[see subtitles] Stratospheric probe balloon films Swiss airliner 

😂🤣

merci quand meme mec

@@vloggeur9412 de rien =)

Merci

Merciiii!!!

mrc

good going teacher ;-)

Trouble is when they get to the universities (with their own agendas) will this experiment be accepted?

@@chloe7seven22 Yes some school accept that as some proof of you scientific background.

@@WebmsJUWindows, sorry I don't really express myself too well. I meant the agenda of the universities. They will take a kid with talent and truth and try with all their might to get the child around to THEIR thinking.

Ben A1 it’s only because they’re not American kid who think they’re too kool to do nerdy things which in fact ARE the kool things

Je suis d'accord avec toi on a vas faire pareil avec mon collège et ils faut des normes très stricte et il faut l'accord de la C.N.E.S

Oh je viens de comprendre : le losange gris bizarre, ce serait pas justement un réflecteur pour aider les avions à l éviter ? Il y a des formes identiques devant tous les pilliers de ponts sur la Seine, c est geometriquement la forme appropriée pour renvoyer tout signal à sa source quel que soit son angle d incidence. Pour faciliter la détection radar ... Les avions récents sont équipés de radars d évitement avec correction automatique de trajectoire Ce qui m étonne est la faible vitesse relative entre l avion et le ballon, les deux se déplaçant dans la masse d air ... Relativement à l air le ballon devrait avoir une vitesse nulle, et l avion dans les 300-500 km/h ...

Je trouve que la vitesse élevée de l'avion est bien évidente, relativement au ballon. Il apparait au loin à 4:25 et il disparait tout aussi loin à 4:29. 1 km parcouru en 4 secondes, pas mal.

pourquoi le ballon éclate ? il ne peu pas continuer...dans l'espace ?

Avec un objectif grand angle, c'est normal qu'un objet semble s'approcher/s'éloigner rapidement. Quand je suis au bord d'un trottoire en ville, une voiture à 50 passe de ma droite à ma gauche en 2s ... en ne roulant qu'à 50.

My thoughts exactly, hard to find footage like this without a fisheye which doesn’t add anything to the footage except curvature. Seems fairly flat here doesn’t it?

Flat

Rudolf Ramseyer yes you are so correct, they way it separates into fine lines is amazing !

Hello. Moi....Magnifique images grâces au superbe travail de ces élèves et professeurs.

Jim Lord. Mee too. And where's the dome?

Not high enough sorry

Harley G how high does it need to go? Always seems like people say you need to be higher to see the curve. Well how high?

They were useing an anti-fisheye lense that makes the world look like it's flat!

The curvature decided to not show up for this one. Maybe it was tired or just felt a little flat on this particular day.

Bc of temperature inversion, other RU-vid’s likely talk about if you google atmosphere temperature gradient or something

Maybe the sun was heating it up and because the air pressure is so low it can't take the heat away fast enough? It is a myth that you freeze instantly when you are exposed to the vaccum of space, vaccum flasks hold their heat because there is no air molecules to take the heat away. The only way to cool down in space is to give up your heat as radiation because there is no conduction.

@Joe Cosgrove The heat is transmitted by radiation mostly IR and light. This "heat" travels at the speed of light through space to earth. Because air is transparent light doesn't heat it much, as the light hits the earth it heats up the earth which in turn heats up the transparent air. A vaccum doesn't have a temperature as such because it doesn't have any mass. Space is like a "black body" in that is absorbs or "accepts" all radiation so that if an object is left in the darkness of space it will give up all of its energy as radiation until it reaches absolute zero (has given up all its energy).

If you microwave an egg you are heating it with radiation. If you boil an egg you are heating via conduction. The air in a microwave is still cool after you have cooked your egg. So the heat must have been transmitted another way other then heating the air.

Joe Cosgrove I've heard somewhere that the sun emits lightwave particles, and not heat. As the light is converted/compressed and charged by the atmosphere, it transmutes also into heat radiation waves, as well as functioning as light.

I strongly agree

Wake up, you can see the curvature, it's not much because you are still to close to the ground. Don't give me, it was 100k+ feet. That's still to code to see more of the curvature.

@@aixaburlison4 man look this, ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-3y0nHhFGXDo.html you can see the curvature when the balloon is still in the ground, when it passes the clouds you clearly notice a spherical earth, but of course with fisheye lenses

flat brain

I think we have a monkey brain hunter

Pouvez vous nous certifier en temp que pilote de ligne, que la terre est plate?

J'ai pensé la même chose que vous mais en temps que pilote de drone ! Je suis très contraint par les règles en vigueur pour un drone de moins de 800g et maxi 500 ft d'altitude

Étonné que le ballon n'est pas été secoué par le passage de l'avion.

