You're free to travel - by bus by train by horse by foot. BUT - if you travel in a vehicle powered by an engine you need a licence and insurance to travel that way. 🙄. How hard is that to understand.
are you aware of the lawful definition of 'traveling' and 'driving'? One is a right and one is a privilege. Should we also have to have a license and insurance for all of our other rights??
I have a friend in Kansas who has done this for twenty years, after he won in court they are always instructed to let him go because he knows his rights and the law
Really, than why doesn’t everyone do it?? Find it hard to believe that cops would just let someone go. Bet he didn’t win any court case. The law is pretty set when it comes to having a license, registration & insurance.
@@cubuff2647 just dont CONTRACT with DMV corporation, which is the company that claims to have a monopoly on the rds. Which of course they do not. Through out time we the people have been convinced of things being truth when they are not. When LIES are repeated over and over again and backed with force they easily become known as truth. QUESTION EVERYTHING!!
@@georgiagirl1961 😂😂😂 you’d better research your information on “sovereign citizens “. Many fools have been put into jail thinking they don’t have to abide by state laws.
@@lawofliberty3517 It's disrespectful to not have insurance, if he causes an accident and is at fault, guess who pays the medical bills, and replaces the vehicle? Hint: Not him.
@@yourface3154 A judge would throw the book at that dude, if he was at fault and caused injury. They love these kinds of cases. My sister was hit by a sovereign citizen with no insurance. Let’s just say she did very well in that case. I see him occasionally and he walks now and he currently resides in a tent. One stupid accident caused him to lose everything. Because he thought he didn’t need insurance. Typically the sovereign citizens are already completely broke and own nothing of value but this guy was a deviation from the norm. Well… he WAS a deviation from the norm. 😂 I don’t feel bad for the guy tho. He made the choice to drive intoxicated and injure my sister. He deserves what he got.
@@yourface3154 actually, he is held accountable. Plus I carry insurance because of other people, uninsured motorist. If he causes harm his pay checks will can be garnished
It says nothing about the right to drive a car in the Constitution. What you're reading is case law based on supreme Court Justice interpretation of the Constitution. And for the record, no one is reading the law correctly. It simply states that everyone is to be treated equally with regards to travel.
@@Tim_ra they "interpret" the law as they see fit, example Roe v Wade, it was the law of the land, until some other asshole decided he was going reinterpret the law his way, and like that women lost the right to choose cause he didn't want them to be able to choose. If you are male you have no say in the law regarding women, but thousands of men celebrated they have the right to control women. Ain't nothing in the Constitution that gives men that right either. But yet men get to control women cause the state rights says they can. Now is that fair?
What do these law breakers have to do to get their illegal vehicles off the street? It's often these kind of drivers who commit accidents and flee the scene.
So in a nutshell, it's your agenda-free community members that you're antagonistic towards, and not the people taking your money to DELIBERATELY oppress you that are the problem??
Should have liability on all your guns too right? And the dog in case the dog bites someone. And health insurance. And if you didn't buy insurance you should get fined. How far you wanna go
I live on my family's 6000 acre farm and drive everything from from grain trucks, tractors, to 4 weelers and semi's. Havn't had a license since 1989 and had several stops by law enforcement and as long as I stay on the travels between fields I am left alone.
Prison for no insurance? No. A private man/woman, takes on all liability. So if they harm someone, they make it right. Unlike children/citizens, who refuse to take responsibility and get insurance.
@@Saltfly It's called, you hit someone, you make it better. No prison needed unless it's intentional. I'd say it's safe to assume most accidents are not intentional and therefor not a crime.
@@axelfoley20you make it right? How you gonna do that if you injury someone bad enough where medical bills alone will bankrupt most people. Nevermind paying for property damages and then some. Good luck making all that right without insurance or any help.
I got no license, no insurance, no inspection sticker, no plates on the car, broke-ass windshield, no rear view mirrors, bald tires and two bodies in the trunk. I'm living the dream as a private man in my private property goin' to jail.
