Тёмный

Secrets of the Cosmic Microwave Background 

PBS Space Time
Подписаться 3,1 млн
Просмотров 715 тыс.
50% 1

You can learn more about CuriosityStream at curiositystrea...
PBS Member Stations rely on viewers like you. To support your local station, go to: to.pbs.org/Dona...
Check out the new Space Time Merch Store!
pbsspacetime.com/
Support Space Time on Patreon
/ pbsspacetime
Hook up an old antenna to your TV and scan between channels. The static buzz you hear is mostly due to the ambient radio produced by our noisy pre-galactic civilization. But around one percent of that buzz is something very different - it’s the cosmic microwave background radiation - the remnant of the heat-glow released when the hot, dense early universe became transparent for the first time. It sound likes random static, but that buzz contains an incredible wealth of hidden information. It holds the secrets of the universe’s fiery beginning,
Tweet at us! @pbsspacetime
Facebook: pbsspacetime
Email us! pbsspacetime [at] gmail [dot] com
Comment on Reddit: / pbsspacetime
Help translate our videos!
/ timedtext_cs
Sound Waves from the Beginning of Time
• Sound Waves from the B...
Hosted by Matt O'Dowd
Written by Matt O'Dowd
Graphics by Luke Maroldi
Directing by Andrew Kornhaber
It’s not surprising that scientists have spent half a century and built multiple satellites to unlock the mysteries of the cosmic microwave background. We’ve delved into its nature before - from its formation 380,000 years after the Big Bang, to its 1964 discovery by Penzias and Wilson with the Holmdel Horn Antenna, to its increasingly accurate mapping across the sky with ever-better satellites. It all culminated in this - the Planck satellite’s map of the CMB.
Special thanks to our Patreon Big Bang, Quasar and Hypernova Supporters:
Big Bang:
Anton Lifshits
coolascats
David Nicklas
Fabrice Eap
Juan Benet
Justin Lloyd
Tim Davis
Quasar:
James Flowers
Mark Rosenthal
Tambe Barsbay
Vinnie Falco
Hypernova:
chuck zegar
Danton Spivey
Donal Botkin
Edmund Fokschaner
Jens Theisen
John Hofmann
Jordan Young
Joseph Salomone
kkm
Mark Heising
Matthew O'Connor
Thanks to our Patreon Gamma Ray Burst Supporters:
Alexey Eromenko
Antonio Ruiz
Bradley Jenkins
Brandon Labonte
Buruk Aregawi
Carlo Mogavero
Daniel Lyons
David Behtala
David Crane
David Schmidt
Dustan Jones
Geoffrey Short
Greg Weiss
Jack Frosch
James Hughes
James Quintero
Jinal Doshi
JJ Bagnell
John Webber
Jon Folks
Jonah
Joseph Emison
Josh Thomas
Kenneth F Leonard
Kevin Warne
Kyle Hofer
Malte Ubl
Mark Vasile
Nathan Hitchings
Nicholas Rose
Nick Virtue
Ratfeast
Richard Broman
Scott Gossett
Sigurd Ruud Frivik
Tim Crookham
Tim Stephani
Tommy Mogensen
سلطان الخليفي

Опубликовано:

 

21 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1,6 тыс.   
@seanmortazyt
@seanmortazyt 5 лет назад
I admire the audacity of you guys even /attempting/ to explain such advanced topics and actually succeeding.
@damaliamarsi2006
@damaliamarsi2006 5 лет назад
Speak for yourself. This video cooked a pizza by giving my brain so much information it overheated trying to understand it up to the point I smelled cooking mozzarella and forgot what I was thinking about thus cooling my brain down and failing to completely cook the pizza. So all this video gave me was a half cooked pizza and a headache. That is not to say it was not fascinating and awesome and very well done. You can teach people things but you can't learn for them. I'm sure one of these days after I've heard it a few different ways I will start to understand it but for now I will just eat my cold pizza and sigh.
@psi.squared9448
@psi.squared9448 5 лет назад
Damalia Marsi dude stick to pewdipie
@freshhorizonswithjakub
@freshhorizonswithjakub 5 лет назад
@@psi.squared9448 That is just rude man.
@shahedmarleen8757
@shahedmarleen8757 5 лет назад
That's not rude!!! That's burnnnnnnnnn🤣🤣🤣🤣
@thisis4573
@thisis4573 4 года назад
I think they make these videos to consolidate their knowledge as well as pass it on
@Dw4rnold
@Dw4rnold 5 лет назад
where discovery channel makes me bored out of my skull. this channel leaves me in the fetal position rocking back and forth. best content on youtube.
@TectonicBadger
@TectonicBadger 3 года назад
Thought I'd check out Brian Cox's recent BBC documentary supposedly on the physics of time. Einstein wasn't even mentioned until the last ten minutes of the hour, and the rest of it consisted mainly of Brian Cox going "Woooah timeeeeee" while looking at turtles and other unnecessary on-location segments. I won't be going to TV for science content again, Space Time is where it is at
@Andrew-zq3ip
@Andrew-zq3ip 3 года назад
@@TectonicBadger yep. Regular TV programming assumes we are stupid and that we want to stay that way. PBS Spacetime understands that we want to get better
@o1-preview
@o1-preview 5 месяцев назад
Soft words but I can agree with the "best content on RU-vid" - I might add, for this time historic time period. After all, most are facts are bound by their time. Too bad they get many things wrong in this video, but I guess that is something that only those that have gone to the end of the universe would know.
@fobusas
@fobusas 5 лет назад
The amount of stuff scientists can figure out from something like CMB is unbelievable. And how it all comes together, independently verifying each other... Congratulations on very clearly presented video!
@thealterego1777
@thealterego1777 18 дней назад
Yes indeed!! The fact that we are on Earth eons later and are uncovering the universe's secrets just by mathematics of spherical harmonics is just art ◉⁠‿⁠◉
@alyasgrey9370
@alyasgrey9370 5 лет назад
I will never fail to be amazed at the depth of measured and modelled evidence for the models of the universe, and frankly everything 'established' in cosmology. Anyone who doesn't appreciate the work put in by cosmologists and other professions involved in cosmology simply does not understand the multitude of information they account for. Thank you for everything, scientists and support workers.
@Mythricia1988
@Mythricia1988 5 лет назад
@shane I always wonder what the construction crews of these huge things think when they're working on it, so it's interesting to see that perspective. I wonder how many think of it as just another job, and how many stop and gaze at it thinking about how remarkable these machines and their results are. Either way it sounds like an amazing thing to have worked on!
@toxxikanshul
@toxxikanshul 3 года назад
Cosmologist here. My core field is cmb. Thanks for appreciation anywayss 😂
@leaturk11
@leaturk11 5 лет назад
That was one of the best explanations I've had the pleasure of listening to.
@kukulroukul4698
@kukulroukul4698 5 лет назад
no is not
@ArakkoaChronicles
@ArakkoaChronicles 5 лет назад
I think I actually understood some of the words.
@patrickt4533
@patrickt4533 5 лет назад
Not that i understand most of it but your right
@mykofreder1682
@mykofreder1682 5 лет назад
I suspect they read some of the comments from similar videos and make a video that answers not the questions of PHDs in a complex way but people with some scientific interest in a way some can understand. It is interesting they came up with the similar results, they also did the same thing to get a universe age which matches the size of the observable universe. I wonder how the equations and constants used in these models are intertwined with the numbers generated from astronomical observations. Are things liked by the value of the expansion rate or Einstein's constant linking the results, could the real unknown expansion of space time from the beginning give us false consistency, is the relativistic frame of reference for these numbers our observable universe and not the whole unknown universe.