J'allais justement le demander: elles sont où les turbulences de sillage ? Et puis le fait que la caméra suive la passage par une rotation idéale pour le voir passer.

Les turbulences de sillages perdent rapidement en altitude et s'étendent peu dans le plan horizontal; c'est basiquement un vortex de petite taille premièrement qui s'agrandit en descendant. C'est assez difficile à évaluer sur cette video mais on peut penser que le ballon est à la même altitude si ce n'est plus haut que l'avion...aucun risque. Cela dit, la vue de la caméra peut laisser songeur...

Maxime Bourjon: Oui, comme par exemple qu'à 32000 m d'altitude on ne distingue toujours pas cette fameuse courbure terrestre ! Eric Dubay a raison, la terre est bel et bien plate. Dommage que le ballon ait pèté, j'aurais bien aimé savoir à quelle altitude il touche le dôme à l'aplomb de la Suisse ?

Charly Brown misérable idiot si la Terre est plate, comment dans l'hémisphère sud tu ne peux pas voir l'étoile polaire et comment dans l'hémisphère Nord tu peux pas voir la croix du Sud ? comment un mec pourrais faire Paris New York en 7h, mais le Cap- Rio En 7h aussi, parce si la terre était plate, les distances dans l'hémisphère sud seraient immenses ! l'antarctique aurait 100000km de côtes soit 8 fois le diamètre de notre terre sphérique ! Pourquoi les phases de la lune ne sont pas les mêmes si tu te trouves en France ou à Madagascar etc...je pourrais continuer des heures mais ça servirait à rien

yeah, but did you even question the lack of curve at over 90,000'? or the fact that after all those hours above a "spinning earth" they landed right back in France where they departed? That's the lesson here. The earth is flat.

idont thinkso I don’t thinkso!

The Earth was very Flat that day.

The plane part is obviously a fake; the sky is bluer, the camera is moving and u can find the sequence in other vids

Merci pour la France 🇫🇷

+Gan Ning tais-toi toujours les mêmes commentaire

Donc en montagne et en face d'une vallée, l'effet devrait être visible suivant que vous regardez vers le bas, l'horizon ou le haut. Curieux je n'ai jamais observé cet effet... Cela montrerait que l'horizontale est privilégiée. Ou alors votre interprétations des effets de la perspective est erronée! Peut-être est-ce dû au faite que la majorité des illustrations montrant cet effet le montre sur l'horizon. - Mais cet effet est général, il est dû à l'éloignement et les lignes de perspective se rapproche de la direction du centre géomètrique de la lentille. Photographiez un puits avec différentes focales, vous pourrez le constater! Donc testez et vous constaterez que l'effet d'horizon se produit dans la direction d'observation, aussi bien à l'horizontale que vers la bas ou le haut. C'est valable aussi bien pour un œil que pour un objectif. Bonne recherche, merci de nous tenir au courant de vos résultats...

@Sony Maire: Curieux cette manie de vouloir faire taire ses contradicteurs sans justifier ou il se trompent!

Mets une règle sur l'écran. Que prouverait le "ciel très noir au-dessus du ballon" ?

J’ai jamais vu quelqu’un d’aussi idiot. Ça s’appelle la pollution lumineuse. Il est impossible de voir les étoiles tout simplement car la lumière reflétée par la terre est bien trop importante. C’est la même chose qui se passe lorsque tu es dans une grande ville en pleine nuit. Impossible de voir les étoiles a cause de la lumière émise par la ville. Tu peux seulement voir les étoiles en campagne ou dans un endroit où la pollution lumineuse n’est pas trop importante.

C'est pour ça que l'humanité n'habitera jamais ni sur Proxima B ni ailleurs.

Which suggests that there may have been more planes, but the camera looked the other way.

Bravo : Vive la science ! Ératosthène revient, ils sont devenus fous !

It does get colder… that’s negatives in Celsius

​@@Flywithjon Did you understand what he meant? I don't think so. When the temperature of the negatives goes up (-50 -48 -46 -44) , it means it's not as cold.

Am I the only one who sees a flat horizon

That's because the highest layer of atmosphere is boiling hot due to high radiation levels. It's where asteroids burn up and the aurora hangs around.

@Fly with Jon the temperature gets warmer the higher it goes up. Just translate it into English subtitles and you'll see.

The wings really aren't needed at that alt and speed. Notice the very small or non-existant wings on such aircraft as the X-1 and the scramjets. It's basically a rocket at that point and only needs very small attitude surfaces.

@@tomthumb1322 o ya that's right. Like how the Israeli f15 flew with a missing wing.

At the End of rise at 9.50 they remove the shade and it is at 2 hPa at the highest point. It sadly doesn't go lower than that...

