People generally throw the term "goat" around pretty lightly, but I genuinely think am4 might literally be the greatest chipset to date. Not only does it have some absolute nukes in terms of budget chips, but it still stays competitive in the top end. And it's STILL supported!
Yes, using the term "language model" to refer to GPT models is more apt because it covers a broader scope. While "GPT" is specific to the language model created by OpenAI, "language model" is a general category that includes all language models, including GPT and other types of language models that generate human-like text. So in this case, using the term "language model" would be more accurate and apt.
@@PuppetMasterdaath144 I'm like 60% sure GPT is used to describe other then OpenAi LMs too. For example after a bit of search I found out "Generative pretraining" was a long-established concept in machine learning applications and the concept of transformers was introduced by Google a couple of years ago. GPTs refer to very large trained language models, LMs can be small and work specific. But other than this argument, I agree with your statement.
Im content with the 5700x for now but looking into upgrading my 3070 sometime soon (maybe Radeon 9000 series?) I am waiting for LGs 5k2k oled gaming monitor to release
Best guess is that it doesnt improve last gen, rather the main focus (or addition) is just the NPU boost. Especially when it still is 4nm and Windows pushing Copilot. Maybe Zen 5 might improve benchmarks but we’ll see. *edited for grammar
STOP!!! Its marketing my guy. The fact you calling red flags without any kinda 3rd party testing is a red flag of a hater or just plain old ignorance!!!
@@samnyce what are you talking about? Their previous processors literally did boast that. Now they don't. This is clearly a red flag. I am not a hater but a 7945HX user who's waiting for better HX370 laptops and I want the info.
AM4 will be going on 9 years of support next year. Trust me, you are not too late for AM5 😂 at this rate they will continue dropping CPU’s for it until 2030
I think the x3d chips are the ace up their sleeve, as they will arrive and be reviewed with the 5090 and if the 5090 performs as expected, then the demands on the cpu will be intense and show the gap being possibly larger than what we see today with the 7900xtx
Imagine if Intel wanted laymen to know about generations of CPU, so they started naming their CPUs Kilo, then Mega, then Giga, Terra, Peta, Exa, zeta, yotta, ronna, Quetta, and then they have to pick a new making scheme.
@@crow9283 From all the videos I have seen its around 36% faster given the information AMD presented . There’s currently no 790M but rather a 780M. The 880M will most likely be a little faster given its 12CUs of RDNA 3.5. The 780M is 12CUs of RDNA 3 and the 890M is 16CUs of RDNA 3.5.
8 years of support for AM4. That is absolutely amazing. I'm still running my original day one board. It started with a 1700x and now boasts a 5950. The fact that they continue to support this platform pretty much guarantees that when I do leave AM4 behind I'll be moving with AMD.
i used to remember every single cpu that ever came out like u could ask me how many cores does an i7 8700 have and id say 6 and 12 threads u could ask about a 4790k id say 4 and 8 threads.. but ever since the performance and efficiency BS from intel and the changing of naming scheme i just lost interest.. like tf is a core ultra? tf is a ryzen ai 300 something?
I think most of this figure comes from the doubling of the instructions bandwidth. This showcases how hard it is to improve on these CPUs. Lol, all the videos claiming the cpus were going to release with up to 40% increase.
I feel like they cut cost on the apu department. Hopefully it comes to desktop. I mean low cost 10/12 core cpu with decen igpu. It Will be bliss for us SFF builder. 300 dollar for 10 core and 350 for 12 core. Remember it will have bad pcie lanes like 8700g
I'm not really sure what you mean by this but, the entire lineup of rizen 9000 generation CPUs include the same APU which is the Radeon 880m. Obviously the higher end CPU will have slightly better performance than the more budget ones.
AMD is playing it smart with AM4. They know that the platform is rock solid and pretty much every "bug" has been fixed. A drop in upgrade for an existing platform will make current AM4 customers happy. New builders for AM5 have the assurance that AMD is trying to address some of the quirks with that platform. Having said that: I have seen a couple of PC builders/testers feeling unsettled with DDR5 in the upper end of RAM capacity (i.e. 96GB and 128GB) not being able to run at the full rated speed of the RAM modules. Maybe AMD 9000 will address that. Overall though: I am now a bit torn between my next PC build. Having said that and to quote another streamer: "Time will tell."
Which OEM do you think will best implement AMD mobile chips in a notebook form factor for creativity and gaming hybrid use case? If so which series lineup?
9900 no direct Vs 14700, different market and price. 14700 is old, 9900 more, prefer 14700, no problem with normal software same office, game, and other. 9900 has only professional use.
