I have rented a 2016 Verano for the last 10 days and I am REALLY impressed with it. It is VERY quiet/comfortable with a great ride and it handles surprisingly well. It handles like a smaller car but rides like a much larger one.
I'm one of those customers, too. Former BMW owner, now Buick Regal. And my younger sister traded in a 2012 Chrysler 200 (couldn't stand it for very long) for a Buick Verano. So yep, you're right on!
This is what we need in the US. More small cars that don't skimp on refinement, comfort, and luxury amenities. If they offered the Verano in a wagon form I'd really be in heaven.
1) Buick started the whole GM conglomerate 2) Pontiac had one model that was completely its own. Yes buick used platforms and interiors but you can switch out most of the body panels on the G3, G5, some of the G6 and the torrent, the solstice was just a sky. Plus they were having trouble moving the pontiacs out of the showrooms. Buicks were moving....mainly the Enclave but still sales numbers speak for themselves. Also buicks sell really well in china.
Agreed, remember back in the 80's and 90's when the 3.8 V6's at 165 and 170 HP were considered great for hauling around the full-size GM's? I'd say 180HP in a 2.4 I-4, naturally aspirated, is pretty impressive.
Right, I just looked back at an order guide for the 2013 models and under standard equipment the back up cam is on for the Verano while only optional on the Cruze and Intelilink is standard on the Verano. Guess thats one big differentiator between Chevy and Buick with how they package their vehicles. Also helps to cut the cost incase someone doesn't want the Chevy MyLink system in their car, so not forced to have it.
My aunt is thinking about getting this vehicle. And with her being elderly she feels it's time to trade in her 2001 Toyota Avalon for something smaller and more fuel-efficient. And i think this Verano will fit the ticket nicely. I'm quite impressed with this vehicle kudos Buick.
I bought a 2016 Verano back in Oct 2018, I like it, was looking for a used Cadillac ATS and couldn't find what I was looking for at my price range so I started looking at the Buick Verano, car is nice, does well on the freeway , I have taken it on 3 trips already Yosemite , Palm Springs, and Grants Pass Oregon and it did well, rides well for a smaller car. Mine is kind of loaded, no leather, but it has heated seats, navagation, blue tooth, and backup camera , found a it used with 20K on it and a great price
Good review, its a very nice driving car and one to really consider, though not as effecient as a Cruze it is still good at being over 30 mpg. Even with everyone harping about that magic 40 mark, I'd like to see a comparison of this and the ILX that is coming out.
I think you're right. The Cruze is mainly a city commuter vehicle; the back-up cam will be there if the car has Chevy's MyLink similar to Buick's IntelliLink. And I emphasize the word IF.
There is back-up sensors in this vehicles. My dad said that he's test-driven a vehicle with a back-up camera, and felt that the image from the camera was inaccurate. Remember, that's his opinion. Every other driver has different opinions as well. To me, only vehicles with high beltlines or longer vehicles like an SUV or minivan are the ones best suited for a back-up camera.
The turbo model is coming in fall 2012, with a manual transmission. Times are changing my friend, and Buick is going to be at the front of the pack. Have lingenfelter breathe on that 2.0 turbo and you'll have all the power you could want in a 3300 pound car.
Your comment is right on the money ... I don't understand why it's been thumbed down so many times. This is exactly what's going on with GM. Despite making truly better cars, there's still way too much of the old thinking there. This car and it's sister the Cruze remind me of the Buick Skyhawk and Chevy Cavalier ... brand engineering at it's worst and what started the downfall of GM.
Found from Motor Trend that a rear-view camera will come in all 2013 models. Don't know if they're standard or optional (most car makers will need a navigation system/touch screen radio to make it standard).
Its more likely that the back up cam will be standard on Verano and only optional on the Cruze since Verano comes standard with the 7 inch touch screen already.
Price and gas mileage numbers are good. A paddle shift could fix the transmission and make it a bit more sporty. Can't say I like the angry old man face on the back end. Reminds me to much of the previous market for this badge.
GM needs to bring back the Astra to the US. Maybe they should sell it under the Buick this time? That will definitely encourage more younger buyers to the nameplate...
The only reason I see for it is just to get an extra shot of looking out back. It does have a high decklid to it. But I do agree to have a back up camera on such a small car seems a bit off.
Yea about 30% of the customers are over 50, but the rest of them are all middle aged between 30-40 looking at cars like the Verano, Regal, and Lacrosse. Last month we sold the largest number of Buicks in our area.
I don't think it is. I sat in one and it felt very comfortable. Next move, take a test drive. Sure, it may be dismissed as a fancy Chevy Cruze, but I never felt it. It felt significantly bigger when I sat in the rear seat. Also, its powertrain? Similar to the Chevy Equinox/GMC Terrain; almost matching its hp (180 hp). Not the 1.4L Turbo or 1.8L Naturally aspirated that the Cruze has. And if you need more power? 2.0L Turbo comes in 2013 with 220 hp similar to the Buick Regal turbo.
Isn't this based on the Opel Astra, not the Cruze? Because the Cruze is based on the Astra, and the Verano interior design and side profile looks identical to the Astra.
You own one today I do its my first car I freaking love it and everyone else who buys the so called Cruze look alike. The person who is running GM isn't anyone you know, so if you dislikee GM so bad why in the world you watched this video.I'am no drone by the way.
Terrible blind spots. That's why they're putting backup cameras on small cars. Even the Kia Rio has one now. The keep make the butts taller and the c-pillars thicker. Can see sheet back up.
