Will he face jail? Hit like & let me know below. And get my new book The Psychology of Secrets: www.amazon.co.uk/Psychology-Secrets-Adventures-Murderers-Influencers/dp/1035002590?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&psc=1&smid=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE
I’m American, none of these elite criminals ever face consequences for their actions. Ms Maxwell is sitting in jail but no one from the list has even been tried.
Really enjoyed listening to this but I do think Andrew Sarah Meg's Eugene knew Meg's before harry came on the scene because of their dealings with Epstein it's so strange that the lies they spewed about most of the royal family they never included Andrew in any of it wouldn't put it pass those 4 to try and damage the royal family
@@Ubernotes10 it means very high quality video - if you watch on a TV that accepts 4k (or Ultra HD), then you should select '4k' in the settings cog beneath the video.
And reported a few days ago, after 20 years all the stored historical documents of Andrew’s work as a trade ambassador cannot be found and are gone. They don’t know where. And because he was working for the country as a trade Ambassador, these documents should’ve been kept for historical records. Disappeared. Coincidental? Nope. Covering it all up.
@@patti3855you’re probably correct. The saddest part is that the peasants and serfs still love that family, and will defend them to the ends of the earth.
@@jaijai5250 Yes, when talking about slaves, King Charles never mentions that he still has slaves. They are serfs. They work land owned by Charles, pay him for the land, give him some of their net earnings from the land. This land they can never own and are dismissed if they grumble or ask for less rent. Even after and during COVID years, Charles raised the rent on these lands. Why no one even mentions this in Britian makes one wonder just how much the Royals get away with. Everyone believes that the late Queen was something like a saint. Indeed she wasn't and was very clever as a young girl to get everything she wanted from Churchill. That is when they were able to be tax free, which is ridiculous. But they have slaves today and don't pay taxes.
Don't believe he'll ever do jail time. It's like here in the States, it's a two-tiered justice system where the politicians go free and everyone else has to pay for their sins.
It's sickening that no matter what Andrew does, the scumbag gets away with it and never really has to answer for his cretinous ways. Even the one time he would've had to face justice his mummy QE2 bailed him out. And that's one thing that I will talk ill of our past Queen for. I get loyalty to her son but there's certain things he shouldn't get a pass on.
The justice system is in place to protect the elites from the unruly pleb, and we can clearly see it these days, they are not interested in crimes that affect common man, like burglaries, but they will arrest you if you go protesting.
And Julian Assange languishes in prison, not guilty, an extremely valuable person, a person who gave us the truth, which made me feel safer in this mad world and just because this royal person is royal, he is protected despite his disgusting behaviour.
Andy and Fergie are perfect together, two soulless grifters who have always used the royal family to make money for themselves. It is shameful that Mr. Lownie can't get the records he needs for his book. The family just keeps blocking him like they did when he was working on his books about the Duke of Windsor and the Mountbattens. He is a great writer, I especially enjoyed, "The Traitor King" about Edward VIII. He is always fair and does amazing research.
Thank you both for covering this. As a victim of something along a similar vein, it means a lot to me that you help to bring attention to this type of evil. Believe me when I say most don't really care as much as you think, even when it's their own children. But it matters greatly to me and others who have had similar abuses happen to them that there exist people like you two who genuinely want to know what happened so you can do what's within your power to bring the monsters to justice and warn the world about who they are and how they operate. So I have a deep respect for the two of you openly discussing this knowing it's never without risk, especially given the types of figures you're dealing with here.
I'm sorry to read your comment and wish you nothing but the best in your life moving forward ❤🙏🏾 it's so sickening to me that people get away with this kind of thing either thru inadequacies in the law and police or in people like Andrew's case having status and access to money to buy their way out. Disgusting!
@@mycatsnameiskaren8253 she was a supporter of ALL of these perverts, not such an innocent as she is always made out to be!! she paid the bill for andy
That Newsnight interview was basically 'how to spot a liar for beginners'. All the lies clumsy and obvious so that everyone - ABSOLUTELY everyone - can tell he's lying.
