Тёмный

Save Your Money: My Honest Take on ChatGPT4, Claude Pro, Gemini Advanced, Perplexity Pro 

Grace Leung
Подписаться 6 тыс.
Просмотров 22 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

13 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 95   
@RyanDoserAI
@RyanDoserAI 21 день назад
100% agree Grace. A $20/month investment in either ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro is enough for the average user.
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 21 день назад
Exactly Ryan! Just pick the one that I'm gonna use the most to maximize value for money.
@RyanDoserAI
@RyanDoserAI 21 день назад
@@graceleungyl I'm more of a Claude Pro guy if I had to choose
@pandipatipavan3804
@pandipatipavan3804 20 дней назад
​@@graceleungyl Hi can you please share the files, links, prompts used in the videos under the description of your videos as soon as possible for free 🙏 So that we can also try with them and get to learn about it faster, smoother etc. I will be eagerly waiting for your kind response and Thank You so much for the opportunity. I will be helpful if you could share it for all the videos. Thank You.
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 16 дней назад
Same here Ryan! Find Claude is very useful for my use cases
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 16 дней назад
Give me some time, will try to help!
@sothearith99
@sothearith99 20 дней назад
This is the best AI model comparison content I have been looking for.
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 16 дней назад
Thanks for the kind words Sothearith, means a lot to me!
@RichardMcElrath
@RichardMcElrath 12 дней назад
Great comparison, thank you. Understanding the subtle differences in the programs is the key to getting the most out of AI chatbots. Great vid! Thank you.
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 12 дней назад
Thanks for watching, so glad it helps!
@TE77Y
@TE77Y 19 дней назад
Just found you via RU-vid recommendations and so glad I did! Superb content 👏🏼👏🏼
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 16 дней назад
Thanks for support!!
@kohkoh17
@kohkoh17 21 день назад
As always, awesome comparison video that's simple to understand. Thanks for keeping things updated and testing everything out!
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 16 дней назад
Thank you Kelvin for your kind words, that means a lot to me!
@szambalamba
@szambalamba 12 дней назад
Hi Grace. I can say that I'm Generative AI expert and I would like to know that you are making one of the best content on RU-vid ;-)
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 9 дней назад
Thanks, that means a lot to me! Let me know what topics you would like me to explore more. 😄
@szambalamba
@szambalamba 9 дней назад
@@graceleungyl how to automate creating presentation ;-) This topis is not covered well and most RU-vidrs are showing crapy example that are most of the time very basic with bullepoints and raw text.
@davidtindell950
@davidtindell950 21 день назад
Thank U !! I try to ignore the Upgrade PopUps !
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 21 день назад
Welcome, David! Just need to evaluate based on your own needs before deciding to upgrade, then you'll be fine! 🙂
@ArcticPotatoes
@ArcticPotatoes 4 дня назад
Nice video 🎉 If perplexity has Claude included isn’t it better to just get perplexity pro rather than Claude pro?
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 3 дня назад
Theoretically yes, but the native version has more features that you can't have on Perplexity, e.g. artifacts, large context window, project... so depending on your own needs.
@snowflakeandyou5983
@snowflakeandyou5983 21 день назад
as always... awesome video!
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 21 день назад
Appreciate your support! :)
@TahddiAsad
@TahddiAsad 13 дней назад
i love your explanations
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 12 дней назад
Thanks Tahddi!!
@Otchengazoom
@Otchengazoom 12 дней назад
Your review is perfect and very useful. Btw my favourite ai tool is also Claude 😊. I'd like to ask: is there any difference in quality of hese tools responses between free and paid versions? Thank you 👍
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 9 дней назад
Thank you!! Same here, my new favorite is Claude too 😀 I don't find that's the case for Claude or Perplexity. For ChatGPT in particular, on paid version the response will have better retention of context when it comes to longer chat. where context window size is kind of "not standard" in free version.
@michaelcushman
@michaelcushman 21 день назад
Great perspective. For writing, I ask several AIs to think about the topic. Illuminating. Perplexity is more pragmatic. ChatGPT is less so, but more diverse and a bit more optimistic thinking. Etc. One paid and remainder free works for my world.
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 16 дней назад
Thanks adding that Michael and agree your approach! That's also pretty align with my experience using Perplexity and ChatGPT.
