Russia’s New Il-96-400M Stretch Takes Its 1st Flight 

erm...Engines Made in Russia...what do you think?! 😂😂

@@swanvictor887Much worse

@@filledwithvariousknowledge2747 they made new engines they are pretty good on paper and judging by that they are going to be used its safe tos ay they are more efficient then the older engines they used

I don’t think it matters. The only customers will be Russian airlines and Cubana, they just want Russian built jets and I don’t think they care about that.

Doesn't matter, the A340 is mostly retired and this thing wont even be able to compete with anything the west makes at this point. Russia is behind by 30 years.

Probably they were part of the project, that's why they knew it.😆

They have designed countless jet planes and flown them. Didn't you know?😂😂😂

@@Zerpentsa6598 like the supersonic one crashing during the airshow?

I mean, it is your country only. You guys tend to think you know better than everyone.

@@Star737_yt like concorde?

4 engines, it's safer dude

You bet! I did Love it too!😊

Bigger planes have 4 engines

Riveting analysis

​@@d.b.cooper1 You'll be surprised how many miss that.

Problem is modern jets are really really complicated, the material science is in another dimension. Russia can’t complete all by themselves.

​@@edc1569Which is why you can just hire good engineers or engineers from different countries/ ex engineers from companies to do that for you, it's not like they can't do that

Exactly

😂 And that's the short one with CFM engines!

Wrong. It's 63.93m, very close to the A340-300's 63.69m

Cabin length and fuselage length are two different things@@DiminishingAugmentation

Yes. But the Russian plane has two genders only.

Spooky

Why do others have 2 engines? Why don't they just keep one single engine after all if there is so much trust and thrust?

@@julienckjm7430 More engines - more safety - more flexibility - higher production costs - higher operating costs - higher noise - higher environmental pollution.

just like boing late suspecious crashes ???

Another gas guzzler If the IL 96 was any good Aeroflot would still be useing them the only commercial airline still useing it is CUBANA and the only reason they are is because they can't get anything to replace it

@@julienckjm7430 Redundancy. Same reason why humans have two of almost anything

A340 is made by several European countries. Russia made this plane alone. Only US and Russia can do that.

@@evelinamillionesyou didn’t get the joke

​@@southside2459she/him shim is american

@@wadehiggins1114 I don’t get your joke

Tell me you know nothing about IL96 without telling you know nothing about IL96

wifi hahah

@@benjicool2808 Well to be fair… most airlines in North America are only getting it now.

​@@benjicool2808are you laughing about western over prized craps,?

russian planes will never have WiFi

@@rocketman1058 Some already do though…

Why? Are you thinking of buying one?

Better than the rubbish Pratt & Whitney

You think this outdated junk with old engines, old fuselage, old systems is 'safe'? Good luck with that one.

@@howlr747 do you mean the 1967 Boeing 737?

​@@howlr747 Boeing IS Better???? 😂😂😂😂 Not now

@howlr747 My guy you're lagging some 30 years

That's a myth. Look it up. 2 engines mean less problems.

Then Why Do Russians Have To Steal Toilets And Washing Machines From Ukraine??? Ha, Ha

Lol. They can't compete globally like the Japanese, Chinese and Americans

Egypt and Turkey are also watching trust me my somalian brother, the corruption and fraud are real

Yes, cars, computer, cellphone everything.

@@jeanpierrelaolou5490 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

That's what I loved about the old Soviet Union era aircraft. They looked so strange. It was like Boeing, Lockheed and BOAC knew that the KGB had infiltrated their companies. So they purposefully made up plans for their spies to find. Once they got the bogus plans back behind the iron curtain. They soon realized the problem, but they made them work anyway.

yes build more yu.....

It’s comes down to fuel efficiency weirdness isn’t profitable which is why they have no place.

​@@lv7603no place? Why are B-747 and A-340 in service yet? In 2019 or 2020 even were announced new orders of B-747

​@@pedropalotes7638LMFAO. Who's gonna tell him?

Because it is.

Because it is, like A320 and a340. But still at least not from the 60s, like the 737.

