In this session, i have discussed Section 27 of Evidence Act along with Chart, Illustrations, Case Laws. As Evidence Act is common among many nations, this can be referred by such students also. Hope helps.
In a murder case, the police records a disclosure statement made by the accused where criminal conspiracy took place and upon disclosure the CCTV footage was attached were the accused shows how they met and conspired to kill
Sir, do Indian law completely presumes that '' Accused is innocent untill proven guilty ''? If yes, then why, before the conviction by a court, the person of accused may be after not furnishing the terms of bond and bail, kept under the judicial custody for half or full term of alleged offence's punishment as prescribed under IPC even after 90 days of judicial custody? According to Section 167 and 436 a Cr. PC. What if he proved innocent after spending whole punishment time in jail? And If No, Why this statement is mostly made in the court of law? Please explain. Thank you
