With so much cash available, Apple should: 1.-Buy "Boston Dynamics" for a few Billion 2.-Invest in developing its own Quantum Computers, approx 50Billion 3.-Invest in developing a microchip fabric in USA soil, around 50Billion You're welcome Apple.
Apple already bought more than 30 AI start-ups this year. ;-) And, rather than Quantum, I think they should jump into photonics computers using Holographic processing, which is even faster/ more efficient for neural networks, than Quantum Computing.
@@joseantoniocanorosas Apple doesn't historically spend $1B on acquisitions. I don't know why, but I wouldn't 2nd guess them. I don't disagree with you, but I can't argue with their acquisitions business model, which has been successful for 2 decades or more. I like your idea of a US Fabrication facility [I don't think is financially prudent for Apple to own it, but the could invest in one.] I'm not sure, but I believe they may have skin in the game with the Chip Fabs in Taiwan and in India. There may be tax benefits for keeping assets in other countries. Congress makes those 'decisions' and laws. Apple used to work very closely with Motorola and later with Intel. I remember that history well, but not details. I think Apple brought the Chip design in-house, then found that overseas fabrication was MUCH less expensive. Note: A piece of the puzzle that analysts fail to mention. Apple may not have all of the Phone market, may not even the largest number of phone sales. And, at one time, their total phone profits weren't the highest. But, the 'hidden' financial secret [ in plain sight] is that their profit margin per phone, at one time, was higher than the three other major players, at a massive 30% profit per iPhone. I'm sure the numbers have changed, but I believe their profit margin per phone is still the highest in the industry. Unfortunately [in my opinion], quality of software and hardware has declined since Steven Jobs died. The devices no longer 'just work', they aren't as reliable, and interfaces aren't consistent and intuitive. Still better than most others, and amazing since ... 2007. But, I believe that production and profit have taken precedence over user delight. And, that's reasonable, Tim Cook's strength is Production and profit... not design.
They will never do anything, if they can't do it better like the already existing things, they just simply buy the ready product itself (so until TSMC not falling back or stuck like Intel did, they have no reason to do anything with chip making), they not even designed a calculator app for iPad in the past 10+ years, just to make the 101th "same app" what you can find in the store, so why they would do anything bigger than that, especially if there is no garante it will be better? Like there are zero car manufacturer who design their own tires.. but that isn't say thst they can't do that, it's just nit worth the time to invest in that.. even if they do a good work, they can get the same result at max with way more work...
As long as I am not profiled by AI and stored remotely? I kind of want real people content, not artificially generated from a possibly "biased" pool of filtered data. I particularly hate AI generated photos and art as it's fake and cheap and goes against real talent and human experience of being and creating... I don't want a watered down fake experience from the internet.
Many articles are already written by ai. A lot of hotlines an ai is welcoming you and leads the talk. So it’s nothing for the future - it’s already happening…
It's like intelligence of a human brain but developed in short amount of time instead of millions of years. It's just resembling our minds, but not real.
A gen AI system without memory is a mostly useless system. My company prevents data to be stored and so the capability stays limited. Chat GPT remembers memories and it weaves in and gets smarter over time. It uses examples in areas that it knows I will find relevant, asks about my daughter, etc. This will only get better. The cloud/memories is critical as long as others can’t use that data.
I do the same thing with ChatGPT for rambling youtube videos, if it’s update news and it’s longer than 20 minutes, you know they are just rambling to pad the view count. Gamers and tech heads the biggest culprits.
@jockaud I have RU-vid Premium and it's located right underneath the video and right next to the share button on the RU-vid app. It gives you a summary of the video you're watching and also you ask the chatbot certain questions about the bullet points of that video and it gives it to you.
@@Wlodzislaw I understand that but don't get on here pretending like it doesn't exist or no one's doing that. You can be applehead. I have nothing against that you like what you like but him as a tech reviewer don't act like it's revolutionary or it's something new
@@carolinabluzzyoure acting like he said its only on safari. so apparently it makes it not amazing because its somewhere else??? in that case almost nothing is amazing.
