President Robert Pierson was one of the best if not the best GC president we have had. He was truly a man of God that stood for principle. I wish we have more leaders like him! Although Elder Ted Wilson from has at times waffled, I believe he is trying to rectify that and doing his best to keep the Church together. Pray for him. Your comments sound like they are coming more from jealousy than anything else. Sorry, that's how I feel.
That comment was more specific to John Rosier. Your sin is in AGREEING with and sharing his accusations and many wrong positions on historical events. MANY OF his interpretations lack historical connection and are based on revised history.
Problem is many have a personal "spiritual/authoritative" relationship with Ellen. As a result it's very difficult for some to see her faults no matter what evidence is presented. Even when the evidence comes from her own mouth/pen.
Cognitive dissonance renders cultists as helpless captives. When new information is presented it can be accepted, pondered, or rejected. Adventists are hopelessly trapped in religious cognitive dissonance which is almost impossible to escape. Adventists have a 5 % chance of escaping eternal hell. Not only do Adventist cultists reject the new information ( biblical reality) but they attack the bearer of the good news. Rosier is a fourth generation cultist. He wants to reform the Adventist demonic cult. Until all the cult leaders repent publicly and denounce their asinine prophet and their foundational doctrine of demons there will be no reform. The cult should be ended. All the leaders should submit themselves to the authoritative body in a real local fellowship with a pastor/ teacher. They need to pay back the money they have stolen as frauds and die and be born again. None of them are Christians. Rosier is living in a fantasy world. By staying in the cult he’s part of the problem. Just admit your family were idiots in an inane demonic cult and move on. You are beating a dead horse demanding it get up and work. It’s madness.
Thank You Peter for this interview. I am polish, and I grew up in polish SDA Church. Most people in Poland know nothing about things You are talking about. Surely I will watch next part on Ted Wilson. God bless You. Please share the link to speech of Des Ford from 27th October of 1979.
- I’m so pleased you are enjoying the interviews! My aim is to both reveal and restore. Here’s the link to the famous 1979 forum talk. adventistdigitallibrary.org/adl-2451/investigative-judgment-theological-milestone-or-historical-necessity
Agree with you, Eric totally! No matter the large amount of evidence of anti-biblical doctrines and fraudulent “prophetic” gift: THEY DO SEE IT. Well, most of the defenders the they do for living is working for the Church. They cannot compromise their way of living out of the fraude
Her rabid stance on civil worker Unions was primarily grounded in the zeitgeist of the day being immigration and rich people fear of them.The irony is they formed and brought Unions into their structure and Unions helped the church.A house divided will not stand.
In Adventism, members are not allowed to scrutinize EGW teaching, one is not allowed to think for themselves --very cultic, ar Glacier Veiw they had proven that their loyaity to EGW was stronger than their loyalty to Christ, instead of correcting the heresies they persecuted and fired those Pastors who were true to their calling --40yrs down the line the dishonesty still continues
The Israelites of old constantly got in trouble over their following the ways of the heathen around. They wanted a king to be like the other nations. They passed their children through the fire to be like the other nations. They worshipped idols they carved out with their own hands. And so on. By mingling inordinately with the fallen Churches on both sides, listening to their sermons, discussions and mosly, attending their Universities of higher learning, they have imbibed much of their theologies, philosophies and ways of seeing and doing things. What is needed is a return to the undiluted Scriptures, free from scholarly misinformation. The scholars of Jesus day kept many from following Him. The same can be said of the scholars of today. They are turning away people from truly following Jesus under the pretense of following Him. Lord help us!
@@SDAQandA Having eyes to see, yet they don't see. Having ears to hear, yet they don't. Strong delusion from rejecting truth has turned them over to a reprobate mind. LORD, PLEASE DO HAVE MERCY.
Its clear ur lack basic biblical wisdom and spiritual discernment ur just regurgitating what ur told by ur paid clergé without even applying CRUTICAL THINKING.
I have never seen anywhere in the new testament that said unto 2300 yeats.or days shall the sanctuary be cleanse.If it was significant to our generstion , wouldnt the.new.testament remind us People like Paul for instace,would have mentioned the importance.Could the bible have been written by the Aristocrats (Elites)to fool us peasants?.😢
How about studying the Book of Hebrews? It is all over there. How about Galations and the Gospels and Acts, especially Stephen's speech at his stoning. The trouble is studying with preconceived notions, and biases looking to prove unfounded theories. We are counseled in the zBible to study to show ourselves approved unto God, worked that need not to be ashamed rightly dividing the Word of truth.
First we must ask ourselves what sanctuary needs to be cleansed? Is it a building containing records of sins or is it the spirit temple that believes lies about God and His Law/His character? Sadly, much of Seventh-day Adventism is stuck in literalism that accompanied the religious leaders of Christ's day. Furthermore, many leaders in the Seventh-day Adventist Church believe that sin must be punished unless God receives a blood payment to relent from His righteous indignation toward the sinner. I mean-these dark, pagan concepts still pervade the minds of the Adventist Review and the Adventist Theological Seminary.
We’re can I access to that information where they came to admit 1844 is not biblical but since is in Great Controversy we have to accept it. Please provide links.
Sorry. This man's comments are riddled with MISINFORMATION, faulty reasoning, unsound theology and basic facts of Adventist history, from beginning to end. His premises are mostly wrong which suggest to me that his miseducation may be largely due to imbibing first day and/or Ecumenical theologies. This is quite understandable to occur when one does NOT believe 2 Chronicles 20:20.
And yet you haven’t pointed out one thing he has said wrong? You can’t juts break commandment #9 and then run away. Let’s look at one thing you suggest he has wrong.
Ur comments r PROVING John is correct in his assessment of the HOLD FALSE DOCTRINES OF ADVENTISM HAS ON U SDA'S PSYCHI. U HAVE BEEN INDOCTRINATED WITH 5HE PHRASE WE HAVE THE TRUTH U REFUSE TO APPLY CRITICAL THINKING TO WAT U WERE TAUGHT BY A FALSE PROPHET
For God will send them à strong DELLUSION ( 1844 sanctuary investigative judgment doctrine) because they love not the truth instead they choose to believe a lie
In general, this presentation was riddled with errors and a definite bias towards Evangelicalism, a direct consequence of Questions on Doctrine. Desmond Ford, George Knight, Jon Pauline and their ilk are culpable in this apostacy. May God open the eyes of those stilly living.
