Russia vs NATO military power comparison 2022 | Data First 

공감합니다. 핵 왜 안나올까요?

NATO it is a Alliance. You thinking 1 st**id country can win big Alliance? Haha.

Not necessarily.

@@erikcapozzi3425 yes necessarily

As it is for now - the count down has begun already.

Because usa was poking the bear, america is smart and got what it wanted,gas contract, west sanctions, new world order will fail, dollar and euro will fall!

Im from sweden and Sweden and Finland is litte country, rusia will easly beat them down with nuclear, which we cant defend for it!

Very true. Ukraine would have not joined NATO since at least Hungary would have opposed it. But that was not why Poo-tin attacked Ukraine anyway- that is just the lie he sold to the Russians. So he said NATO and they pooped their pants as usual.

Seems Putin's popularity has greatly declined due to he & his oli's theft . The people barely live . Yet every time he starts a war his popularity rises . Thereby ensuring his survival , both politically and otherwise .

Exactly, even without the US they would be fighting the combined armed forces of the other 29 nations And at the top of that pile are several of the world's strongest armed forces and three all been practising how to fight as one for _decades_ The technological and training overmatch enjoyed by those top nations (let's choose UK, France, Germany, Italy and Poland) is enormous Remember Desert Storm? Their tanks and aircraft would be exploding and they wouldn't even have known we were there. There are only 3 navies in the world that have true global power projection blue water navies and they're all in NATO (UK, France and the US) We have the only supercarriers outside the US, the only nuclear carrier outside the US and the Italian Carvour although smaller carriers 10 F-35Bs We have the most advanced tanks outside of the USA, the aircraft, the armaments, second only to the USA Our advanced weapons systems, missiles and bombs, I would argue _are_ the very best in the world. And all backed up by enormous populations and buckets of cash to throw at a war when we have to War with Russia would look like trees being fed into a wood chipper

And? I mean its a country against a coalition. Thats the point of NATO.

And nothing, I mean that in the event of any conflict, God forbid, Russia is one country, and a NATO alliance is an alliance, and looking at history (1939 invasion of Poland and help from England and France) one should not rely on such alliances@@igyboo

But where is the problem? The NATO was founded in 1949 because of Communism on Russian side. Russia controlled East-Germany after WW2 and Stalin could wanted to install the Sovietcommunism there, to prevent another charge of European countries on the Soviet-Union. And this is also the beginning of Cold-War. And don't forget that many NATO partners are very small like Baltic-States, Denmark, Netherland, Belgium, Greece, Montenegro and it also depends on the amount of money the government spends on its military.

@@ketrab5154 the thing is that there was no real treaty before Nato, WEU or Treaty of Brussels. The attack on poland officially started WW2 as invasion of poland was an ultimatum (no invasion or full on war) given to Nazi Germany. Now there are alliances that are used to protect europe from aggression. And I do believe that if an attack happens Nato coalition will form defensive/offensive countermeasures. (Source: My uncle (General In NATO (Now retired), and other useful sources)

And Russia is a federation of dozens of smaller, we could say occupied, states on 2 continents. It will fall apart if they lose in ukraine. Dissasembly of USSR was not enough, even nations living under today Russia should be free and have their own countries.

true

You forgot about that fact, that russians "power" gets screwed right now by only one county😂

@@samcresh4730 Man, did you know that not the whole Russian army is involved in the conflict. The Russian power there is pretty equal to the other country's forces.

If he compares Alyan with Russia, then compare Alyan with the alliance.. Compare NATO with Russia+China+India+Iran 🫵☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️

May i ask why Russia is risking herself to fight with NATO countries? Outcome is obvious.

Hahaha, I see what you did there. It was very true and funny. Good one.

😂😂

Could of swore I thought 2007

Top comment 👌

Third best. You forgot the Ukrainian Farmers Auxiliary.

Slaughterhouse5 , correct. We need an update of later 😁😁😁😁

@Bandhu you do realize that some NATO Troops will literally put hot sauce in their eyes so they won't fall asleep right?

Where do you heard it?..😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣 take it easy dude..😁

@Bandhu 😂😂🙌

@Bandhu sure!! . NATO is just going to sit there while Russia are bogged down lmao cos that makes sense. And at least 2 other idiots liked your comment. I suspect you probably you're number 3 and liked your own comment.

