Red was quietly a stud. Good backcheck, quick breakout passes to his wingers, solid defensively and completely unselfish Edit: just went through the comment section and red is completely under the radar. Damn
Ye i loved Red. I think Green could use a little work but i think they played well with blue and red too. Dont want to bash the d they did their best but they were the bigger weak spot.
It really depends on the team. It's not wrong for you to be in front of the net as long as the LW is low enough on the boards to get RD's pass. This way you're ready to play D should your team turn the puck over. That's the way our club sometimes does it and we're statistically one of the top teams on PS4 so obviously it works. But it's all about being on the same page and knowing what everyone is expected to do.
@@Batman-bh6vw yeah, our LW was usually on the boards so i felt it was best if i hovered around the left faceoff dot/in front of our net. all in good fun tho :)
This is awesome. I haven't played EASHL in years but I was the starting RW for Shammers, a top 5, and playoff bound team a few years back. I was actually on EA sports radio show as the captain when EASHL started the playoff system and we were the top team. Ha pretty crazy memories. I might get back into this one day soon.
Blue objectively was the best. There for the breakout, helped generate offence and was solid defensively. Honourable mention to green as well for really good zone entries getting their defence to back off to allow the space for a quick play. Wish green shot the puck a little more but has the great sense of a natural playmaker. Anyway, great stuff!
Yeah I was wondering that too. And dont play board plays like yellow all the time when you got no pressure. Board play makes playing slower. C is also playing smart when going to deep when wingers stops the play.
1. Blue, smart player but could maybe be a little more offensive minded 2. Red: red had two goals backchecked hard, and was solid in the neutral. maybe should switch to wing tho because he plays too low in the offensive zone 3. Yellow: In my opinion, yellow had a good game but not great. On a positive note he found blue consistently on the boards and had a good break out. Also in the offensive zone, he had shots low and if he didn’t have the shot he sauced it down low. 4. Now to get to cuts: Green looked average but didn’t do much, he was on the boards on the break out but I felt like he didn’t have anything that could keep him for another game, tough cut but I think is the right decision Teal: Teal was similar with green and didn’t do much. In the defensive zone yellow has no one to go to when looking for that d to d pass behind the net. With that being said, there is no support for yellow and it forces yellow to either rush the puck or force a decision. Therefore, for the cuts of this video I think that teal and green should be cut
Teal: Cut Yellow: had moments, but overall didn’t impress to many turnovers Green: needs to be a center, doesn’t cover the point well, overlapping with other players. Red: winger, flashy, has pivots and plays more of a winger role Purple: Simple hockey, few mistakes but that’s bound to happen, more takeaways then giveaways, solid player. MVP of the game
I feel blue and yellow were the obvious best players. BUT Red, he was a sleeper. Great defensively, strong offensively, good on the breakout, didnt make alot of sui's, and ofcourse the GWG.
Blue is definitely a sure thing, but I think red and green deserve a second shot, but red as a winger and green as a center. Teal was the better defender overall, other than the clearly pointed out lack of board support, he did play well positionally when on the back check. Yellow has some work to do but there's potential.
Awesome concept! I don't know why people voted for yellow to be second he got outplayed defensively and killed blue over and over with suicides. Both defense weren't horrible when it came to defense but their breakouts were terrible. It would be cool to have a coaches viewpoint or like a GM view to watch players play for this kind of thing. That would be a cool feature for an online league. You got lucky on that goalie interference call since you had plenty of time to get back into position. May have been called a goal in the nhl.
everyone was good except yellow. blue was good but left zone on breakout way too early and green would hold it at the blue line but nothing too bad came out of that
What planet are you all from where the other defenseman goes to the boards for the breakout pass? Teal was perfectly positioned on those rims from yellow in the first
Love this series but they all seem solid my personal favortie is the defensive pairing remind me of a Hayden fluey and Derrick Pouliot sum offensive defenseman a little rough on breakouts and nuetralzone play but solid
I definitely would gel well with you guys, played hockey all my life so I have the IQ. In EASHL I’m a power forward, right wing, goal scorer. Played EASHL since 14, top winger every year when I actually played.
Red was a Stud He's your Jonathan Toews 200ft Center with 200HockeyIQ Blue also a stud. Yo might prefer a scorer or playmaker. And develop Blue into a RD You guys Dominated in the OZone this game Green spend most of the game picking himself off the ice lol