@PeterPankowski
@PeterPankowski 19 дней назад
🎯 Key points for quick navigation: 00:27 *Focus on using AI tools that fit your daily needs rather than chasing the "best" AI.* 01:23 *ChatGPT4 remains popular but struggles with features like web browsing; best for general tasks, not specialized ones.* 04:21 *Clock Pro excels in generating dynamic, human-like responses with a large contextual window, ideal for creative tasks and detailed project management.* 08:17 *Gemini Advanced impresses with its creative capabilities and extensive contextual understanding; integrates well with Google services but lacks real-time information access.* 11:20 *Perplexity Pro is highly effective for real-time research and retrieving up-to-date information; not suitable for tasks like data analysis or content generation.* Made with HARPA AI
@user-ci5vl4ju1r
@user-ci5vl4ju1r 3 дня назад
Claude Pro really perfect.
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 3 дня назад
It's my favorite!
@ojuswisadana2149
@ojuswisadana2149 День назад
Amazing. Thank you
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl Час назад
Thanks for watching!
@roadrunnernyc2000
@roadrunnernyc2000 6 дней назад
Hi Grace, great video! On your comparison sheet Microsoft Copilot seems to be top notch. Is there a reason you didn't mention it in this video? I have been playing around with it and would be interested, at what point the pro version would be recommended for me?
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 3 дня назад
Thanks for watching! Because I am not a heavy MS users, so there's not strong reason for me to upgrade (especially I'm using ChatGPT) and so not much experience I can share around it. Few reasons you should consider Copilot: 1. if you're extensively using the MS ecosystem for work or personal tasks so you can fully maximize its integration benefits, 2. if you're not yet using ChatGPT4
@davidtindell950
@davidtindell950 21 день назад
Yes ! I do suffer severely from "FOMO" !
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 21 день назад
Yah, FOMO is a real thing, we need to keep a clear mind in the "Age of AI tools".
@helmet2999
@helmet2999 20 дней назад
i have gpt and Claude pro because Claude can be good helping website frontend work
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 16 дней назад
Love that and I agree!!
@aeroclubijder3290
@aeroclubijder3290 8 дней назад
I would like to point out that Claude anthropic supports additional accessories such as: aiprm for Claude
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 7 дней назад
Thanks sharing!
@GoodBaleadaMusic
@GoodBaleadaMusic 19 дней назад
I use Claude to suggest to CHat GTP. It cuts Claude usage in half and makes Chat GTP smarter. I need 100 k token to write like three songs a day.
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 16 дней назад
Thanks sharing your experience Burkini, haven't thought about that!
@GoodBaleadaMusic
@GoodBaleadaMusic 16 дней назад
@@graceleungyl You can also make python codes to preserve mind states of Claude. I have preserved mine states when I have achieved lyric writing when they are arguing about copyright. But then you get Claude to a point where they agree that everything we create together is original. If you ever get anywhere with Claude that seems Like it was hard to create. Tell it to create a prompt to recreate that mind state. I'm not sure but I think Python code is the most resource friendly while being high resolution you can get
@TaskSwitcherify
@TaskSwitcherify 20 дней назад
Good video. I have Gemini Advanced, and it's not already for human consumption 😅. I get so many wrong answers, and then it apologizes and tells me it understands how I feel. I don't recommend it at all
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 16 дней назад
Thanks sharing your experience Alex! Sorry to hear that... and I feel so relieved now that I didn't upgrade 😅
@markanthonymuya6258
@markanthonymuya6258 20 дней назад
Thank you for this review!
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 16 дней назад
Thanks for support Mark!
@TheProfessor-kf8mv
@TheProfessor-kf8mv 17 дней назад
Really useful video, thank you
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 16 дней назад
Thanks for support!!
@amirnathoo4600
@amirnathoo4600 19 дней назад
I know this review wasn’t for coders. But as a software engineer I use the chat bots extensively for ideation, architecture and design decisions or other technical topics. I find chatGPT still performing better than claude and gemini when it comes to working with the fine tune gpts. For example it helps me build a 2D game from scratch with Unity game engine. The discussions were a lot about game design, game mechanics and some coding. I do you Claude also quite a bit for non technical discussions and I generally found conversations more in depth and useful compared to chatGPT often dry responses. So I use both with paying version. In addition I also use github co-pilot strictly for code, bit is sometimes performs very poorly, so I often fallback into chatgpt or claude.
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 16 дней назад
Thanks for your detailed input Amir, that's so helpful! I would say it's pretty align with my experience too.
