Scientists at Cal Tech develop 'baby wormhole' l ABCNL 

If they gave the general oublic 40 minutes of this interview people would realize how real this "simiulated" wormhole is and its sitting somewhere in a cali university...

Agreed!

God not another one of these "We -simulated- created a ______" things. Thanks for sparing me the wasted time.

Thank you.

He explained it like they explain it in the movies.

HOLY CRAP WORST INTERVIEW EVER... plus click bait.... big difference from a simulation in a computer than in real physical wormhole.. ffs

Him and niel are great at explaining such complex ideas

@@OG_LAMONT That movie where they make a ship that can use wormholes but they find out it goes to hell then comes back for another crew. Yeah, explained exactly like that and the perfect reason not to do it. Equivalent to cavemen playing with genetics. Event Horizon is the movie.

@@pata6129 😌 So Basically It's A Cartoon

I really doubt understand what he said tho 🤣

Love how the Anchor person starts off with the statement pretend like you’re explaining it to a 5 year old 😂.

Passion + faith. The best fuel for our civilization.

@@donyay6083 Only way to save it. 😎🖖

@@sickvick83 I don't either but it's cool.

Yeah? You're in a 2D space. The z axis isn't really there. In fact you wouldn't even notice it in space. You see from a 2D perspective too,, like pictures. You can draw everything you see on a 2D surface into a 3D picture look up 3D street art. You can simulate a Z axis on a 2D screen. The Z axis appears to give you depth. However depth is perceived aka the depth perception. This is why both reality and illusion exist, well optical illusion. You're more than likely in a box. Some kind of quantum computer perhaps. We assume that outer space is all there is. However, it makes way more sense that the universe is some 2D fractal like that of the Mandelbrot set. Because you're told you're in the 3rd dimension if you actually saw in all 3 LxWxH you would be able to see a sphere or cube all at once. Now before you go off think of it like a video game. If the character became self aware and you tried to tell it it's in a box it wouldn't understand because the box would technically be outside their space and time. Just like how a projection system works our sunlight could be projecting the reality because you literally cannot have a visual picture or image without some sort of light source. Also cameras are based off the eyes. This was discovered. The original camera was a camera obscura which you can create with guess what? A box.

They already make a telephone

@@panthefox I hope you’re joking

Or, we could mount probes bound for deep space with the capability of generating these wormholes, thus we could receive deep space images and information instantly across many lightyears

@@AFRoSHEENT3ARCMICHAEL69 interesting

i hate people of colerr

Following.

Worm hole simulation . souce pewees 😁😁

@@Allenmarshall Some day, you are going to die with no one left beside you.

Weekend?

Dude's got the coolest job on the planet. Quantum physics is the most fascinating discovery in human history.

Scotty can't give you a complete reliable answer. He can only do the best he can with what he's got at moment.

Quantum computer is different than a computer that runs on bits / 0 and 1's.

A quantum computer is not a regular computer. The significance of this is that it’s a huge starting point for combining general relativity and quantum physics. We think gravity is a quantum force but cannot seem to unify that with what general relativity predicts.

Many things we see today were created inside a computer and now it’s on the outside. 😉

I'm a bit confused: a worm hole and a black hole are 2 different things. How is he using these terms interchangeably?

Yeah, I like this guy. I will look up his documentaries.

Why?

He was on the tv show "outrageous acts of science"

Without the huge possibility of horrible mistakes first, not likely.

Not true. Current physics allows it. Physics changes as we become less ignorant. We have a LONG way to go.

something that their understanding of physics allows which could be a faulty understanding, leading to a faulty simulation and ignores the fact that you magically need the energy of a million stars to create one wormhole did they simulate obtaining the energy of a billion stars in some feasible manner or did they just initialize E=4.2E946 watts

@@kenwittlief255 Nah it doesn't need that much energy. I saw a documentary about going back to the future, the scientist on it said you only need 1.21 gigawatts... 😃

@@elliotgillum hahaha yeah and you only have to travel at 88 mph to start one!

So they did nothing. They basically did what Einstein did with his notebook and pen and his maths and proved wormholes are possible. We all already knew that, but how to create a wormhole with technology is the question!

@@bigman4407 Yes, just a greater feeling of certainty worm holes is a possibility now backed by quantum mechanics. 👍💎🔥

the kicker is, unbeknownst to you, we are living in a simulation ourselves. This is why they said they are able to do this now and explains CERN large hadron collider and it’s ability for time travel, or data transfer to other times in the past after it’s been installed. This is also why CEO of DWAVE quantum computers - geordie rose mentioned they are vape to access other dimensions with quantum computing and pull things from out of them. This is also why CERN director mentioned they are opening portals to other dimensions and something may come out of them, or they may send something out to them.

not how proofs work

no that is huge. harness dark matter = harness warp travel.

Since the movie Event Horizon, guess he purposely forgot the whole opening a portal to darkness thing.

@@climatepurification 🤌🏾🤓

It’s the simplest way to introduce the concept lol

Yay😊

Me too 🥰

And a baby Yoda

Even a baby Wormhole is too heavy for a stork to carry

Best christmas gift ever. Hopefully it comes with a space suit and oxygen supply. You could be taken to another galaxy to explore.

No you haven't 🤣

@@gheetuio8640 Go back to your mums basement, incel.

@@gheetuio8640 🤣she lying like a MF🤣

Well...nothing bad will happen. It's simulation and models and experiment.

How the Universe Works.

@@the1natester734 My favorite TV show by far.