😀Its flat my bro

100% flat. They forgot their fish eye lenses! RU-vid will probably remove soon. They went to 90,000' with zero curve but you can click on other videos right here that show you a curve at 35,000'. EVERYTHING is faked to promote a globe planet that does not exist.

@@FloodItAll Sorry but a flat earth is physicaly impossible.

@@WebmsJU prove the earth is round. Go. I can do this all day. Did you even bother watching and reading comments before you vomited on your keyboard? 90,000' flat. 120,000' flat. You cannot prove curve without a fisheye lens and a NASA lie.

YOUR EYES DO NOT LIE BROTHER

😅😅😅

Ils ne sont pas aussi cons que toi....

@@micheleclerget6912 r/wooosh

A quelle moment

Tu raconte quoi toi

Hector RAM. With an icedome that reflects the hologram stars.

@@christsrevenge8030 I dont know about that, but I am doing more observations. If that is true that will explain why the East see a double sun...

Hector RAM. The east meaning Russia? The stars are holograms from the pyramid in Greenland.

@@christsrevenge8030in Russia, India,Iraq..

I remembered in 2000 in California they launched a rocket and it hit something in the sky. ever sense that day I been asking questions and how NASA just talks about building hotels, and other B.s, but nothing ever happened.

Merci, la courbure se voit et peux même se mesurer avec un simple logiciel de retouche photo. Je n'avais aucun doute, les arguments qu'ils avancent sont vérolés à la base. C'était juste pour montrer ce que pourrait être leur recherche. Car leur explications utilisant la perspective montrent une méconnaissance totale (volontairement ou non) du phénomène, et leurs mesures laser vers l'horizon qui négligent les effets de la réfraction pourtant presque 10 fois plus importants, ne peuvent rien prouver. Sans parler de leurs fausses affirmations toujours répétées, jamais confirmées, concernant les autres phénomènes qui les gênent. En plus, ils ne tiennent pas compte des ordres de grandeur... J'oublie les bannissements arbitraires, dés que l'on se montre un peu trop précis. Cela à été mon cas, lorsque j'ai osé dire que j'étais allé au pôle sud 15mois, et que j'étais monté sur "le mur de glace". :)

Respect :)

jeteste « mouai... ché pas hein »

Alors jy comprend rien prcq jai que 12 ans mais je m'intéresse à cette vidéo et j'aimerais comprendre tout tes calculs.. Mais bon mdr jvais pas te faire chie* a tiut réexpliquer pour un idiot comme moi😂

Heu... ce qui signifie, concrètement? J ai compris la première partie mais ensuite...

Notei isso tbm...muito interessante

@ Também reparei nisso e, na verdade, até já estava esperando que isso acontecesse. Essa inversão da temperatura é bem conhecida em meteorologia. Veja aqui, por exemplo (figura à direita): acmg.seas.harvard.edu/people/faculty/djj/book/bookchap2-8.gif

Exact, ça m'a immédiatement tilté aussi

Au dessus de la troppopause la température remonte jusqu'à 30 000m environ, c'est comme ça

merci

le déplacement de l'air au moment où l'avion passe avec un bon coup de bol sur la position du ballon par rapport à l'avion

aminotor1987 il y a plusieurs cameras il faut regarder la vodeo jusqu'à la fin 😉

C'est probablement grâce au souffle de l'avion que le ballon et donc la caméra ont pivoté à ce moment précis, ils juste eu la chance que la caméra soit de ce coté ci à cet instant ;)

Dans le titre il y fait mention qu'il y a 3 cameras HD embarqués !

Bien

As the balloon gains altitude the atmospheric pressure outside gets less and the pressure inside the balloon expands until it reaches the bursting point or until a signal is perhaps sent to cause a burst. That's just my basic take on how it works. Different materials are another variable. A great project and wonderful video.

GoPro rocket has a video that show it hit something through water

@@truearther Link?

Mark N is right, if the balloon bursts. If the balloon doesn't burst from expansion it will reach an altitude where it's internal pressure equals the atmospheric pressure and simply won't go any higher.

So the question is can we make a balloon that can allow its pressure to be changed by using sensors to read the pressure as it reaches these critical points, and then eject a different kind of gas that will allow the balloon to pass the zone where the pressures are equal as J Richardson pointed out causing the balloon to go no further. I feel like the government has the capability to do this already. It'll take a strong balloon material and a new balloon design.(perhaps put three balloons inside the one balloon each with their own gas) so when one balloon with its own special gas reaches its point and is no longer helpful with climbing in altitude another balloon will fill up with a different gas of different density and pressure value just at the right time to bypass that zone and so on... and deflate the other balloons if need be. I feel like we're acting like cavemen with sending one balloon up with its one type of gas(or gas mixture if that's the case) where it just pops at a given height every time. Also is the air so thin up there that if a Drone was strapped to the balloon programmed to turn on and fly on auto-pilot when the balloon pops.. Would the drone be able to create enough thrust to continue going higher?