@technocore1591
@technocore1591 5 лет назад
I’ve watched all of these videos and when you mentioned the geometry of the universe before you explained what that meant I knew it referred to whether triangles are 180deg or not!!! It seems the primary benefit of watching SpaceTime videos is being able to understand SpaceTime videos! 🤣🤣🤣
@only1kingz
@only1kingz 5 лет назад
I love this comment haha! It's so true that I definitely understand these videos far far better now than I used to. I should re-watch the old ones now!
@Yora21
@Yora21 5 лет назад
We are learning!
@technocore1591
@technocore1591 5 лет назад
Peter Yeah after I started watching a few that showed up randomly I decided to watch them all chronologically and now I’m thinking about going round again.
@DanielZajic
@DanielZajic 5 лет назад
This was one of my favorite episodes ever. I'm amazed how we're able to find out so much from what seems like so little evidence.
@glitchwalker5422
@glitchwalker5422 5 лет назад
One thing I love about these videos is that, even where the content gets more advanced than my current knowledge, they're explained in such a way that it's possible to understand the abstract concepts. Which also then makes it much easier to fill in the gaps of my knowledge. This is a brilliant series, and a great public service. Thank you.
@J.Rod_Drums
@J.Rod_Drums 5 лет назад
I wish I'd've known that the Physics skill tree is required to unlock the Wizard class....
@calebmauer1751
@calebmauer1751 5 лет назад
Damn, I put all my points into Animal Husbandry.
@jdtug8251
@jdtug8251 5 лет назад
I had a little bit in curiosity and logic prior, I invested a bit into free time and interest in physics. From that point, gathering experience into my physics tree was a breeze. I started by investing some of my time points into Neil DeGrasse Tyson, which told me how to see the world beautifully through the lens of science, and then at that point my curiosity stat exploded. I invested more into the physics tree, and I also branched into that deeper, obscure quantum tree. It's a bit difficult to master from a gameplay perspective but it teaches you to approach from a perspective of unintuitiveness that makes playing it as interesting as watching sci-fi flicks. I also branched into biology, psychology and computer science, at this point I have a lot of points invested in it, and I feel rewarded x4 every time I invest more points into the science builds. I have a sickness debuff, sadly, that keeps me from experiencing life on a "normal level" and this is my redemption. I'm hoping that one day, my skill tree investments allow me to develop new strategies against the progression bosses.
@kinhamid9665
@kinhamid9665 5 лет назад
Whomst'd've
@njdevilsforlifewoohoo5533
@njdevilsforlifewoohoo5533 5 лет назад
You don't English well. It's ok. You science even worse.
@thesuccessfulone
@thesuccessfulone 5 лет назад
Alchemy and chemistry were parallel branches until the unifying treaty to call the entire class "master of the universe"
@emiliavlahos3956
@emiliavlahos3956 Год назад
i have spent the last 2 days trying to understand this for my midterm tomorrow and this is the only helpful explanation i have found online. Thank you i feel so enlightened
@seanj3667
@seanj3667 Год назад
How did you do?
@emiliavlahos3956
@emiliavlahos3956 Год назад
@@seanj3667 pretty good tbh
@TheMarrethiel
@TheMarrethiel 5 лет назад
Man: the universe is flat Alien: And I guess you think dark energy exists too. Alien: [aside to other Alien] These flat universers, are they for real or just trolling us?
@wefuntw
@wefuntw 5 лет назад
man: show us how you measured the universe, share your tech with us! Alien friends?
@SandhillCrane42
@SandhillCrane42 5 лет назад
Ah, the impotent absurdities of flatland. What does 3 by 3 by 3 make? Why nothing at all!
@wefuntw
@wefuntw 5 лет назад
@ZeOverman no , the observable universe is flat , does not mean whole universe is flat, it just means the curvature is not measurable within such distance. It's like when you stare distance
@cheapmovies25
@cheapmovies25 5 лет назад
Yeah flat earthers were on to something all along lmao
@cheapmovies25
@cheapmovies25 5 лет назад
@@wefuntw right imagine the weight of the universe bubble on space time under it it would be flat perhaps with a higher weight density more in the center
@Aidan42781
@Aidan42781 5 лет назад
PBS Space Time has to be the absolute best Science communicator I've seen. They don't really dumb things down in any significant measure and Matt is always careful to set the record straight to avoid falsely hyping things as the media so often does (ie. "That star over there might have an alien megastructure" one of my favorite examples of the media's clickbaiting pranks)
@theCodyReeder
@theCodyReeder 5 лет назад
ah I was wondering about this!
@SwordOfApollo
@SwordOfApollo 5 лет назад
I think it's interesting the way they use spherical harmonics in the calculations. I've always thought spherical harmonics were cool. I have a chemistry background, and I enjoyed the modeling of electron orbitals as spherically symmetric harmonics in the potential well of the nucleus. Not sure if you've done a video on spherical harmonics, but if you haven't, I think it would make an interesting topic. Maybe you could find a way to show spherical harmonics somehow. Maybe striking a hanging glass sphere filled with a colloid/gel suspension? Or playing a loud sine wave next to it?
@Vincent-kl9jy
@Vincent-kl9jy 5 лет назад
yo wuddup c-dog
@aphidamas1
@aphidamas1 5 лет назад
Let us all revel in awe at the great cosmic sponge!
@megsinzoa7424
@megsinzoa7424 5 лет назад
How is your fermented urine artillery shells going m8? Sorry but i Cant be asked to check.
@SpaceCadetLaC
@SpaceCadetLaC 4 года назад
Annnd I still am.
@carson0myers
@carson0myers 5 лет назад
"In that noise can be found, the secrets..." oh yeah here it comes "of the earliest epochs..." wait wtf "of space time." YOU TRICKED ME
@nathandaniel5451
@nathandaniel5451 5 лет назад
Thanks man, you are one of my big motivations to get into astrophysics and particle physics. I'm currently at university and these videos still boggle my mind. Like "baryon-photon plasma" when I heard that I almost yelled "WHAT?!" I haven't even studied QM or relativity yet but I'm mind boggled at the idea that the speed of light is the same in all inertial reference frames. Physics RU-vidr like yourself absolutely make me crave my textbooks Just to be able to understand why things do thing.
@josephlau13d77
@josephlau13d77 3 года назад
recommend Susskind's theoretical minimum for an introduction to QM and SR/CfT. Maxwell equations are also a great way to start physics and is vital to electromagnetism and SR.
@nathandaniel5451
@nathandaniel5451 3 года назад
@@josephlau13d77 I have Griffiths introduction to quantum mechanics, as well as some more advanced texts i haven't started like Sakurai's and Shankar.
@danclaydon6588
@danclaydon6588 5 лет назад
We truly are blessed to have channels like this.
