Robbie Williams Dishes Dirt On Celebrity Fights | OTE Podcast  

Feb 13th 1974- now

1997 - 2000

1851-1861

Probably when I was in the UK 98-99 it's really when I had much more exposure to him.

Now. the 🎁 This!

Debbie go look up Robbie Williams Graham Norton Hand Job, hes the best story teller

same!

Angels. And feel! Listen to those !

@@preesi1403 Pressi, I Googled the story. I shouldn't laugh at this but I did. Obviously he is has humor, ability to engage others in his stories and added music talent!

@@AndrewGold1 I am listening to his music right now. I have heard some of these songs before but just did not know who was the artist. His music is awesome and I do love the Angels!

book and look, i noticed too haha

time to get into his music now :D

Musically I've always put him on par with Morrissey

Me too ❤️❤️❤️

He’s the best !

Thanks Roxy! Was so lucky to get to talk to him

Me too 😊

Thanks ! I love him too!!

i loved that bit!

I have to say Robert and Gabor Mate have given me many insights into my addictions and my PTSD over the years an the way my personality (ego) developed. I have videos and documented my addiction in 5 minute sessions over days and months the last year and believe me at 60 years of age it is not pretty at all. When I am in full recovery I am going to make one video exposing everything an addict goes through. The thoughts and resistance to getting well. If one person can get help that will be great. My next and fourth rehab will be my last

Thanks tezzy!!

I agree Tezzy. He is refreshing. I think he has a rich inner world, curious about others and humble as you noticed. Someone that has learned from his life mistakes.

So glad!

Glad you liked it! Give him a go on Spotify!

@On the Edge with Andrew Gold Exactly. He is amazing. But I'm also Danish and wherever he puts on a show, he is sold out and he is loved by so many here.

Ah fantastic thank you Jem!

At least 10 rounds..

Thanks!!

Hahaha

Haha love it

Glad you enjoyed it

@@AndrewGold1 I found you a couple of months ago and I have been watching your videos. You have a really good channel , just wanted to say. 😎

@@ophelia93 Aw thank you! :)

Phew !!

Interesting ! Will look them up. And yes , I love Shaun !

Hello to you in Hatfield down the road !

You’re

It’s great. No Regrets is my favourite remaster

Booo!

I am praying he finds the truth: Jesus❤

He does look like an old Moz, lol

Stewart Lee’s let himself go

Excellent

Romain, what are you talking about, it's an interview with singer Robbie Williams. What did I say that was Right Wing?

@@AndrewGold1 It's not about this interview, sorry if it's confusing, it's something I have observed in some of your videos and could have given specific feedback where it is relevant. And I will, I owe you that. I wanted to draw attention to the fact that in my opinion it is very hard to avoid, I would include myself if I was in the same position as you. I'll give you 3 examples: - complaining about virtue signalling is a rehashed argument from the Right. The Right being outraged at the use of pronouns, or being passionate about Pro-life (or anything for that matter), can also be accused of virtue signalling. For them, what they stand for is virtue, and they are signalling it. There isn’t a way to know what someone’s true intentions are when they express an opinion. Assuming it’s for wrong reasons, only when it’s the Left, is sliding towards the Right. - Then there’s Jordan Peterson case. I admire the story of this ex Muslim lady, I truly do, for all the courage that she showed. I wish her well too. But it doesn’t prevent her from being very conservative, and that’s often the case with people who have been involved in extremism (but not always). Jordan Peterson is a very controversial figure who is considered Right wing extremist, with very strong opinions against the Left. He can suggest accusions of someone being interested in child porn in a Tweet without the hint of a proof, just because it’s someone who he opposes politically. The fact that you don’t push back, well it may not be your role, but it feels like (and that’s the risk) you would agree more and more with these people the more you get close to them (because there’s a personal relation, and empathy for these people). Their discourse gets normalised (for you, for me, for any viewer) - Now JK Rowling, same thing. She may not be an extremist, but her views are directly affecting a minority, a group of people.

