No video :(

Roland JUNO-X (SOUNDS DEMO, no talking voice)

Подписаться 13 тыс.

Просмотров 68 тыс.

50% 1

Everything on the outside is reminiscent of the classic Juno-106 polysynth, but the Roland Juno-X pursues other goals in its high-quality analog modeling synthesis endowment…
[ESP] Todo en su exterior recuerda al clásico polisinte Juno-106, pero Roland Juno-X persigue otras metas en su dotación de síntesis mediante modelado analógico de alta calidad…
#junox #roland #synth #sintetizador
Do you like this video? SUBSCRIBE to our channel and DON'T MISS the following 🔥 bit.ly/2R0ZyBm
[ESP] ¿Te gusta este video? SUSCRÍBETE a nuestro canal y NO TE PIERDAS lo siguiente 🔥 bit.ly/2R0ZyBm
🎹 Nuestro newsletter GRATIS: bit.ly/3KOD1Dc
🚀 Sitio web oficial de FUTUREMUSIC.ES: bit.ly/3ElAWfB
🎧 Más sitios donde encontrarnos: bit.ly/3cemGrn
Por un momento estaríamos pensando que habíamos saltado en el dominio continuo del espacio-tiempo. Y es que al ver el nuevo sintetizador Roland Juno-X, parece como si la multinacional japonesa hubiese resucitado una mezcla de Juno-106 y Juno-60 -sin lugar a dudas, Juno-X destila una pinta muy de la vieja escuela, en sus formas y colores.
En cuanto a la arquitectura de síntesis, las cosas recorren caminos diferentes a lo que podría parecer: Es así porque Roland Juno-X incorpora un sistema completo del poderoso generador Zen-Core, que es digital en toda su complexión; eso le permite ofrecer buenísimas emulaciones de los dos sintes Juno de los 80 (si no son las mejores que hoy es posible tocar), además de otras máquinas añejas de Roland. Y es incluso posible añadir más Model Expansions desde Roland Cloud para así ampliar el repertorio de unidades virtuales.
La síntesis avanzada del Siglo XXI, también en Roland Juno-X
Si alguien está apesadumbrado por la naturaleza digital de esta unidad (en los tiempos actuales de bestias analógicas, híbridas, y el humo de otros), que no turbe demasiado su mente: Nosotros fuimos de los primeros en gritar de horror cuando vimos Jupiter-X; pero hoy nos confesamos unos absolutos enamorados de Zen-Core, sus propuestas y métodos (y lo tenemos en nuestro estudio). Así las cosas, el generador totalmente renovado de Juno-X estará a la altura, de eso no albergamos la más mínima duda.
Detalles familiares se dan cita en la unidad, como la clásica forma de onda supersierra (‘Super Saw’) propietaria de Roland, y los dos modos originales de chorus de Juno -más una modalidad extra que anuncia más grosor y movimiento. Y no faltan decenas de controles y knobs que piden ser pellizcados.
Parece que los modos de chorus son una parte importante de nuevo (ya lo eran y son en Juno-60): La idea es que puedes combinarlos para obtener hasta siete procesamientos diferentes, que puedes aplicar sobre cualquier parte de Juno-X.
No se vayan todavía, aún hay más (en Juno-X queremos decir, superratones)
Pero las montañas de lo analógico no son las únicas que pretende escalar este súper-emulador: El paquete incluye modelos del ROMpler rack XV-5080, pianos acústicos de la serie RD, e incluso un vocoder. Y los usuarios tienen acceso a otros modelos, que incluyen a Jupiter-8, SH-101, JD-800, y el sistema Vocal Designer.
No falta la posibilidad de incorporar las maravillas de Roland Cloud Connect, a través del adaptador inalámbrico WC-1; todo es fácil, porque la suscripción de un año a Roland Cloud Pro está incluida, lo que te deja navegar, escuchar y cargar esas Model Expansions, así como acceder a miles de patches, y otros contenidos útiles y excitantes, sin quitar tus manos de Juno-X.
Una puerta de lujo hacia Zen-Core
La teoría es que Roland está facilitando diversas puertas para entrar en el bien diseñado y masivo universo de Zen-Core. Y como es fácil prever, Juno-X hace justo eso por medio de los familiares paneles de unos más que dignos ‘primos hermanos mayores’. En la práctica, eso facilita las tareas de diseño sonoro, basado en cuatro capas muy complejas, junto a un sistema masivo para efectos.
El teclado de cinco octavas soporta postpulsación; y las opciones de conexionado incluyen entradas de pedal, auxiliar y micrófono, puertos MIDI In/Out sobre DIN (¡pentapolares!), además de conectividad USB para audio y MIDI. Vemos también la operación de I-Arpeggio basado en Inteligencia Artificial, que ya tuvo su estreno en Jupiter-X: Su finalidad es lanzar patrones de arpegio tanto de corte tradicional como otros potenciados mediante algoritmos neuronales.
Quizá como un guiño a aquella versión HS-60 de Juno-106 con altavoces, la conectividad Bluetooth en Roland Juno-X hace streaming de audio a un dispositivo móvil o altavoces externos; pero resulta ser más práctico que hayan provisto el software editor Juno-X Editor, ejecutable sobre Windows y macOS.
Anunciado en su llegada para el mes de Mayo, Roland Juno-X tendrá un precio recomendado de 1.895€ (2.000$), que traducido a precios de calle debería dejarlo en niveles cercanos a los 1.695€.
Más info sobre Juno-X: bit.ly/3vQKyuY
Producido desde Future Music media[LAB] en Madrid, España