@miriamgonczarska613
@miriamgonczarska613 5 лет назад
Wow your programs, are becoming better and better! Thank you so much! Fascinating :)
@danielhenderson7050
@danielhenderson7050 5 лет назад
Sometimes I feel like I'm keeping up with you and I'm like "yes OMG, go on.."and then I get distracted for a spit second and I've lost it. I love this channel, and I love even half understanding what you say half the time. Don't ever leave :)
@XtremeAlpha
@XtremeAlpha 5 лет назад
A tiny spot in the sky gave away the composition of the universe. What a time to be alive!
@DanFrederiksen
@DanFrederiksen 5 лет назад
You aint seen nothing yet. When man learns to hold a thought and actually think about ball lightning, UFOs and cosmic jets things will really take off. We are so close yet so far. Like Trump telling the truth.
@kindlin
@kindlin 5 лет назад
@@DanFrederiksen Ball lightning has some plausible explanations, and there are many other similar phenomenon that also have explanations. It just takes a tiny bit of research, a tiny, tiny bit. I don't even know what you're referring to with cosmic jets, must be some weird conspiracy theory... And UFOs? Really?
@jdtug8251
@jdtug8251 5 лет назад
Well, the universe was a tiny spot. What he describes here is the minuscule shapes in that tiny spot translating to the scale of the universe as it expands, much like you still have the same traits as when you were a kid when you're an adult, but they have morphed to adapt to your growing body.
@jdtug8251
@jdtug8251 5 лет назад
@@DanFrederiksen people already think about cosmic jets ? almost 100,000 saw this video, probably maximum 1% of which has the professional background to understand it without having viewed any other content on spacetime/other shows like this. I assume on those 100,000, many aren't watching their first, like me, and gradually worked their way through physics, at their own paces, with wikipedia/youtube/similar content.
@danfrederiksen1607
@danfrederiksen1607 5 лет назад
@@jdtug8251 are they? what about ball lightning? even though a stable spherical energy configuration violates known physics, try to get Matt here to take it seriously. Try to get yourself to take it seriously. When something is implied in our society to be taboo, very few can think about it. Most will shy, irrespective of apparent intelligence. Scared in a sense, it blocks their mind completely. Forcing the issue will only make them angry and blame you.
@pumpupthevolume4775
@pumpupthevolume4775 2 года назад
How this was even put into a coherent presentation is mind blowing which doesn't even scratch the surface on the science that went into figuring all this out. I am humbled.
@LeWille00
@LeWille00 5 лет назад
I always feel sad when I hear "of space time" because that means the end of the video :'(
@krelion
@krelion 4 года назад
The best video on the CMB power spectrum in RU-vid period.
@Verlisify
@Verlisify 5 лет назад
Finally. A Space time I can understand
@whoisthis4948
@whoisthis4948 4 года назад
Other than Palkia and Dialga? lol
@Zeegoku1007
@Zeegoku1007 3 года назад
@@whoisthis4948 What ?
@whoisthis4948
@whoisthis4948 3 года назад
@@Zeegoku1007 oh damn I forgot about this comment XD
@whoisthis4948
@whoisthis4948 3 года назад
@@Zeegoku1007 Verlisify is a pokemon youtuber and palkia and dialga are the space and time pokemon
@Zeegoku1007
@Zeegoku1007 3 года назад
@@whoisthis4948 Ah I see 😁
@OctorokSushi
@OctorokSushi 5 лет назад
I've heard this explained a few times before but it all went over my head. This is the first time it actually makes sense lol I seriously love this channel. You guys do excellent work.
@LordAlacorn
@LordAlacorn 5 лет назад
"You Will Be A Wizard" - way to roast somebody...
@SimWyatt
@SimWyatt 5 лет назад
Do you think he knows what he said there?? ^^
@yaldabaoth2
@yaldabaoth2 5 лет назад
Still better than a bard.
@chrisgeorgakopoulos7519
@chrisgeorgakopoulos7519 5 лет назад
Well, depending on the definition of "done", you very well may be a wizard.
@RyanSandorRichards
@RyanSandorRichards 5 лет назад
Man, I loved that little quip at the end XD
@sahilbaori9052
@sahilbaori9052 5 лет назад
@@SimWyatt Uhhhhhh Yes?
@natsune09
@natsune09 5 лет назад
You know, these guys do a good job at explaining things. I am a smart guy, but due to laziness when I was younger, I never really pushed myself. When I did go to college, it was for criminal justice. But you don't have to be super intelligent or educated in physics to understand what is going on. Clear and concise explanations and the great visuals (I am a visual guy) really make it easy to follow.
@NewMessage
@NewMessage 5 лет назад
Oh.... Oh, 'oscillation stacking'... No wonder my calculations are so off the mark! * puts down the ocelots and frowns at the chalkboard *
@fuckoffannoyingutube
@fuckoffannoyingutube 5 лет назад
wait. you're here as well? it's always good to run into you :) you're one of my favourite internet strangers
@tiresias3342
@tiresias3342 5 лет назад
New Message this isn't comedy
@tabaks
@tabaks 5 лет назад
Tiresias, he isn't smart enough.
@tiresias3342
@tiresias3342 5 лет назад
tabaks what
@account1307
@account1307 5 лет назад
Hkllhihlilhi
@ananths5905
@ananths5905 5 лет назад
Just wanted to say thanks for providing something I look forward to and also something that actually excites me all the while explaining some of the most advanced concepts in such a simple and elegant fashion. Million thanks to you Matt for making me feel alive and also question my place in this wonderful space-time
@TeddSpeck
@TeddSpeck 5 лет назад
Wow, Matt, that was really great. And I thought the last CMB video was amazing. This was a really interesting extension love the confirmation of the relative amounts of dark matter, baryons, and dark energy.
@reclavea
@reclavea 3 месяца назад
No Big Bang….the universe is spinning The CMB is not from a Big Bang Genesis 1:1 👍🏻
@copacetic6440
@copacetic6440 5 лет назад
Of all the videos that he does this is by far my most favorite one it's something I you can relate to as a kid when you look at the static on the TV and wonder where does that come from.
@bonob0123
@bonob0123 5 лет назад
im a biologist, this is like the "omics" approach being applied in physics (to great results!)
@tomschmidt381
@tomschmidt381 5 лет назад
Fantastic program. I've seen the power spectrum graph before but did not understand what it meant. Amazing how much information scientists are able to tease out of the CMB. That this analysis agrees with other estimates is awesome. It indicates our understanding of physics is on the right track. Considering we have barely left our little planet and our brains evolved to keep from getting eaten by tigers being able to figure this stuff out is a testament to our capabilities.
@nicksawyer4371
@nicksawyer4371 3 года назад
This explains wandavision
@anthonydavolio981
@anthonydavolio981 3 года назад
I love PBS spacetime, without it I would be purposeless, existing in a reality without the slightest idea of the rules that govern it
@AbeDillon
@AbeDillon 5 лет назад
Wouldn't the "moment" of recombination depend upon the local density? I would expect high-density regions to reach recombination a little later than low-density regions. It also seems like the speed of sound would be density-dependent.
@cjfontaine9206
@cjfontaine9206 5 лет назад
He does mention at 6:22 that the "speed of sound" in baryon-photon plasma is half the speed of light, which is way faster than it is on Earth.
@AbeDillon
@AbeDillon 5 лет назад
@@cjfontaine9206 Yes, I saw that. I'm still curious if the speed of sound was uniform and if not, how much it vary.