The super rich such as royals see the rest of the human race as 'Useless Eaters' who they are culling down to a few million they say and who they see as very stupid eg Andrew thought his lies would be easily believed because he is so clever and we so stupid etc. Their arrogance and psychopathy is hard to believe for most.
@@suemcgregor9248 The security for the Yorks was over £2m last year alone. His staffing costs alone were over £1m. Food and lodgings werent rent free either. His horse and stabling costs were £150k alone. His £22k naval paneion wont go far towards that lot.
@@maxdamagusbroski I get your point. Brand was accused and Gov. actively tried to "deplatform" him. The stories about Andrew are mad though, the connections at the top helping him out etc don't help his case when others lose their careers, livelihoods and so on.
Charlie has had some very questionable friends over the years, he still has, look at his involvement with the WEF, quite frankly i dont think he is completely innocent in this situation!
Despite having world class information, Charles AND Andrew ended up being chummy with two of the most prolific PDs of our time - Jim and Eppers. Isnt that interesting.
its a good point, but its very easy for them to be exploited for foreign interests, and ultimately, the only people the destruction of the monarchy serves are foreign agents/nations. they also could be very weak people who cant handle the battle which is also bad because as the monarchy they should be strong. remember, they were born into something and raised by a team above them. i dont think its as black and white as it seems. its upto ghislaine maxwell to reveal it all, which will happen. i think she was a double agent and actually did some important work
Andrew asking a diplomat to line up some blondes for him makes Virginia Roberts Guifree's accusations against him are all the more probable. It also makes his insistence that he didn't know what Epstein was up to look ridiculous.
Virginia was being held in a large gang of traffickers, it wasn't for fun. Luckily she was able to break free from such influential sickos.@@sallywright8065
@@sallywright8065it was always about money for her unfortunately .. she has similar traits to Rachel Ragland … cut from the same cloth … VG actually came from a well off family .. not the story she has been peddling …
@@sallywright8065 In America, the system is designed for settlements. 98% of cases settle. Going to court would be unusual and too expensive for the plaintiff.
I think she was not much involved with her 2 eldest kids who indeed were odd youngsters and teens. Then Andrew was her first that she was was more involved with, was a personable attractive active boy not out looking at weeds like Charles or rebelling like Anne, so she was more relaxed and he was personable. Young edward was quiet, not overly interested in royal life since he had 3 elder siblings. His son is much like he was, invisible. So I believe it's unfair to judge ThE Queens choice of Andrew as a favourite CHILD, vs favourite Adult.
I was amazed to discover that Andrew and Edward were not sons of Prince Philip. I cannot find the photos now but a friend who is great at research sent me details of the real fathers of Andrew and Edward ie the Queen had affairs as well as Phileep.. I woudl have been sceptical if I had not seen the photos of the real fathers who look exactly like their sons - the fathers are European wealthy men who the Queen was in contact with. The royals are as corrupt and criminal and in fact evil as it is possible to imagine. They are related to the Rothschilds who are known to be satanists.
@@joywebster2678 Your aspersion "not out looking at weeds like Charles" is an ignorant disparagement of botany and disincentivizing of botanists; e.g., Sir Charles Darwin's son Sir Francis Darwin, a pioneer botanist who studied and so discovered and wrote a scientific tome on plant tropisms, valuable e.g. in economic botany.
When I have a daughter, I will teach her if blonde green pink or blue that she is not put on this earth to be some name sex slave or be used to be abused. Especially by going somewhere, assumedly to a place of safety. Especially when a young, unworldly, trusting, some would say niece person. To this day, young people do not expect that other adults do not have their best interests at heart. And will gobble them up with perversion@@justinsmith4562
@@justinsmith4562 she was underage according to UK and USA law. Seeing as how his best two chums was a convicted paedophile and a convicted sex trafficker, and he paid millions to avoid going to court, theres 100% credence to her accusations. He is a nonce.
