Please give this video a thumbs up if you liked it and feel free to comment below or ask me anything. It will help me to get recognized by youtube's algorithm. Thanks! :) WATCH NEXT: ○ GeForce RTX 4060 - Test in 20 Games at 1080p and 1440p - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-xX63xXtAUEQ.html ○ Cyberpunk 2077 1080p, 1440p, 4K DLSS 3 Frame Generation - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-69O-y4vNSws.html ○ Cyberpunk 2077 1440p, 4K Native vs DLSS 2.5 vs DLSS 3 Frame Generation - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-quACRga5FnA.html
only if you use ray tracing on ultra or extreme. i play ray tracing on high and everything maxed out and 120 fps with DLAA and frame gen. Ray tracing in this game is useless and is only applied on Cars reflections.
4090 can do that. rt ultra cyberpunk runs fine, path tracing doesnt but thats a whole another beast. but i'd turn dlss quality on anyway cause it looks better than native
RTX 4060 is amazing, it has 242 TFLOPs in DLSS and 35 TFLOPs in ray tracing, let alone frame generation and ray reconstruction. I have this lovelly budget card ❤
DLSS Frame Generation feels acceptable and helpful when your base framerate is at 35-40fps. However, it does a better job if your base framerate is at 60fps and above.
@@MxBenchmarkPC I still heard DLSS2 is still superior as in less ghosting and stuff like that. I have seen DLSS3 add crazy ghosting due to it calculating or guessing frames is how it works am I wrong?
@SiqFix DLSS Super Resolution (DLSS 2) and DLSS Frame Generation (DLSS 3) are completely different technologies. The first one is an upscaling alghorithm with some help from AI, the second one is generating completely new frames using AI, motion vectors and some information from already rendered frames.
@@od1sseas663 The inputlag remains the same with FG enabled. However your Inputlag is the same as your native framerate. But the visuals obviously, look as if you're playing at nearly twice the framerate. Making sloggy games feel much better, since lower fps = blurry mess when looking around quickly.
it seems to be fine. I think the pricing is what sets me off from getting the 4060. If it drops a few more bucks, Id get this to replace my 1660 super.
@@Sounyy_ that's nice to hear. By the way, how is dlss/fg perfomance? How noticeable is it vs native? I'm excited to upgrade. Hopefully in the next few months. Thanks
@@covidbryant6412 hey i can't really tell this because i have a 60hz monitor so i play with vsync to hold 60fps. i play simulator games like farming simulator 22 and euro truck simulator 2. and gta 5. i can play them on the highest settings without getting under 60fps
I'd advice 4060 ti for it's 16 gb of V-ram and that makes the V-ram nothing to worry about. but if the budget is limited then 4060 is also a great card but some games are not optimized and will use much much more than the 8 gb of v-ram that it has.
Im new to pc gaming and so i decided to get the rtx 4060 bc of the DLSS3 FG.. since im not upgrading an rtx 3060 i went for the best option availabe for my budget.. I get it that if you own a 3060 it's not worth it upgrading but if you are buying your first pc i think the 4060 is better.
absolutely man. Enjoy PC gaming! Do not let people tell you the choice was bad, because it wasn't. The market knows it, but tech reviewers are trying to sell you a different agenda because their pockets are lined by competitors (AMD).
It's a great choice! Everything is newer, new technologies, dlss and fg. FG + dlss 3.0 = almost 3x more fps, even better than a 3070 ti in raw performance The only problem is the 8 vram
I've bought one and I am very impressed with it's performance, despite the critics. By the way: most honest comparison so far! Thank you for the video.
Look at CPU usage, DLSS3 also reduces it since AI helps generate the frame, and people talking shit about the a new amazing feature, the problem is the price from 4060 not the GPU itself, if you don't like just don't buy it, DLSS3 is fucking great as DLSS, if wasn't for Nvidia AMD wouldn't have created FSR in first place.
Dlss 3 is great when you are not max at vram usage, every 40 series when FG is enabled and runs at max vram, the perfomance drops more than using dlss2 or even native in some cases
It’s been thoroughly documented my ass! The 4060 is made for 1080\1440P gaming nothing more,nothing less. It DOESNT need more than 8GB for gaming at those resolution’s. Do your homework before sounding like an idiot. I’m playing Cyberpunk at 1440P with everything on ULTRA using DLSS 3.5 and frame gen and I’m on butter smooth 98fps. GeForce Experience testifies to that. Btw, I build my PCs from scratch, not stick a GPU on-top of a smorgasbord of generic crap and call themselves a ‘builder’ and moan that they are only getting 60fps on a 3080 with StarField…… Think they know everything, but know nothing…
wait is the frame generation a new feature for dlss 3 only? So if you upgrade to 40 series you get both dlss 3 and fg while the older ones have dlss 2 only?
