@@liljasere Okay, but how does the lid get ejected? Gonna be a cost just for the electricity generated by the power plant. And then you still have to pay for the operator to sit in a chair and manipulate a computer.
To our politicians pocket. Those markups are at 5000% at least from cost of making. 500% for politicians 500% for lobbying 500% for their children's lambos
And they tell us there’s not enough money and resources to go around, we really have our priorities straight, half the planet lives in poverty and suffering from starvation, we spend all our money, time, and energy figuring out the most efficient ways to kill each other. Look at all the homeless people, and people who are struggling we have here, meanwhile the government is giving the military all our money, and there spending billions on target practice every month.
Imagine, the cost of one military excursion with useless technology, we could provide healthcare and food for our people. None of us would be forced into debt slavery over something as basic as health. Not to mention, we wouldn't have to pay as much in taxes if our whole budget wasn't going to military. Maybe then the working man gets a break, and the billionaire who feels entitled to the sweat on that mans brow pays his fair share for using our roads, structures, and services. Republicans would rather have you blaming immigration, or love, not the red hand. The rich, the ones they serve
@@rickkrolltrue that, except it really isn’t that simple, without our astronomical military force, world war 3 would start as we are enemies of a insane amount of country’s without any way to defend ourselfs, causing the end of the world by nuclear warfare. The problem isn’t the military itself, it’s how we get military equipment, we could easily shave off at least a 1/16 to a 1/8 of our military budget if we actually got our supplies from better places. Anyways your point is taken into consideration but otherwise invalidated because that’s just not how it works
Сэр снаряды в банке закончились, не чем стрелять! Командир: отправляемся в порт за боеприпасами! Сэр у нас теперь нет порта! Командир: как это нет больше порта? Сэр порт продали! Командир: кто продал? Жулики в правительстве сэр! И кстати у нас нашей страны тоже нет, они её продали! Сэр смотрите ракета летит на Пентагон! Командир: отправьте все оставшиеся ракеты туда же😂😂😂
This is significantly more than the lifetime median income of an American citizen. The average person could work their entire life away, not spend a single dollar, and still not be able to afford this.
Doctor: I'm sorry, sir, the insurance will not cover your medical treatment. You will die in one week. Patient: can you tell me why? Doctor: I can show you *opens youtube*
yep. That is happening now in Europe. Before this shit we have good health system. Now, not anymore, they want us to be like in USA, die if you can't pay.
That goes to paying for the buildings and teachers and the school charges the government whatever it wants threw you its a racket they say it costs x amount to send you threw school the government pays it no questions asked and you get saddled with the responsibility of paying it
With thay budget you'd think America was fighting Klingons and Romulans. But no, They're just getting their asses beaten by Taliban,and bankrolling some Jews in the desert.
Речь идет о распределении ресурсов. Если эта ракета стоит 900тыс долларов, и может потопить корабль, значит его цена окупается в 4-5 раз. Это все равно что использовать дешевые дроны для подрыва бронетехники стоящий 300 тыс баксов Upd:я понял что он против ракет работает. Но это не отменяет того факта, что его цена окупается
This actually is a problem when fighting guerrilla or small militsry groups, uhh lets call them "H groups", they can destroy a tank that costs millions with just a rocket launcher and some recovered explosives, the bombs that fail to explode by the americans in vietnam and iraq were repourposed by the enemy into IEDs so you get a war that never stops getting more expensive and also the enemy gets more guns the more you fight
@@JacksVictorianTrainsпоэтому нужно раздувать свой ВПК, до той степени, что он превосходит несколько вместе взятых ВПК, других стран занимающих вторые места по этому самому ВПК, кстати, от кого США оброняться собрались, в последнее время только они войны развязывали
$255.8 billion for a 2024 budget, planned to go up another almost $2 billion next year, up by $11.1 billion from last year. Every year we would dump as much as we could so we will always have a bigger budget next year. We fired off belt after belt for our MGs and popped off 3,200 HE mortar rounds in 2 days so we would get more next year. Blew the living hell out of Fort McCoy's range and got damn good training out of it. 11C 2010-2016 US Army
@@KANGZSLAYER1488 You don‘t have to feel sad. That was 1600 years ago. I promise most of us can live with the consequences of the barbarian invasion and we don‘t think about that everyday anymore.
The fact that 16 million kids under 15 die each year from all sorts, including starvation and disease, but we can spend billions and billions to kill each other for sometimes no reason. Scary world.
yeah, the material cost lost per launch is soo low compared to the overinflated costs they show. Either way money goes back into the US economy. If it goes outside for security, that is a big problem for a superpower.
"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement. We pay for a single fighter with a half-million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron." President Dwight D. Eisenhower, Chance for Peace Speech, April 16, 1953
@@hehehehe_hah no, esos son socialistas, comercio no es sinónimo de capitalismo. Además, todos esos países también tienen pobreza, estados unidos es el más afin a las ideas del capitalismo y míralo... (Es súper restrictivo en temas de libre comercio, súper proteccionista e interventor)
@@Shevshenkko si fuesen verdaderamente socialistas todo seria del gobierno lo cual no es verdad, el mundo no es blanco o negro, europa es mas socialista que estados unidos pero sigue siendo capitalista. (Aun así decir que es restrictivo con el libre mercado, super proteccionista e interventor es decir que son socialistas. Porque todas las ideas de la propiedad privada y el libre mercado son ideas del capitalismo)
@@Shevshenkko el libre comercio es uno de los pilares del capitalismo, ademas cuando el estado más interviene en temas economicos eso es mas socialismo que capitalismo porque en un estado socialista todo lo relacionado con la econonia lo controla el gobierno, no empresas privadas, porque el que defiende la propiedad privada es el capitalismo, el que esta en contra de la propiedad privada es el socialismo. Si no me crees buscalo
The raw material cost is probably less than a thousandth of that, and the money it costs to turn that raw material into a missile is probably not more than 4,000. makes you wonder where the other 900,000 went...
The rest of the cost comes from research and development, construction of the production facilities, development of logistics chains, worker compensation, operating costs, and of course, the cost of running the machinery needed to build the precision weaponry.
@@dangersnail5839 you are very trusting, especially when it comes to the government and the MIC. I'm guessing you haven't seen how much a bag of bushings costs. $90,000 for a bag of 200 bushings, technology that has existed for decades and doesn't need to be researched nor developed.
@@canadianradiochemist4465 Well, I have heard of those, I just don’t know what to think of it, because no one has clarified what equipment they are to be used on.
@@canadianradiochemist4465 a garbage can to hang up on street lights with inner bucket in the netherlands costs 700 bucks yet it rusts away in a few years.....
I would have to work for 6 years straight just to cover the first shot at my wage. That is absolutely insane that 6 years of my theoretical life is gone in an instant like that.