@AbeDillon
@AbeDillon 5 лет назад
@@jacobpilawa203 Thanks for the reply. I think the more relevant measure is how long after the Big Bang the moment of recombination happened. He says (~ 0:59) that the CMB formed 380,000 years after the Big Bang in which case +/- 1000 years is a more significant number. Though I'm curious what the actual time-scales were.
@user-vc5zt9ci12
@user-vc5zt9ci12 5 лет назад
I think it may be due to the vast majority of the energy being bound up in the photons, which were more homogeneous, rather than the baryons. However, I still think it is a valid point which deserves a shout in next weeks review!
@mal2ksc
@mal2ksc 5 лет назад
Yes, the moment of recombination was different from place to place. The question is if that would leave enough of a trace to be discernible now. If not, there's no sense worrying about it.
@tuseroni6085
@tuseroni6085 5 лет назад
i'm with you on that feeling, i LOVE that feeling, when you peel back the layers of the world and discover more new and amazing things. when i learned to program, when i learned how to use sockets, when i learned how to use ajax, when i learned C and C++, when i learned how to make leather, when i learned how to smith metal, when i learned about the fourier transform, when i learned about the lorentz transformation, when i learned about Noether's theorem (thanks btw), and many many other discoveries that have changed my view of the world, not radically in most cases, but like...shifted, like when you finally see the image in a magic eye....or when the you are looking at a picture of a duck and then you look at a certain spot and it becomes a rabbit. and the best is that feeling like "I AM INVINCIBLE!" to quote boris from goldeneye, like armed with this new ability you can do anything. when i learned about sockets the entire internet opened up, complex things became so simple, insurmountable problems became trivial, when i learned about ajax i finally had a way to bridge the client side and the server side, my code became simpler, my server side code became less and my client side code became more, but overall my code became simpler and complexity fell, i no longer needed to maintain some state from one load to another every time someone interacted with an element, i didn't need to load the whole page again. when i learned C i became able to control my computer at a deeper level, not just use other people's programs. it's just an amazing feeling.
@adzaaahhh
@adzaaahhh 4 года назад
Big fan of the Lorentz transformation. A man so ahead of his time, and (in my opinion) underrated in the pantheon of physics; arguably, without him, Einstein would not have been able to formulate his idea of special relativity and we'd probably still be stuck in the relativistic dark ages.
@TheJulioToboso
@TheJulioToboso 5 лет назад
The combination of oscillations of many sizes... sounds like Fourier Analysis
@SolarShado
@SolarShado 5 лет назад
I thought that too! Was kinda hoping he'd mention it so I could be sure.
@gm683
@gm683 5 лет назад
Was about to comment the same
@TheRealFlenuan
@TheRealFlenuan 5 лет назад
Well it literally is the reverse. Fourier analysis is what is used to rewind the clock
5 лет назад
@@TheRealFlenuan ... and your background is? I feel pretty confident that Fourier Analysis is waveform analysis, and these are spherical waves they are looking for.
@TheWasimu
@TheWasimu 5 лет назад
It is very similar to Fourier analysis. With Fourier analysys you decompose your signal with trigonometric (sine, cosine) functions. This is good on a flat space (line, flat plane,...) but since in the present case you want to do the analysis on the surface of a sphere you decompose your signal in functions called spherical harmonics.
@jppagetoo
@jppagetoo 5 лет назад
Finally somebody explained how the CMB shows the universe is flat. Yes, I knew about the triangles the missing piece was knowing the measured size of the hotspots verses the expected size of the hotspots. Now it makes sense. Thanks!
@jureculic9737
@jureculic9737 5 лет назад
I always wanted a video on this, great content!
@drew8443
@drew8443 5 лет назад
Good luck with your future physicist career!
@sahilbaori9052
@sahilbaori9052 5 лет назад
Is that complex or a compound sentence?
@TheCimbrianBull
@TheCimbrianBull 5 лет назад
Y'er a wizard, Juki! 🧙🏿‍♂️
@gaemlinsidoharthi
@gaemlinsidoharthi 3 года назад
Physics has always been a fascination. If only I could have seen a way, in that time before time, to be able to earn enough with it to be able to stay alive. Admiration to those of you that find that way.
@betiedu
@betiedu 5 лет назад
Im in love with these radiation videos lel
@Th3EpitapH
@Th3EpitapH 5 лет назад
the music you guys have had in the videos for the past couple weeks has been great. really nice touch, and subtle enough to not distract.
@flamur.dyrmishi
@flamur.dyrmishi 5 лет назад
Thank you for explaining physics in clear English. What do you think of Quantized Inertia vs Dark matter?
@inertia186
@inertia186 5 лет назад
I'm curious about the notion of quantized inertia as well. Specifically, how does QI hold up to this presumed verification of a Dark Matter / Dark Energy audit that the CMB appears to reveal here in this video? In other words, does Dark Matter / Dark Energy explain this CMB data better than QI does, if at all?
@gabor6259
@gabor6259 5 лет назад
Someone commented that the theory of QI ignores the things that contradict it and it can't be true, though it's very elegant.
@MrSJPowell
@MrSJPowell 5 лет назад
It was about 8:00 that I finally understood how the math worked for the "we tested the flatness of the universe with trig" claim from all those episodes ago. I had never caught how the opposite length could be known. Cool to see.
@gardenhead92
@gardenhead92 5 лет назад
But can I use the CMB to microwave my leftover pizza?
@danielkirk4755
@danielkirk4755 5 лет назад
Only if you like your leftovers at 2.7 Kelvin :p
@crackedemerald4930
@crackedemerald4930 5 лет назад
But what if i use a big lens- No... It would be 2.7 Kelvin... Only faster
@bastawa
@bastawa 5 лет назад
Sorry I have already used it and that’s why it is only 2,7 kelvins
@kennyhoughton
@kennyhoughton 5 лет назад
Call me ‘Kennedy G’ but I was wondering if this uses the scaling term at all (1- 2c^2/aΘ) In the tensor calculus for the early universe?
@DANGJOS
@DANGJOS 5 лет назад
@@crackedemerald4930 Magnifying microwaves on pizza wouldn't cool it.
@johnjrgensen3541
@johnjrgensen3541 5 лет назад
I've watched 10^3s presentations - this is the first time I've wished that I could give more than one "like". In fact, this deserves 5. Beautiful! Thanks for the goosebumps.
@SunriseFireberry
@SunriseFireberry 5 лет назад
Those early Rings. Sauron was there.
@IanTheTroll
@IanTheTroll 5 лет назад
i’m totally down with the collared shirt. you’re making physics look fresh
@urf1985
@urf1985 5 лет назад
My brain feels better when I'm here.
@johnsonandjohnson10
@johnsonandjohnson10 5 лет назад
Amazing episode! I've tried to read about the CMB power spectrum a number of times and have always had my eyes glaze over. Thanks for making it approachable, you guys rock!
@cholten99
@cholten99 5 лет назад
If the universe is currently geometrically flat but still expanding due to dark energy, does that mean in deep time (post the baryonic / dark matter era after all particles have broken down) there will eventually be enough curvature introduced purely from dark energy to cause it to folk in on itself?
@only1kingz
@only1kingz 5 лет назад
Since dark energy is constant regardless of expansion, I think it will remain flat. I think..
@kazedcat
@kazedcat 5 лет назад
@@only1kingz But the universe is flat because of the total energy. As all baryon, dark matter and photons gets diluted the total energy will be less than the required number to remain flat.
