Thanks for the review. Can you please compare Anker prime 100W with Anker 736 nano ii and if possiable add 737 120w. The reason is 736 Nano is in deal with good price compare to other 2. I purchased 736, but my Samsung S23 ultra doesn't shows Super fast charger 2.0 with single USB C input. I am using 100 W type C cable, So need some comparison planning to switch Anker Prime 100W, not sure whether it supports Samsung 2.0 Super Fast charging. Please let us know your thought's.
This Anker charger doesn't have PPS protocol/mode. So this can't do "Samsung super fast charge 2.0". You need a charger that supports PD 3.0 PPS upto 20V and a 5A cable. For example AOHI 100w or 140w charger both can do super fast charge 2.0
Thanks for the review. Which one do you recommend a 120w 737 model or this one. The 737 model has some heating issues? Will it be the same in this one.
This new charger is already better than the 120W 737 just due to its smaller size. Also, the USB-A port in the new 100W charger is included in the dynamic power distribution. That means, that you will no longer have 2 devices slow-charging and 1 fast-charging in 3-port charging mode. Previously you could only have 24 watts split between Type-C 2 and USB-A port. Now there’s no such limitation.