Para isso twrian que comparar os demais paises do lado da otan como Brasil Índia Argentina etc...

Isso realmente seria a terceira G mundial

Etc. meaning North Korea. 2 other Authoritarian Hellholes.

China would not ally with russia and the others are of no merit

yeah, and NATO with Finland and Sweden XD

you think they alone? you got to be joking buddy

@@moelester391 Are they NATO? Or the Russians?

@@moelester391 I mean, it's more usual to see a comparison (for example) USA and Russia, or China. Comparison of two countries. And then the coalition)

@@monkeys7187 wet dreams

@@moelester391 What? Who made this video was who compared 1 contry vs 29 countries. Who is joking here?

nato is no diffetent

Most of Russian weapons are rubbish and we can see that in Ukraine!Also their soldiers are amateurs and have no clue how to fight.The only advantage of Russia is nuclear weapons.In WW2 they were supported by USA that is why they looked so strong.Otherwise they are highly overestimated!

You have no clue what you're talking about. "Inoperable junk" is a vast overstatement. Russia has been selling off and shipping out obsolete but perfectly functional T-55s, T-62s, and T-72s to Syria, Iraq, and many countries in Africa within the last 10 years. Their stocks of T-90, T-80, and T-72 are by most defense analysts perfectly operable, some with a requirement for refurbishment or upgrade packages, particularly the ones from the 80s and 90s, but that is already standard when taking tanks out of storage depots, even the tanks they end up selling usually get some degree of upgrading, barely minimum being some ERA and FCS upgrades. For comparison the US has something like 4000 Abrams in storage, mostly M1A1 and some M1A2. M1A1 is from the mid-80s, so about as old if not older than a lot of the Russian tanks in storage. For any of these to enter American service, or even be sold off to allies, they would likely be upgraded to SEPv3 standard at least, for US service, if not the upcoming SEPv4, and for overseas export a standard similar to M1A2S sold to the Saudis, or M1A2-K sold to Kuwait. Crews are another issue entirely. Russian conscription leaves much to be desired but it is not exactly difficult to train crews to some modest level of performance. Tanks are not nearly as complicated nor difficult to use as planes, and even in NATO service tanker positions like driver and loader are trained within weeks, gunners take longer and tank commanders typically as long as a year.

Russian equipment isn't necessarily garbage. Most of their tanks may be old, but function perfectly fine. Their crews and tactics are garbage. The equipment being sent to Ukraine by the allies is doing exactly what it was designed to do. You think a javelin wouldn't smoke an M1A2 or a Leopard?

Russia's technical capability is excellent, but its army isn't well prepared for drone attacks, that's for sure.

Don't forget china,north Korea Iran and probably India would make a good addition to Russia's superpower as well 😂

@@muhdfazli7409 I mean India is the world's largest democracy aligned with dictators and authoritarianism isn't a good look for them.

@@muhdfazli7409 China and India will never lie in bed with this living dead Putin. "Superpower" only in insanity. Have you forgotten who has lost the cold war? The times of russian "superpower" are 30 years ago.

@@muhdfazli7409 lol, like India would ally with with Russia in a war with NATO! KEEP DREAMING. AND N KOREA doesn't even have an aircraft that can fly more than a hundred miles. Had to borrow the Chinese aircraft just to fly Kim to Singapore! So good luck with that!

@@muhdfazli7409 India would not align themselves with China in a world war.

И БРИКС еще припишем, хотя это уже торгово-дипломатическая организация 👀

No it isnt, he have more. Putin have sent only 10% of His Army against all Ukraine and this is a big Deal. Russia have made and make more damage with this 10% Army against Ukraine then Ukraine to Russians Invasion with 10% thickness of Army

Exactly!

I'd be surprise if they work as they should.

@Marhild Ordo who said it the fullshited west

@@jonathonblacker299 😂😂

The vast difference between clowns with fragile toys and veterans in steel monsters is a lot different

5:38 this is a helicopter belonging to poland with polish painting not russian // pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siły_Powietrzne

@@alainstrzyga3474 Yes, but this model of helicopters was created in Russia (more precisely, in the Soviet Union (USSR)) - Mi-24 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mil_Mi-24

Quality is as important as quantity. An old and (not sure if 100% operable) wapon cannot be compared with a new well functionig one

Russian tanks better than western tanks. Historical fact.