Buddy go online and order yourself a set of private plates.. Go on a site and make your own... all they need to sat is Private,Ucc-308 and Not for hire. Now your all set. Cops can not pull you over or tow your car . Because they can only deal with the PUBLIC and as soon as you take those PUBLIC plates off that the state gives you and then put on plates now also confirming that this is a private automobile , the ucc is to reserve your rights and the not for hire means well your not looking to be hired by anyone to "DRIVE" them around. Nor are you looking to be hired to play a role in one of there "Acts" .
DMV privately owned companies traded on the stock market not apart of the government. No one needs to a driver license! Congress has ruled it. Violation of the Fourth amendment
And violation of US code 18 subsection 31 #6 and 10. Not sure about the ruling, but it does violate 4th amendment and article 6 clause 2 of the US constitution.
Just cuz he didn't have a Florida License doesn't mean he isn't licensed in another state This video is a joke You must have a license (from any state) and insurance I'm calling BS on video
- *THEY* approached *HIM* (as you would do to a complete stranger) - *THEY* pryed into *HIS* private life (as you would do to a complete stranger) - *THEY* demand payment from *HIM* in order to inconvenience him (as you would do to a complete stranger) - *THEY* do as other _people_ tell them to put *HIM* through (can you guess what I'm going to write in these parentheses??) This tells you exactly what I think of you and the people you "don't see a problem with". Like something I trod in on the pavement.
I see now, IF, he was on private property, they have no business there. However, if he was on a public roadway, lack of registration IS probable cause for the stop. Driving without a license is an arrestable offense as the officer can be held liable for any damage or injuries he may cause if they allow him to continue. They can't just leave the vehicle on the right of way. It has to be towed or he can use them for leaving it to be burglarized. Traveling TO his private property cannot be done legally on a public roadway. There's more to consider than what he's showing us.
@Justus Forrester where does it say you have a right to a car, a horse , a plane, a boat , a train ? Which part of the constitution states that? . Can you lose your ability to drive by law?
@@mirov7786 They still could not touch it. They can only touch /interact with with what they own. Which is anything considered to be part of the public. Its all very simple.
@@mirov7786 I know your just trying to be a smart ass which is all good yet at the end of the day i just want people to know who they are and the rights they have. No i myself of anyone i know has not ever parked there car in the middle of the road. Yet for an example a friend of mine did have there car brake down on the highway, they were broke and could not afford to get the alternator at the moment. Long story short the car ended up staying there for over a week. After a lil more then a week he had the money and bought the alternator. I ended up taking him there to put it in and get it out of there. When we get there there were two business cards. One from the state police and one from a towing company. With a note on the back saying that they understand the car most likely broke down but they would really like to remove it from the side of the road and that the tow company was willing to tow the car to wherever needed and would just give him a bill if he did not have the money at the time...Now if this car did not have private plates on it and instead had the states public plates on it the car would have been gone and put into the impound the day it broke down...
This guy if this is him ! He’s a smart dude ! The things he knows will blow your fkn minds ! He stated he’s a private man travelling in his own private property! Which he is simply stating that he’s a free man ❤
@Cha' Lee Chan the cops didn't make the law. That law was put in place to protect the rights of others. I don't want someone who can't pass a driving test, possibly endangering my life.
This is another thing that shouldn't be allowed to happen on the streets roads and highways of any states. Because when this idiot has a wreck destroying others property. Just how is he planning on paying for the other's property? Because this will cause the other persons insurance to half to pay for uninsured motorists. And which will cause your insurance to go up and have a wreck on your license. So no this man shouldn't be allowed to do this without going to jail are at least pay fine and impound his car until he has license tags and insurance.
Are you okay with emailing me? I want to talk about something privately, but if you’re uncomfortable with emailing, I have a NON-email option you can consider.
Are you okay with emailing me? I want to talk about something privately, but if you’re uncomfortable with emailing, I have a NON-email option you can consider.