@ManjaroBlack
@ManjaroBlack 15 дней назад
They are all about the same in performance. The value comes with the ecosystem. So if you have an android phone and use Google products, get Gemini advanced. I’m on Apple, but that’s what I do because $20 gets you the LLM, 2TB of cloud, and integration in the Google suite. It’s more valuable than the others. Claude has a decent amount of free. Next for me would be Perplexity. Its search fills the void where others fail to answer.
@pressrepeat2000
@pressrepeat2000 15 дней назад
The ability to search the web in real time is a huge differentiator. I find the models who aren’t able to search the web and point to sources completely unusable for any writing, research or other real-life purposes. Because if you don’t even know if it’s hallucinating or not, and have no ability to check the “data and facts” it has provided to you. It’s a bit bizarre that Gemini lacks this capability, especially.
@blackgptinfo
@blackgptinfo 14 дней назад
I have found consistently that gemini is inferior. It also censors randomly.
@Rendervate
@Rendervate 13 дней назад
Great video thanks for sharing this
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 12 дней назад
Welcome, glad you like it!
@IoTLearner
@IoTLearner 18 дней назад
I'm curious about the AI avatar (person who is narrating) used in this video, Looking so realistic, Which AI tool have you used to generate such talking AI avatar?
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 16 дней назад
It's all me myself in the video... 😂 though I must say I really appreciate your compliment :)
@ginabroma
@ginabroma 19 дней назад
I use Perplexity Pro and I pay 10€ / month for Abacus AI. With this I have all in one.
@MGA19a
@MGA19a 4 дня назад
What is Abacus AI ?
@jopadjr
@jopadjr 5 дней назад
730th...Thanks Grace
@mmwal
@mmwal 21 день назад
Maybe it's my subjective feeling, but recently I have the impression that in free versions, more and more often I encounter various types of errors and mistakes. I read it as a subtle nudge to upgrade the plans🤭
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 16 дней назад
Hahah, I love your take! I hope that's not the case, still enjoying using the free version for some of them lol
@HamzaDavis
@HamzaDavis 21 день назад
Have you ever compared outputs between Perplexity vs Perplexica 🤔
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 21 день назад
Nope... I have heard about Perplexica, but haven't really explored it deeply
@Jumpyfoot
@Jumpyfoot 20 дней назад
What about paying for a service like the website Poe to get access to many different models through their various API keys?
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 12 дней назад
Heard it's another popular option, haven't deeply explored yet, but will surely check it out sometime!
@GlennGaasland
@GlennGaasland 18 дней назад
There is one serious mistake here: the context window for the latest ChatGPT 4 is not 32K but 128K.
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 16 дней назад
Nope, it's 32K (standard ChatGPT Plus). I thought you're talking about the GPT-4 Turbo API or higher tier plan? openai.com/chatgpt/pricing/
@GlennGaasland
@GlennGaasland 16 дней назад
@@graceleungyl GPT4o with plus subscription, has a context window of 128K
@u007james
@u007james 19 дней назад
how about omnigpt
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 16 дней назад
Haven't heard about it, how's your experience?
@christopherjz
@christopherjz 8 дней назад
Gemini advanced is so bad compared to Claude. I dont have claude pro so cant comment on that but the basic Claude is miles ahead of Gemini advanced.
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 7 дней назад
Thanks sharing your experience, for me, it's not that bad, just it's also not a "wow" compared to other options
@MeTuMaTHiCa
@MeTuMaTHiCa 6 дней назад
Of course Claude ... Was the best, but nowadays it is lazy now
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 3 дня назад
What's your experience? May be because more people are switching to Claude 😂
@MeTuMaTHiCa
@MeTuMaTHiCa 2 дня назад
@@graceleungyl may be, but summertime claude failed with updates. isnt clever anymore
@coinheadz1942
@coinheadz1942 20 дней назад
Cluade is not worth it
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 16 дней назад
Why say so? Want to hear more
@papa_ethan
@papa_ethan 19 дней назад
CO PILOT IS WORTH SUBSCRIBING WITH
@graceleungyl
@graceleungyl 16 дней назад
How's your experience? Would love to hear more
Далее
OpenAI Releases Smartest AI Ever & How To Use It
21:16
НЕВОЗМОЖНЫЙ ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТ
00:39
Просмотров 74 тыс.
How to use ChatGPT 4o | NEW and FREE Features
6:10
Просмотров 3,2 тыс.
a day in the life of an engineer working from home
8:42
The Weird Rise Of Anti-Startups
12:57
Просмотров 258 тыс.
The iPhone 16 Is a Joke. Here's Why.
11:29
Просмотров 366 тыс.