Great: Include Thailand, Australia, Japan, New Zealand, Tawain, South Korea etc. please.

NATO countries have 78% of the world budget, and they can increase their military power 9 times within 3 months. Imagine a NATO 9 times stronger, all the more so that within a year it can increase its military power 32 times. You don't know the power of NATO, what it can do. Imagine if other alliances like Japan, South Korea, Australia, etc. were taken.

@@biglebowski5737 Why?) They don't look like suicides. Japan did not dare to attack the USSR even in a direct alliance with Hitler. They (unlike you) understand how quickly they will be destroyed in this case. Australia lost to the ostriches and, in principle, will not participate in a war on another continent. Don't overestimate yourself. Even England and France will run away from you at the first opportunity. Everyone is already tired of you ;)

@@user-yz9ko1yj2e I’m sorry, did you say something? I was too busy being awesome

Yes

Пока что 😉

Скоро будет не одна, а ноль.

@@nickmakeitbetter ты это про НАТО говоришь, Россия вот будет больше иметь союзников и Японию и вообще в том видео не состыковка, там уже больше техники сделанно.

33:2 почти всухую НАТО выносит Россию. А Путинские пропагандоны говорят, что мир Россией будет

и в резерве более 250 тысяч

Exactly. Also not to mention the proper level of training needed for a well functioning force. These things make the bigger differences

@@arjenhuytker this is not ww1,no matter how big spirit you are, with a scream of uraaa!! or whatever, will be ez grind with excalibur, avenger, stingray, or reaper drone, because they can be driven while drinking coffee from the base

You mean Russians drink spirit?

No, he means the cocaine spirit of the little dictator who sold his country to NATO. If you know what I mean ;)

Who said Sweden is joining? Sweden does not need to, it's been independent since last decades and will stay out of any alliances I "guess".

@@elfillari Sweden is considering on joining. That's all. We'll probably get a response soon from their government.

@@ajcyrilldy Where did you hear from? Your Alaskan neighbors? Maybe it's better to be in Sweden to know why them keep going independent in so many "international crisis"? Because they don't have to involve in those chrisis.

@@elfillari Where did I hear it from? *The Swedish Government.* The responses they gave is not the same as the responses they gave last month when they were keen on not joining at all. They're considering on joining. But they still have to make the final decision on whether they should apply or not.

@@ajcyrilldy All the countries around the Sweden will apply or being already members. Why should Sweden joining and paying four percentage of its turn over to Nato? They will get the same protection thru the borders for free. If Russians want to invade Sweden, they have to cross the border of the Nato country first. Either from east, south, or north side! Such a great geographic situation for this Swedish territory they having!

Dokładnie

И это правильный вопрос. И надо принять во внимание союз России с Китаем и Северной Кореей.

russia lies when listing numbers also . they only had 2800 active tanks before the war ten thousand are in storage and most of them are scrap metal need to be replaced . they count 1930s tanks as reserves from world war 2 . same goes with many of their listed numbers they list 1950s jets to boast their numbers on paper .

@@apollo-eu4fk 💯

Thanks in part from the US and UK in getting those Javelins. Those weapons are lit.

@@bhattiji433 you mean the fact the Russian Army couldnt capture a single city until now. Ukraine will get it back with ease.

Less Tanks yes, the Oldies from the '60 and '70 😂.

Why would you want to insult Accrington Stanley ?

@@ejcm55 : Agree, I think that's rude right?

Hey whats wrong with Accrington Stanley !!!!!

@@fisherking1863 Nothing. Their motto is "Who are they".

Accrington whatever they be didn't invaded no one... Also it will be a football team against a ping pong double team.

La qualité d’europe et américaine est 100 x supérieur à celle des russes

hahaha VeRy FuNnY🤤

Comedy Gold Medalist 🏅 🎖 🤣

Finland just sent some tractors to the boarder.

@@fairybeliver180 "armored tractors"

@@nikosmosxos5856 now that's something I'd pay to see

Your right they are all corrupt. The poor soldiers get wiped out the fat cats got big boats .

they are very important . escorts,yachts and football teams . all important stuff to have around

Haha. All those yachts are in USA's hands along with over $100/billion seized. Ha ha. F Russia

Yes but it is domestic affair of Russia (corruption etc)

США самая коррумпированная страна в мире.