@justinsmith4562 he's shady. He'll never get arrested, of course not, but lets not pretend he wasn't close mates with a well known convicted p3dophile, and ch!ld s*x tr@fficker
Oh my god... I honestly burst a blood vessel every time I read that tripe comment from some over zealous royalist trying to defend that absolute scumbag Andrew. And I think it's disgusting that either QE2 or the RF bailed him out when he should've been made to face the music in court against that Giuffre woman.
Actually she was underage because she was trafficked internationally and prostituted to Andrew. Epstein paid her $5,000 to have sex with P. Andrew. Now, whether Andrew knew she was being prostituted I do not know. Did he not talk to her--if he met her of course, and he says he didn't ever meet her.
I find it regularly disturbing how people in the U.K. think Andrew is alone as a predator of underage children in his family. We know his uncle abused young boys regularly in Ireland. His father had young teenage girls taken to him by Saville. Charles was friends and holidayed with numerous child rapists and wrote letters to court to try and get them freed from sentencing for sexual abuse of children.
Never heard that Charles wrote letters for imprisoned pedophiles! If true, that should be a huge scandal. For sure Prince Philip was a pedophile. Why are there so many pedophiles?!!
The whole Pizza Express thing was NEVER an alibi …. He said he was there at 4-5pm . That was 6 or 7 HOURS before the offence occurred after the nightclub ! “ I couldn’t possibly have robbed that bank at 3pm, because I was having breakfast at 9 am” it’s a NON ALIBI
@@blueraven596 Pizza express and Pizzagate maybe he was telling the elite sickos that they needed to protect him to protect themselves .... Andrew knows where the bodies are buried and who dug the holes.
Andrew never claimed it as an alibi He said that was the reason he remembered the day in question almost 2 decades later Also there’s no sign of sweat on Andrew coming out of Annabelle’s on the original photo The Mail ‘glossed it up’ to make it look like sweat Obviously couldn’t find an actual sweaty photo
Prince Andrew is an incredibly arrogant man,I think that he thought he could do as he pleased and couldn't be touched because of who his mother was.I don't think Virginia Giufre was the only young girl that he abused,my fear is that there were much younger girls made available to him also. Since Prince Andrew became a single man after his divorce ,it's strange that he has never had a relationship relationship with another woman.
She was trafficked!!! Were you born yesterday?Andrew had some very powerful friends and associates, I don't know if you have heard of a lady called Ghlislane Maxwell?
@@brianeduardo1234 well the present head is Pavlos Constantine son, I find Lownie fascinating, no wonder there are those that want him silenced, I wonder why mmmm 🤔😂🫣
@@annetteelliott1494 oh lord you cannot educate stupid Fergie should’ve of gone to prison for selling access to Andrew then there is the countless scams she has pulled
I really do love Andrew Lownie, someone who I’d never have known about without the benefit of Mr Gold. Really fascinating interview, if not, an incredibly frustrating topic at the same time.
The photo of Epstien at Balmoral says it all. May they reap what they sow, England without the monarchy would be a fabulous move into the 21st Century. That the English public accepts any of this is mind-boggling.
@@kalo924 I don't understand your fascination with the BRF. They are arrogant, entitled, lazy, grifters, adulterers and perverts who love to keep the company of pedophiles. Why are they a huge asset again? Those who fail to condone an injustice are collaborators.
@@kalo924 What do they do for the money they receive? Shake hands, show up, smile for pictures and they are billionaires while people of England suffer. Nope. Bye
There are three infamous photographs that are very alarming in the extreme. Each one is damning to the Royal Family. The first is a picture of Prince Andrew and an under-age girl Virginia Giuffre in 2001 in a London Terrace house. The second is a photo of Jeffrey Epstein, bizarrely at The Queen's Private Country Lodge at Balmoral Castle The third is a picture of Ghislaine Maxwell and Kevin Spacey sitting mockingly on the then Queen's Throne at Buckingham Palace - the contempt and disdain is palpable. Each one features Ghislaine Maxwell prominently. What are they saying? They are saying that The Royal Family was being sexually compromised, possibly blackmailed. More scarily this was being done by a Foreign intelligence agency. Knowing Robert Maxwell's connections with Israel we can follow confidently a direct chain. This means that for over 30 years a foreign government has been using a Member of The Royal Family as a puppet to manipulate and gain direct personal advantage and highly secret security information at the expense of our own country. The implications are terrifying.