@carloguerrero6583
@carloguerrero6583 5 лет назад
Dark energy acts as our expansive force. Since as far as we know it doesn´t dilute, it leads to an ever expanding universe. This is the accepted theory on the end of the universe. I´m not sure about the curvature tho, i think that IF it changes, it´s going to go towards negative curvature, so the oposite of collapsing inwards
@cholten99
@cholten99 5 лет назад
I've been thinking about this and actually it was a pretty dumb question :-). If mass-having particles have radiated away and all that is left is dark-energy filled space then each cubic meter of that will have exactly the same energy and therefore space will be *very* flat.
@jaydienparks5658
@jaydienparks5658 5 лет назад
@pyropulse we don't actually know that it could change with time
@r7diego
@r7diego 3 года назад
Being a big fan from this channel for years, i just discovered this amazing video today (12/2020) almost two years after it was pubished. So much good and well thought out content content, BEST RU-vid CHANNEL EVER !!
@Nozomu564
@Nozomu564 5 лет назад
17:04 he still have whole 17 years to rethink his career choice.
@tuele4302
@tuele4302 5 лет назад
Or be able to realize his dream.
@AlexanderLouizosLouizos
@AlexanderLouizosLouizos 5 лет назад
@@tuele4302 its all about dreams
@Noman1000
@Noman1000 5 лет назад
:^)
@tuele4302
@tuele4302 5 лет назад
@Alexander Louizos Louizos Sometimes, dreams can come true.
@DvDick
@DvDick 5 лет назад
It's hard but definitely rewarding if you're into it
@rohlodendronfilantropis1040
@rohlodendronfilantropis1040 5 лет назад
Matt you are great. I enjoy this non-dumbed down scientific divulgation immensely: the audacity of what scientists do is inspiring, and the conclusions are breathtaking. When I was little and watched Cosmos on TV I was equally fascinated by Carl Sagan's voice and presence and the message he conveyed. It's beautiful that Cosmos, as his wife says in the anniversary edition, needs little revision. Since then, I have read lots of divulgation but only the Feynman lectures have fascinated me so much, with his approach of explaining QM how we know it but without the mathematical machinery. I'm glad to be able to say that you continue on that tradition of accurate divulgation, obviating the maths. Your work is wonderful.
@TheExoplanetsChannel
@TheExoplanetsChannel 5 лет назад
Great video! Is it me or they are using a new microphone? It sounds really good.
@mahditr5023
@mahditr5023 5 лет назад
Ikr
@aygwm
@aygwm 5 лет назад
I think they’re using more compression.
@BenoHourglass
@BenoHourglass 5 лет назад
They changed volume with the answers segment.
@brandonboilard1956
@brandonboilard1956 5 лет назад
I can hear every breath he takes its making me go crazy
@oldmanspooky6641
@oldmanspooky6641 5 лет назад
Outstanding!!! We are living in the Golden Age of Astronomy/Cosmology!!! What an awesome time to be alive!
@epichdsheep
@epichdsheep 5 лет назад
Old man Spooky just think of the things to come!!:)
@leeparker5822
@leeparker5822 5 лет назад
How's the cosmic neutrino background coming? That's very exciting
@nafrost2787
@nafrost2787 5 лет назад
Wow they should totally do a video about it. I’ve heard something like those early neutrinos are lighter than current ones. Do you know anything about it?
@leeparker5822
@leeparker5822 5 лет назад
@@nafrost2787 I've seen a few videos .. I think we're a bit away from finishing it but sounds like we could look back to seconds after BB not years with sooo much more information. I hope he does a video it's very exciting
@nafrost2787
@nafrost2787 5 лет назад
Yeah that’s the idea that because neutrinos hardly interact with matter, they could have decoupled from matter much earlier. But also I have heard something like that those early neutrinos would have been much lighter than neutrinos today. Do you know anything about it?
@leeparker5822
@leeparker5822 5 лет назад
@@nafrost2787 lol no I'm just a carpenter from London done qft qed 101 tho
@nafrost2787
@nafrost2787 5 лет назад
Nice, the fact that you’re interested in science is good enough. I’m 17 years old, and I want to do something with science in my future, my direction is the theory of everything.
@waleniafs
@waleniafs 5 лет назад
you explaining space and vaatividya explaining dark souls must have the same amount of big brain thanks for existing
@BelgianGeneral
@BelgianGeneral 5 лет назад
Question - I'm more of a layman than most in this comment section, having never studied any science but actively following this channel, so this might be a dumb question, but: could we literally spot on an image of a lot of galaxies these circular ring patterns, and if so, where can I watch that picture?
@AlemitoFilms
@AlemitoFilms 5 лет назад
BelgianGeneral good question, actually I’d like to know too. Maybe the circular pattern is so faint in the apparent random disposition of the galaxies that only a computer algorithm can detect it. But if someone can link an eye visible example I’d be very interested
@psykkomancz
@psykkomancz 5 лет назад
Theoretically, yes. I did some math, and considering how big those rings are , it would be possible to see them at the distance around 500 milions of light years withnin a 10 degree span of sky. The true problem is that there are so many objects until that distance that to capture photo where those rings would be clearly visible is practically impossible.
@TheHellogs4444
@TheHellogs4444 5 лет назад
Didn't PBS show such a real-life-image picture in the last episode?
@danshultz11588
@danshultz11588 5 лет назад
Watch the video that came out before this one on this channel and he goes over it. It's not nearly as complicated as this one was.
@danshultz11588
@danshultz11588 5 лет назад
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-PPpUxoeooZk.html
@RADlX
@RADlX 5 лет назад
This is such an insane channel. Thanks for blowing my mind each time.
@Corbald
@Corbald 5 лет назад
[Contains Question] You say it jokingly, but it has been my belief, since I was a small child, that Science *IS* Magic. It's the only form of Magic which actually worked! We tried so many forms, and we *did* find the 'One True Magic'. We then went on to miscatagorize all the ones which *didn't* work as 'Magic,' though Science more fits the definition. Mighty Google defines Magic as, *"The power of apparently influencing the course of events by using mysterious or supernatural forces."* 'Supernatural' is a non-sequitur, as 'Nature' is really a synonym for "The whole Universe, excluding stuff we make, but not really." So we'll replace 'Supernatural' with 'Natural'. Mystery is merely a matter of perspective, as something can be Mysterious to the uninformed, but old-hat to the expert. We'll replace 'Mysterious' with 'Understandable.' Our definition is now, *"The power of apparently influencing the course of events by using understandable natural forces."* So, Yes, you *ARE* a Wizard, though I've often thought of Physicists as 'Sorcerers.' You work more directly with the Primal Forces. Engineers are Wizards, and we make Golems and Enchanted Tools, Weapons and Armor! ;P [*Question Begins here*] Now, with all that said, I have a question to be of the Grand Sorcerer Supreme: It has to do with Black Holes, I'm afraid... It seems to me, in all the explanations I've ever heard, that crossing the Event Horizon of a black hole is actually on the Table as a reasonable question, but it only makes sense, to me, if you don't factor in Time Dilation, especially as we now understand that black holes evaporate. Imagine that we had a probe with a magical warp shield. It is immune from outside gravity wells, though it can still experience time dilation due to being in one. Again, it's magic. Doesn't matter how it works, all we want to do is track a single 'camera' inside the black hole's region of affected space-time. Now we line the probe up with the middle of the singularity and give it a nudge. As it falls in to the gravity well, it'll experience time-dilation, relative to the outside universe. It'll see stuff 'out-there' speeding up and we'll see _it_ slowing down. But the part that never seems to be discussed is, "What does the probe see the Black Hole doing, time-dilation-wise?" Well, we know that the Event Horizon is shrinking, via Hawking's radiation, if ever so slowly from our point of view. However, the probe is now much closer to the Black Hole, so it's deeper in the gravity well, so it's clock is running at a speed more comparable to the one in the Singularity, so the Black Hole appears to speed up, to the probe. We see the Event Horizon shrinking more quickly, pulling away from our probe. Let's speed up our probe. As we do, we see the Event Horizon slip away even faster, because we're falling deeper and deeper into the gravity well and our internal clock is slowing down so much that even the glacial timelines of a Black Hole seem fast. We'd never be able to cross the Event Horizon, because accelerating (or even drifting) toward it would cause it to zoom away, until it was a tiny as the matter inside could be compressed to be (whatever the minimum 'packing distance' of 'stuff' is in our Universe) then it would explode as a GRB. But our probe would be billions and billions of years in the future. If our probe could hover just beyond the Event Horizon at the instant of a Black Hole's creation, and 'follow' the Horizon in, the probe wouldn't even notice a 'Black Hole' at all, or only for an instant; the length of time it takes the Horizon to sweep the space from the edge of the Schwarzschild radius to the edge of the 'Sphere of Minimal Packing,' at [C-(distance from Horizon)] or nearly the speed of light. Ergo: Black Holes both Exist and Don't exist, depending on how close you are to them?!?