The difference is not big, because in 2-3 years Russia will be able to restore all its losses with newer equipment

@@MeikZoo stay in your sweet dream, whatever happen

@@vanessalucie8443 It’s you who stay in your dreams if you think that Russia is suffering incomparable losses in Ukraine, even now Russia produces 1500-1600 tanks a year, which allows it to cover losses in Ukraine in 2-3 years

Und woher kommt das Geld für die Teile und woher kommen die Teile und woher kommen die Leute die die Panzer bauen etc. ? Und lass dir deine Zahlen mal von einem Militärexperten bestätigen.

@Meikzoo they dont produce 1000 tanks pero year. The only thing they do is refurbish old Soviet-era tanks that they have in storage. 🤣

In first, it's even not possible to survive without cheap Russian gas and Oil for the Whole EU and America, so it will be a miracle if NATO survives a Apocalypse, let's pray for those NATO countries

Yeah they have disturbed the hornet's nest.

@@brucetaylor4118 not true. The USA was importing only 5% from Russia. That is now zero. The alliance will get to the point of using zero fossil fuels from Russia ASAP. Dependent ATM, yes, but they have learned their lesson. Considering America is the lion's share of the alliance's military power, it will be capable of getting the job done by itself if necessary. Remove Putin and maybe the world can live in peace for a change. But if you really want to test our resolve, then go for it. There is NO winning scenario for Russia. And before you threaten it, nuclear is not the answer either. Like I said, there is no winning scenario for Russia.

@@brucetaylor4118 Wrong the US can become oil independent in 6 months.

And it's all for politics and to kill incident people in another banker war

this is a direct hit to russia i see but out of russia 150billion yearly budget almost half of it goes to maintain the old tech which is why russia is using it in the war with ukraine to get rid of it and also shows us why they dont really care if they lose it or gets destroyed

@@NahIdWin995 half of it goes into general's and politician's pockets. The other half is spent on vodka.

@@CH-pv2rz mhm sure

@@NahIdWin995 So you're basically saying they're using this war to get rid of their old equipment lose men and resources just to get new equipment in the end? Wouldn't you think that recycling these tanks and using it for their "modern" vehicles would be a better choice?

and the other half of the budget is for vodka and bribes.@@NahIdWin995

Не кого не уничтожат , нато просто перестанет существовать , ведь стоит только дернутся нато начнется ядерная война , и не одно пво нато не в силах уничтожить ядерные России

Рашку естественно.

@@user-rm7gt4ne2d Врятли Сербия присоединится к этому конфликту.

А Сербия тут причём, или ты про украпарашку изгоев что ли ну да наверное@@user-rm7gt4ne2d

they would beat up ukraine if putin could spell tactics lol

Putin ran away after the attack in belgorod, he has been hanging out in the East of Russia. looks like he is dying

They culd but the are fighting Nato alrady by proxy

@@militaristaustrian you think they're fighting NATO by proxy because they said so on Russian TV. Um, no. You better hope you never trigger article 5 or you'll see that what you're facing today has zero resemblance to what would come. Feeding Ukraine tidbits is crushing the Russian army. I'd actually feel sorry for the Russian military if NATO launched an attack. It would be Russia's last war. Ever.

@@alainlefebvre9860 RT IS BLOCKT IN EU, I ONELY GET GERMAN, UKRAINEN AND AMERICAN NEWS

The longer the Ukraine war plays out, the more likely Russia will lose. Its already lost by most of their own metrics.

Sans nuclear

Lol Ukraine has a support of nato n their latest technology weapon but where in Russia is being caution to limit civilian casualties but cmg by ur logic then super power usa and nato was in Afgan for 20year still have to return defeated so can we conclude that Afghanistan has defeated NATO.

FAAAAAAAAAAACTS!!!!!!!!!

I agreed Russia is poor country

Технику НАТО толкько умножить на 8 можно тк она новее и лучше . Один в поле воин во второй мировой войне при лендлизе США и при поддержки Великобритании и США в Африке Азии и западной Европе

Просто твоей самке нужна белая лада

Just imagine what a squadron of A-10s could have done to that miles long, stopped or slowly moving, convoy. Can you say, "Highway of Death II!"