Опубликовано:

24 авг 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 171

@FutureMusicMediaLAB 2 года назад

You can SUBSCRIBE to our channel and ACTIVATE the bell so YOU DON'T MISS our new videos 👉 bit.ly/2R0ZyBm [ESP] Puedes SUSCRIBIRTE a nuestro canal y ACTIVAR la campanita para NO PERDERTE nuestros nuevos vídeos 👉 bit.ly/2R0ZyBm

@digitaldiezel5870 2 года назад

People think that saying "VST in a box" is derogatory, that's actually why its so great! Keep saying it because the Juno-X is in GREAT COMPANY! The Waldorf Iridium, The Novation Summit, The Nord Wav2! All very powerful and very awesome! I love quality digital synths. I don't love sound design with a mouse or being forced to upgrade a computer every other year. Great job Roland!!🏆🏆🏆

@kimdiez2681 2 года назад

Digital Diezel Agreed !!

@MusicZeroOne Год назад

Let’s not forget 2 of the most famous synths, the DX7 & Virus.

@dvamateur Месяц назад

Beautiful instrument, indeed. Contemporary analog synthesizers are great, too. Probably because they use digital operating systems.

@amazingworld8592 2 года назад

Sounds awesome to me. People still arguing about digital and analogue and don’t even release any music. It’s the end result that matters

@Acrimonious_Snake 2 года назад

This sounds and looks awesome. I am very glad that modern Roland finally realized that the interfaces and proper outputs of musical instruments matter as much as their sound engine.

@digitaldiezel5870 2 года назад

Roland is on point! This is exactly the type of digital synth I need. Simple with powerful sounds! And the XV5080 is an added bonus!

@SoundMadeVisual 2 года назад

Can't wait to bring this into the studio!

@jerrypeterson6109 2 года назад

Same here! I preordered one last night. I love analog gear and digital the same. All the people hating on this synth have completely missed the point. If it sounds good, it sounds good! I can’t wait to get this thing hooked up to my live rig. It’ll be replacing a JDXI. 🤘🏻

@FutureMusicMediaLAB 2 года назад

@@jerrypeterson6109 Great item! Congratulations, Jay

@doklovelove3023 8 месяцев назад

vocoder....5.37' : marvelous , the best ever

@ivangarcia_5 2 года назад

take my money Roland!

@GuitarsAndSynths Год назад

Sounds massive. Definitely want one to use with my Oberheim, Moog and Virus a real synthwave powerhouse!

@bhaveshmistry3255 2 года назад

Super impressed with this synth, I have a Jupiter X but this one sounds too good. Fantastic demo specially like the vocoder patch...Mind blowing! I love this synth...Great Job Roland ❤️

@FutureMusicMediaLAB 2 года назад

Really impressed too here about this machine. It's like more than three synths on a unique machine -and Roland is saying that the combined engine of 106-60 is new too.

@MakeMagic 2 года назад

@Cortana Zeke I think it's more to do with the fact Gattobus made a lot of the presets. His patches were the best thing about the JDXA.

