Even in platonic paradigm, politics is ethics writ large. The sundering of politics from ethics is something that has taken place post-Enlightenment period. Many other sundering took place, like the sundering of facts from values, sundering of scientific explanation from purpose and theoretical enquiries from practical ways of living. People have short memories.
Yes and no. It’s political in the sense that the views of a group of people must be expressed, but not in the way the modern west engages in politics with its tactics.
@@lucasroberts2138 it's political in the sense that Allah sent down a political system for it to be implemented on earth. That's what The Prophet ﷺ and the righteous caliphs achieved uptil monarchy took over.
I'm from the UK. Please post more content about Australian Muslims and Muslim communities and how they may be perceived by white non muslim Australians. We are under the impression that white Australians are still very racist however I was brought up watching Crocodile Dundee, which is one of my all time favourite films, and I want to believe it is less racist now.
Everything good is good, is الحمدلله, is amazing and not insane, is not crazy, is not mad! People please stop using language how the dajjal followers want you to use it. They want to confuse your mind by saying black is white and white is black. All in preparation for the dajjal comes out. Like they say, there is no genocide when clearly there is, or they twist their words to confuse people into thinking its not a genocide because they have not used hundreds of tanks to go in to Gaza and Rafah!
Sami is so compelling i discovered him on thinking muslim n now watch him constantly. Islam is very profound n so much more authentic than christianity im a bhuddist but im impressed with islam n how sami talks abt it. Beautiful complete path. 🎉😊❤
What a comeback 👏 great ep! Would love to hear you guys also shed some light and speak about the situation in Sudan. Last night alone, a massacre took place with at least 100 civilians (الله يرحمهم) and unfortunately thats not as bad as it gets.
In the Palestinian issue, I think four people are the best, and the rest speak with emotions and are far from understanding the political reality. They are Dr. Hossam Zomlot and Dr. Mustafa Barghouti, both of whom are in the Palestinian government, and Dr. Talal Abu Ghazaleh. It is possible to talk about the Nakba and he is one of the eyewitnesses to it, from a historical perspective. Rashid Khalidi, and among the political aspects of the Arabs, the best are the political commentator Salman Al-Ansari from Saudi Arabia, Dr. Abdul Khaleq Abdullah from the Emirates, and the political journalist Imad Al-Din Adeeb from Egypt. From the American inside, Dr. Sami Al-Erian and Dr. Nihad Awad, knowing that they are from the Muslim Brotherhood and you should not believe everything they say about the Arab countries, but they can be benefited from inside the America. If you host all of these people, you will understand the political reality and challenges in the Palestine issue.
Prosecutor of icc court is a Muslim alhamdulilah that’s the only reason they trying to prosicute Israel he done his job now it’s up to the judge shout out to the prosecutor America and Israel blackmailed and mafia style threatened him n his family and he still went thrue with it hopefully the judge does his job people don’t realise the impact of this it got Germany the biggest supporters of Israel in europ to go against Israel if the judge agrees wif prosicutor also France and other countries the reason the prosecutor didn’t file for genocide is becouse he needs a guilty plea on anything to make Israel’s freinds turn on Israel and genocide case woulda made it a lot harder to find them guilty
Not sure about political switch on is not the same as spiritual switch on. I think they are both connected. It's kinda like sex; mostly an empty physical act that doesn't give either much and very like eating your favorite pie. Much is at stake when sex has deeper meaning, deeper understanding about your beloved. But I am the last to know anything about the spiritual in Muslim religion and what I do see only vaguely makes me think the religion is very humanitarian. No loans with interest; a jihad inside the self, which accepts the fact we are human and hackable. Again: I refer to the following article and to be honest, I know little about the religion but these are the things that go against my culture and stand out in my mind.
Is there no success in poverty, in growing you own food, being independent from a state that wants you dependent? Hamdi sounds like a "soft" capitalist. "Success" is relative.
I randomly came across this video and don’t know who this is but this was interesting content and well organised discussion. I feel like I was only superficially familiar with Islam from a couple friends, but my expertise is in transnational financial regulation and kinda off topic except in the context that it’s a component of life that everyone essentially participates in, almost unavoidable logistically and recently I’ve been interested and reading a lot on Islamic banking law. That’s kinda required me to get a deeper understanding in general which has been very interesting and now I’m a bit at the “more you know the less you realise you know” stage but on the financial and economy issue do you have thoughts on this. I think the principles are very on point but maybe because of the global economy we exist in, is it fair to say there’s a bit of legal interpretation around it to get to the same place while trying to remain technically compliant. That’s not a criticism because as a lawyer that is what we excel at and do to everything. But does it lose meaning I’m also trying to imagine a way where considering the Australia economy and market and components like super with limited control, is it possible to manage this and certain things or just have to accept what is outside of control with certain financial instruments
I disagree with this guy when he said, "in Islam the public should be involved in politics", this statement is not entirely correct, the ones who were allowed to get involved in politics are the leaders of the tribes and the Sahabah whom the Prophet use to consult with, not the public. Abu Hanifah never went against the ruler and the true story is that Abu Jaffar Al Mansour request Abu Hanifah to become a judge, but Abu Hanifah refused so he asked him again to be consultant for the judges but he refused again and the reason he refused because he did not want to wrong anyone even by error and that anger Jaffa Al Mansour and put him in jail.
