I have some concerns about pronunciation, but I am awed by the perspectives on re-ionization, the age of the universe and many other aspects of our understanding of the reality around us! Thanks!
The voids are simply areas of the Universe with very, very little visible matter in them. That's all. Because even in voids there is gas and thin dust, it means that light can't travel completely freely through them, so If you were in one of the larger voids, until you have access to tech that can see other EM frequency's other than visible light, it may appear your location is alone in the Universe, as you couldn't see any other galaxies when looking up in the (night) sky.
...and a powerful group of quasars (ultramassive black holes) that supported by their jets energy and particles to the new created universe bubble (after the big crunch of the previous universe)... Casually today NASA informed: James Webb just detects giant black holes all over the early universe that could redefine astronomy...
Maybe some of those early Galaxies HAVE GONE OUTSIDE of OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE of ours. 380 million years since the beginning is a very long time and that time is being measured by our standards of today which maybe that time was more STRETCHED than our today's time since according to Mr. E Gravity and Time are bond together, 380 million years after the beginning there was hardly any GRAVITY therefore 1 second of our time was 100 second or more of 380 million years after the beginning.
If Jades-GS-z14-0 existed 250 million years after the speculated Big Bang, and if that galaxy contained stars having a high metallicity, then there would have to have been many supernovae long before that galaxy even existed. What are the implications for the speculated Big Bang's timeline? Well, you know as well as I do. I really wonder why this video doesn't even mention this.
A fully mature galaxy only 390 million years after the Big Bang (invented by scientists)? It would be very interesting to know the exact age of our magical universe! Is it perhaps 15, 18, 21, 24 billion years old or is it even infinite (multiverse)? The next or over next generation of space telescopes will bring us certainty... *ahh, Maisie, I love you! You are even older than me... 💗
scientists didnt make up the big bang , both the expansion and the CMB were predicted by ienstiens math mate , and then confermed , bit of history go,s a long way
@@sonarbangla8711 Theories brings us closer to reality, but we need the telescope to be on the "safe side" (research). Without the JWST we would still assume a singularity and a start explosion (big bang)...
We not only assume the singularity, but has no idea what a singularity means to us (one explanation we have is infinite curvature of space). Some say a more powerful telescope will reveal the reality. What bother me that no scientist can explain what we see. I am sure a powerful telescope won't satisfy us, we will get closer and closer to the singularity and then what...@@thekingofmojacar5333
Which just shows you that they know nothing and everything is guesswork, until proven otherwise, and this one kicks the 'big bang' clean out of the window.
❤❤❤❤ The presence of mature galaxies at the edge of the observable universe gives support to the pulsating universe hypothesis. These mature galaxies may be remnants from the previous universe which had collapsed into the singularity which gives rise to the present big bang. 😂😂😂 Dr HW Looi
Please correct the title on your front page: "250 light years after BB" makes no sense shouldn't be "250 years after de BB" instead, since tou are talking about time not distance?
We can't use a telescope to look back in time because light traveling at c experiences both time dilation and length contraction per special relativity. In the paperback book I published 09-27-2021, almost 3 months before NASA launched the JWST, on page 48 I wrote, quote "James Webb Space Telescope will discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as the telescope can see, further than 13.8 billion light-years away." I know where the theories, laws of physics and the evolutionary cosmological model went wrong. I fixed the mistakes and came to the conclusion we cannot use a telescope to look back in time per the claims by general relativity's look back time. You can be awed and inspired by all these incorrect theories and postulates or you can simply pick up and read the paperback books I published to understand the secret universe. If I had not figured it all out years ago, then I would not have accurately predicted the massive galaxies in my books. Don't be left in the dark like all the rest.
