In basic tasks, low-performance cores are usually used from what I understand. Exynos 1380 and 1480 have 4 Cortex-A55 cores at 2GHz, The difference is probably made by the more modern UFS 3.1 and LPDDR5 memories in the A55 and perhaps that is why it is faster.
The others a78 cores clocked at 2.75 GHz (compared to those on the 1380 wich are clocked at 2.4GHz) And an amd (xclipse) gpu 530 wich is (obviously) more powerfull compared to the mali g68 mp5 that has the 1380
Exactly, in more basic tasks, not as much is required of the processor and memory, showing practically equal performance of the two, however, the more complex and heavy the tasks, consequently more is required of the cell phone's processor and memory. In this situation we may see some significant improvement, but unfortunately I have not yet seen simulations like these.
Samsung is doing exactly what Apple does. It takes the superior version from a previous year and places it as the inferior version in the following year, removing some features, and updates the superior version from the current year with a small improvement. There was the A34 as a lower version and the A54 as a higher version. The following year they put practically the entire specification of the A54 in the A35, apart from some small things, and gave a small improvement to the A55. Apple does this with iPhones. There was the Iphone 14 and 14 pro max, then they launched the Iphone 15 with the processor of the iphone 14 pro max, but without some things, and they made a small upgrade to the iphone 15 pro max. That said, the company doesn't lose anything, it doesn't need to create much, the architecture is already ready. And consumers are spending more money.
У меня два телефона,один эпл второй самунг,оба последней модели.Я блоггер,сравниваю в течении года.Знаешь,эпл разрывает просто на фоне Ультра.В руки просится именно IOS
But consumers are also getting a good quality phone for cheaper price, yes it could be better, but nkw you dont always have to spend top dollar to experience prémium.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5g has a small Bezel than Samsung Galaxy A55 5g, they have almost the same in performance, but the A35 is $80 less in pricing than the A55 ....
It is important to make this comparison, as they are practically the same cell phones. From the reviews I've seen, the A54 has a slight advantage in photo and video quality, but it's almost unnoticeable for users who aren't extremely demanding. However, on the A35, even using the same processor as the A54, it had slightly better benchmark performance, almost imperceptible as well. But it may be that Samsung, when it generates updates, can address this issue. In the end, the advantage of the A35 would be that it will receive an extra year of updates, as it was launched later. And it also has a slightly larger screen, but with a little less density (dpi). Here where I live, in Brazil, comparing the prices of the two models with 256GB, the A35 is around 38.53 dollars more expensive.
Both phone will reject becouse only small changes in design in last 5 year and use both phone exynos chipset very bad actually samsung think we are brand but he don't know there is 21 centuries every not fool as think samsung these chipset exynos 1 year good but after 2 year working very bad now samsung try to mad 1 year divice samsung think to purchase every year new divice Samsung not think about coustomer demad and also 25 ward charges so stupid and so disappointed i think samsung will lose his position then he will realise