I can tell you how it went for him, he didn’t drive away on his own… he would like for you to think that he did, but if what he says is true no license no insurance… He most certainly did not drive away, he was driven away but he did not drive away
Holy moly I knew that was you when I heard your voice and said Levi, I double checked your page and was right….It’s Les btw…and kudos on schooling the law
@@Will_JC yes cars are incredibly dangerous and there are rules drivers have to prove to be proficient in following to get a license that mitigate the risks associated with driving a car in terms of registration I feel a little less strong in support but one of the parts of getting a car registered is an inspection to ensure that the vehicle is safe to drive not only for your own safety but mostly for the safety of other drivers random innocent people that could suffer harm due to your rusted piece of shit car snapping in half in the middle of the road and causing an accident this isn’t a tyrannical government trying to control you it’s a government looking out for the safety of its citizens for the same reason it’s illegal to drive ur car or a motorcycle on a sidewalk it’s illegal to drive unlicensed, unregistered, and uninsured because it’s incredibly dangerous and you can seriously harm someone
@Joan Your comment is confusing. Do you support the claim that a man is obligated to have a license or registration in order to use a car on the roads?
@jerryallman Are you okay with emailing me? I want to talk about something privately, but if you’re uncomfortable with emailing, I have a NON-email option you can consider.
Might not be a contract but there are laws. Thomas Jefferson said, “Ignorance of the law is no excuse in any country. If it were, the laws would lose their effect, because it can always be pretended.”
If you drive on city property and live in the city and use city water. That’s called a citizen. And you’re required to obey the traffic laws and pay taxes for living there
What he says is true. But they don't want people to know. I know someone who gets tickets takes them to court and they clear the courtroom every time. Hear his case and dismiss the tickets. They don't know people to hear what's being told. It's all alot of money
The man is probably a lawyer it's known as being a sovereign citizen and that's what they are hiding in courtroom and don't want you too know ,but you better be a lawyer when you try it.
Lol.. my stepdad was arrested in Miami for Failing sobriety test and I had no license. Cops asked if I knew how to drive, and then told me to go home and drive safe.
I was stopped by Tulsa Police. The first thing I asked "Was I speeding?". I was driving a wheelchair which would only go 5 mph and had a 100 pound lab (Service Dog) running beside me. They said I was banned from the store property and I knew it. I informed them that they had the wrong person. They told me to get off the property and not come back. I started home with them watching. I went part way home and turned around. As I went by them I waved and went into the store. The police were stunned and just watched me go by. I told the manager what had happened and he said you don't look anything like that woman. I was friends with the manager. He couldn't believe they stopped me.
Are you okay with emailing me? I want to talk about something privately, but if you’re uncomfortable with emailing, I have a NON-email option you can consider.
@@FazetarezThe U.S.Constitution does recognize the right to travel, but this right is generally understood as the ability to move freely between states or within a state, not the unrestricted right to operate a motor vehicle without a license or registration. Courts have consistently ruled that while you have the right to travel, states have the authority to regulate the means by which you travel, including requiring driver's licenses, vehicle registration, and insurance,
I don't care what kind of bullsht clickbait is being created but you will not leave a traffic stop without proof of insurance? Your Private property is required to be insured if you plan on being on a public road! I call bullsht because old Levi failed to post the whole encounter?
Yes he is in the State of Florida to operate a motor vehicle you're required to have a driver's license and liability insurance if you're a passenger you have the right to travel. By boat by bus by air by horse by carriage but not by driving anything more than 49cc. On the public roadways this protects the public and yourself.
You're correct, you don't need a license to drive on your private property or someone else's private property with their permission. Once you get on that public road, it's a whole different story.
Your comment is confusing. Are you trying to be sarcastic? Do you support the claim that a man is obligated to have a license or registration to use a car on the roads?
I tried that whole natural law, private citizen, private property stuff once. With the Kent county sheriff. They kicked the dog shit out of me. When I woke up, I was in a jail cell surrounded by murderers rapists and politicians.
If you currently have a DL you have to notify the DMV that you are returning your license in good order and make sure you let them know it is not to be suspended and you want a receipt to reflect that. There are videos on YT tube here to assist in accomplishing that. Do your research and act accordingly. Peace!