@hazelelcamino7453 2 года назад

@Cortana Zeke Does the old one have age modeling? I’m asking, just noticed that’s a feature on this.

@FutureMusicMediaLAB 2 года назад

@@MakeMagic sure!

@FutureMusicMediaLAB 2 года назад

@Cortana Zeke we’re not really sure about this -could be a new combo for this time. But Zen-Core compatibility forces things to be the same, that’s true

@mybachhertzbaud3074 2 года назад

Best way to listen to this was on my car stereo😁Incredible! Play On 🎶🎹🎶

@dunkelkammapresents...1460 Год назад

This vocoder sounds so damn good. Would buy this thing just because of it...

@Aetila 15 дней назад

I used to criticise the new Roland digital synths, didn't liked the sounds (owned 30 synths, starting with D50)...but I start to like THIS one... (only able to judge via YT listening) Like the synthwave style sounds wiht great "aura" and bandwith...pretty good work there!

@thefool2007 2 года назад

I like it despite the argument that it’s an expensive controller for VST. Perhaps Roland or Behringer could release analog reissues that are direct copies. As a stand-alone unit, I think it packs a lot (similar to Jupiter X) and has a great vibe. If you already have the originals then maybe this isn’t your cup of tea. Looks gig and studio ready to me. The UI is cool.

@JohnnyMacaw Год назад

Just bought one.. $1,970

@frankgeppert7698 2 года назад

This vocoder sounds so great. I would say better than many others.

@synthverkstad2093 2 года назад

It’s a stunningly looking synth and sounds great too. It has the hallmark of becoming a modern classic. But will stick with my Jupiter Xm for now.

@Dolores5000 Месяц назад

Love this

@draculascountry9872 2 года назад

Roland jupiter X .Full sinthetizer Best Nr1 PLANETA TERA.

@dirkkeersmaekers4343 Год назад

Sounds good.Looking good.

@cyberfennek Год назад

It can do sounds analogue synths could only dream of. 256 notes polophony is also nice

@sednerpjonathan2989 2 года назад

Una de mis marcas favoritas!

@FutureMusicMediaLAB 2 года назад

De muchos por aquí, Sednerp!!! 😉

@sednerpjonathan2989 2 года назад

Ojo al arturia v9 collection! Brutal... El plugins de strings es una pasada en la versión completa

@megaglitch Год назад

I use VST, but need this in my life. Better get saving :)

@istvantoth7431 Год назад

It's not bad. It's okay. It's an okay, decent digital synth.

@LouisTorres-ut4ks 6 месяцев назад

I was thinking about getting it, you said it's an ok Synth, you don't think it's worth it ?

@tskolits Год назад

Sounds so good

@Drum2 Год назад

Mine just arrived yesterday :) it's awesome :) ....just trying to lean how to program it now, especially the multi parts and arpeggiators/drum parts

@mrbeats7434 4 месяца назад

How is it man? Happy with it? It sounds lovely. I see people saying fantom-08 go for. Thoughts

@Drum2 4 месяца назад

@@mrbeats7434 to be honest I don’t have the time I would like to use it. It’s just sitting there and only used about 4 times. I might have to sell it 🥹🥹