DLSS 3 is technically not Frame Generation. DLSS Frame Generation is a separate technology (exclusive for the RTX 40 series), which for NVIDIA's marketing purposes, was united with DLSS Super Resolution (DLSS 2.x) and NVIDIA Reflex to call it DLSS 3. But recently NVIDIA released a new version for DLSS Super Resolution (DLSS 3.1.13), which eventually will replace DLSS 2.x and new games will come out with DLSS Super Resolution version 3.x natively. With these updates NVIDIA have made DLSS things even more confusing, but DLSS Super Resolution 3.1 version will work on the RTX 20 and RTX 30 series just like the DLSS 2.x runs on these GPUs.
if i may, Frame Generation (where it is 'faking' frames in-between, based on the frames that come before and after the 'fake' frame) takes calculation time and so always introduces a bit of input lag (Latency) - this is how it improves performance slightly ('faking' the frames in-between), at the cost of some latency. NVIDIA has "Reflex" to try combat this, and AMD has "Anti-Lag" to try combat this (AMD have Frame Generation too, they call it Fluid Motion Frames). HTH
if i may, "DLSS3" is the 'suite of functions' that include the Frame Generation function, just like how AMD has "FidelityFX" is the 'suite of functions' that include their frame generation function called Fluid Motion Frames [both AMD and NVIDIA have the same functions available].
@@plasmahvh actually you can for example fh5 you can run on extreme but because of the vram you get stutters so you have to drop to ultra but this is just a example
@@MxBenchmarkPC I just bought a 1440p monitor, used to play in 1080p before and I compared my fps benchmar. 1440p DLDSR seems to have the same fps and native 1440p.
DLSS Frame Generation requires ~700MB, ~1GB and ~2GB of VRAM for activation at 1080p, 1440p and 4K respectively. If the GPU memory is already maxed out, then DLSS Frame Generation does not boost your performance at best or will have a performance degradation at worse depending on a game.
I hate that NVIDIA and AMD claim that their DLSS 3 / FSR 3 can boost fps by 2x up to 3x, but they don't mention that they meant NATIVE resolution vs Perfomance mode upscaled resolution... Where performance on big screens looks awful. On my 2K 31.5inch monitor Quality mode is acceptable, balance have visible reduction on screen, and performance is unplayable.
I disliked the video because of Unnecessary CPU cores data eating up almost more than half of screen which no one here to look at to be honest. 1 data for CPU was enough 😡 Although I subbed for now to see if you improve. Also add 1440p especially for FG support gpus.
uh.. you're here for the data and not the gameplay... right? all that data is necessary to see how much of the CPU cores are being utilized and how they're being utilized.
videocards should have this DLSS 3 speed already without the help of neural networks , this should be a software based network running on memory of the pc , so you could speed it up yourself as you like in bios or by buying newer memory , but at least it would give us a choice , now we're stuck waiting on a dll file that won't come for months because they think they cracked it this ai business is going to set us back a couple decades , we're relying on it too much and the underlying product suffers from it , badly ...
Please stop it... Don't encourage people out there. No one should be buying a 4060. This is a shame of a product. NVidia is screwing over customers real hard with these crippled "entry level" GPUs. The fact of the matter is, it's been documented that 8GB buffer does not cut it anymore in 2023 even at 1080p. Plus, the fact they crippled these cards with x8 PCIe interface is absurd. 128-bit bus? Are you serious?! Especially at these absurd MSRPs it's a hard no. $180 to $200 at best.
@@H3TOXY Eeeeeh it totally depends on the different offers you have available. If you are in the US apparently the RX 6700 is better since they are both priced the same and the RX 6700 has 10GB of VRAM. In my case though i think the RTX 4060 is actually a good option since the cheapest RX 6700 i can get is for $400 vs RTX 4060 at $350 lol.
@@blade1950 "not really worth the price" my GOD is just 299$, What did you expect? A Gift? It is an optimal GPU for 1080p, with all the new technologies, with very low energy consumption and therefore much lower temperatures, it gives excellent performance in 99% of games. What do you want? A high performance for 4k at that price?? 🤣🤣
Не понисаю, зачем делать тесты видеокарт такого уровня в Full HD... У кого такие видеокарты у тех монитор минимум 2к... А у кого Full HD - у тех видеокарты 1000 линейки и максимум 2060-2070...🤷♂🤷♂
не согласен с тобой, чел, я собираюсь брать эту карту и думал брать Моник 2к, глянул тесты, сравнения, форумы и подумал остаться на 1080. Потому что есть люди которые карту берут лет на 5-7, как я. Во-вторых, это видеопамять, её и так впритык сейчас, а в 2к она превратится в тыкву года через 2 ну и придется снижать настройки. Плюс, 1080 ещё ооочень долго будет базой, спасибо рей трейсинг) Те же лет 5 так это точно. Я в свою очередь выбрал высокогерцовый Моник, чтобы играть в 80-100 ФПС, кто бы что ни говорил, плавность решает. 80-100 ФПС эта карта даст спокойно в 1080, а вот 2к уже с натугом. Да, генерация кадров есть, но она тоже жрет видеопамять) И тут мы возвращаемся к предыдущему тезису, что придется снижать настройки дабы эту память вернуть. Вот как-то так.
