروی کریں جو علم وہی سےان پر نازل ہوا، یعنی قرآن۔ اسلئے غامدی کے خیالات قرآن پر مبنی نہی بلکہ ان روایات یا احادیث پر جو پیغمبر کے 300 سال بعد لکھی گئیں اور سنی سنائی باتوں سے اخذ کی گئیں۔ اسلئے ان کی حجت قرآن سے نہیں بلک تیسری صدی کے کسی امام کے حوالے سے ہوتی ہے۔ یہ اصرار کرتے ہیں کہ وہ روایات جو نسل در نسل منتقل ہوئی بالکل باعتبار ہیں اور ان میں کوئی تضاد نہیں۔ جبکہ مسلمان معاشرے میں روزمرہ کا اختلاف انہی باتوں پر ہے کہ فلاں سنت کا صحیح ثبوت کیا ہے۔ اور اسی بناء پر مسلمان آج کئی فرقوں میں بھٹے ہیں۔ مگر قرآن تو ہمیں روایات کی اندھی تقلید اور مذہبی پیشواؤں کی پیروی پر متنبہ کرتا ہے کیونکہ وہ خود کو اور دوسروں کو بھی گمراہ کرتے ہیں۔
There's an obvious problem in Ghamidi's categorisation of sources of knowledge - whilst direct observation is universally accepted as a reliable source, no rational person can accept that knowledge passed-on through generations of people is as reliable. After all, this second source is called tradition and the world is full of diverse traditions, all contrary to each other but held strongly by each community. You cannot make a special case for Muslims in this regard. Jews, Christians and Hindus all believe their traditions are faithfully transmitted by their people. Thank God for Qur'an's guidance that actually tells us to question ancestral traditions for they could wrong or misled.
Not only this his explanation has much greater problem. 9/11 happened is elementary information but how ,who did it,who benefited is where knowledge begins and scholarly work stars. Ghamdiism is for school boys how can only pass for play group .
Sir kindly let us know which tradition is transmitting knowledge like Muslims tradition and which book other than Quran is transmitted in both oral and written forms with the reading as read by prophet PBUH. Thanks
Observation is processed through critical review and then as a result of the critical review a claim is made about the observation. Often the claim is challenged by other reviewers. Mere observation doesn't possess absolute value in the scientific approach.
