Please show the accounting documents and the transaction keys(bsx, etc) hit through these documents in every video. It will give complete understanding of each scenario.
Please answer...While transferring goods from vendor consignment to buyer authority, we are not charging against cost center but while transferring the goods to production, we are charging against cost center? why is it? In SAP SRM/Ariba, any item thar are added in cart, Cost Center/IO/Project is charged? why in SAP MM, while creating PO, you are not charging against cost center
During MRKO settlement I could not save the document.. like save icon not in enable mode...should i do configuration for this? If yes, what should I do? Please advise sir
Hi ram what is the document /step which need to be done when consignment stock is not consumed within 90days, in pharma company interview they have asked this question.
but how the vendor will receive a material which is expired.i think there should be some agreement between vendor and costumer so that the vendor will receive returned material up to some period only (ex:90days from gr date). if material is not required it should have to return to vendor before (ex:min 15days) expirey date.where to maintain these details in sap
how come the both storage locations same (0001) ? material received at consignment place and moved to our warehouse. you select the same storage location 0001 while creating GR (101K) and also same when moving to warehouse (411K). could you please explain me I am confused!!
@@StudyuuuSAP-MM-EWMSir, In Location 101 do we have again a separate place for vendor storage and other place for storing the goods owned by the company? so doing mb1b with 411k..makes the goods owned by the company?
See, we can have 0001 storage location all kinds of stock. Thats not even a problem, system doesn't show error. But the deal is, if you have taken stock out of vendor consignment, you pay via MRKO.
Okay so key takeaways are - Nett price will come zero, - 411k for movement to own stock (we are liable to pay the vendor), 201k for direct GI to Production (liable to pay vendor). Can't we have a certain pricing procedure in the PO itself?