Nothing special apple m4 geekbench single core score is 3600+. They are promising 15% improvement. How they r gonna beat m4. Heck even intel 15th gen is gonna smash this ryzen lineup. It doesn't look powerful
I'll get excited when they push the core count in the CCX's up. Zen 5c is rumored to be 16 core CCX, Zen 6 is rumored to be 32 core CCX. 64 core desktop processors in a xx950 would be awesome.
So when I got used to the old naming and could tell every spec of the last Ryzen CPUs... They made another one and its even more confusing. From a marketing perspective, they're just saying their AI chips are a generation ahead which is kindda true. But from a customer's perspective its annoying and even harder to understand.
No hate from me on the name changes. AMD is making amazing products, but for the average consumer, "bigger number more good". AMD has to play the marketing game. As long as their products meet expectations, I don't care what they call them.
AMD's engineers are GOATed, but their marketing team should be fired for all the stupid naming scheme changes. Why can't they just make a consistent naming scheme and stick to it??
😂 everyone is blowing the recall feature out of proportion. MS and any other nefarious organization doesn’t need it to steal your data. Your smartphone probably has more tabs open that have never been closed that Apple or Google could steal from. What should be blown up and pressure that should be applied to Microsoft is if you turn a feature off an update shouldn’t turn it back on. I would go as far as having the FTC step in and do an investigation on why this happens.
I’m so over the bloatnaming going on, so confusing every fkn release that I don’t bother following or wanting to buy. Intel too. All stupid … on that note though glad they are providing some stiff competition.
So happy I went with am4 like 4 years ago if not more I got the x3d chip rn and will upgrade later to the 59000xt I’m riding out am4 for another 5 years tops feels good
Comparing to the currently existing gen means almost nothing to me. The real comparison comes when Arrow Lake comes out and then we will see if AMD can out punch them. It’s nice to have competition
Everytime I come back to this channel this guy is all over the place with his opinions. It's not like he corrects himself either its.just contradicting statements. I'm not watching this.
Cinebench R23 R9 9950X: 44,151 My OC 13900KF + DDR4 4000: 42,300 Single-Core: 2365 Single-Core: 2362 Don't get swept in the hype folks. It's not bad, but a "monster"? I would've been impressed with something closer to 50K in R23.
dammm came out of no where with the power move just that they dropped Another! am4 alone is just the best marketing no talking just actions that show they still care bout the lil guys lol
AM4's longevity is the main reason I went with AMD in my newest build, I felt confidant that AM5 would be supported for many years. Even back in the day they had Super Socket 7 which was quite chad as well. Good history of supporting their CPUs over time. Cant say that for Intel, thats for sure.
why do things have to change. when I was a yoiung man all I needed was my trusty old TI-83 clculator. sure it was primitive for a computing device but dammit it was HONEST :(
The only difference is on IPC, that it is around 10%... very disappointing, I mean what it is this? Intel? No core count increase, no clock speed increase... also there was no pricing....Hopefully zen6 launch something good otherwise the investment in the am5 platform was not worthy. Just tons of AI shit
You're not getting a clock increase unless TSMC can make N4 switch faster than N5, and considering it's a minor improvement, it's most likely only a power usage decrease, Zen 4 was the clock up-tick design, while Zen 5 is the an IPC boost. Clocks are overrated, and they've been overrated since Pentium 4 at 3.8GHz was slower than Athlon 64 at 2.8GHz. You can squeeze an extra 10% out of an overclocked Ryzen CPU, but it's power usage will double, just look at how awful Intel's i9 series is atm, chasing clocks are a bad idea.
@@woobilicious. 10% IPC improvement it is not good enough when there is no otyer improvements... I men what it is yhis? Intel. We already have good coolers, I didn't want the new CPUs to use more power, but clearly a 8 cores zen5 should be able to clock faster than zen4 using a better node, AT LEAST 6 GHZ. They didn't want to do it because it will the 12 and 16 cores look baaad
Is 6:31 compared to a specific chip or just AM4 ? I wanted to know how much better the 9950x will be over the 7950x 3D in terms of gaming and rendering etc.
I don' t know that I'd go so far as to call the graphics bandwidth slide cringe..... Maybe the fact that It's titled "The Ultimate content creator AI platform" is cringe since, with that title, the fact that you can't use the bandwidth is an issue. If they had labeled it something like "AMD is ready for AI of the future" or something more forward looking, it'd be better, but having the bandwidth available in the future is a good thing that they should be advertising.
I see conference for desktop Ryzen is a totally deception same core counts and no AI just increases IPC. Ryzen AI HX is for laptops and no signal for new RX with real AI build in.
I’m looking for to see how the x3d variants change through this generation. Wondering if they go with it on both CCD’s. Want to see if that helps the parking issues with the higher core counts
when the heck are they going to put out a higher core count chip!?? they are still stuck at 16!! even 18- or 20 cores would be nice!! I don't understand why they are still hung up on this!!