@iestynne
@iestynne 5 лет назад
Corbald very interesting thought experiment! So you suggest that nothing can enter a black hole because doing so requires traveling further into the future than the actual lifespan of the black hole. How would this account for matter that is already inside the event horizon at the moment that the event horizon forms? Is there a great schism at this moment, a bifurcation of permanently diverging timelines - matter inside and matter outside, never the twain shall meet? And what would be the "experience" of matter just slightly inside the horizon?
@Corbald
@Corbald 5 лет назад
@@iestynne For the first part, yes! I couldn't (apparently) have said it better! For the second part, no, I think the matter inside the shrinking event horizon is converted to gamma radiation once it has shrunk past the point where degenerate matter can hold up. Actually, the length of time it takes (in it's own time frame) to explode is the speed of matter in the center of the degenerate matter 'ball' converting to gamma radiation, then forcing it's way through further collapsing matter as that is converted, center out. Like how light has to force it's way through the Sun to escape. Or something to that effect, I think.
@ferdinandkraft857
@ferdinandkraft857 5 лет назад
It's an interesting thought experiment, but please note that Hawking radiation is a prediction of QFT in curved Spacetime, so it's not part of general relativity. It would be a very interesting calculation if you'd compare the rate of evaporation and the time to cross the (shrinking) horizon from the perspective of a falling observer.
@carloguerrero6583
@carloguerrero6583 5 лет назад
Jeesh. That intro was good, changing words like that raises eyebrows tho. Very nice thought experiment and well explained to boot. noice. Though it does raise some issues this seems to be calculable. If the ratios line up just right, the in-falling matter (including you probe) could still contribute to the mass of the black hole by just being close to it while being invisible to outside beings by being MASSIVELY red-shifted by the black hole. The mechanics of this warp stuff just go over my head at the moment though. AND (this just occured to me, i saw it on a PBS NOVA episode with Brian Greene some years ago) i´ve heard that as not massless objects aproach lightspeed they ¨flatten up¨ along their c-aproaching vector while the world around them flattening up in the same way from their perspective. Sooooooo look at this. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yWO-cvGETRQ.html Very interesting don´t ´cha think? A test could be a probe aproaching as big a black hole as possible, as slow as possible with the biggest ultra low frequency radio antenna we can hang on it.
@garethdean6382
@garethdean6382 5 лет назад
A good question and one that can be tricky to figure out. The first issue is that you're assuming that the black hole is going to be 'sped up' as the probe's own time slows down. This is not true because the black hole itself is deeper into its own gravity well than the probe is. From an infinite distance away a probe at the horizon would appear frozen, infinitely slowed, while things further out appear less so. From those further probes then wed expect to see things further from the hole sped up, but things closer to the hole still slowed. The hole itself we would expect to remain frozen (Infinity divided by any number is still infinity.) What about hawking radiation? Well this is an effect of the space AROUND the black hole to a radius of about twice the hole's own radius. (The reasons for this are explained in another PBS video.) This is why Hawking radiation is possible at all instead of being infinitely time dilated to a standstill as it would be if it had to emerge directly from the hole itself. Now there ARE speeding effects due to the probe's speed. Imagine a probe going before, shooting photons out behind it at regular intervals. Now our second probe is going to be following the first and moving directly towards those photons, blueshifting them. So the second probe will see the first 'sped up' compared to a stationary distant observer. But the speedup can't be infinite or the second probe would catch up to and\or pass the first at some point. In fact the speedup is quite mild all things considered. So for any black hole heavier than about the state of Texas it's possible to fall into it before it evaporates. Interestingly enough the 'Outsiders can't see anything fall into the hole' scenario is actually only true in one very, very special case and most 'real' observers most certainly will see stuff fall into a hole.
@davidmoe4384
@davidmoe4384 5 лет назад
Good follow up to last video. This is what the public needs, good explanation of how data from the last video can now prove the universe is geometrically flat. I always wondered how Astronomers were so sure of these results, but after this video it's apparent. Thank you.
@jajupa78
@jajupa78 5 лет назад
So Chuck Norris used a microwave once,so what?)
@levbobrov1398
@levbobrov1398 5 лет назад
The fact that we can make such observations and calculation about the entire (observable) Universe, while still sitting on our tiny speckle of dust, is absolutely mind blowing.
@dididogster9994
@dididogster9994 5 лет назад
Lays in bed a hears static: I guess I'm studying history tonight
@phdaddy7
@phdaddy7 5 лет назад
That project must win a contest for the most important information taken by one series of observations. And the most amazing.
@proof-xx1vv
@proof-xx1vv 5 лет назад
nice
@loopernoodling
@loopernoodling 5 лет назад
Finally! A proper shirt! I can't tell you how happy this makes me.
@TheWolfboy180
@TheWolfboy180 5 лет назад
I love you, Matt, but you don't have to try do hard on your Rs when you talk. Your accent is wonderful on its own.
@duggydo
@duggydo 5 лет назад
This was your best video yet. Truly great inference from minimal information. Very well presented. Thanks
@francoislacombe9071
@francoislacombe9071 5 лет назад
I'm asking this question again. How do astronomers distinguish the very small temperature differences in the CMB from the microwave noise of all the stuff the CMB has to shine through to reach their instruments?
@Crootcovitz
@Crootcovitz 5 лет назад
With precise measurements and a lot of Maths. I remember reading about it a long time ago, but that's all I can recall.
@cherrydragon3120
@cherrydragon3120 5 лет назад
Most of it is an estimation. They can't 100% proof it because of it. They may say its a fact. But most of this type of science is estimations combined to math. If the answer is close enough to their estimation they say it has to be a fact.