...you forgot to add that it was Randy Andy as was often referred to back then that took Maxwell to his private rooms at Buckingham Palace, when the sitting on the throne incident took place... and again, Randy Andy, who took Maxwell to the Lodge Country Cottage. He's been totally ruthless, not having any consideration at all for the impact on the RF. No wonder he and KCIII have never gotten on.
You can blame Ghislane all you want, however fact is, the royal family would not have been compromised or blackmailed if Andrew didn't have a perchance for sex with underage girls. Foreign powers can only have an advantage if the person is dodgy. If Andrew was straight, Ghislane would never have found a way in. Simples.
The Yorks are up to their eyeballs with this Harry and Megan saga......notice no more leaks are coming from the palace.....Eugenie had been shut down.....the similarities with her kid and Megans very suss.....they have been involved with epstien and Soho house.....to many dots connecting
If his records have magically disappeared there’s no way he will do jail time, Andrew is definitely been protected by security services, can’t wait to read your book, Andrew and Fergie are so entitled can’t bare them.
Non Andrew est protégé... il reste un prince de sang. .. il estctoujours nourrit et loge par la couronne donc par l'argent des anglais qui vont bientôt payer son remariage....
Andrew Gold's studio has top, top sound equipment. Better Pop into Lownie & Phil Craigs Scandal Mongers vlog to encourage these busy, busy men to upgrade their equipment.
The best thing Prince William could do for his family is get rid of the monarchy. The Monarch have enough private wealth, they don’t need the monarchy or people feeling like they own them
William has said, thinking his father would do this (doesn't realize the extent of his father's and grandmother's green for money) - convert of the castles for a mental health clinic and hospital to truly aid mental patients, not just throw them away as his grandmother's cousins lived their lives, locked in a room. William wanted all the homeless classified as drug addicts or mental people. He wanted to convert another castle for the drug addicts, getting them real help, not more drugs. I feel William is a good man with very fair ideas. What are these castles being used for anyway. Does Charles really need six place to live????
The cosroyals show is a vital part of British history...I have a feeling they'd rather take the personal property. Pay taxes on it(if they can). Leave the govt of the kingdom to run the royal history part of their heritage. They can turn Buckingham Palace into a homeless shelter if they. Choose.. but what a loss to the world. Harry and his debacle only drives in the nail. Windsor Castle could be a bed and breakfast destination. Is that what the kingdom wants ?
This is gross, letting him back in public. The fact that everyone treat Prince Harry worse the andrew who connected to sex crimes, is beyond me. This is making me take a really good look at the royals and their morals now. I'm disappointed in them trying to bring andrew back in the public and their lack actions. Andrew is the biggest disgrace of the royals.
Harry saw the Royals for what they are and got out . l have no time for him and he's wife but even less for Andrew and Charles two arrogant pampered and entitled parasites .
