Post (5) For Rev San Toe; I admire your burning desire to shine the glory of God. But, you yourself know the level of your knowledge. You shouldn't preach the areas where you don't have full knowledge upon. If you are doing so, then you are leading many innocent believers into error. There is no error in Truth. Truth is against in-completion. If your knowledge is limited, then explore more. Don't you feel sorry to those uneducated Christians who are piously listening to you and clapping what you said? You should know that Christianity is a complex system in terms of faith and you should educate yourself more.
Post (1) The use of "Christian calendar and bones of Jesus" is not simply the proofs of existence of God. We do have many other calendars were in use through out the ages. Rev San Toe can't use Christian calendar as a proof of God's existence because it is a modification of "Gregorian" calendar. It doesn't prove anything at all regarding God's existence. Jesus wasn't born in year "ZERO." According to Rev San Toe, he used Christian calendar as a proof, then Jesus was born in year zero. Does it make sense to you at all? As a matter of fact, Jesus was believed to be born in between 6 and 4 BC.
No, he is not Budhist , Mara Laikha . You are wrong understand because most of the Budhist don't like the Christian.He have good religion. I'm not to speak Saya San Toe, not to meet him ,not his family .I think you are Christian, please see your fault.please and thanks.
Post (4) Proving existence of God and Christianity are very beautiful and logical. But, after hearing this teaching, I felt that Christianity is very cheap and not logical. Actually, Christianity is way more than that. I don't even know how to comment on this type of teachings any more since they don't have any logical foundations at all. Again, my fellow Christians, don't just "clap" and say "Amen" to your own delight. Be intelligent and informed Christian.
Yeah, you are right, I do pray for them. But, in Christianity, it is simply more than praying for them to get back on right track. The Lord commended us to put our actions such as feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, and welcoming stranger. James 2:16 clearly mentions the need of our action rather than just *praying* for the needy. Using this very same analogy, you can directly apply to this pastor's insufficient, unhistorical, non-Biblical, and bias teaching. I'll be disobeying the Word of God if I were to just sit and pray for them. Also, you can put it this way; our Heavenly Father is using me (as an instrument) to show them (the pastor and his followers) what is lacking or wrong in their preaching. Now, I hope you understand why I commented. God bless you, Ms. Sandar Kyu!