@@WoodyGamesUK I think you're confusing Left and Right with Authoritarian vs Libertarian. You can be either of the latter on the Left or Right. I lean Left for policies such as abortion, drugs, prison, lgb, and most importantly to the position relatively high taxes on the rich. I also lean a little libertarian. It means I'm not about to tell women they must be forced to accept certain ideologies that come from magical thinking and pseudoscience. But mostly, it means I welcome people with different views from mine. The Authoritarian Left and Right have done equally awful things (without realising they were doing wrong) over the centuries - but centrists and moderate libertarians have not. When you find yourself equating JK Rowling with the Right...one of the boldest, most Left Wing champions of minorities in modern times, then it might suggest your own place on the spectrum is out of whack. I'd imagine that'd be hard for you to see right now though. But really, I'm very much in the centre. I would warn you to be careful, because suggesting that anyone who agrees with certain elements accepted on the Right IS right-wing inspires bigoted and prejudiced thinking. Virtue signalling obviously happens - we all engage in it. We just disagree about the degree to which it is happening. I'd conclude by just saying, I've certainly not gotten 'more' Right Wing. In fact, although I've always been centre-left, when I started this podcast a few years ago, I was far more persuaded by some of those things you don't like than I am now. You're probably referring to some of my older videos.

@@AndrewGold1 I didn’t say that agreeing with anything from the Right is bigoted or prejudiced. I only mentioned elements that I find disturbing, that are very divisive and cause harm to groups of people who already have had prejudice against them historically. I wouldn’t have bothered otherwise. JK Rowling, I can see her as a feminist figure who did a lot of good, and still think that she’s causing a lot of harm with her transgender comments. People who are affected are the ones who should say whether this is the case. You may say that not all of them are against JK Rowling’s views, but what about the ones who are, are they all "out of whack"? Virtue signalling happens, to what degree, and who is doing it, we don’t know. My point isn’t to dispute that. My issue is with the Right using it as an argument to discredit any criticism from the Left, by casting doubt on the person’s true motives, and moral standards in general, which has the power to dismiss anything they are being criticised for (if one is willing to adopt it). It’s a flawed argument, and if you are willing to reuse it at every opportunity, then you shouldn’t be surprised to be called out. Authoritarian ideologies, historically, go hand in hand with extremes, but the point of having a strong political identity (for a person, or a government) isn’t to impose them by way of dictature, it is to push for what they consider to be the most effective for the good of the people they represent, and based on what they consider the most desirable in a society (education, living standard, technological progress, environment…), which is subjective and part of the ideology itself. Having a strong ideology that is Left or Right has nothing to do with being authoritarian. In fact the fight against authoritarianism should be a core element of policies even when they are leaning away from the center. Of course certain ideologies have the cult of the leader baked into the ideology itself, or a nationalism or racism that cannot be separated from the ideology. This has to be fought against, always, at any cost. I don’t think it’s a healthy strategy to accuse the other person of “confusing” things like Left and Right with Authoritarian vs Libertarian. I am not trying to lecture you on anything, or educate you. Just taking issue on some things that you have expressed. All I have mentioned in my examples, are things that are very commonly expressed by the Right, and that I find troublesome (not that I find everything from the Right troublesome). JK Rowling including. It doesn’t matter if she’s left wing, what she says today about transgenders (specifically) is typically adopted by the Right today. Eventually I suggested (accuse, you may say) you of sliding towards the Right, and I still think you cannot be aware of the process of ideas become more normal, or at odds with yourself, even though I admit that the process is fluid and doesn’t go in one direction at all times. I took issue at certain opinions that you expressed, or that a guest expressed. This is just my opinions, I expressed my objections, you may not agree, however I was respectful and did not try to force these opinions. You accuse me of me being equally blinded by my own political affiliation, making it “hard to see right now” for me. I don’t think we can go any further with this.

@@WoodyGamesUK 'Authoritarian ideologies ... push for what they consider to be the most effective for the good of the people they represent, and based on what they consider the most desirable in a society'. You are absolutely spot on. They all do so thinking they are doing good. But I prefer - and I think it's the responsibility of any good journalist to go with - the words of Bertrand Russell: Never let yourself be diverted either by what you wish to believe, or by what you think would have beneficent social effects if it were believed. But look only, and solely, at what are the facts. Providing JK Rowling is speaking truth and science, her speech must be defended. And the idea that because some people - be they minorities or otherwise - are offended, it means she is wrong is bananas. What about all the women - certainly a marginalised group - who are offended by what you say? And by the way, what was it that JK Rowling actually said that was so 'harmful' and wrong. Historically, groups have always done what they think is best for society. The times that have gone most wrong are when they've stopped considering the two sides to each debate. So in answer to your very first comment - as we've gone down something of a rabbit hole - I appreciate your concern about my apparent lingering towards wrong-think. And am ready for my Orwellian 1984 re-education camps so that my ideology better suits yours, lest I be 'Right Wing' (aka thinks different things from you.)