@TheRealFlenuan
@TheRealFlenuan 5 лет назад
By taking the measurements in multiple locations. The CMB in theory should measure the same wherever you are on Earth, but the noise originating from Earth should vary. All you have to do is use some math involving Fourier transforms to figure out the information that the signals share. Essentially the same process is used to read gravitational waves too.
@harryscrotum007
@harryscrotum007 5 лет назад
They can't actually measure anything unless they right there to measure it. Most of astronomy and space science is make beleive. It could be real but nobody actually directly measured it therefore an idea make beleive.
@boyan3001
@boyan3001 5 лет назад
Basically it's same principle as microphone noise cancellation. With one or more microphone you are catichng ambient noise and when you have clear picture how that signal should look like, you can subtract it from signal that is captured by primary microphone.
@xang5950
@xang5950 5 лет назад
Mind: Blown. Thanks again PBS Space Time!
@ast0815
@ast0815 5 лет назад
Magic is real, but we call it science.
@jojolafrite90
@jojolafrite90 5 лет назад
It always was a matter of perspective.
@Aurinkohirvi
@Aurinkohirvi 5 лет назад
I would appreciate if they worre the pointy hat and wielded a wand though.
@calebmauer1751
@calebmauer1751 5 лет назад
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." -Arthur C Clarke
@kazedcat
@kazedcat 5 лет назад
@@calebmauer1751 Yeah but what do you call a sufficiently advance magic?
@jdtug8251
@jdtug8251 5 лет назад
...and Science makes better stories than science-fiction. =)
@zack_120
@zack_120 11 месяцев назад
Indeed this is "a insane wealth of information" revealing the secrete of the Universe. Thank you this wonderful, trustful PBS channel 🙏🙏🙏
@colleen9493
@colleen9493 5 лет назад
I’m a new subscriber
@mbreiner08
@mbreiner08 5 лет назад
Sometimes I feel like an ant waving it's antenna while watching these videos as most goes over my head. I still love them so much tho
@paradox1093
@paradox1093 5 лет назад
Q.does elecrtomagnatic field affect space time?
@Yora21
@Yora21 5 лет назад
It is part of it.
@ferdinandkraft857
@ferdinandkraft857 5 лет назад
Yes, the electromagnetic field contributes to the stress-energy tensor, which is the source of spacetime curvature: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress%E2%80%93energy_tensor
@stuartvolkow9286
@stuartvolkow9286 5 лет назад
Great tutorial on the CMB! Our lab at UCSD is on the forefront of experimental cosmology on the CMB and collaborating on building the Simons Observatory. Polarization matters!
@SpaceTrump
@SpaceTrump 5 лет назад
Here before the background radiation was.
@FunScientifix
@FunScientifix 5 лет назад
Here Officer. This comment right here
@KanwardeepSinghNarota
@KanwardeepSinghNarota 5 лет назад
Microwave radiation 4 m she’s only I love more then myself
@tatjanagobold2810
@tatjanagobold2810 5 лет назад
Are you a primordial gravitational wave?
@wythaaof6650
@wythaaof6650 5 лет назад
lol best "first" comment ever
@KanwardeepSinghNarota
@KanwardeepSinghNarota 5 лет назад
t. gobold yes guid me to success
@dziban303
@dziban303 5 лет назад
Best episode of Space Time right here.
@nafrost2787
@nafrost2787 5 лет назад
After you are done with the CMB, do an episode on quantum loop gravity
@Gnug215
@Gnug215 5 лет назад
Holy carp! I've always heard so much about the CMB, but never really understood the implications of it. Even though I'm a fairly skeptical person, I've always had a trust in science, so I figured that when scientists were so hyped about the CMB, it had some merit. This video really shows it. My trust was completely justified. Damn, scientists are smart, and damn is science the most powerful tool ever. Thanks for making me finally understand a little bit about this!
@Gnug215
@Gnug215 5 лет назад
@MySecretMessages It's fine that you're skeptical, but you're basically going in the completely opposite direction by calling it "garbage". For me, I'd always heard about this and thought it sounded a bit like wild speculation, but in this video, a lot of the underlying theory (and evidence) was explained, making it a lot less speculation.
@khaliffoster3777
@khaliffoster3777 4 года назад
@@Gnug215 Not really it means they are clever is saying smart things that make sense logically, so it is not illogical, but it is illogical in the whole system so you have to be careful to believe what they say so they might be wrong and other people which you don't believe might be right, like Flat Earth, and other deniers things. The point things can make sense logically but doesn't mean to be logical in the whole system, that is point the whole system which is everything, not something that is part. So, people have to think to make sense or/and using the computer to make sense base on what they see, but it is wrong because of foundation principle is wrong. So, you are basing that it makes sense that means people in past is right to now, so they in past make sense to now so it makes sense in higher information, not really because it is misleading information from past to now. And also you are assuming humans are trustworthy base on the system which is everything that means the person must be trustworthy to justify the system that makes sense, if one thing is wrong then the whole thing is wrong in the system. The information system that doesn't match reality system.
@ytpanda398
@ytpanda398 5 лет назад
Since the universe is expanding, will it eventually gain negative curvature?
@bossninja0612
@bossninja0612 5 лет назад
No. As far as we can tell our universe is geometrically flat. It's flat because the total energy we can measure is equal to 0.
@kazedcat
@kazedcat 5 лет назад
@@bossninja0612 But dark energy is constantly being created. As the universe expand the new empty space created will have dark energy which makes the universe expand faster creating more empty space that have more dark energy. That is a positive feedback loop that creates more and more dark energy.
@bossninja0612
@bossninja0612 5 лет назад
Lol I'm sorry to say but it doesn't seem like you know what you're talking about. All the energy that ever will be was dispersed during the big bang. You can't create nor destroy energy. The universe is simply expanding into itself.
@ytpanda398
@ytpanda398 5 лет назад
@@bossninja0612 sorry this kinda messes with my brain a bit bear with me. Is it rate of expansion proportional to total energy? As far as I understand isn't the rate of expansion increasing? Thanks for your help
@mal2ksc
@mal2ksc 5 лет назад
physics.stackexchange.com/questions/33404/how-is-dark-energy-consistent-with-conservation-of-mass-and-energy
@hemsingh6785
@hemsingh6785 4 года назад
Its around about 35 mins videos but took 3 hours to complete and literally explained everything I have heard about universe
@CosmicBackgroundRadiation01
@CosmicBackgroundRadiation01 5 лет назад
A whole video about me! 🙃
@avov2297
@avov2297 3 года назад
Proud supporter of pbs spacetime. Ive watched every vid
@foetaltreborus2017
@foetaltreborus2017 5 лет назад
Why is the CMB shown as an oval ?
@cherrydragon3120
@cherrydragon3120 5 лет назад
Flat mapping. Flat mapping the earth is also oval like. Even tho its a sphere. But yeah... if the Universe is flat... then whats the point of an oval... unless the universe is actualy flat and rounded up as a cilinder... or actual spherical
@YYYValentine
@YYYValentine 5 лет назад
It one type of projection which project a sphere (sky) into 2D. You can find something similar earth maps.
@TheRealFlenuan
@TheRealFlenuan 5 лет назад
Imagine a sphere surface made of infinite circles of latitude. When you project a sphere onto two dimensions, one way to do it is to take each of these circles and unwind it into a line. The resulting shape is an ellipse whose height is the height of the sphere (2 radii) but whose width is the circumference (2π radii), and so you get that shape. It's called the Mollweide projection.