Thank you for this comment as I too am amazed at the treatment of Harry vs the treatment of Andrew in the public sphere anyway. It's utterly unbelievable to me that I've had people say to me that Harry is worse than Andrew 😲 that blows my mind every time I read that comment 🤯
@@MaliKamicak he arrived with other members of the royal family for Easter Sunday service in Windsor. He says, he is innocent. Prove it and this all goes away. Simple! I like the royals, always have! I pray for the King and Princess to have a speedy recovery and for their families. Prince andrew thing is a disgrace to the royals. I have been seeing and reading a lot what you guys are saying about Prince Harry on this channel and others. It has been a lot of straight up bashing. Sorry to say but you guys are looking like a bunch of bullies. Proven facts, Prince Harry won his court case against the UK media ( the mirror ) they were tapping his phone and the palaces leak information to the media about Prince Harry. This all happened before he left UK. Actual proven facts in court. Google it and look for yourself. Plus, he has a couple more court cases against UK media. I think there is 50 people in that court case against UK media. We have are own fake news here, it has destroyed families and peoples lifes. After seeing that, I am a firm believe in facts and truth. Not what the media is trying to feed me. Spread love, not hate! Peace ❤️
What does Andrew Lownie think of the story that the reason he and Fergie split up, which was presumably got from a nanny, that she found him in bed with another man and it was at this point the marriage ended but to retain his 'randy andy' image she essentially has kept it secret, whether financially, or the fact that she still resides in Royal Lodge.
@foretfleur Funny you say this. 25 years ago I heard the same story too. I used to hear he was just like Mountbatten, he liked little boys. Turns out he liked underage girls. I believe Fergie found out pretty early what she had married, she decided to keep quiet because Andrew was her meal ticket, and also to save her children face! The queen liked her because she kept quiet. Phillip hated her because, although she protected Andrew's secret, she somehow exposed him when she began to have affairs!
Personally, I woyld like to know more about the millions of pounds in plastic bags given to Charles in return for a British citizenship. I do not understand why people were not more outraged about that?
Loved this interview with Andrew! His Scandal Mongers podcast is definitely worth checking out. Just wish his book would come out sooner...have been looking forward to it for quite some time. His book on Mountbatten was excellent!
If he goes down, he needs to speak-up and take the wife with him. She's been able to slither under the door like smoke, because none of her male hook-ups are ever going to come out of the woodwork. They have families and reputations to guard. Allegedly, and just my opinion.
And the British people (some) think that their royal family is not morally corrupt, hence they hang on to them as if their lives depend on the royal family for survival.
Name one single ruling class or system of governance that isn't morally corrupt. We don't choose to retain the monarchy, it's integral to our constitution which has evolved over 1000 years and stems back to the magna carta. It also prevents a single person gaining absolute power.
I am from the UK and I am not a monarchist as I believe in equality etc I don't see royals as moral but people some good and some bad... I think UK needs to move on We need to move on and for royals to be more like those in europe Again royals are people and there is bad people in every walk of life
I think they know as much as us, doubt Andrew told them the truth, really don’t think they believed him. They are stuck w him unfortunately. He is lucky he isn’t in prison as a result he should stay out of the way
@@florinelenaradamileawhy charles? If it's because he married camillia, then you have to blame the queen. Simon Day in austrailia says Charles and camilia are his parents, if this is true you have to say the queen sent him away for 2 years. If this is the case, then the queen is the one who distroyed charles & camillia,s life. I think the queen knew, but brought in Diana
@@pastryshack551 Charles because he works for the WEF announcing the Great Reset that will put millions into poverty. The roads in his Duchy are apparently disgraceful as he won't pay for repairs. Another spoilt brat whose favourite uncle was Lord Mountbatten ... do your research on him.
@@pastryshack551 I know, they all have a share of blame in all that web of deceitful intrigues but charles could've stood his ground like Elisabeth did for Phillip, or stay faithful to Diana. We know how that worked.
I’ve heard many of these stories of Andrew ….. it’s a good thing he isn’t a working Royal …. And although he didn’t publicly trash his family I do think he has created a bit of spot light by refusing to move out of the RL !!! I do feel for KC at least Andrew tho is removed …Harry continues to add aggravation!! It’s not so easy to legally remove titles is my understanding, I hope however those kids are removed from the LOS !!! Great interview- looking forward to the book !
He's a waste of tax payers money!! While people starve and go cold he's getting his nails done💩🤬 for goodness sake what a carry on!! Isn't it time to see him for what he is? A waste of space, give the tax payer a fair go, it's ridiculous !!
