That makes more sense as to why they sound so butt hurt Hoover Alabama losing and making all these excuses for why they should have won could have won so funny Tim Tebow making assumptions
Had Michigan lost their fans could say the same exact thing. Fact is, Michigan was more physical in the trenches, had more yards, more yards per play and won.
@@sanddunestacker6110 nah their center wasn't snapping the ball ten yds behind the quarterback and miscommunication. Michigan won nevertheless less, but under certain circumstances. We'll take that loss, but this year we're coming for blood! You're going to see a different Alabama team with more key pieces, new strategies and a chip on their shoulder. You know BAMA turned the ball over several times due to errors on their side. Even if you don't like Alabama, you can't miss the was so obvious. 2024 will show the difference!
@@user-uf1on4yk8m Centers often mess up when overwhelmed by defensive pressure. Had Michigan lost they could point to countless special teams errors including the punter's worst performance of the year, missed extra point, missed FG, muffed punt, dropped passes, missed open WRs, etc. Michigan made as many mistakes as Bama. Alabama lost because Michigan was more physical. Michigan's Dline won against Bama's Oline. Michigan's Oline won against Bama's Dline. 5.9 to 4.4 ypp.
@@sanddunestacker6110 i respect your opinion, but I don't see it! Michigan wouldn't have beat Georgia... But we got a L regardless... But this time, I don't think these mistakes and miscommunication problems will be a factor.
@@user-uf1on4yk8m Who would have won Georgia-Michigan is speculation. Fact is Bama beat Georgia in Atlanta with all of the chips on the table. Bama brought those chips to Pasadena and Michigan walked away with those chips and was statistically the better team. Michigan will likely have a down year next year.
