Russia Turn 2! - Crazy Position - Europe 

If you ever try competitive pokemon and miss a bunch of 95% accurate moves you’ll realize how annoyingly often 1/20 can be lol

@@davidshatto7604 nothing but truth especially when playing decks like wugtrio

Negotiations are hard, often times people will egress for no reason. Usually this means you need to find another ally or come back to it at a later point. More often than not someone that can’t play good neighbour ends up annoying everyone and dying

❤

What. Is. Up. SPOILER BLOCKERS!

I did my ranked grind on fixed caps tr a while ago so those ones are old!

It probably still was their best pick I think, since he had a lot of troops next to france + the free france bonus

I thought maybe Trinidad and Tobago's at least I was geographically close 😛

​@@dariuszhorvath-krol8540somewhat similar, but Trinidad and Tobago is red black red with the black stripe being diagonal. There's also some white in there

You might no intend to break now. But you do intend to break eventually. If I'm going to pull a move like that I'll put the troops on all at once. Like dump a set into the position randomly. That would be was less threatening to my neighbour than progressively dripping troops into that territory and it also would allow me to use the bulk of my forces where they're needed, making kills and avoided the stalemate part of these settings.

Winter war part two

That would just convey that Pete wants his bonuses broken and gain an eternal enemy.

@@desyncer I'm not saying to take Finland - just reduce the troops on it. It would not break blue's bonus.

And my argument remains the same. Pete attacks Finland and blue sticks it right back too him. Not taking the territory just enables him to retaliate easier.

And too early

I doubt this happens in anything less than many years time

Screen marker and recorder app

@@TheKillPeteStrategy thank you very much and I hope to see you in your videos playing against each other 😊

yeah it does need a bit of a hand

But there are many, many issues with the concept of god that go far behind just "why does he let people suffer? An omniscient god is problematic for example. If he knows everything past/present/future, it means he's creating some people he knows he will doom to hell for eternity. We may have free will, but if he knows what we'll do before he even creates us, it means he's creating life knowing it will cause suffering and knowing he will burn it for that. If that's how the universe really works, yikes. We either have a maker who is far from benevolent, or more likely there is no maker. But too many people want to act like god is just watching us with popcorn and hoping for the best. That's not how an all knowing being would work. If I create a robot and give it the ability to make choices, but I already know that its programming is going to lead it to murder someone, are you going to blame me or the robot?

For me, the thing about faith is I think it's ok to admit that sometimes people believe things without evidence and in that case don't need proof. I prefer that because I feel it's more honest

@@TheKillPeteStrategy but that’s like me saying o have powers you would say no I don’t and I would prove it same with god it’s reasonable to ask for proof

@@t.n.h.ptheneohumanpatterna8334 since there is no proof we have to allow everyone the freedom to believe what they choose and understand that that belief is based on faith rather than fact. So I don't think it's reasonable at all to ask for proof of the unprovable. I think it's a waste of everyones time at best and disrespectful at worst.

presumably because he believed as long as he did nothing blue, who deliberately made a friendly move at the beginning of the game to let him have russia in the first place, was only ever going to use that stack when he was ready to attack him and would do so regardless of if there's a guard stack or not. Pete didnt want to have to invest over 50% of his troop generation guarding against an attack that would only happen if he was already in a losing position against blue only to get them slammed anyways. Especially since in Progressive cards owning territories only truly matters in the early game... the cards are more valuable in the late game as he demonstrated with his reverse card block on blue in Spain with black. He assumed that if blue was a noob he wouldnt have vacated russia to give him russia and that if he isnt a noob than the stack isnt a threat to his game its just annoying...

@@rockstermaniac makes sense, thank you for explaining, I’m newer to the game and trying to get all the insight I can:)

Lol disappointed implies that you expect me to play perfectly

@@TheKillPeteStrategy 😅

Much more. Giving us abilities like this via sandbox mode is how this game is going to reach the next level

Look up risk: Legacy, it could work something like that. Also there just needs to be digital risk: Legacy.

What's wrong with it?

I think the reason religion is such a big deal to people is we're wired for it.