Would be so saddisfying

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-1g9EXIaKAIE.html

@@tfp0052 Target rich environment.

russia also was lucky that ukraine was the poorest country in europe 🤣 if the poorest european country is doing what it's doing to such top military power and right next to the closest border of the developed russian zone... i cant imagine what a rich ukraine could have done lmao (in both cases with western's help)

Only on paper, most of it is not operational.

@@mr.t993 and they really can’t fix or buy anything because of sanctions

Because no one wants to completely destroy Ukraine. A huge number of mass weapons are not used (and this is not about nuclear weapons) The purpose of this war is to capture Ukraine with a minimum number of victims from both sides. And also try to preserve the infrastructure as much as possible

Вам напомнить как мы гоняли вас в Сирии? Россия могла за 2 дня просто разбомбить Украины как вы это сделали с Югославией , но мы страна миротворец и до вашего уровня падать не будем , это не война , а спецоперация , было послано 1\10 армии , цель защита граждан Донбаса

they took more then 30% of ukraine only with 100k troops

usa > russia 1vs1

Correction Russian number one Submarine plus 🤣

It's more than one taken out of action

True say!

Why? Nato lost more they don’t even have ammunition. 😂😂😂

@@Mcorpmike yeah and russia lost the war

@@Michael-mk6sm did they? as far as i know they keep moving at Kiev.

@@Mcorpmike where did you get this information? even Kremlin news isn't saying this? besides that, call me a traitor all you want, but im all for Легион Свобода России in Белгородская Область...

Except false pride and the ability to suffer greatly.

@@socaljarhead7670😭😭. You didn't have to do them that dirty 😂

Actually, I'm afraid they may have more small tactical nukes than NATO

BRILLIANT! HOW ABOUT RUSSIAS STOCKPILE OF NUCLEAR WEAPON'S??? DOES NATO OR THE U.S. OUTCLASS THEM IN THAT DEPT. TOO??? ARE YOU SERIOUS?? Do you have any clue how quickly a "military ground war could escalate between U.S./NATO VS RUSSIA, before RUSSIA unleashes it's highly advanced, Nuclear Missiles, that can evade U.S./NATO defence systems.. Missles aptly dubbed: "SATAN 2 Nuclear Missiles"...?? How does that vast number of military ground troops.. i.e. soldiers from U.S. and NATO, with their state of the art weaponry fight a "Global Thermonuclear War" against RUSSIA and their sophisticated, Missile Technology??? How could they even hope to stop RUSSIA, given the likelihood of that scenario! Where is the common sense??? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-j9kbiXVjeMc.html

Don't trust appearances, they can deceive a war is decided by several factors

China couldn't care less 😂

China only care about China.

the most of data is wrong

most of the stuff in this video either complitely wrong or partially false information

i was worrying about that thx

@@scootjeboschwi5352 no just no

I bet 90% of their nukes don’t work. This war has really exposed Russia as a retard state.

The point is most likely. That we all can pray that Nato and Russia will never go to war. Because nukes will be used for sure.

Yes. Russia has no hope whatsoever in a straight up conventional fight. Any force of any size would be vanquished in short order. That’s why they can never be challenged because those crazy (and proud) asshokes wouldn’t hesitate to use nuclear weapons to save themselves or even worse, to save face.

Russians just seem wholly incompetent on every level of life. I’d worry their nukes are degrading as we speak. Nobody over there knows what they’re doing.

Entertainment purposes

Well too be fair Russia is the same size.......

@@biglebowski5737 nato more than 800,000,000 people, rusia 145,000,000 people, 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@@UniversalVideosAll ....so?

It's like Empire Strikes Back right? Or perhaps the revival of Anglo-Saxons Empire again? *The Great Reset*

Are you a NATO or America troll? Just because someone likes Russia does not mean that they are a troll!!

NATO all they way. BTW, I have nothing against normal, kind, loving Russians. It's the brainwashed ones I have a problem with. Would like a world where NATO is not necessary.

De semmit se ér. NATO hadsereg katonáit csak a pénz motiválja. A NATO gépek is =0.

