Тёмный

Retractions, Post-Publication Peer Review, and Fraud: Scientific Publishing's Wild West 

McGill University
Подписаться 38 тыс.
Просмотров 6 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

28 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 12   
@fernando-loula
@fernando-loula 3 года назад
So interesting, and so little views, this is sad.
@JustLauraThatsAll
@JustLauraThatsAll Год назад
Great work. Very interesting topic. 👍👍
@JimSmithInChiapas
@JimSmithInChiapas 2 года назад
13:40 This happened to me 30 years ago!
@vecchio1066
@vecchio1066 Год назад
Almost every researcher worth his salt can tell a similar story.
@blixten2928
@blixten2928 Год назад
Very interesting indeed! A fascinating examples. One thing, though, a pity you bring in Sokol, his hoax is not analogous.
@timsexton
@timsexton 3 года назад
Wild West, huh? Then I suppose Ivan is the sheriff who is holding these fraudsters accountable. Increase the video playback speed to 1.25 or 1.5 if you're finding difficulty getting through the beginning.
@JCResDoc94
@JCResDoc94 6 лет назад
33:20 you have to publish b4 you can retract
@danlhendl
@danlhendl Год назад
E=mc2? Yeah right! 😅
@tugger
@tugger Год назад
one of my profs passed off one of my undergrad assignments as his own work in a paper
Далее
The Art of Scientific Publishing
1:24:19
Просмотров 10 тыс.
titan tvman's plan (skibidi toilet 77)
01:00
Просмотров 4,7 млн
Катаю тележки  🛒
08:48
Просмотров 293 тыс.
The BIGGEST culprit in academic publishing
17:56
Просмотров 104 тыс.
Is peer review broken?
5:49
Просмотров 8 тыс.
Should Knowledge Be Free?
22:32
Просмотров 1 млн
Lectures: Exploring the Psychology of Creativity
50:41
Selecting a journal for a publication
50:05
Просмотров 62 тыс.
titan tvman's plan (skibidi toilet 77)
01:00
Просмотров 4,7 млн