@@Will_JC only on private roads i don't want any jackass who can't drive proper crashing into me that's why you need a license to make sure people know how to drive how would you get rid of drunk drivers if there was no license?
Uhm, if he ever got put in jail for this stop, he could and would have sued the police department for thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, there is no law on private property, he is not 'driving' but travelling, he is not a commercial unit.
@@whatislifebro actually you're very wrong, they are plenty of videos with "sovereign citizens" getting owned. Notice you never saw the end of this guy's video? Lol why? Cause he got owned.
I'm still waiting on a court case that actually backs up what they say. Every court case that has been cited by sovereign citizens or people who think they don't need a license, insurance, or registration to operate a vehicle on the road has actually said the opposite of what they claim. They will cherry-pick something in it that talks about freedom of travel on public roads which is true, but ignore the other part that says that the state has policing power to regulate the use of automobiles on public roads for the sake of public safety. It being a right means that the state can't deny or revoke your license without due process.
Allegedly, if you never get an ID or any type of legal document to drive, it’s legal 🤷🏾♂️ 🧐 as soon as you acquire a drivers license. Now you have to go by the rules like everybody else.
I'm glad someone pointed this out. She said it so fast that it was clear as day that she was not genuine and was just trying to gain his trust in some respect
Yall need to start doing your due diligence and realize all crimes are commercial. You DO NOT NEED A DRIVERS LICENSE TO DRIVE. YOU ONLY NEED A DRIVERS LICENSE IF YOU’RE DOING COMMERCE
Osmosis, are you okay with emailing me? I want to talk about something privately, but if you’re uncomfortable with emailing, I have a NON-email option you can consider.
4 tickets , impound the car . Period. He is a danger to the public . If he has an accident and seriously hurts another civilian. They will have no recourse of action . And the person doing the right thing gets screwed again.
@@bryanbradley3609 sure. If you want to walk around , go right ahead. If your diving a MV on public roads you get a license registration and insurance. It’s part of the social contract. So twits like him don’t injure others and they have no recourse.
@@crena64 traveling within the continental United States of America is a right not a privilege. As long as its not commercial transportation equipment or products.
Are you okay with emailing me? I want to talk about something privately, but if you’re uncomfortable with emailing, I have a NON-email option you can consider.
@@Will_JC I think the law isfir money and that all. No. We shouldn't have all those road laws as we do. Yes tge ones to help curve people pulling out or making turns. But the speed traps is for money. Many of the locations the speed is a trap. We're u love the road speed is what was approved in the 30. I'm in a 55 zone, it is hard to drive 50 to 55 only when there you could drive 70 safely
Thank you, FINALLY someone who is smart enough to challenge the laws surrounding "you need an I.d. to travel" the right to travel shall not be infringed! Nor should its methods or accommodation... Wake the fuck up people.
Driving a car is a privilege, not a right. You are free to travel. But anything motorized you need license and ins. It's sad you don't mind looking stupid to make an invalid point
Driving a car is a privilege how? And a privilege authorized by who? We pay for the roads. We pay for the cars. We pay for the govt. Why is it just a privilege? You are just repeating a saying you heard and vaguely agree with. Insurance maybe. But licenses shouldn't be required and courts shouldn't be able to suspend your right to drive/travel.
@@erichokhold8459 dude are you really that fucking stupid??? Everybody has a right to walk or ride a horse or a bike. But driving a car is totally a privilege. Everyone on here complaining or thinking any other way has a closed mindset. You let those liberals in Washington brain wash you. I hope one day you will open your eyes and understand how life works. But as long as you are a puppet on a string, there is no getting through to you. But don't worry we are all just laughing at you. Get in a wreck or break a traffic law and see how far being a Sovereign citizen with no license or ins gets you
@Will JC No. I'm saying that as a private person, traveling on his own property, shouldn't be required to have a license, or insurance if he owns the vehicle free and clear.
@@johnnelson9063 Are you okay with emailing me? I want to talk about something privately, but if you’re uncomfortable with emailing, I have a NON-email option you can consider.