Мы вас всех убьем

​@@-lismore-9122Russians didn't defeat them either.

The Chinese spy ballons.....🎈🎈🎈🗽🤣😭

And rocket cruiser "Moscow", and Leopards...

Ναι και μάλιστα ζήτησαν συγνώμη που το κατέρριψαν γιατί δεν ήξεραν ότι είναι αόρατο 😂😂😂😂 Ζήτω ο μεγάλος ηγέτης Πούτιν και η μεγάλη Ρωσία

a like on the wisest comment in this entire selection

Well said, that is my point too.

Yes but if you dont protect your nation how will you stop agression. War is a must. If only russians learn that they are not compatible for world dominnce. I mean russians themselves dont buy putins shit

They only want all people suffer

@@cap9719 Who?

way to kick Russia while their down...

@@dylanmahanets6603 😂🤣😂 *most underrated comment wow

@@roddy6924 it gets even worse when u relise it doesn't taker into account fuel or food supply... imagine having to fight a war and live of rations that exspired in 2015...

@@dylanmahanets6603 unfortunately I didn't see tactical nukes compared, maybe i missed it though

Yes wich russia do not have

Who want to team up wit a country that soon will collapse?.

Точняк. Забыли копья Эритреи посчитать 😄

NATO isn't alone either south Korea, Taiwan, Australia,New Zealand, Austria, Vietnam, Mexico, Egypt, Ireland, Moldova, Sweden, Mongolia and many others will back up NAtO

​@@DeltasquadformingupMongólia, vietname = 🇷🇺

@@Olgarina_do_rosario17 no they won't they have no reason to support Russia and have constant disputes with China

NATO: "Peace through superior Firepower" Amen to that.

The comparison is legit whatever opinion u may have about Russia or nato

Yeah your insane if you think Italy alone could take them Ukraine was the strongest country on the continent if they can’t beat them no 1 country can except china or usa

Доказательство, что НАТО это агрессор . Ливия, Ирак, югославия

@@Trill-Is-Real Без поддержки НАТО - война в украине давно бы уже закончилась

NATO helping Ukraine.. and learn to spell properly

​@@StormHerobrineНАТО помогает нам разоружить не только 404, но и всё НАТО.

@@clarkdavis3588 Massive collection of good condition Russian vehicles, the farmers just wanna collect equipment ! :3

That's true. But Russians are absolute honey badgers if anyone invades their Motherland. They are incompetent militarily but defending their homeland is a different war.

I don't know why they haven't already. They have been handed all the top of the range fire power from other countries - just go and use it!

@@Patracat USA will not allow them.

Ukraine should. Taking the war home to Russia

Putin needs to learn and understand Russia is not a superpower.

We can compare USA and russia

@@sk4klp727 sorry, one very important nuance. the enemy of my enemy is my friend. If there is a direct clash between Russia and NATO, I think China and India, and other countries dissatisfied with the United States, will take part against the West. After all, they understand that if Russia loses, they will be next, and already in that ratio the chances will be less than before. So, your statistics don't give the real picture. and these are completely different figures and no longer in the direction of the west.

@@sk4klp727 Yea, this would be fairer. If we were to compare NATO to something we would need to compare it to China+Russia+India

It would seem so..

hahahah, it's literally losing to 1 country Ukraine, your country is pathetic

Russia and Nato peace 4 ever❤❤

We already saw this potential in Ukraine

Надеюсь, Россия станет страной побогаче, как минимум, что бы не уступала остальным в производстве микроэлектроники. Когда изобретут российский литограф? Надеюсь, в ближайшие 10 лет

@@egarinka typicl russian excuses🤣🤣 Kiev for 3 days🤣

The pride of the Black Sea is no more. Unreal.

Its on a special sub surface Mission

qubla2 underrated comment 👏

How much joy and gloating are in you. As if Ukraine and NATO are not losing anything. As if you had no losses in the Iraq war. Rejoice and gloat. This is your nature.

@@qubla2 special diving operation

or "aircraft carriers" even.

Maybe try third time lucky ?

Most of the countries dont need them...