Would you agree that in it's basis the Adress of the Legislator is the responsibility of the servant ? If we agree that the Deen of Islam regulates the affairs of the people, then this is political. And calling to it in essense isn't only to belief in a Single Creator, but also to obey Him in all aspects of life, which encompasses politcs. As for the stance of Imam Abu Hanifa (rh) it is well known that he supported rebellion not only by fatwa but also financial.
@@Abd.Al-Malik You are asking for the impossible my brother. Did you ask yourself why there is no total Muslim country in the world? Even a person cannot be 100% perfect in his devotion to Allah. Yes, we are requested to do our best but sometimes we find ourselves in a position where we cannot avoid erring and so are the rulers, still what your friend is doing is not good for the Muslim Ummah for all he do is inciting the Muslims against another Muslim country and if this is not a call for division between the Muslims then what do you call it? If you are a sincere Muslim, please get your facts from official sources and beware of wolves in sheep skin.
@@anagil1720 Please let's first remain on what you said initially before moving on to other subjects. Till what extend do you believe the Muslim masses have a role to play in politics ?
@@Abd.Al-Malik I believe the Muslims should not submit their minds to people like Mr. Hamdi who care about causing fitnah between the Muslim Masses and trust that their ruler knows what is best for their country more than Tom Dick and Harry.
@@Abd.Al-Malik And what do you want from the masses to do? Do you want them to disregard the ruler and follow what people like Mr. Hamdi dictate to them, isn't this what is going on right here.
And who is your Salahudeen? You and Mr. Hamdi have no leader and no plan and what you do has no purpose except spreading chaos and mischief in the lands of the Muslims. This is my response to the below post from @Abd.Al-Malik, I had to post it here because it was cancelled twice: @Abd.Al-Malik 43 minutes ago @anagil1720 I guess we found those with such a position too in the time of Salahudeen too, as such he spend actually more time fighting the obstacles than time removing the occupation. And the latter and those who joined them are recognized for the the correct opinion and praised, while the obstacles are shunned and forgotten. And we know of not a single classical madhab Imam or he was known for political differences with oppressors. And we might ask ourselves; knowing the Sunnah, had the Prophet s.a.w been in attendance; would he have remained silent or would he s.a.w. have rallied ? Would he s.a.w. have given a vocal or silent approval of neglecting the hungry, forsaking the oppressed, selling out the occupied and normalizing with their enemies and establishing aid and assistance through trade. As Imam Malik (rh) narrated; the forced divorce is baatil (void). I.e. his fatwa: the forced bayah is void. For which he was lashed, shaven and paraded through the streets, because the authority of the day forbade him from relating the hadith. Now, did he speak the truth when relating the words of the Messenger s.a.w. or was he inciting rebellion ? The reason you avoided the basic questions is due to your unstable basis for your conclusions (arguements)
Brother I encourage you to listen to podcast again. Clearly Hamdi never mentioned a plan or a leader to rally behind he explicitly stated that he is trying to speak about these things to create an environment or spark that will make good leaders. We can not always default the ruler if the ruler is being useless.
@@hmm-ku3uc You might not be aware of the attacks on the Arab leader these days and how people utilize rumors to EmPhysis the corruptness of those ruler in the attempt of causing fitnah between the people and their leaders: but, for us, Middle eastern, know exactly what is going on and why, and if you do not see the blatant incitement against "certain" countries in all the videos of Mr. Hamdi then you need to open your eyes wider.
@@hmm-ku3uc People with agenda do not reveal their plan. I challenge you to bring me one interview or speech where Hamdi did not slander or talk negative or spread rumors about Saudi Arabia.
@@anagil1720 Why do you assume Hamdi has an agenda, there may be things he says that don't sit well with you but that is not grounds for discounting all of what he says. Also I didn't mention anything about Saudi Arabia though I think there is a reason why Hamdi constantly talks negative about it's because they are doing negative things.
Hamdi agenda is very clear, he is diverting the blame away from the guilty by blaming the innocents. I ask why he never mention Iran? Didn't he know about the strong alliance between Hamas and Iran. Everyone knows that Iran alleged full support to hams and brag about its ability to destroy Israel, by saying that Iran encouraged Hamad to attach Israel. So where is Iran now and why no one talk about it?