Don’t think he gets anything from the tax payer… think he pays tax, as the royal family do. Personally prefer a royal family to some rich person wishing to be president and spending the money on highly corruptable elections every four years…still the expense for less of a tourist draw.
I want to know why Andrew is living the life of Riley riding around the Windsor estate and the nerve of him leading the royal family on I think Easter Sunday with the his former wife, what the hell is going on there, who lives with his former wife, how dare she think she is allowed to prance around with the royal family, she is divorced, bugger off and disappear with your missteps of her past, it sickens me.
Great interview.. The more we dig about royalty, the worse it gets it seems.. Must take Andrew & Fergie's privileges from them, starting with "evicting" them from their luxurious abode. He is a twat and she is dishonest and uses the RF for her own benefit. If Charles doesn't act according to the public's wishes with Andrew & Harry, his reign will start looking very precarious.
I think we're moving to an age of Transparency and Visibility especially for Public Assets like our Royal Family...I worked on the Government Digital ID Biometric Systems at the Home Office...it would be very easy to Tag & Track Public Assets like the Royals... Wonder how Climate King Charlie would like that level of Dystopia?
If you are reasonably good looking, you’re famous, your family has tons of money, history, etc, how much help do you need getting women…??!! What does this guy need help with? That’s a red flag right there.
I'm sure he had no shortage but probably gets to the point we're these people think there above the law can literally do whatever they please with no reprocussions. It just seems like more of a ego thing entitlement.
You get the feeling he is soo soo entitled and living in this bubble he would have self importance … You must to a degree have a view of oneself as upper echelon when considering the people of working class you mainly deal with are SERVANTS .. Soo far above everyone that you could pay for women for a ‘service’ but i’m even above that … go get me someone for the evening and i’ll think about your business proposal … imagine being that into yourself ‘narc’ personality that that is your reality
They don't need help pulling their curtains, but they have servants who do everything for them. It makes perfect sense for him to snap his fingers and ask for some girls.
Excellent interview. This gentleman was incredibly interesting. You are an excellent interviewer, Andrew. I always appreciate it when the host allows their guest to speak!
What I really miss in this channel is the introduction of the people Andrew is interviewing. I am a subscriber, and I don't live in the UK. A few introductory words would be very helpful.
Historically, some English princes and monarchs have been incarcerated: e.g., King Richard II by his cousin, future King Henry IV; Richard III's child nephews; Princess Elizabeth Tudor enTowered for a time by her half sister "Bloody" Mary (she scratched a poetic couplet on her cell window with her diamond brooch, "Much suspected of me, / Nothing proved can be, / Quoth Elizabeth Prisoner." Then King Charles I during the Interregnum of Oliver Cromwell, prior to his regicide.
Technically, he has been stripped of his title and is no longer a royal, so he doesn't have the protection of the monarchy. I still don't see it happening either, unless Charles reeeeeally wants to get back at him for being mommy's favourite lol
While I agree that there are many, many questions that remain unanswered about Andrew, I think there are also questions about Ms Roberts-Guiffre, starting with why her parents allowed her to travel with Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein; and if she was being brought into the country against her will, why didn't she speak to immigration staff at the airport. Don't get me wrong, having et Andrew I think he is boorish and an appalling "advert" for the UK and the monarchy, but I don't think we should take his accusers "on trust". The Duke of Kent is still pretty active, and the Gloucesters (who are in their 70s) are very active - read the Court Circular.
In the last few years , being a member of the RF has become rather embarrassing . It has lost the shine it once had . You have a divorcee on the throne , a sleazy Prince and a couple of money hungry grifters selling tat ! I pity the rest of the clan .
Isn’t the Archwell Foundation in essence a front for money making ventures with only 5% going to charity, although they present it as a charitable foundation?