@mrbeats7434 4 месяца назад

@@Drum2 ah get it cranked up brother, i am dreaming of one now haha

@Only-Juno-G Год назад

The Juno G actually packed a pretty in depth synth engine, that being the Roland XR/Fantom X engine. While it lacked a number of Roland's current Zen engine features, most notably in areas of VA, FM, and 3 band EQ per partial, it actually exceeded Roland's current Gen in arguably two key areas. 1. It carried a greater amount of routing "Struct(s)"ures. So patches could be set into numerous single osc to single filter OR dual osc fed into dual filters in serial configurations. There were also numerous ring modulation and Oscillator "boost" functions that could be done within some of the "Structs". 2. While by no means extensive, the engine did feature a rather basic and useful Granular capability for Osc. Basically, loaded (particularly user created) waves could be tempo locked for auto real-time time stretching and the time stretching algorithm employed was pretty darn good with often up to 3 octaves able to be achieved. So, want to use a sampled wave that had some sort of tempo related action occurring (LFO sweeps, percussion, or what have you) as an Oscillator for further synthesis? Not only not a problem on the Juno G, but up to 4 such Osc could be used simultaneously. Another area of worthy note here is various interesting granular synthesis effects could be achieved by offsetting the root/base tempo of waves..... If a sampled wave were originally at 60 BPM, telling the G that it actually was 240 BPM for example in order to get more stretched and grainy effects out of the osc behavior. The default amount of user sampling time was pretty short, BUT, this could be increased to 512MB, allowing for up to some 50+ minutes of user waves! The XR/X engine had also introduced 16 step wave programmable LFOs and these LFOs could either come in sets of 2 per single Osc->Filter->Amp or (in a way) 4 per dual Osc-> dual Filter->Amp. It depended on the Struct assignment. "PMT" was also introduced, which allowed for things akin to (Wolfgang Palm) Wavetable, Korg "Wave Sequencing", and EMU Transwave and kinda/sorta "Preset Link" abilities. In essence, any given patch on the X/XR engine could be a make up of what would be an equal of 4 stacked single osc -> single filter -> amp synths 2 stacked dual osc -> dual filter -> amp synths or 2 stacked single osc -> single filter -> amp synths ON TOP OF 1 dual osc -> dual filter -> amp synth "PMT" could then be used to sweep through through these stacks via LFO, Envelope, velocity, key tracking, or modulation wheel control. Suffice to say, most notably when paired with the granular osc capabilities (limited as they were/are) one could quickly start getting some very crazy and complex timbre actions out of PMT. For these reasons, would say one can definitely hold argument for the Juno G (and XR/Fantom X engine in general) actually being a stronger synth engine than Roland's current Zen (Fantom / Jupter X / MC-707 & 101, AX Edge, etc.) when one specifically boils things down to the area of sample based osc. As is often the case, Roland really didn't at all show off how deep the abilities the engine of the G went in the stock presets and compounding this, unfortunately, deep programming on the G wasn't exactly a pleasure. The XR/X engine was/is pretty deep and this meant one could quickly land themselves in a menu diving hell if not using a soft editor and sticking to programming natively on the G itself. I'm not sure as haven't had opportunity to fiddle with it, but at least from a skim over things, it "seems" to me that Roland may have continued employing the XR/X engine in the current Juno DS line.

@Jason75913 Год назад

Yes, the Juno-DS, Juno-Di, and Juno-D share an extremely similar engine as the Juno-G, Fantom X, Integra-7, and FA, but the effects algorithms sound noticeably better in the DS and FA/Integra-7. My MC-707's effects sound like updated versions as the DS effects algorithms sound old and are very muddy and kill subbass. Newer hardware sporting that Fantom-X-inspired ”PCM” engine have ”TMT” instead of ”PMT” with almost the same capabilities, but no possibility to modulate with an LFO. Zen-core's cross-mod options are more different rather than less than the PMT/TMT structure types.

@Nathanaelsun22 2 года назад

great demo! the music! And, i wonder how it would sound if it were an analog synth, with a soul... jk ... it sounded really good actually! Roland is moving a little closer maybe.... but... granted Rolands original stuff from the 80s was so good, like that team that worked on that stuff, wow, my point is its like the new star wars vs. the original ... it kinda fxxxs up their legacy... I am curious what their thinking??? would it really be detromental to the company to hire another amazing group of engineers to make the next jupiter 8 all analog and for that matter ... take the legacy Forward with things as mind blowing as the jupiter 8 was when it came out!!!!!! We need to reach!!!!!!!!!!!!! REACH for more Roland and more will be for all to receive! Thanks.

@istvantoth7431 18 дней назад

Not bad actually.

@cassettedisco6954 2 года назад

excelente como siempre amigos saludos

@FutureMusicMediaLAB 2 года назад

Gracias Cassette! Nos "vemos" pronto por aquí. Abrazos!😍😎

@ericwolfe4301 Год назад

amazing il get one for sure

@usbprogressiverock6777 2 года назад

Just seen the OB-X8 ...I suggest Roland needs a new Head of Strategy ...is there any other business with such passionate lovers of its products which steadfastly refuses to give its customers what they want, obsessed with digital yet no JD800 reissue ? ...I'm so confused.com

@oziaso6503 2 года назад

does it have a detunable and spreadable unison? and supersaw oscillator ?

@Jason75913 Год назад

@jonathandossantossilva2683 2 года назад

Se todo teclado vier com alto-falantes será ótimo...parabéns ROLAND!!!!