@@gregharwho62 true the u.s needs them because it’s on another continent lol

Carriers are outdated now, they were good duaring WWII to deliver bombs to remote countries, now its not needed ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-iSs88fn-CXg.html

The nukes do

@@ssww3 do russias nukes even work- lol

@@joemama-kl1xm idk and I don't to find out

@@joemama-kl1xm Say that to the TSAR BOMBA Lmao

@@johnwick6831 only one made

Yep.

Those are old, and unusable.

Actually , closer to 2500 before the invasion.

Probably just like all their equipment, I'd cut all the numbers given here for USABLE Russian assets by at least a third

Honestly even 2,500 is optimistic judging by their maintenance standards. With more than 500 confirmed losses their total operational tank force is most certainly well below the 2,000 mark now. I also wonder if those personnel numbers are pre-war as well, because they've got no less than 15-20,000 KIA at this point and 2-3x that wounded so total losses have to be well past 50,000 now.By May 9th their KIA count might actually exceed US KIA's in the Korean War (Which would put the Ruso-Ukrainian War in the Top 5 Most KIAs on the US list, behind only the World Wars, the Civil War, and Vietnam).

Its probably around 3k operable tanks but thats still a lot... Uk and Germany have combined 500-550 tanks so its still very impresive...

offcourse there is comparisons

But Goliath dead in the end of the story & his head got cut off by Yahweh's will right remember?? You shouldn't forgot this though

@@princevelkan295 what do you mean David cut his head off

a bunch of little Davids with their big brother America vs Goliath. Russia is just a bully country, trying to take what they can. its nothing new, I hope NATO gets the chance to wipe the floor with Russia. Find out where the ICBM Silo/vehicles are and strike them fast

David had won because he had God how Russia today, is not like the USA with nothing only they show that they could but they cant do nothing its hopeless how Nato

Define "real war"! But if you insist: Look ant Irak I and II. Although was not involved, the alliance was led by Nato countries. They kicked Irak's ass quickly and effectively.

only thing modern is uk and usa :D

And constant training

@@rustama.h1913 I think Canada's finally going to start replacing our old fighter jets with F-35's. 👍

@@rustama.h1913 try to never mesestime your ennemy, its the safer way to win a war.... Bastian

@@felixluisocasio8948 you are completely right, 4 ex. the flying's hours of the pilots are essentials for real the goal, and russian's pilots have less than a third (in the better situation) than us.....not mentionned the advance of fighters tech. But its important not to underestime their capabilities....its safer, at least.

Yes, but this comparison doesn't take into account the training, morale, experience, logistics, tactics, etc that the Russian troops have compared to the west. Some of the numbers may even be counting irreparable Russian utilities, meaning that their amount of any number shown in the video could be significantly higher.

If they cant capture a country anymore, I doubt they can go against NATO.

We'll see who's who... RU-vid Compilations Don't Win the Fighting. Good video...

most of the nato countries have tiny land armies of a couple thousand troops . most of natos power is from usa uk france and germany

@@apollo-eu4fkNumbers don’t mean much in this age.

We already did...partially. If Russia can't handle little Ukraine with HALF of proper weapon and trained solders, what would happen if NATO really was going to get into the fight. And in nuclear war there is no winners, I think tiny silicon dwarf knows that as well(he have children and grand children as well).

@@waynebynet нато уже воюет с россией руками украинцев и вы всем миром не можете победить Россию. Подумай над этим.

Я думаю развязка скоро, наблюдаю с интересом, заранее предполагая результат...

@@crm6312 guess what, the world has used less than a fraction of its arsenal, so has nato, they havent even gave ukraine tanks or its much more advanced machinery. russia is using a majority of its arsenal and they are still not in kyiv, and they are now using soviet era machinery and their economy is collapsing, the western economy is still growing.

Наша все равно лучше 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺❤❤❤

Russia raised Ukraine from its knees, then Russia received knives in a spiral

@@goblinslayer5176 So WRONG, NATO is getting trashed...billions spent, millions sent and 🇺🇦 can't reclaim her acclaimed territories, that shows that those places are incredibly 🇷🇺Ian🤷

У нас в Сибири в день сотни танков и самолётов изготавливаются на случай агрессии НАТО

Russia using 10% of its army

То, что ты думаешь и то, что есть на самом деле - тоже сильно отличается))

Some of them at divided at Chinese borders...

about 3000 can everyone actually be serious

Thomas Demasi Australia Russia is killing women and children NATO forces cannot let this happen push them back 2 there borders and stop this inhumane bloodbath slava Ukraine

Only modern tanks left are used in the annual parade the rest are rusting wreaks in Ukraine 😂

@@PaPyRene Exactly my point

@@CptUhudini Putin hat ein großen Fehler gemacht.