The origins of the English monarchy began with the Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain by Germanic settlers from mainland Europe in the 5th and 6th centuries. The settlers were not ethnically related to the original indigenous people of the British Islands, i.e. the Celtic. Cornish and Welsh tribes. The so-called current English royals are descendants of European royalty, most notably the German Hanoverians, who were also related to the Russian Romanovs, the last royals in pre-revolutionary Russia. In 1917, George V changed their surname from Saxe-Coburg-Gotha to Windsor to make it sound English. Britons regard this so Britishness is about as bizarre as one could possibly imagine. It is also bizarre that some British people continue to OBSESSIVELY FAWN over the current representatives of this old institution which has a VERY EVIL HISTORY and a PRISON - LIKE LIFESTYLE.
The Normans killed off the Saxon aristocracy, so you're wrong from the outset. The Germanic bloodline comes through inter-marriage which was standard practice with European royalty.
I am now 82, but as a young girl in school in Canada years and years ago, when asked what I was, I was told to put in Anglo Saxon as was everyone else. Then I went to the States and coming back to Canada found out they now put down Canadian. But, yes, maybe surprisingly, as a child I thought I was Anglo Saxon.
@john-nc4bl thank goodness someone who knows what they are talking about, people shut me down when I tell them this, the RF are narsasistic mercenary people and don't give a toss about us "commoners!!!
Yes, the Queen had a way of putting up her two fingers to the public, whilst at the same time many of those people thought she was doing them a favour! The height of repulsive deception.
@dimitritrabouzalas3090 Well said. QEII was an evil awful woman. The public was duped as to her true nature. I was done with her and the Monarchy way back in 2003, when she gave the royal ascent for the illegal Iraq Invasion. I always found it funny when people called Blair a war crime and stayed demanding the queen deny him the Peerage, when fact is SHE was just as much of a war criminal as he was.
Go away with the Trump name dropping. Trump had to throw him.out of maralargo. He didn't like him. Why not mention Clinton he was back and far to little St James island which was Epstein island.
I think he did mention Clinton. I agree, it seems absurd to drop Trump's name. His history with women is well known, and his inclinations don't run in the direction of the sleazy billionaire's.
Trump supporters often use the video of Trump saying how Andrew "likes them young" as a defence of his relationship with Epstein. On the contrary, Trump actually incriminates himself by admitting prior knowledge of what was actually going on. Amazes me how few people actually pick up on such an overt profession of complicity. You can ergo take it for granted Trump knew and did nothing. He said so himself. Of course Clinton is guilty, but you do yourself no favours by refusing to accept that Trump was up to his neck in it all too. That he 'once' threw Epstein out of Maralago during a function says nothing other than he didn't want that kind of behaviour happening at that particular moment in time around his own social circle and family. Plenty of videos of him fawning over Epstein, joking around with him at parties, and calling him a 'good friend'. You cannot escape those facts nor the fact that he is named often and unequivocally by Epstein, numerous numbers, private lines, and even down to his own chauffeur. If it quacks like a duck ...
@@michelleb3698but he had no problem letting them farm his staff at Maralago for victims. And of course as long as a woman is of age its ok to just grab her p%"ssy
Lots of billionaires visited Epstein . Andrew is low hanging fruit. I am reminded of young girls who had abortions when they were inconvenienced by the results of their generosity. They blame others and grieve later. Disgraced prince Andrew has Been scandalous before. But I believe that 17 is old enough to say no. 18 and eager to party with the rich for sex? No difference I think? I know that's not a popular opinion in this age of victim hood but they chose to Have the experience. Hope they had fun when it was going on. Sorry they have regrets
What really gets under my skin is how the Royal family got to the point of where they are now. In the past they have robbed, pillaged, stolen lands, colonized, murdered, extorted and deceived to get where they are. No one ever brings this up in conversation. Why do we have to look up to them as if they have some divine right to be there? Then there's all the inbreeding, which probably leads to all the evil that happens with the minors. This family is basically the biggest sponger of the state. I also think Harry fled the nest because he knows exactly what happened to his mother, like we all do.
