Тёмный

Sec. 122 IEA: Communication between husband and wife 

Theory of Abrogation
Подписаться 316 тыс.
Просмотров 81 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

21 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 87   
@TheoryofAbrogation
@TheoryofAbrogation Год назад
1. Start your preparation of Judicial Service at home with our membership plan. For more details drop a message on WhatsApp on this number : 8840961324 or visit this link WhatsApp. wa.me/message/KQFV6VUK5AIWB1 2. Follow us on: Instagram: instagram.com/theoryofabrogation?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= 3. Twitter:mobile.twitter.com/NajeebU83984530 4. Facebook: facebook.com/theoryofabrogation
@shikhar7547
@shikhar7547 3 месяца назад
Najeeb Sir, u explain in very easy and simple manner Watching ur video + reading the content and done for the topic 🔥
@ushasinhaabhiyudayknowlegd4279
@ushasinhaabhiyudayknowlegd4279 4 года назад
Sir ,etni achhi jankari k lite dhanyawad Mahe ramzan Mubarak ho Khuda aapke har nek murado KO muqqmal kare
@shaanarora1068
@shaanarora1068 6 лет назад
You are a blessing fr us . thank yu so much .
@adalatadehmiwal2487
@adalatadehmiwal2487 6 лет назад
Very good explain. ...and u r very innocent sir😀😃😄
@amanbhathal0074
@amanbhathal0074 4 года назад
Bhai bhut acha samjhate ho ap
@Solutionpoint-j8i
@Solutionpoint-j8i 5 лет назад
Bhai bohat achcha lagta h aapke lecture ko sun kar.
@SK-fc4ug
@SK-fc4ug 4 года назад
Sir am ur big fan for ur teaching skill. Ur teaching skill is very superb , fantastic, awesome..Which is very helpful for us
@smritisharma8619
@smritisharma8619 4 года назад
thank you muchh... u make law subjects so easy to understand..
@garg_paras
@garg_paras 5 лет назад
bhai aapnai bhot hi bhadiya tarikai sai samajaaya thanxs
@sharadwankhede9753
@sharadwankhede9753 2 года назад
सर, आप बहुत अच्छा समजाते है. आपका पुरे indian evidence act के ऊपर कोई ऑनलाईन पेड कोर्स हो तो मुझे बताये.
@pallavisingh9735
@pallavisingh9735 4 года назад
sir I was very confused about this topic...thank you so much for your explanation....😊😊😊😊
@niharikagiri4347
@niharikagiri4347 3 года назад
You are just extraordinary.
@mayankkasera4573
@mayankkasera4573 4 года назад
Thabk u sir..... Dono language me smjhane ke lie
@mohitshakya6630
@mohitshakya6630 5 лет назад
Sir pls clear, Such communication are protected even after dissolution of marriage but those made either before marriage or after its dissolution are not protected
@induchoudhary3991
@induchoudhary3991 4 года назад
marriage khatm hone ke baad koi communication protected nhi hai . But jo communication during marriage ki gyi hai vo comminication marriage khatm hone ke baad bi protected rhegi
@mukeshraykwar7520
@mukeshraykwar7520 5 лет назад
Smjhate hue thodi thodi smile bhi laya kro sir ji chere pe ache lgte ho👌
@raviranjan-wc8xm
@raviranjan-wc8xm 4 года назад
Yea I like this sir. He looks nice😎😎
@jayantmishra7088
@jayantmishra7088 Год назад
Sir, in the book of the law of evidence by batuk lal, it has been written in the case of Ram Bharose vs State of UP, that the statement of the accused to his wife that he would give her jewels and that he had gone to the house of the deceased is inadmissible, but you are saying that it is admisable according to the same case. Kindly clear my confusion.
@TheoryofAbrogation
@TheoryofAbrogation Год назад
Wife testimony in court as to what her husband did that is admissible not her statement as to what he said to her.
