Jelly beans are a bit unrealistic though, I personally wouldn't ever grab a vacuum-cleaner to clean spilled candy. That's what the old brush and dustpan is for, always stowed away in a kitched cabinet. Vacuum-cleaners are to clean dust with and other debris small enough to disappear into a carpet. I'd probably leave the soft-roller on most of the time.
There are so many other variables I look for. Obviously suction power/weight/battery life. But also really important are the attachments and ease of use UNDER furniture. One thing that frustrates me about these reviews in general is that this isn't "normal vacuuming". Getting in to tight areas, pet/human hair, dusting, mopping, and hoses/extensions/accessories also factor in. Still very well done and I enjoyed it. Just isn't thorough enough.
Yeah many reviewers vacuuming stuff that are usually not on your floor. I would collect jelly beans with my hand instead of vacuuming them. Also bigger pieces of anything else like glass, corn flakes etc.
I think the difficulty pushing on carpets comes from not having the "gates" on the Samsung. I debated between these models for a long time before deciding on the Dyson V11 Complete Pro (sold in Australia for 1050 AUD) The Jet 90 is basically the same price - and if I'm paying that much, why not get a Dyson. The parts availability seems to be worlds apart. A lot of third party options too. Who knows what Samsung parts we will get 5 years from now. Also - Dyson parts are cheaper - For e.g. the V11's battery can be had for 170AUD, the Jet 90's battery is 250AUD. I really liked the look of the Jet 90 and the button layout + performance, but it just doesn't make sense to drop 1k on a machine that may be completely unsupported in a few years, compared to a machine you can almost guarantee will have replacement parts several years down the road.
Looking for a little preference from you . I have the Dyson V11 Torque Drive for my home . And the biggest dislike is the fact that I had to get 2 wands replaced because after a short period of time they got really loose to almost the point where they broke off . What would you prefer between this model or the Shark® Vertex™ Pro Lightweight Cordless Stick Vacuum with DuoClean. Whuch would you prefer to not have that problem ? And I love all your content man KEEP IT UP !!!!!
Jelly beans still aren’t a good test for a hard floor - they are round so will always be pushed away because the vacuum cannot get a grip on a round option that rolls away from it and not into it. Maybe another large object like a fruit loops or something?
I agree but it's a real life possibility that something that size and that's hard will be on your floors so why not test it...I will include some fruitloops in the next test. What else would you like to see?
I think Shark Regular Vacuums are amazing, but their Robot Vacuums are absolutely junk. I know Adam will agree to this, and this proves Adam is honest in all of his reviews. Can you do the Deebot T8+ MEGA STRESS TEST? I have been waiting all day for that test!
@@AdamsReviews o wow... the regular Shark IQ without the base has the Large Dustbin and more power! It should do a bit better in the tests hopefully. Shark IQ non Self-Emptying base can’t be used with their Self-Emptying base, which is a first.
I was just at costco and bought the dyson v8 animal + which is on sale for $299 and on display next to it was the LG Cord Zero which the design and some of the design features like the base and the buttons and some latches were VERY similar to the samsung and has the soft roll as well that looks the same other than the color and is $200 cheaper so wonder how they compare. I also have the hoover impulse which you showed at the end of the video and for only $115 its not half bad. I'm returning it because I got the dyson but its better than the Tineco A10 I had that I returned for the hoover. You will have the same problem though with the hoover pushing stuff infront of it like the jelly beans but honestly thats an obvious thing.