Love how they think this is good MPG. In 2000 my then new 3.4 V6 Impala with more horse power with a 4 spd tranny got the same MPG and could hold 6 people and 18 CU FT Of Luggage. So, tell me where is the 12 years of advancement here in the MPG?
Affirmative, except for the front and rear Buick identity, it is the twin of the Opel Astra J Sedan (P10) and of course shares the GM Delta II platform with the Chevrolet Cruze (J300). It debuted in Saint Petersburg, Russia in 2012, taking advantage of the Astra J's mid-commercial facelift of the same year. In China, its main market, it was marketed under the Buick brand as the Excelle GT.
Look here that's your opinion GM has been loyal to me since I was young. Pontiac I really miss but you got to get over it, Buick, Caddy, Chevy, and GMC are here to stay. It's a different time now so stop looking back into the past and prepare for the furture.
Corvette King well said i own a 2014 buick verano nice cars also have a firebird wouldnt trade that for anything also have a german car i cant wait to get rid of
That 2012 seems a bit slow, I have the 2016 version which included the backup camera and sensors that alert of someone behind you, and sunroof the seats got better as well as the 0-60 is said to be around 7.5 8.0 and my engine sounds very quiet , great car of course they pulled it off the market, grr
@@analystzorncasteel3047 weather air temperature and how I've been driving plays a big role I'd say some days its 8.5 others not even close to that long , i know that's what GM specks are but GM specks aren't end all be all, other sights have it at 7.5 sec which isn't fast
I personal own this vehicle and I will tell you, it is a luxury version of the cruze. This vehicle is not any faster or better performing. The motor is bigger but because it has all this sound absorbing material (increasing curb weight) it evens out. However, If you want to change this vehicles characteristics put a K&N air fitler and 89octane this will totally change the engine performance. Night and Day!
I doubt an air filter would change much, especially on a modern vehicle. As for octane, if you read the owner's manual, you're supposed to use 87 or higher. And if you know anything about gas, you're better off using the lowest you can. Which in this case is 87.
What a stupid financial plan. Who spends $25,000 to save a couple hundred of bucks a year in fuel when the other car is already bought and paid for? While she is at it, maybe she should buy a bridge to save on tolls?
Yeah. When Marry Barra of GM decided to sell the EU division Opel. Unfortunately that was the end of GM in EU. Their last car was the 2017 Opel Insignia/Buick Regal. Then the plug was pulled for good.
Easy. Pontiac sales were down, right along with Oldsmobile. Buick sales were higher. And with their new product line, Buick sales have been going through the roof since 2010. And in China, Buick is the cash cow for GM. GM would've made a terrible business move killing off Buick.
V6, but still, that car just didn't suit her at all. And the V6 was ridiculous. Plenty of power indeed. It was like stuffing a V8 into a riding lawn mower. Some people, I'm sure, find that appealing. I didn't. Neither did she. The I4 in the Verano has the right amount of thrust. Very punchy. The 200, it was like you jumped off the line, torque steer and all, and had to take care not to wipe out pedestrians, the cars in front at a stop light, or ruin tires. And the 4 in the 200 is AWEFUL!
I haven't driven one of these but I've heard good things about them. I HAVE driven an ILX, this car's main competitor supposedly, and that thing is the worst piece of garbage I have driven in years. Noisy, underpowered, and not much room inside (I was scraping the headliner). It does look better than the Verano, but that's not enough to choose one.
I was in the Market for a used mid sized sedan and tried out ILX with only 15k on it, it was terrible. The ride was very stiff and the car was so underpowered for a 2.4. The ride felt cheap, felt the road and bumps something awful. I wonder how anyone ever bought it . The engine struggled to rev.
As a former Pontiac owner, I just dont see what is appealing about this car. It means to me that GM just polished up its act a little, it just shined it up. A "sporty" Buick is this: a nerd in a bandana with shades is a nerd just the same. What I have been trying to say is that Buick can't escape what it is in the same way GM can't escape that it sacrificed loyal owners for any semblance of profitability.
I've honestly never seen one of these that wasn't part of a rental car Fleet. Aside from the Chevrolet Cruze being one of the most unreliable pieces of garbage I guess there were not enough of these sold two of established its own reliability record? Who the hell would pay in the mid-to-upper 20s to buy something like this who's resale value is inevitably going to sink faster than the Titanic? Well I guess an answer to that question not many people did which is why this was one of the biggest Automotive flops.
Oh, I do. I just don't subscribe to GM touting this car as anything but what it is. It's only #1 because there is a huge number of passionless drones who drive. Who do you think is running the company now, anyway?
No selling points really? Fully loaded for under 30k with heated steering wheel, seats, navigation, and passive entry. If you can find another car like that I will gladly kiss you on the mouth, tounge or no tounge its your choice. And the majority of customers car trading in BMWs, Audis, and Honda/Acura cars for this one.
I watched it because i used to be blindly loyal to GM. Not anymore and not in its current state. I didnt say u were a drone. When i said passionless drone i referred to the vermin in suits who run the company 'cause i'm sure they drive.
Cash cow or not, this is why GM has no right to ask for another bailout. an overpriced, tarted-up, hideous-looking Chevy Cruze clone doesn't sound like a resurgence to me. The "new GM" is this: Chevy- What the company revolves around Cadillac- Earning every opportunity to become more respectable within the industry Buick- Gets all the crappy FWD cars GMC- Money pit which is nothing more than a trim level of Chevy