@user-pb3lm9xf1q 9 месяцев назад

Это по мне, супер!

@danielortizdecaracas Год назад

and the plugin version when??

@KellBailey 2 года назад

Can someone please explain to me digital vs analog?? I keep seeing y’all say it’s not a analog synth ?

@juanrnavarro 2 года назад

Digital sound source is a wave table of 1s & 0s and calculations are performed like in a computer, Analog is about voltage oscillators, resistors, and electrical components (no computer). sorry bad english ;)

@KellBailey 2 года назад

@@juanrnavarro thank you !!!

@DiamondWoodStudios 2 года назад

Also to add, the best way I heard was to compare it to those old digital and analog clocks ⏰ Where in digital clocks it jumps from values with no in between values, analog clocks ultimately glide when going from value to value making it in my opinion a better and more precise representation of “telling time” when you bring that analog-y ;) back into the conversation of digital synthesizers, you’ll have a lot of arguments over the fine tuning capabilities of these digital sounds, aswell as the quality of the sound itself, these company’s who are doing digital synths are actually getting really good it at and soon we won’t be able to tell a difference.. cheers!! Edit* also yeah this bad boy is fully digital, so there might be some standout differences from the original analog when it comes to sound but my biggest problem is any knobs being used for sound design are sending information digitally and it just doesn’t feel the same when working with analog knobs lol digital is more choppy when going between values but most people including me wouldn’t notice it unless you were a synth guru 😂

@kimdiez2681 2 года назад

@@juanrnavarro Perfect definition.

@DecentralEyes Год назад

Digital means the audio signal is produced by a digital to analog converter. Analog means the audio signal is produced by an oscillator formed of linear components

@lundsweden 2 года назад

Why would I buy this $2000 dongle when TAL UNO-LX sounds so good?

@oskarkoshenina1930 2 года назад

Software synths never will sound as good their analog counterpart. Any hobbyist/established music producer will come to realize this.

@lundsweden 2 года назад

@@oskarkoshenina1930 I used to say this 20-25 years ago, but now there is little difference. The Juno-X is digital anyway.

@stackerman2800 Год назад

@@oskarkoshenina1930 this isn't analog my friend

@b.hornetiii.6771 Год назад

@@lundsweden It's about workflow and inspiration, the most important things in composing. The sound you can have the same on comp or hardware. So, yes, hardware synths are my first choice.

@lundsweden Год назад

@@b.hornetiii.6771 I'm just bitter cause I cant afford it!

@klarenzjeong8031 2 года назад

Let's call this α-Juno VI(1986.7.18 style)

@ZK-LV-2811 Год назад

👍👍❤

@karimsadouni4758 2 года назад

Nice

@AlrightParty 2 года назад

In reality it’s hard to tell it apart but there’s a million ways to get this exact sound. So unless you really want the body of a Juno there’s no point to this

@dxtrs_mnpltr 2 года назад

Like with a shitty clone inside your computer you mean? People buy hardware not only for the sound but for the feel, interaction and the vibe of the instrument which is inspiring and personal. Why else would people buy any acoustic instrument when you can just load a sample library in your DAW and have the exact same sound? It’s obviously not the same thing.

@JuliusLC 2 года назад

as long as you use it as a synthesizer instead of a sound module with presets, it's far better than mouse editing...

@blakewigginssnewwavechanne404 Месяц назад

Can you program other keyboard sounds like pianos and all that into the synth or is it strictly synth sounds only?

@alicaramba7680 Месяц назад

It has PCM sound bank of 3000+ patches including pianos, organs, guitars, you regular sampled synth patches and many more. You will find it in almost every pro level Roland product: Fantom/Fantom 0s, MC-707/101, Jupiter X/XM, RD-88/80.

@blakewigginssnewwavechanne404 Месяц назад

@@alicaramba7680 Ok cool, I just wasn’t sure if it was strictly synth sounds only

@bhaveshmistry3255 2 года назад

I have a 2 questions see if you can give reply, it would be great help to me. No1 Dose this keyboard have all the XV5080 patches? No1 How many acoustic piano samples they have used from the RD series?