You are only legally required to have “said documents” on Federal highways. Not on notate or county roads. Pity more people don’t actually know the laws and their rights.
Your comment is confusing. Do you support the teachings of the user named SovereignLiving? (go watch his videos about “Right to Travel” if you haven’t heard of him before now)
The reason you need a license is because you are required to show understanding of the laws required to drive safely according to the infrastructure put in place by the federal government for military and logistic control of the border and territory. The reason you need registration is because owning and operating a vehicle immediately has the possibility of being a liability and causing externalities not to do intrinsically with self defense or the needs and actions of being alive. You should have insurance, as an ethical concern to take care of possible damages you can't afford done to you, or by you to others so as to affirm that your actions do not leave your life or others negatively affected due to elements beyond one's own control or because of it.
With women officers, you can shut them down if you ask “what time do you get off work? Would you like to go out for a drink?”… basically, be a creeper.
Don’t know what he was pulled for, but I’m guessing he got a ticket, was forced to park the car, and possibly got arrested or they found meth in his pockets
The sovereign citizen game. We are not under that law system! It’s not right that our tax money pays for roads etc. and he drives them for free. He needs to pay his part.
Blessings. I need some assistance in this area please let me know if you have a moment thanks would also love to do an interview on my channel. I have also stated this and shared this info. Live in Florida as well
"The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highway and to transport his property thereon, by horsedrawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another's rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct."
Are you okay with emailing me? I want to talk about something privately, but if you’re uncomfortable with emailing, I have a NON-email option you can consider.
Your comment is confusing. Are you trying to be sarcastic? Do you support the claim that a man is obligated to have a license or registration to use a car on the roads?
Casey, are you okay with emailing me? I want to talk about something privately, but if you’re uncomfortable with emailing, I have a NON-email option you can consider.
Tickets. What he's talking about is from like early 19 hundreds for horse a buggy lol. He's aloud to travel freely just not in a car on roads pay for from tax payers dollars. Ignorant p.o.s
@@brianwaddington46 wrong, right to travel freely extends to private automobiles. You just think you know something that you don't know. Probably repeating what some other dumbass told you.
Bryan, are you okay with emailing me? I want to talk about something privately, but if you’re uncomfortable with emailing, I have a NON-email option you can consider.
Driving, and traveling. There is a legal difference. Anyone who says otherwise, well, is a cop, and cops, don't know the law. Lawyers do. Cops, aren't lawyers.
Imagine this dude hitting and potentially seriously injuring someone with his motor vehicle and he has no license insurance or registration what a great citizen.
He's not a citizen. He's a man. Completely different. And if he does hit somebody or damage occurs, he will settle with them either through court or out of court.
then take him to court and sue him for the damages caused by the accident. It's not impossible you know. How many people pay for insurance for years and never even have to use it? Don't even get a return on premiums not used. I remember back when insurance was not a legal requirement, but voluntary, based on whether a person wanted to reduce their risk of having to pay in case of an at fault accident. Guess who lobbied to make it mandatory...do I really need to tell you?
@@skipprice4376 Are you okay with emailing me? I want to talk about something privately, but if you’re uncomfortable with emailing, I have a NON-email option you can consider.
@@Will_JC I think that we should be allowed but I know it's not allowed... I hate traffic bullshit. I'm 23 and already facing jail time for simply not having insurance. At first was bc of ignorance. But then afterwards it was financial issues 😂 so to be in a position where I could be in jail for driving is ridiculous. It's not too difficult if you get a license as a kid but there's a lot of kids like myself who didnt have parents with license or cars to take you or family that's just absent and in my state the DMV doesn't provide a car you have to provide your own for a test so you have to illegally drive to even get to the point of driving if you have nobody around you that drives and can help you. It's a scam sorry if that was too much
@@HashiramaSells I’m looking for help with something. It’s related to _freedom from government._ I don’t want to talk about it where just anyone can see. So, again, *are you okay with emailing me, or would you prefer a NON-email way for us to talk privately?*
@Gloriah214 I'm in the process of filing conditional exceptance letters to 12 officials involved. I'm LEANING their ( cesti Que vie trust account) held in the Department of Treasury for $6,000,000.00 Each. Under contract, they will owe me lots of money. Violate my rights, and I prove you did . You pay. To much to write concerning traveling Vs. Driving. But I will if you ask.
