His victims also deserve financial compensation for ruining their lives. I hope they bleed him dry of his substantial wealth his amassed over his career.
I'd like to hear Rolf talk about these incidents, the way of life during that time, who he hung around with.. What I'm trying to get at is this type of abuse was mostly likely considered "normal" (and possibly encouraged) in some circles.. These guys can't be convicted unless the entire picture is made clear, BBC celeb, BBC exec's and leading political figures of the day.. all appear to be rumored or involved or implicated.. by convicting (possibly minor players in these schemes) you are covering up the muck of the ring leaders.. I hope Rolf blows the whistle on everyone both low and high.. before he's knocked off while in jail... In any event the wheels of justice are turning way too slowly given the scope of these Indictment/allegations.
The Harris persecution is a scam by a few lawyers and their quest for money. These lawyers use the misguided, the deluded and the outright fraudulent. The media refer to a 7 - 8-year-old victim when they demonise Harris, in fact she is Wendy Wild, a 54 year-old long-term substance abuser. This is the best example they can think of to promote the theme of the male perpetrator + female victim.
Wendy Wild decided to go for some Harris money after she went bankrupt. Wendy Wild alleged that Harris gave her a swift touch when she was at the head of an autograph queue, in a crowded hall 45 YEARS AGO. Strangely she didn't tell anyone, strangely no one saw it happen. It has been proven, by the police who were seeking evidence, that Harris was not at the location, a community hall in Leigh Park, Portsmouth, where she alleges this happened. Harris was not there either 3 years before or 3 years after the year that Wendy Wild was 7 years old.
What is absolutely convinces me that Wendy Wild is a fraud is that the police searched the news archives, they questioned the staff of the hall in Portsmouth, they letter boxed residents of the town and they interviewed people in aged care facilities. Not a sign that Harris had ever been there. The police who did all this work are (quietly) disgusted that Wendy Wild's accusation still resulted in a conviction. During the Harris trial she claimed Harris assaulted her after a rendition of the hit song, 'Two Little Boys' .. but this song hadn't been produced by Harris when she claims she was assaulted. (The song was written in 1902 to tell the story of two boys who grew up to fight in a war, with one saving other's life). How this case wasn't thrown out very soon in the investigation is beyond belief.
Read the 'Professor6871' comment. This is one of the false accusers who makes brief comments on the Harris video pages. Note the interest in money, as though they false accusers grab for money was a good thing.
So writes one of the false accusers - chasing compensation money. Bad luck, you'll have to rob the bottle shop again, otherwise that drug pusher will be after you.
fastrac89 But what if he's found not guilty? He was found guilty of 12 indecent assaults, yes, but that doesn't mean he'll necessarily be found guilty of the fresh charges!
Rolf Harris had a second trial which finished on February 1, 2017. Notice the media barely mentioned it. After destroying the Rolf Harris reputation by misleading the public for a year (during 2013 and 2014), the media proceded to sensationalise and exaggerate the 2014 trial. Post trial analysis made informed people aware that the Crown Prosecution Service's Alison Saunders just wanted convictions at all costs. It was a scam supported by the greedy compensation lawyer, Liz Dux, who was chasing money. There was no real evidence. All the circumstantial evidence pointed to false accusations (www.rolfharrisisinnocent.com). It had become apparent that the false accusers in the 2014 trial were cognitively impaired, middle aged, substance abusers seeking money. The false accusers in the 2017 trial were the same, all obviously making up stories for compensation money. On February 2017, Harris received three acquittals and a hung jury on the other charges. He will be released late this year. A big part of the 2017 trial was the defence team demonstrating that the jury got it ridiculously wrong in the first trial. See a site like www.rolfharrisisinnocent.com to see just how ridiculous the evidence was. All the accusers of Harris should be tried for perjury. The only excuse for not doing so would be that they are mentally ill, but if they are mentally ill, why are they allowed to make silly charges? Answer: the Crown Prosecution Service's Alison Saunders just wanted convictions at all costs.
To see the defence evidence on one of the false charges in the recent 2017 trial, search for, *rolf-harris-trial-singers-former-manager-defends-him-in-london-court*. There isn't more news of the 2017 trial defence because the media abandoned the trial, tail between legs. Only a few months ago the media were referring to Harris as a pedo pervert. During the defence part of the 2017 trial they fell silent. Pathetic idiots. I search for news on the issue of the hung jury, which means the CPS could decide on a third trial but the media is dead on this, they are starting to realise that people are becoming aware of the scam. I recommend that everyone stop watching the main news and current affair programs and instead view RU-vid videos in which individuals criticise the mainstream media for being blatantly biased.
He got it very cushy behind bars too singing in the jail Christmas choir helping in the gardens etc I thought jail was meant to be a place for punishment not these days!!
Shotgun Squirtle Likewise with you, RESEARCH this gross Miscarriage of Justice! Rolf did NOT do any of these things...there was not a SHRED of evidence! He is, however, worth £MILLIONS and THERE is where the root of this case lies...as it does with many of the Operation Yewtree cases....
Lizzie Cornish Give me a damn break, im 12. I dont know what determines justice miscarriages or anything like that yet. But what i do know is that if that was true, he would have been released by now.
No, he wouldn't. You have to have NEW evidence for an Appeal..and as there is NO EVIDENCE to start with, that can't happen. A miscarriage of justice takes longer, but can still happen..and it will. You're 12? Then you shouldn't be on RU-vid on your own, nor the internet...Most DEFINITELY not on such a thread, unless you're not 12 at all, of course....If you ARE, then get your parents to safety lock your computer. RU-vid is a vile place at times, filled with very unsuitable subject for a 12 year old. Thank you...and don't say 'damn' when you're only er....12. Thank ye.
R. Ukiddingme Primitive? We now presume innocence! That's not primitive! Primitive would be a presumption of guilt, which is what the Anglo-Saxons did!