@jayantmishra7088
@jayantmishra7088 Год назад
@@TheoryofAbrogation Smj me aa gya sir, Thank you:)
@sapnaverma2167
@sapnaverma2167 6 лет назад
ur all lectures are awesome sir
@sanasheikh7857
@sanasheikh7857 2 года назад
How cute when he say ...hame nhi pta isko kese pronounce krna h...🤭🤭
@chetansamariya8482
@chetansamariya8482 5 лет назад
Bahot bdhiya ....Bhai.
@MSHADAB2015
@MSHADAB2015 6 лет назад
Very good method to teach us
@sushimknmuhuri8458
@sushimknmuhuri8458 5 лет назад
Awesomely told..carry on bro.. 👌✌️
@advsrabanti
@advsrabanti 6 лет назад
very nice
@amangill5916
@amangill5916 5 лет назад
so cute explaining..😄😄
@msg1997
@msg1997 4 года назад
What is the fundamental difference between sec 120 & sec 122...? Please koi batey
@ananyasingh6961
@ananyasingh6961 5 лет назад
awesome video
@divyanshikumar7371
@divyanshikumar7371 2 года назад
Sir in case of this husband and wife and official and professional communications, the consent which is needed is only express and not implied right?
@adv.poojasharma4514
@adv.poojasharma4514 3 года назад
Are they competent witness to each other in civil or criminal cases....
@singhkrutika546
@singhkrutika546 3 года назад
Sir .. what if a husband wants to use a audio clip of his wife's words of their conversation as am evidence in the court. In order to get divorced
@gaffarsir9059
@gaffarsir9059 3 года назад
Nice explanation
@namitapradhan2292
@namitapradhan2292 4 года назад
Sir section 120 and section 122 me kya difference hai ? thodi si confusion hai .
@manastripathi1641
@manastripathi1641 5 лет назад
Thank u soo much Sir for explaning soo well🙏
@counsel4you
@counsel4you 4 года назад
Jo third person ne suna hai kya uska evidence hearsay evidence nahi mana jayega? Kya aisa evidence admissible hai? Please reply
@aashigupta3394
@aashigupta3394 5 лет назад
Sir ek doubt h ki ue priviledges communication only marriage pe based h ya hum isse r kisi chees se b compare kar skte h ?
@wefolloweverything6587
@wefolloweverything6587 5 лет назад
Thank you yaar🥰💪🏽
@amanbhathal0074
@amanbhathal0074 4 года назад
Ghaint bai
@eshalawan8558
@eshalawan8558 6 лет назад
sr. kindly section 132 pe video upload kren.
@alkarsinghrajpoot1480
@alkarsinghrajpoot1480 6 лет назад
Thank you very much sir ji
@-amar999
@-amar999 5 лет назад
Thank you so much
@judiciaryaspirant2184
@judiciaryaspirant2184 6 лет назад
sir ji awsm..thora negotiable pr b videos bna do sir ji
@ruqayyashaikh5146
@ruqayyashaikh5146 6 лет назад
Thank you so much sir.
@SaddamHusain-sk6my
@SaddamHusain-sk6my 5 лет назад
Please make more videos on Law...
@adv.sakshirathore.4150
@adv.sakshirathore.4150 5 лет назад
U r the Best nazeeb........
@ManpreetSingh-xw9bo
@ManpreetSingh-xw9bo 5 лет назад
very nice sir
@ashuphogat6679
@ashuphogat6679 9 месяцев назад
Bhaiya sec.123 to 126 IEA pr vdo bnaiya plzz
@SmritiSingh04
@SmritiSingh04 6 лет назад
Explaination was awsome... Can u plz explain some case laws also... With sections... Thnkew
@avigupta328
@avigupta328 6 лет назад
Are you from Faculty of Law, Delhi University ?
@SmritiSingh04
@SmritiSingh04 6 лет назад
Yes am
@avigupta328
@avigupta328 6 лет назад
Which year, I am from LC1
@SmritiSingh04
@SmritiSingh04 6 лет назад
Lc2 first year
@avigupta328
@avigupta328 6 лет назад
Can I get your email address or could please ping me at avimarwari@gmail.com
@adv.poojasharma4514
@adv.poojasharma4514 4 года назад
Thoda hss jate to bdia lgta mja ata sbi ko
@priyagupta236
@priyagupta236 6 лет назад
Dissolution of marriage aur nullity of marriage me kya difference hai?