@FutureMusicMediaLAB 2 года назад

Hi Bhavesh. First at all, the XV-5080 Expansion Model is included by default, so you can load any libraries that were available before the launch of Juno-X. Said that, you will find more than 900 XV-5080 presets that include acoustic instruments, vintage synhts, percussions, and ethnic sounds, only to name a few. Refering the RD piano samples, this is unknown by now, as Roland hasn't revealed any details related. They said too that the users will find ten soundpacks free with many sounds ready to use on Roland Cloud. Best!

@woodyforrest313 Год назад

re multitimbrality: how many sounds?

@vampirbacon 2 года назад

Yeah it sounds thin on your 15$ wallmart-airpods.

@danneu8 2 года назад

Seriously. Sounds incredible on my sennheisers.

@scythianprometheus8448 2 года назад

👍🏼😺

@Musicology1975 2 года назад

1700€ ? Come oooown man.

@FutureMusicMediaLAB 2 года назад

That is, crazy price tag

@Musicology1975 2 года назад

@@FutureMusicMediaLAB Yes way too much, what a loss.

@trippypages7309 Год назад

5:38 👍👍🏻👍🏼👍🏽👍🏾👍🏿

@alonsorascon9643 Год назад

This or the Novation Summit? Decisions... decisions...

@FutureMusicMediaLAB Год назад

With Roland you got the cloud way, along potential new engjnes and, less important, the Juno retro look; taking the Summit course, you follow the powerful hibrid proposal (digital OSC, analog VCF and VCA), which is so exciting, and less update options via firmware. Booth sound awesome

@Jason75913 Год назад

Fantom-06 is the far better deal in a Roland Zen-core keyboard, and then pair it with the Summit for best results.

@mcweb1036 2 года назад

Schönes Ding. Aber: Was wenn das Display ausfällt wie bei fast allen Juno G's und es kein Ersatzteil gibt ??? Pech gehabt. Viel Geld in den Sand gesetzt und ein Synth zuhause den man sich an die Wand nageln kann.

@jamesdelrogers542 Год назад

There is nothing like a real Juno 106

@joleemmolson3844 Год назад

If only some synth wizard somewhere reissued the analog Juno 60 /106 into one amazing identical featured fully analogical device I'd be so freaking simpingly joyfull I'd preoder two... I don't want a pcm Juno I want the real thing brand new in the box. Roland has turned into a digital fascist cult so we can forget Roland

@imandan1966 Год назад

@@joleemmolson3844 give it a rest drama queen

@fernandollombardi Год назад

@@joleemmolson3844 Roland engineers deserve a standing ovation. From the 70's to now. Come on!

@zuluecho5886 Год назад

@@joleemmolson3844 Roland = fascist cult?! ok buddy

@cyberfennek Год назад

All electronic instruments has its beauty it is all up to you how you express them :)

@BlisterHiker Год назад

Very cool, but overpriced!

@fernandollombardi Год назад

in Brazil a Nautilus 73 costs U$ 4,600 and the Juno X around U$ 2,250. That difference doesn't make sense. So I think the Juno price is ok.

@ellenbacklin 2 года назад

Checking on good hammond b3 sound in particular and good grand piano sound that's it! Just check my profile pic and you'll know what I'm talking about

@IBEAN0 2 года назад

Ou my gosh

@AnalogDreamJP8 2 года назад

Not my cup of tea, I prefer my jx's and D 50 with their unique sound. Their flaws or limitations complement to the charm of the sound character ...but that's a matter of taste. I just don't see the point of Roland referring and naming after their analog gear, while using digital perfection to imitate analog...Roland skips the people that look for instruments like prophet 5 or the soon to be released OB X8...I simply don't need perfect piano sounds from a Juno.

@nonideal Год назад

I agree. Them making digital structures of their original analog roots makes me so... upset? The digital sound just sounds far too perfect.

@visible7044 2 года назад

you can get real juno in great condition for this price lol.

@Kynect2Hymn 2 года назад

Doesn't include all the other bells and whistles though.

@morphoice 2 года назад

The fact that it doesn't even say Juno on the back shows that they know another fancy housing for software emulation won't impress anyone on stage.

@ENSONIQ5 2 года назад

Or maybe it's because 'Juno' also wasn't on the back of the 106... www.deepsonic.ch/deep/pix_equipment/roland_juno-106_04.jpg

@denispolic2404 Год назад

Don´t see nothing what my System 8 cannot do for less money, its just a too expancive for a VST controller.