@@workman88 Agreed

I'm sure you'd like to be alive no matter the time.

Yes,like Star Trek and Star Wars.

Keep hating kiddo

And we just sent a message to the hell dimension...awesome.

Basically a wormhole is just an equation. So they plugged it into a quantum’s computer and a little time and adjusting later and bam. Baby wormhole

@@mafinalmessagechangedaworl7131 kinda. they did actually teleport stuff IRL in a worm hole like matter (they saw a measurable change in entanglement values), but it is so funky that it often gets called an equation, to my knowledge.

@@rorycannon7295 huh

"The fly " probably happened so many times with our nazi science testing.

We would also have to calculate where exactly to travel and find a way to get back

It will never happen through the human experiments God has set up boundaries that naked eye can not see unless it’s pure

@@lovejones2179 think we were intended to view atoms and bonds? Mitochondria, cell walls, germs? The only boundaries that Humans have are the ones we place upon ourselves.

@@lovejones2179we have the power of the brain and science to help us

@@ExTrA_Live_ the difference here to your examples is trying to understand something so unfathomable far away with very limited understanding…

Wrong. We're decades away from quantum computers that can simulate a wormhole more fully. You're not getting a wormhole without negative mass. Do you have any laying around???

@@brianburris1857 yeah, I do actually

Lmao 🤣

Actually, quantum computers should eventually be able to do everything classical computers can do, but with much greater speed and efficiency. Normal computers work with bits, which can be in either 0 position or 1 position. But quantum computers use qubits, which can be in a superposition of both 0 and 1, thus greatly enhancing the capacity for high-speed processing.

@@themagnificentmanbeard Lol I know what a quantum computer is. And actually, that is not correct. Quantum computers will not outperform classical computers for all types of problems. There have been some recent advancements that show in certain algorithms, quantum computers don’t significantly outperform classical computers. By “significantly outperform”, I mean there isn’t an exponential increase in efficiency. An example is Grover search, in which quantum computers only provide a square root increase in speed, which is not significant at all. However, quantum computers will be very good at solving problems that have exponential efficiency in classical computers, such as many-body problems in quantum mechanics.

@@Brassard1985 Significance is entirely dependent on how large the number is. Here's an example taken from Wikipedia: Grover's algorithm is optimal up to sub-constant factors. That is, any algorithm that accesses the database only by using the operator Uω must apply Uω at least a 1 − o ( 1 ) 1-o(1) fraction as many times as Grover's algorithm. The extension of Grover's algorithm to k matching entries, π(N/k)1/2/4, is also optimal. This result is important in understanding the limits of quantum computation. If the Grover's search problem was solvable with logc N applications of Uω, that would imply that NP is contained in BQP, by transforming problems in NP into Grover-type search problems. The optimality of Grover's algorithm suggests that quantum computers cannot solve NP-Complete problems in polynomial time, and thus NP is not contained in BQP. It has been shown that a class of non-local hidden variable quantum computers could implement a search of an N N-item database in at most O ( N 3 ) {\displaystyle O({\sqrt[{3}]{N}})} steps. This is faster than the O ( N ) O({\sqrt {N}}) steps taken by Grover's algorithm.

@@themagnificentmanbeard Was entirely unnecessary to post that directly from Wikipedia.. I’m the one who mentioned Grover’s algorithm in the first place. When we talk about efficiency, “efficient” usually means anything that can be solved in polynomial time. There are certain algorithms, like factoring, that have exponential time complexity for classical computers, but quantum computers can solve them in polynomial time. Thus, providing an exponential speed up. In these types of problems, “quantum supremacy” hold true. In other words, as the size of the input grows, it will eventually not be possible for a classical computer to solve the problem in a feasible about of time. Hence, the quantum computer provided an exponential time saving, which is quite significant. However, in the case of Grover’s search, quantum computers provide a mere square root speed up compared to classical computers, which is not quantum supremacy. The classical computer will always be slower, yes. But as long as the quantum computer can solve the problem in a reasonable about of time, so can the classical computer. My entire point is that quantum computers are not inherently better than classical computers at solving all types of problems. This idea that quantum computers will always be exponentially superior is simply false. I would direct you to listen to Scott Aaronson’s interview on the Lex Fridman podcast. He discusses this topic.

@@Brassard1985 I want to apologize if my comments came off as rude or disregarding of your points, that wasn't my intention. I'll give that podcast a listen some time, and thank you for suggesting it.

Aliens are already doing it so it's gotta be possible.

Off da perc

Wow, there is literally not one thing you got going on in that comment

How.

@@ibrahimaniang3403 you Brian works on electrical signals which are electrons which works on a wavefunction which is in a superposition of uncertainty electromagnetism plus electrons tend to travel into neurons and activate neurotransmitters and basically or simply everything works in quantam the physical thing's u are seeing are made out of quantam we can alter it by temperatures your eyes recive photons that goes into photo sensory cells thats transforms it into electrical signals thats goes to your optic nerve to your Brain which process it on 13 milliseconds and so one your organs your cells your blood your bones everything tends to work on the quantam mechanics a quantam effect influence everything u can learn how tf humans brain works first start with Brian Cortexes and then nervous system and then neurones neuro transmitters harmones energy's receptors and learn with it is made of from big to smaller and then learn what is energy at the fundamental level the u will understand it properly

I'd rather see it used for exploration.

Sadly that’s true

it can be used to vaporize planets

You ever seen any?

That demo was the standard in physics education long before the movie. They requested I do it