evidence for a photon feeling the effects of time dialation and length contraction , because without that actual evidence (and I dont remember ever and 1 saying they do in any experiment ever) you have a hypothisis , not even a therory
@@stevensmith797 The JWST discovered more than 100 fully developed galaxies, some more than 10 times larger than our own Milky Way galaxy but further than 13.5 billion light years away. I would say it's sufficient evidence indicating we can't use a telescope to look back in time. If the telescope could look back in time like Einstein predicted with his general theory of relativity then the JWST would have found tiny young galaxies containing young population III stars. But nope, the JWST found fully grown galaxies further than 13.5 billion light years away. If the galaxies formed rapidly from galaxy collisions in the early universe then the galaxies would not be smooth. They would be stretched out and warped out of shape. They would not be bright, they would be dim. They would not contain old red giant stars, which take billions of years to form per the Eddington Limit, they would contain young population III stars with no heavy metals, hydrogen and helium, possibly lithium. The only way to explain the large, bright, old galaxies in the distant universe is if Einstein's look back time was wrong. Astronomers and astrophysicists are still confused how galaxies more than 12.7 billion light years away are more than 10 times larger than our Milky Way. I however accurately predicted them.
Please help us to understand by letting us now the name(s) of your book(s). Respectfully appreciative of the thoughtfulness and ideas, I note that hypotheses without official theories and testable experimental evidence are very crucial, regardless of whether or when they may yield results that are measured.
Isn't there also the concept that Bing Bang was born in an existing universe? The galaxy that has no way of existing since the beginning of the Bing Bang is not possible to have existed in the universe before? doesn't this theory exist among scientists? . And do we think that we are in the center of the Galaxy, and the Galaxy rotates behind us?
If the Big Bang is mostly correct, then every location will appear to be in the center of the Universe. Every point in the Universe is receding away from every other point. This is one of those places where the concept of Relativity is very important to grasp what we're looking at.
Let me understand that at the point where the Bing Bang happened there is nothing left, we can consider that point the center of the universe, do we have a way to look towards that point? If we go forward, shouldn't other galaxies come behind us? Or because we move at the speed of light, other galaxies are the same and the black matter makes the distances even greater, we don't know if a galaxy is coming towards us because the black matter separates the galaxies, and in this way we don't know in which direction to look for the center of the galaxy :) Worse
Genesis 1:1. "In the beginning". Make up any number you want. It's still "In the beginning GOD created the heaven and the earth." I don't need a telescope to tell me anything. And when you stand before God to give an accpunt of yourselves, read Him your laughable "theories".
in the begining god created heaven and earth , and the first verifyable mistake of the bible , as for evolution , again a verifyable fact , so says our (and every other living thing we have tested ) came from 1 start , all linked , no adam , no eve , a myth writen by people who didnt know any better , welcome to the 21st century
Monomyth worship. Watch this. Do you know of Moses in Exodus? Can you read conceptually? With Greek myth, Jason and the Argonauts. Same sequence as Star Wars. 1. Calling - Moses and Jason both saved out as children. 2. Denial and struggle to leave past - Jason and Island of Old gods. Moses and Pharaoh. Both leave but then are chased, barely escaping. 3. Cycles of hurt - Egypt and plagues. Phineas and Harpies. 4. Supernatural Aid - Moses talks to God at burning bush on Mt Horeb. Jason talks to Zeus on Mt Olympus. 5. Crossing the threshold - Jason sails through clashing Rocks with Goddess Hera's help. Moses crosses Red Sea with Gods help etc, etc, etc They are stories made up on the same template. Did the Romans of "Official Bible" know this? Yeppers. Jesus was the chosen one as the son of God, had supernatural powers and directed to seek the Kingdom of Heaven Within. King Arthur was chosen as the one who could extract Excaliber, had Merlin for supernatural powers and seeks the Holy Grail. This is why religions want their practitioners to stay away from reading anything else. The pattern is too obvious. Only the genre of story telling the mythical template remains the same. One may as well worship Zeus and await the return of Jason.
Bb signals a moment in time that we can observe. That indeed is a fact. However the known Universe and the bb was not likely the beginning but some form of iteration. But that is based on the best evidence humans have. You have access to it as well.