Russia is capable of technology... of the 90s

@@azurefire7266 thank you proving me right about american racism. 👏

@@azurefire7266 immediately

@@azurefire7266 nevermind america uses bombers from the early 50's

​@@tylerdurden4006They only use them because they've done extensive modernizations.

737 is in production since 60s.

The Olympics that popularized Adidas in Russia!

It’s based on the IL-96.

The other way around@@DannoAviation

If that also means more crashes than the entire 737 series 3 fold, then I also expect that too if Russia's aviation industry turns back to the 1970s.

clown are you blind? the Russian plane is superior to its competitors and therefore will never be allowed into the West

Doubt it. Their workforce is rapidly decreasing.

@@arvedludwig3584 How can workforce be decreasing (with constant technology) while production is increasing?

@@Rusich945 Superior, by what? Tell me.

More safety, I approve.

@@DanMaverick22this isn’t about safety

​@@Sedna063 дело...

They are military and super reliable

The whole plane looks like its from the 70s.

Actually, the PS90A turbofan engine "family" was developed by the Soloviev Design Bureau in the mid-1980s. It was the Soviet Union's first commercial high bypass turbofan.

@@brittsaunders4621 By that standard… you can say the Trent family was developed from the RB211’s of the 1970s

@@maestromecanico597 Yes, minus the winglets...

Russian, humankind, those are two words that should never be used in the same sentence.

Il-96 first flight was in September 1988.

The IL86/96 platform has never killed anybody.

Good point and here's the there were no fatal accidents involving the airframe on the other hand the Airbus equivalent A330/A340 family had serious accidents.

@@EpicThe112 In the last 35 years, only 33 il-96s have ever been made, while Airbus has delivered over 1,800 330s and 340s. The fewer airplanes, the lesser the chances of airplane accidents.

@@MODECHARLIE true...but there again, they don't fly much, do they...?!

@@johnstuartsmith Thanks for telling me about that

It is pretty wide, maybe is that. Over 6 meters, I think.

Could be cuz Russian companies like to make their vertical stabilizers Huge.

So what should have been done? Russia had to withdraw itself from everything to have what, the NATO fleet in Sevastopol?

lol... ignorance is bold !... 4 engines were done looooooooooong time ago and are not in use anymore for 20 years (exception made to the very large A380) !... if you know nothing about this topic, better no to comment !...

I wanted to give u a detailed answer about aviation, my experience and jet engines history .. but decided against wasting my time @@oldowleye3161

@@oldowleye3161 could you enumerate countries which achieved that?

@@superdingo9741 ...don't cry bot

​@@oldowleye3161he's probably one of those Vatniks.

Welp, most popular Boeing and Airbus models are ancient design too. Just cause why would you change something that works perfectly right?

Brainwashed

​@@bloodst0rm1337 👍

Like brand new 1960s 737 max? Or the brand new 320neo from the 80s?

You may love it, but airlines are interested in twinjets. The 80s are over, mate. Range is 5400 nm, so below average for modern widebodies.

The range is all the way to the crash site! 🤔

You're asking about range with 4 old fashioned engines? How quaint.

It's all political because they've been told that Russia is "bad" (meanwhile, USA and Israel are "good", right?). Real aviation enthusiasts love this development and I'm sure would love to fly on one, myself included.

@@dennisrettke There is nothing political about this, the plane is not up for todays standards.

Arabic, Indian, Chinese people

@@evelinamillionesno

Пиндос,ты думал что ты властелин мира?

@@paulc4302 there will be the day when the Russian airspace (the most valuable airspace between eastern asia - europe and north america - whole asia) will be allowed only with the Russian made aicrafts ... checkmate!

American rockets with Russian engines - RD 180 to this day! Americans don’t complain and even ask that the RD-180 not be included in the sanctions!

Who stole?

@@Стратегическийвыбор russian terrorist state

When the owner refuses to take your money for his things caught in circumstances and cant' be returned - very strange, very Western definition of theft

​@@beibotanovда они просто гопники, которые не на того напали.