@Dudderlyful Год назад

System 8 and the aira stuff sounds better but the green is just too much!

@fernandollombardi Год назад

hmm... they're not the same thing, much less the same Mojo. Got it?

@MusicZeroOne Год назад

The big difference is you can play 4 parts at once. They can be layers or split, each with their own arp or sequence if desired. Even mix them on the fly. The System 8 as a VST controller can’t do that. The rest sound almost identical between them all.

@klaasj7808 2 года назад

Tal uno much better

@JuliusLC 2 года назад

Not much from a performance perspective

@AmarokOfficial Год назад

Why not analog Roland, why!?

@FutureMusicMediaLAB Год назад

New times, new technogy -easy for all the chain

@FutureMusicMediaLAB Год назад

@@AmarokOfficial Yes, Korg and Arturia too and many small companies as well -but the Roland preferences are digital with analog modelling. And the main acceptance is that this sounds nice too. Thanks!

@marcoagius6926 Год назад

This or the Jupiter X?🤔 There's only about €500 difference 🤷‍♂️

@Drum2 Год назад

I bought the Juno x over the Jupiter x. Because it's more reliable over time, does not need servicing and go out of tune and need parts replaced like most real analog synths. Plus the multi parts with appeggiatored parts and drums is awesome. But the Jupiter x is an awesome synth, just not reliable enough for me over time and playing live.

@infestedalien Год назад

@@Drum2 A friendly correction. The Jupiter-X is digital like the Juno-X with the exact type of circuit board, the only difference is the firmware and the control-panel. However... are you satisfied with the Juno-x? I plan to get one myself and already have a Jupiter-X.

@infestedalien Год назад

I think this is a hard one. When I bought my Jupiter-X there was no Juno-X on the market. Now I feel that I would like to have the Juno-X also. The Jupiter-X seem to have gained lot more popularity since they updated the firmware and we got the actual Jupiter-X model which is not the same as Jupiter-8-model. Which means you can use the Jupiter-X as Jupiter-8 and Jupiter-X. :)

@adityajoshi1211 Год назад

Not my tea of cup. I use VST🤗

@JuliusLC 2 года назад

No suena mal la criaturilla. Qué tal lo ven los usuarios del original??

@FutureMusicMediaLAB 2 года назад

Quizá sean máquinas muy distantes y diferentes entre sí -para empezar, por lo que ahora cuesta un 106, sería posible comprar casi 2,5 JUNO-X (y no digamos ya de JUNO-60)

@JohnnyMacaw Год назад

Effective complaining can’t afford it

@borispradel1037 2 года назад

Sounds thin as any other modern Roland ACB/ZEN Core synth from Roland, sad.

@kimdiez2681 2 года назад

IT DOES NOT SOUND THIN.

@normdurkin6425 2 года назад

..it sounds gaaayy.. I will be keeping my June 106 and HS-60...

@endorphinsmusic 2 года назад

which sound straight ?

@normdurkin6425 2 года назад

@@endorphinsmusic ..this new Juno is digital junk.. Roland hasn't made anything decent since 1994..

@endorphinsmusic 2 года назад

@@normdurkin6425 so it likes same-synth relations ?

@normdurkin6425 2 года назад

@@endorphinsmusic ..you tracks gaaayy.. I would pay money not to hear them..

@AlrightParty 2 года назад

Yeah it’s coming off very homosexual indeed 🤨

@angeldc54 2 года назад

Just a VST plug-in housed into a very expensive controller.

@jacquesmertens3369 2 года назад

Absolute rubbish. This is no longer the typical 12-bit sound. Roland evolved from a company that made instruments for real musicians to a gadget producing factory. It's the 12-bit processing that gave all early 80's synths the sound we love so much.

@tonystephen6312 2 года назад

it doesnt help the analog feel when it comes over a digital audio link aka the internet.

@jacquesmertens3369 2 года назад

@@tonystephen6312 That makes no difference at all. I'm talking about the wave form generator that produces the original sounds. That was 12-bit and quite 'raw' compared to the sound chips that entered the market in the late 80's and early 90's. If you listen to computer game music created in 8-bit mode, it still sounds like 8-bit, also on RU-vid. That's because the 64-bit processing is quite neutral. It does not alter the original sound in any noticeable way. To illustrate the difference: listen to the same sounds on a Yamaha DX7 vs DX7S. The DX7 sounds like the real thing we got familiar with in the 80's. The DX7S doesn't. That's because the DX7S has a 15-bit wave generator vs the original 12-bit in the DX7.

