Тёмный

Review: Serpent and Peacock Tarot 

Tom Benjamin
Подписаться 10 тыс.
Просмотров 902
50% 1

www.serpentand...
(There’s a smaller, less expensive version that comes in a tin without the extra cards: www.serpentand... )
Buy me a coffee: www.buymeacoff...
Find me, have a reading, get my books: www.tombenjami...

Опубликовано:

 

4 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 10   
@hradecky9855
@hradecky9855 Год назад
I got this version directly from the creator and as a "recovering catholic" I cannot agree more that this is some of the most well curated religious snark FOR ME and I am enjoying it very much. Quality is better than I thought and I am 100% behind the way the art has been chopped, as if we sneakily noticed in the corner of a revered religious work that "something isn't quite perfect here" and that brings me much healing joy.
@1976mcfarlane
@1976mcfarlane Год назад
I'm loving this deck. It shuffles like butter. Such a nice experience all the way around . I was a little worried with the finish but it's shuffles great. Looks so good too. Kick ass art
@toadstooltarot
@toadstooltarot Год назад
I owned the earlier edition but passed it on. While I liked the unusual source material and borders, the cards seemed to have a slightly cold blue cast over them and the resolution was a tad fuzzy. I like that this edition has tweaked the color palette such that the images seem warmer, but enlarging the borderless images doesn't appear to have helped in sharpening their resolution. And while some of these images retain satisfying borders, others seem randomly cropped in a haphazard manner making me think of classic art in history books with zoom-in details and leaving me wondering what elements I'm missing out on seeing from the original full paintings. While these images do intrigue me, I feel like Kat Black's Golden Tarot does a much better job at collaging history in a more refined manner.
@shelbygivens1648
@shelbygivens1648 Год назад
Hey Tom!! Yes, this deck had a first edition with borders same book and it came in a printed tin. I just love it. U fortunately I missed the kickstarter. If you'd wanna trade , since you like borders haha let me know
@tamipie
@tamipie Год назад
Always here for a deck with TB... I don't love this layed out, but your right the weirdness is fascinating. 😮
@SanskritBlue
@SanskritBlue Год назад
I’m totally with you on the train wreck of weirdness that is medieval era art. I have been watching multiple walk-thrus and unboxings of this one by various people, and I’m probably going to have to break down and get it. I want to geek on the source art and it’s relevance to the cards, but I will also probably read with it. 😈
@AuntyKsTarot
@AuntyKsTarot Год назад
The weirdness is fascinating
@deepdeserttarot
@deepdeserttarot Год назад
SO “wonkily charming”! 💯
@SalemElectro7
@SalemElectro7 Год назад
I backed this deck. I love the weird art of these few hundred years. I knew I liked the deck, but I’m glad I waited for the borderless edition. I ended up loving this deck. It reads surprisingly well. I really only use it for myself, but I’ve read for 2 of my friends with it and it gave some really interesting readings. I feel we always need more whimsy in life and this deck def serves. I try to just take it as kind of a surrealist vibe- while I realize it is a completely different era and style of art…the lack of diversity is with a grain of salt since white European was the artwork en mass that the creator had to choose from. Overall I very much like it. My main decks I use are queer, so this is just for fun. I hope you have fun playing with it. Thanks for sharing with us 😊
@weststartarot-Liz
@weststartarot-Liz Год назад
Wow what a bizarre deck…..
Далее
🦊🔥
00:16
Просмотров 789 тыс.
Thoth Girl Summer?
30:20
Просмотров 576
Navigator's Tarot of the Mystic SEA (Deck Review)
47:21
Review (and ramble): Supernova Tarot
22:25
Просмотров 725
WMW: Am I Cursed?
18:51
Просмотров 471
Reading Pips v. RWS
39:31
Просмотров 799
🦊🔥
00:16
Просмотров 789 тыс.