Чучело, ты за базар отвечать собираешься? Или ты, как ваши тупые лидеры, вякнул и в кусты?

Does your country produce planes on its own? In 2023

You are not welcome.

You do realize most of the planes you fly in the west were originally designed in the 60s-80s?

@@evelinamilliones Is the Russian bot’s feelings hurt by its own country’s hilarious incompetence at building anything?

@@dylan8389 thanks to the sanctioning, this incompetence is to be overcame at least in critical sectors. Demand creates supply! And workforce deficit makes blue-collar wages soar.

You have that option. Russia does NOT due to sanctions.

They don't offer it to you

Russia has its own cheap fuel...

@@ВгостяхуСантасаand so?

It could be cheap only in aviation for jet fuel. Because in gas stations fuel is up to hell prices expensive and not profitable for people cause to bustard government trying to be against of the world and people: native and foreign

Russian oil is the boss

It's more trustworthy than the twin engine especially crossing vast stretches of water

Safety.

@@tenton459 Almost all long haul widebody passenger planes use only two engines and so far without bigger problems.

A380 using 4.

@@tenton459 A340 was designed in 1980s. Since you edited your message I'll do the same: A380 is no longer in production.

It's aiming domestic market

It's probably the only option for Russians to travel. People WILL pay the higher prices, if it's their sole option. Besides, that profits that this company Ilyushin makes can be used to develop better aircraft. Russia will once again dominate aviation.

​@@Sanyu-Tumusiime😂😂😂

@@Sanyu-Tumusiime 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I'm guessing it fly's by burning old cooking-fat oil, collected from restaurants and cafes lol

@@swanvictor887 clown even west europe have their energy supply from russia. they have plenty oil you uneducated people.

Plus it’s mostly stolen!

@@harstoft The West stole 600 billion state reserves from Russia. Themselves are fools.

@@harstofttired old trope at this point.

Stop reading comics and it will pass

Why?

So does your brain !

Yeah, that's Ukraine you're thinking of.

if you are thinking antonov thats ukraine.

​@@DavidOfWhitehillsthat's not ukraine to be honest..that's USSR.

@@joe91IMand now Ukraine

@@DavidOfWhitehills nothing to do with Ukraine, apart from the physical location.

Due to the four engines?

They have no other choice, cant buy western planes.

What exactly about its airframe is so outdated? Or what, do you think it's still got soviet-era internals and materials?

Ru$$ia is the only country that can make airplanes independently. Airbus and Boeing outsource many of their components. Incredibly, despite the sanctions, they still manage to do something unique! 😎

@@x-gamessimulator1067 doing like 3 per year

Aeroflot will be the first and biggest operator of this type don't worry

@@jettrd_utilitychnl4230 Aeroflot is government owned, so essentially they’re just flying aircraft that are also government owned. So I wouldn’t call it “sales“

@@stevencramsie9172 Aeroflot is a publicly traded corp. State owns sertain share but you can go and buy their stocks too. And as any airline in the world they operate leased planes via commercial leasing company. So it is definetly sales and capitalism as everywhere else

@@stevencramsie9172 and by the way Lufthansa or Air France has relations with respective governments of the same nature and I would realy like to hear how they can decline a qouta of a certain % of new planes they must order from Airbus. Tell me about it))) (actually don't because I don't want to hear that "free market" naive bullshit)

Inchallah

It's very expensive

​@@yuratgit is made in 1 place. I think it is cheaper. No imported parts needed.

So avoid! Do not fly on this junk!

funnily enough, the plane it's based on (Ilyushin 86) had been flying since before the A340 was even produced.

@@spitfiremkiv339 Omg so does it means airbus copied them ?😂

Lol the A340 looks like it

​@@kingnat4874more like, this is how any standard moden-ish tubeliner with 4 engines would look

@@federico339 ohh okay

You are mistaken, because you have no idea about the new Russian aircraft engines of the series: PD-8; PD-10; PD-14; PD-35

Old model PS-90A will change for PD-35 engines. While in testing by now.

Ты можешь купить себе пару резиновых дилдо... А на остальные ведро вазелина - и развлекаться

Airforceproud95 reference?