@@user-fp5wz3hl1u Definitiv. Ich glaube zwar immernoch, dass Russland diesen Krieg gewinnen wird aber das wird ihn EINIGES kosten

@@PaPyRene what problems russia have there? took more then 30% of ukraine with only 100k troops, not bad

Vietnam was half a world away. Ukraine literally borders Russia. You think the logistic of invading vietnam is even remotely as easy as Ukraine?

Not actually true. Russia would be gone but many nato countries would not be hit. No radiation would reach a large area of the southern hemisphere.

Армия России уступает армии НАТО но не так сильно как военный бюджет 😂

@@tclanjtopsom4846 Why do we need such a world if there will be no Russia?

@@dzelat5849 World without russia = dream world 🌍🌎

Well said brother, the fools think it is a game, but winter is coming and we shall see what surprises it will bring them. Mother Russia will prevail, you have the whole normal world with you. 🇷🇺🇲🇰🇷🇺

bo twórca tego materiału jest mocno pierdolnięty i wyciągnął dane z dupy i zdjęcia też

which were helped by us 5-tons. especially during the battle of kirsk

@@raymacleod6370 Red Army Mechanized Corps 1943: 3 rifle brigades, 1 tank brigade, 2 regiments of self-propelled artillery units(SAU), etc. Red Army Tank Brigade, 53 tanks: 20 tanks - a T-60 tank (5 tons) and a T-70 tank (9 tons), etc. 2 Regiments of SAU(hard,medium or light regiments): 12(152mm), 16(122mm), 20(76mm) SAUs+1 command tank.

In WW2 the both sides of the fronts has +- 10.000.000 troops. In Ukraine +- 500.000

NATO IS IN MATRIX I WILL DESTROY NATO

NATO IS TOO OBESE LIKE 10 PERCENT FIT FOR SERVICE RUSSIA HAS 44 PERCENT FIT FOR SERVICE

Please don’t insult African counties like that.

@@jamesb95 I'm in Uganda, east Africa)

@@aileronhelicopters you could beat russia too🤣😂🤭

@@BeardedBavarianBiker. agree, incase there's a war between him, after being defeated will show strength by using Nukes

@@aileronhelicopters I think one of his generals (or cooks) would pop him on the temple before he got that far. 🤞

@K D'Arcy not to mention they have no parts to fix these days🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Russia only has 2500/3500 tanks ( working ) The rest is scrap metal lol.

@K D'Arcy Well it could be used. There using junk now. Maybe they would have to tow there tanks into battle with farm tractors.

Old tanks from 12.000 only 2000 are functionally. Split this to another zones of Russia .... So many aircrafts and still no air superiority. Admiral ship taken down with lower rackets technology. Only "useless" nuclear weapons are real threat but I guess many also are only on paper in order to justify the stealing money hidden under name of " military buget".

EU paid for that heavy arms lost

2nd best army in Ukraine... and we ( NATO) aren't even in the fight yet .. Putin knows he cant match us..

Imagine if China went for land grabs in Russia.

China’s power is all propaganda. Research has been done and shows that there military is a lot worse off. Even compared to Russia’s failure in Ukraine. China is a lot worse then that. China just knows how to lie, steal and talk very loud. But they have absolutely no substance to back any of it up. Why else would China need the politicaly over exaggerated Coronavirus (given to them by Angel of Death Anthony Fauci) to overthrow the United States of America Federal Government. Democrats are part of the CCP after all, and look how those treasonous bozos are doing. They fit perfectly with China, there owners. Don’t be afraid of these paper threats (China and Russia) and any who work for them. Democrats in America, Macron in France and the Labor part in Britain. There all hot air with no substance. Let’s free the world of all these Globalist crap heads. Death to the Left.

@@Fred-eg9sx resources…nothing the Russians could do about it.

Sorry, but with all their Made in China military equipment....I think China's military would be broken after 48hrs in the field lol