@MrAlRats
@MrAlRats 5 лет назад
It's a map of the whole sky. Check out this article. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mollweide_projection
@YYYValentine
@YYYValentine 5 лет назад
@@cherrydragon3120 Flat universe with a spherical "boundary". (It is not a real boundary, it is a boundary of time.
@bitmen1296
@bitmen1296 5 лет назад
You guys have amazing content. I'm back in college and as I make my way through my math classes I gain just a little more insight to your videos. Keep up the good work!
@DaveXXX
@DaveXXX 5 лет назад
But can it heat my hot pockets properly?
@matthewtalbot6505
@matthewtalbot6505 5 лет назад
No, quantum mechanics forbids this
@jkj420
@jkj420 5 лет назад
My mind is blown. Thank you. I don’t have enough time for these topics, so your videos are a real treat!
@SpectatingBystander
@SpectatingBystander 5 лет назад
1 down vote... It's been up for 4mins. Does this person like to be uninformed?
@CloudsGirl7
@CloudsGirl7 5 лет назад
They probably believe there's a sauropod living in the Congo.
@trewq398
@trewq398 5 лет назад
yeah why did he do that
@Melthornal
@Melthornal 5 лет назад
youtube (and all social networks) display semi random numbers of up and downvotes in addition to real votes. this os partially because its borderline impossible to measure the number of actual votes and also because they want to prevent people from gaming the system to get their content promoted.
@GeorgeD559
@GeorgeD559 5 лет назад
fuck them assholes.
@UATU.
@UATU. 5 лет назад
Let them relish their illusion of power, it keeps them off the streets
@dandanner3111
@dandanner3111 5 лет назад
Big thumbs up for the fun-yet-inspiring pep talk at the end. Nice one Dr. O'Dowd.
@DavidMaurand
@DavidMaurand 5 лет назад
I suspect 'dark matter' is a theological idea - we can 'explain' what we see but are only at a ptolemaic understanding, equivalent to epicycles and deferents.
@WanDeLay4
@WanDeLay4 5 лет назад
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but did you just use the "I don't know, therefore it's God" argument? Historically speaking, that argument is a bad bet.
@dinf8940
@dinf8940 5 лет назад
'suspect' hehe, when mainstream astronomy fails to make single valid prediction for nigh 100yrs, is constantly stumped witch each new observation yet keeps adding layers of complexity to prop up their obviously faulty models, id say its safe to say we are way past suspecting at this point
@kazedcat
@kazedcat 5 лет назад
Did you not watch the video. You need mass that does not react with photons to provide a braking effect on normal matter oscillation. This mass must be independent of ordinary matter otherwise they will bounce with them and not provide the needed braking effect. We can measure how much mass that does not bounce based on the peaks of bouncing mass. This non bouncing mass is dark matter because ordinary matter bounce. That is Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation.
@DavidMaurand
@DavidMaurand 5 лет назад
WanDeLay4 the opposite.. the presenter promoted dark matter as an established fact, rather than issuing the caveat 'the math indicates there is far more matter than we can detect, we don't have a clue as to what it is...or whether our math is wrong." For centuries, the math worked for ptolemaic astronomy, until Copernicus recalculated the same numbers. Confirmation bias is a powerful force.
@garethdean6382
@garethdean6382 5 лет назад
Dark matter IS a fact. Stars in galaxies orbit far faster than visible matter allows. WHAT dark matter is is unknown but it's definitely there. And 'the math is wrong' has been tried. Modified Newtonian Dynamics was the first attempt, tweaking the math of gravity. The problem with it and other 'wrong math' theories is that they're too simple. Some galaxies are >99% dark matter some have none at all. Large galaxies have a mostly consistent amount, dwarf ones vary. Changing math fixed ALL the orbits of our solar system's planets. Changing math with ark matter can fix only a handful of galaxies. This HEAVILY suggests dark matter is a THING which you can get varying amounts of. Ironically attempting to make wrong math theories fit its observations itself tends to add epicycles. 'There's some stuff out there we can't see' is a pretty simple model. When the orbits of the gas giants seemed a little off it didn't mean that Copernicus was wrong, it meant there were some undiscovered planets out there. Once again we face some odd orbits that seem immune to mathematical tinkering. Soemthing's out there and people are desperately trying to pin down what.
@nolanwestrich2602
@nolanwestrich2602 5 лет назад
All those secrets were taken from .01% variations in the brightness of a dim microwave glow. That's kinda like taking a sculpture, pulverizing it into a fine powder, and having an expert determine what the sculpture was from the powder.
@rydvalj
@rydvalj 5 лет назад
One of the best videos on this channel
@osmium6832
@osmium6832 5 лет назад
One video I'd like to see is Matt explain how we've come to the conclusion that the CMB originated 380,000 years after the big bang. I understand that that period of time is when the universe cooled down enough for visible light to escape the "quark soup" that existed in the early universe. But how do we know the rather specific value of 380,000 years? This is always glossed over when science educators are relaying this subject to an audience who doesn't necessarily have a degree in physics. I asked this question a few months back and got a very good response from a fellow commentor who had a background in astrophysics, but I think a video with graphics would help me wrap my mind around it a little easier.
@my3jeeps
@my3jeeps 5 лет назад
This episode reminded me of the time he mentioned that the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light. At some point those galaxies won't be observable because they are moving to fast. Our ability to peer into the darkness keeps expanding. Will we ever be able to "see" beyond the threshold of light speed?
@ohtheblah
@ohtheblah 5 лет назад
no
@maynardjohnson3313
@maynardjohnson3313 5 лет назад
The important thing is to use an analog tv tuner, not that you hook up any tv to the analog antenna. It is the detection circuitry in the old ntsc tv that you can see the cmb with.
@robharwood3538
@robharwood3538 4 года назад
Suggestion for a word to describe the oscillating expansions and contractions of these sound waves: They are like the *bubbling* in boiling water. Heat and vaporization expand into a bubble, and then cooling and the ever-present water pressure collapse the bubbles again. Just like the photon pressure vs. gravity *bubbling.* Then the metaphor extends to observing the sizes of these 'bubbles' in the placement of galaxies and the CMB.
@DoctorAlex1
@DoctorAlex1 2 года назад
This is a really clear description of the BAOs.
Далее
Sound Waves from the Beginning of Time
17:32
Просмотров 695 тыс.
The Cosmic Dark Ages
15:21
Просмотров 719 тыс.
연준 (YEONJUN) ‘GGUM’ Official MV
02:44
Просмотров 9 млн
What If Space And Time Are NOT Real?
26:02
Просмотров 1,8 млн
Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation - Sixty Symbols
17:26
Supervoids vs Colliding Universes!
14:00
Просмотров 956 тыс.
Did Life on Earth Come from Space?
18:34
Просмотров 669 тыс.
Does Gravity Require Extra Dimensions?
16:42
Просмотров 1,1 млн
How Much Of The Universe Can Humanity Ever See?
18:03
Просмотров 813 тыс.
Welcome to Cosmology and its Fundamental Observations
3:50:49
The Cosmic Microwave Background
1:01:28
Просмотров 3 тыс.
연준 (YEONJUN) ‘GGUM’ Official MV
02:44
Просмотров 9 млн