Salomon v Salomon: The “One-Man Company” 

PLEASE NOTE: The “Borrow $” arrow at 1:34 was drawn the wrong way around! The company (debtor) borrows money from you (creditor). My bad, sorry!

this was actually really well explained, thank you! :)

Conclusion: Separate legal entity would stand even the business seems to be the same as before (1man business)

Thank you soo much for taking time to explain this🙏 I think "separate legal personality" and the extent to which it should be adhered to is the key issue in this case.

Been trying to understand this case for the longest time and this made it so easy!!!!

This is a very valuable video with nice animation thank u also for the notes in the description Thank u

finally understand this case until i found your video. Thanks, u guys are amazing

Thank you so much this made it so much easier to fully understand!!

Thank you sir for briefing the material facts!

RU-vid education channels be saving lives

This is fantastic. Thank you so much

This really helped. Thank you

this helped so much. thank you

Nicely done!

Well explained.Thank you 🙏🏽

Awesome video bro. Keep it up.

what happened to Salomon hair!!

Watching it 10 mins before exam gimme a kiss boy

so helpful thank you !

Great content. Thanks!

Hello, if have a question regarding the people that invested money in the business. Because they invested money in the company without becoming a shareholder; but why did they invest this money into the company, and how would they be compensated for these investments?

This was awesome. TY

Thank you

Thank you.🥰🥰

Thanks

It was so helpful

Great video !

「内容を明確にする必要があります」、

Nice 👍🏾

omg i got it thank you!!!!

nice job,.. sounds like a Singapore accent so no wonder you know law lol

👍🏾🗝️💎🏆📠

Thank you, a bad law among most others. You need to make your accent clearer for an English audience.

Great video! Thank you