@tonystephen6312 2 года назад

@@jacquesmertens3369 yes i know what you mean - the lower bit rate makes that sound youre talking about. I remember the early dx7 mk1's - awesome sound. I was just adding that the digital transfer and recording over the internet doesnt do justice. That can sometimes produce a sterile flat sound. Anyways! :)

@pickyyeeter 2 года назад

Depending on the commenter, this synth is either too digital or not digital enough The harmonics created by a signal being generated at a lower bit depth are effectively cut out of the equation once it's run through a low pass filter

@jacquesmertens3369 2 года назад

@@pickyyeeter Roland market this gadget as a sort of all-in-one machine that can recreate the original sounds from their legendary synths. But that's not what it does. It's just a collection of the same sounds they sell online for your DAW, and those sounds are polished using 32- or 64-bit calculations and high sampling rates. They sound nothing like the original.

@Janomix 2 года назад

Don't sound analog, very digital, it's like listen my system 8 or zenology vst...

@visible7044 2 года назад

the original juno is digital. and it is your system 8. it’s the system 8 software in the juno layout.

@rox54q 2 года назад

@@visible7044 only the oscilators are digital DCO, the filter and evrething else is analog on the original juno

@Reyescult 2 года назад

@@rox54q DCO = Digitally Controlled 'Analog' Oscillator!

@JuliusLC 2 года назад

@@Reyescult + DCF

@EyezerProductionz 2 года назад

@@rox54q A DCO is an analog oscillator. All DCOs (usually 1 or 2 per voice) on a DCO based synth are digitally controlled, which means they are all tuned exactly the same (because they are synced to a digital clock, or something like that). This creates a very stable pitch, which makes them more reliable while still being analog. The classic Elka Synthex is an amazing sounding synth that uses DCOs for example.

@MELOPSMUSIC 2 года назад

very disappointed, vst uno tal way better !

@JuliusLC 2 года назад

Another Togu Audio Line software license owner sporting software development.

@ChrisP3000x 2 года назад

Harsh digital tones drenched in reverb in every Juno X promo video. Total junk.

@iceuul674 2 года назад

Juno is quite digital sounding synth, comparison original vs juno-x, the original wins, but the differences are very small: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-kvkfmMKnIVo.html

@ChrisP3000x 2 года назад

@@iceuul674 They even put the inferior crappy keybed in it. At least the Jupiter X has a premium keybed. What a joke.

@sauermusicDE 2 года назад

@@ChrisP3000x "the inferior crappy keybed" >> The one from the Juno-DS? Or which one?

@tonystephen6312 2 года назад

well yes.

@annother3350 2 года назад

It sounds great. You need to de-wax your ears

@ZenMountain 2 года назад

Thin, $2000 plugin inside a case. Roland sucks!!!!!!

@kimdiez2681 2 года назад

Bahahahahahahahahaha.

@marekn629 2 года назад

This is another phony Juno nostalgia trick from Roland, no real analogue in here. It has "Zencore" which is more 2 years old, and is in many other Roland products. Just another VA plus piano from RD. Way to pricey

@HatredPrime 2 года назад

Virus is still great and complex synth. How this is better than System 8? S8 has already juno on board. This is very overpriced nostalgia ridden Vst in overpriced box, So much for "not chasing ghosts"

@annother3350 2 года назад

@@HatredPrime It's got 4 layers -- twice as many as the System 8 and has other instruments only available in this machine. It's idiotic to say anything non analogue is a vst in a box

@HatredPrime 2 года назад

@@annother3350 Didn't Roland put their emulations in Roland Cloud? That's why I call it Vst in a box and where did you read that I call all things non analogue Vst in box?

@annother3350 2 года назад

@@HatredPrime There are emulations on here not available in the cloud. This keyboard can do other tricks and effects, and you can combine up to four layers. It would be very hard to recreate what this keyboard does with VSTs alone. Calling it simply a VST in a box is lazy and just untrue

@HatredPrime 2 года назад

@@annother3350 those tricks don't justify price and you can ad them to S8 without problem. Second, I doubt they build from ground code of this synth since Roland proved to be lazy quite few Times.