@@airplanenut89 yøs

@@BillyCrabtree-ob6py Nice.

They don't have engines that are powerful enough to use just two. The engines on this 400M are the equivalent of the PW2000's

Why not have only one engine if there is so much trust then?

They will probably re engine it with the PD-35

@@julienckjm7430use your brain

this airfraime was engineered for 4. And I'm all for it ! ))

And how does that make it better?

@@azurefire7266 it doesn’t.

60% of the books you study in schools and universities are based on the works of Russian scientists :) The problem is not to create a new modern wide-body aircraft. Moreover, modern wide-body Boeings were designed by 30% Russian engineers. The problem is that in two years, Russia closed from 900 to 1200 positions in various sectors of the economy. From can lids, paper dye and ending with dozens of different engines, gas turbines for pumping gas, high-speed trains. I'm not talking about microelectronics. We could not produce until 2022, although all modern lithography methods were discovered by Russian scientists. Now we produce everything ourselves. The problem in aircraft manufacturing is the closure of more than 160 positions for small parts and testing of these parts. There is no point in increasing the number of design departments. Everything will happen with time.

China and Russia will benefit for sure from this technological marvell.

Anyone in BRICS. So like 70 per cent of the world population.

Your mom ))

@@mirekslechta7161 technological marvel? Lolll

More up-to date than their cars!

Может 50- х?

400. Pls keep up with conversation 😂

Enough fuel in Russia

@@evelinamilliones Yes, and more safty.

@@evelinamillionesno

Will be subsidized by russian government

Eh, I've heard good things about the Cubana planes which are only gonna turn 20 recently. It seems like they do take care of them (they kinda have to, considering they can't get replacements easily).

@@Fay7666 those planes have little little flight hours

@@henson2k what are you talking about? they are always in the air mostly

Aka Boeing 747

The USA used to do it on its own. In ol' good days...

@superdingo9741 Yeah, those simple times, very little technology. You about the time when the first supersonic passenger plane was made all by Russia or earlier?

Remember when in the 1970's a newly formed conglomerate of small european plane makers made the very first TWIN engine widebody? Yes, without the help of Boeing nor Douglas. Ilushin is almost 50 years out of date

Probably Chinese help

When the owner refuses to take your money for his things caught in circumstances - very strange, very Western definition of theft

Mad copium displayed here.

@@aantonic They're not under sanctions, so they're allowed to have computer chips.

It’s completely digital and Russia makes its own avionics clown boy..

@@jayspik6498 They make cheap copies of the US because they're isolated, I know that already.

@@jayspik6498 Are you proud that russians depend on the USA for very simple things like youtube?

​@@OneOfThoseTypesRussia has its own search engine and youtube equivalent apps.

Whatever that means

never))

Why and what for?) BRICS is calling

What's the point? It's not like they gonna use it anyway?

New?

@@nntflow7058they’ll use it within countries that have relations with Russia

@@maxsaviation9512Countries that have relationships with Russia will still buy Western unless they themselves are sanctioned. Look at Iran - they managed to buy enough spares to keep their old Boeing and Airbus jets flying, plus buy some more, before the door slammed shut again.

You mean like China and their Comac aircraft. Mixture of the 320 and 737’s features or mostly appearance.

You did not hear the author right. These engines are modified ones, more efficient.

They are more fuel efficient than the twin engines!

@@rickymwamba9681how?

@@Max-xw3ouit might be more fuel efficient than its predecessor, but i guess current twin engines by rolls royce and GE are still more efficient

​@@jaysonjose5675а ты не думай, тебе это вредно.

When have you last been to Russia to make this comment grounded?

Yeah but since russian airlines can’t buy western aircraft it doesn’t matter if it’s inferior

Well that’s the point. It is built to be bought by Russian airlines. That’s it

Russia, Cuba, China, parts of Africa, some former Soviet countries

@@maxsaviation9512 China wont buy this, I can tell you that.

Don’t forget Iran!

@@maxsaviation9512no

Yes. Safty.

Yes. Safty.