@andrewperry6991 and it will be thrown out of court as frivolous. Not one person has ever been able to show any of that works in court. SCOTUS who interprets the constitution has stated over 100 years ago that States have the constitutional right to govern their roads by requiring a driver's license and registration for all who drive on public roads in Hendrick V Maryland.
If he has his ducks in a row it definitely worked. I’ve seen it work several times. If you have no contracts with the state there are no contracts to enforce. Period.
@@cbrooks0905 so I guess he didn’t have a birth certificate or social security number. Or any bills in his name. And I guess he doesn’t pay any taxes. Yea you have a right to travel. And yea I have a blacks law dictionary. But to travel in a vehicle is the same as an automobile. I’d have to look up the case law. But yea you need a license. I played this card and the common law card in court. I sited my case law and arguments. I was on my shit. The judge had me taken out of court to make my case go last and then I got two weeks for a mental evaluation under a habeas corpus. In Baltimore city. So I mean if you’re willing to go to jail then go ahead and try. But it didn’t work here or he would have shown it.
@@cbrooks0905 Are you okay with emailing me? I want to talk about something privately, but if you’re uncomfortable with emailing, I have a NON-email option you can consider.
If you think he is in the wrong he isn’t, if your car is for private use and not commercial use your car doesn’t need taxing, but they are not going to tell you that are they, only vehicles used for business should be taxed.
One of our biggest problems is the people that pull us over for not having the right stickers and licenses get paid by the money people pay for stickers and licenses.
Failure to identify especially on traffic stops is extremely childish and insufficient. If you don't like America and the rules you need to abide by, move to the Amazon and try your luck there, you won't be bothered 😉
Well...that's the thing about driving without insurance. If you get into an accident, you should be held responsible to pay off all the expenses of the victim. Even if that includes losing your house and having your wages docked. Is that too harsh? It's not too harsh for those WHO HAVE INSURANCE
Its our constitutional right to travel freely on public roads. If you get that "contract" for the DL or the "contract" for tags on your car.. you are held by the laws of that contract
@@hunterpinson807 you must be a cop or .. please tell me and then i will educate you. Correction, I will try to educate you because when I have written the truth of it on here they delete it.. lol
@@lenalena8675 if you have the right to travel then why is it illegal to walk on the right side of the road? Sound free to you? I’m no cop I just have an actual understanding of law and your view has never held up in courts
@@hunterpinson807well, Im free because God says I am for the most part.. this is "the natural law"..and His law is sanctified by the Constitution. Miranda vs Arizona "Where rights secured by the constitution are involved, there can be no rulemaking or legislation which would abrogate them" Miller vs U.S. "The claim an exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime" Snerer vs Cullen "There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional Rights" Washington vs Port " Licensing cannot be required of free people, because taking on the restrictions of a license requires the surrender of a right. The drivers license can be required of people who use the highways for trade, commerce or hire. If you are not using the highway for profit, you cannot be required to have a drivers license" Justice Tolman of the Supreme Court [II Am.Jur.(1st Constitutional Law, Sect.329,p.1135] Thompson vs Smith The "natural right" of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse drawn carriage, wagon or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but the common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It is one of the most sacred and valuable rights, as sacred as the right to private property... and is regarded as inalienable." This is only the tip of the truth.. it will be deleted lol
As an American citizen I did look into " sovereign citizen" outlook and interpretation of laws but came to the conclusion unless We the People come together and change these laws and the practice of said laws we cannot without being arrested and convicted conduct something as simple as traveling. Contact your congressman
I don't have insurance on my home or rental either, I owe à bunch on em so theirs no equity to steal and the mobile homes have no sale value because the law doesn't allow old mobiles to be transported on the roads
I live in Florida I'm pretty sure the only traveling Hugh did was to a local County Jail you know what they say come to Florida on vacation go home on probation
