Thank you Atty for this extra effort to share your understanding. Big help for us who are having a hard time understanding provisions of the law. Bless you abundantly.
Good evening Mr Atty Al, I am new to this channel, all the way from SA, Cpt. and I have to say that I have been missing out. However, I am still grateful to have come across your channel. As a Bcom Law student, I find your lessons very insightful and I also love how much you have broken down the content in this module the examples you provide really make it easier for one to fully understand the work and fall in love with law. I thank you. 🤝🤝🤝
thank you so much sir!! im revewing for the bar exam. although enrolled ako sa 6 months pre bar review i still opt to listen to your lecture being a more comfortable option. i read my materials, then to your lecture for last touch
Good luck! Sige, repeat mo lang para ma-master mo yung mga laws, concepts and doctrines. Sana makatulong ang mga videos ko sa inyo na nag-aaral ng batas. Good luck sa NovemBar! 🙏
Atty, Al, sa sale of agricultural land under RA 3844 gives the lessee pre-emptive right/ right of first refusal. Notice should also be in writing. Sec 11, Art. 3844, as amended by RA 6389. - The best mga lectures mo Sir, very catchy❤️ Uribe baby ako sa law on sale, sayang dkita naabutan sa UE. looking forward to meet you in person, Sir. Magpapa picture ako🙏🙏🙏
atty.what if the the case is the land of A was sold to B in the year of 2006 with the price of 15k but they have no notarized deed of sale its just a piece of paper or just simple contract that both parties executed , meanwhile in the year 2021 the the buyer would like to transfer a parcel of land in the buyers name which measures 600 square meters with the current value of 1700 per square meter? if they execute a deed of sale at this year with the 15k for 600 sq.meters parcel of land, can it be consider valid or is it gross inadequacy of the price which could result null or void contract?? please enlighten me..
The sale is valid. The price is not inadequate because they agreed on the price back in 2006 when the price was still reasonable. They should not execute a new deed of sale now. They can execute a confirmation of sale, instead.
Hi po Atty. Just want to ask po about lease. For example A is the lessee and B is the lessor. So they agreed to enter into a lease contract of a commercial unit at the 2nd floor of the commercial building of B. After sometime, B started making renovation on the 3rd floor of the building that causes major disturbance in the business of A. A even received many customer complains regarding the noise of the construction. What are the remedies available to A po since you said that the disturbance of peace pertains to legal enjoyment po and not physical? Thank you.
Thank you for your question. It's true that the warranty that the lessor shall respect the peaceful enjoyment of the property refers to the legal enjoyment, thus the lessor warrants that no third person will disturb the possession of the lessee during the existence of the lease. But when it comes to the problem you mentioned, that is covered by the other obligation of the lessor to deliver the property in a condition fit for the purpose for which it was intended. This obligation persists during the term of the lease. Thus, when the leased premises is intended for the lessee to have a profitable business, the lessor violates that when he does something that prevents the lessee from doing business. The lessee may demand that the lessor respect the lessee's business. Also, the lessee may avail of his legal remedies under national and local laws on nuisance.
@@TheHowsofLaw Thank you very much for your reply Atty. :) I truly appreciate this. By the way I am from San Beda Alabang, your discussions here are very helpful. Hope to see more of them. Stay safe po. :)