@consorcioinactivo6381
@consorcioinactivo6381 4 года назад
Dissolution of marriage after marriage has taken place, whereas nullity is something that happen before marriage due to Legal Restrictions like Minor , Insanity etc.
@shivangigupta839
@shivangigupta839 4 года назад
If wife and husband communication is privileged communication acc to sec 122 than how can wife or husband be competent witness acc to sec 120
@achaljain1000
@achaljain1000 3 года назад
@@consorcioinactivo6381 I guess, isn't marriage with minor is voidable and not void?
@akashchauhan-ig3ew
@akashchauhan-ig3ew 4 года назад
Protection of s 122 gives after dissolving of marriage ?
@TheoryofAbrogation
@TheoryofAbrogation 4 года назад
Yes
@vinayakdolas6179
@vinayakdolas6179 5 лет назад
Is Hear and say evidence allow?
@adv.poojasharma4514
@adv.poojasharma4514 4 года назад
R /Foster case pdo
@sritidey2463
@sritidey2463 5 лет назад
Aagar spouse ne murder Kar Diya then can they express their communication before the court...
@rizwanakhan4301
@rizwanakhan4301 6 лет назад
Thank you sir .....
@sapphiresapphire9241
@sapphiresapphire9241 2 года назад
sir ian from pak ... how can i get your notes
@pritimishra4708
@pritimishra4708 3 года назад
👍
@nikkuyadav2899
@nikkuyadav2899 5 лет назад
thank u sir
@mr_pal1774
@mr_pal1774 6 лет назад
section 10 and section 32(1) per ek video bhi bnana do
@MohammadAkram-up5ex
@MohammadAkram-up5ex 6 лет назад
One thing in ur lectures is too short videos containing ultematily complete object of that section.
@TheoryofAbrogation
@TheoryofAbrogation 6 лет назад
Mohammad Akram i try my best to convey all the necessary particulars of the topic but still i miss many of the things though not very important.
@kanchanyadu6266
@kanchanyadu6266 6 лет назад
Best
@AngadVLOGS-vh5ji
@AngadVLOGS-vh5ji 6 лет назад
Bhai jaan sec 116 and 117 estoppel ka smjado .plzzz
@Fakeha1947
@Fakeha1947 6 лет назад
Sir plzz cover remaining section also
@TheoryofAbrogation
@TheoryofAbrogation 6 лет назад
Jee
@priyankatiwari6053
@priyankatiwari6053 4 года назад
confused 😣
@nikhilchandra8798
@nikhilchandra8798 4 года назад
😀 wahi to dur kar rahe hai
@anupamadnaansri363
@anupamadnaansri363 5 лет назад
Ram bharose Vs Rajasthan state hai up nhi
@AbhishekThakur-uo6il
@AbhishekThakur-uo6il 5 лет назад
It's ram bharose vs state of up AIR 1954 SC 704
@anupamadnaansri363
@anupamadnaansri363 5 лет назад
@@AbhishekThakur-uo6il but sir law book Jo abhi ki hai fifth semester ki usme Rajasthan hi hai
@AbhishekThakur-uo6il
@AbhishekThakur-uo6il 5 лет назад
@@anupamadnaansri363 it's a different case. The correct one is Up. Maybe there's a printing error in your book.
@anupamadnaansri363
@anupamadnaansri363 4 года назад
@@AbhishekThakur-uo6il ji sir maybe aisa ho skta hai
@newage9602
@newage9602 6 лет назад
appreciable research over Law Bro..M also the final year student of Law from Pak..If u find appropriate then send me ur WhatsApp num so that v can discuss the theories, doctrines and rules of Law..
@akritisingh6072
@akritisingh6072 2 года назад
Kya cutu ho Sir aap
Далее
#kikakim
00:17
Просмотров 7 млн
Section 137 of Indian Evidence Act,1872
19:25
Просмотров 20 тыс.
Sections 144-150 of India Evidence Act 1872
16:34
Просмотров 153 тыс.
Burden of Proof evidence act | section 101 to 114 - A
23:54