Or maybe it was stabilized and controlled remotely. Ah the wonder of technology.

@@noevilea624 as an RC enthusiast myself was a VR headset utilised? so that the real time environment around the ballon could be reacted to as they do with modern drones etc? which requires connections to servos and batteries and subsequent increase in weight needed to remotely operate the cameras for the purpose of collecting the one inteligent shot of the fly past. Unlike the rest of the footage which uses the random rotation and oscillations of the balloon in flight and no other intelligent choice of shot or framed video.

exactly like the footage of the module landing on the moon and taking off the moon... so if the filming crue was already there why so much for the first man on the moon hahaha

It's clearly a zoomed in sub-section of the overall picture, moved to follow the plane in post process while editing the video. I wish people had just a little bit of a clue about the things they're commenting on.

Qualquer um pode encher o balão com hidrogênio e soltá-lo com uma simples câmera.

Kevin Burnes Don’t be silly Kevin.

Kevin Burnes Haven't you heard? Failed Earth is *DEAD* (Flat Earth to you) but since you asked the question I'll add to the answers already given: You *SMALL* Earth *BIG* as in really big and not just something you can compare to your backyard! So no, there is no massive flat disc, smh

ON RU-vid.. " JET FUEL HOAX " THE ENGINES ARE FREE ENERGY....INVESTIGATE..

Gustavo upper case text + flat earth claims = ignorant and safely ignored comment.

Wow!!! People still have sense... we are not moving, everything else is.

round its already been proven

@@alanclark2416 dumbass lol so when a plane crashes why is it on fire?

It's just you Globe confirmed 💯🌎

@@awatt not just him, there are millions of us that see it's flat and not spinning, at all, even a little bit

@@dpackman Trouble is you can't show me the flat. Globe confirmed 💯 🌎

@@awattGlobe Debunked 💯🤡

@@Joey-wq7iw You can't show me the flat Globe confirmed 💯 🌎

Surprised? I would've been PISSED! Know what a balloon can do to an airliner? Why do you think that toy drones aren't allowed to fly high enough into commuter airspace anymore? One in the past collided with a helicopter and nearly brought it down the hard way. That balloon could've cost the passengers their lives. I hope the airlines and authorities find this video and pay their teachers a little visit, 'cause it's great evidence.

I'm struggling to believe that it's real. It looks real enough, but how did they track the airliner so well with the camera, where are the contrails and why did the pilot fly so close to the balloon if ATC was aware of it? Edit: I guess a 360 camera would explain part of that and contrails don't always form... I suppose.

@@PistonAvatarGuy I think it's fake, they also got permission from the ATC I read that somewhere in the comments long time ago

The passengers saw a UFO and will swear to it 😂

It usually is up to a point, then reverses.

I wonder how heat from the sun looses energy enough to be -52 degrees.. and then gains energy again for surface temperature?!

@@cpvsgvmnt2116 The reason why the air higher up is cold is because the actual space radiation is traveling through is almost completely a vaccum in the atmosphere so the rays can go without hitting any atom warming it up but the ground is a lot denser so a lot more rays get absorbed by atoms so it heats up more and the radiation is transmitted trough convenction into the lower layers of the air so thats why its a lot colder when really high up. And for the slight increase of temperature in the stratosphere this is caused because the ozone is absorbing a lot of the highly energetic uv rays which the lower atmosphere is not really capable off

In my video, it's showing a decreasing temperature as the balloon elevates. 4 mins into the vid, they're showing temperature at -62 °F. Hackers stink. They're desperately trying to hide the truth. And the truth is at extreme temperatures whether high or low, nothing can survive.

exactly what i was thinking.

Jonathan Guyot sûrement parce que y’a eu une erreur

@Ayman Etetuani En même temps, à une trentaine de kilomètres d'altitude, on est encore trèèès mais vraiment très loin d'avoir atteint l'espace... :P

yeah, it left from France and returned to France because the earth isn't round or spinning.

@@FloodItAll important thing!

Earth is so flat it's undeniable , from such an altitude the horizon should not appear at eye level...only if cameras pointed down you would see a curved horizon of a sphere ...so far Flat Earth disc Geocentric theory reality wins...heliocentric tiny space balls faked theory looses..

@Genna Tuelz silly answer ....the creator sends you a merry Christmas wish !

@Genna Tuelz answer this first, so according to you, how high (kms or miles) would you need to hover above ground level to be able to see the horizon curvature under eye level, say looking down to "your globe, your theoretical sphere"

i guess that the sensor reading is wrong so instead of confusing people they blurred it out . you can still see that the sensor reading at 20km is ca 342hPa when looking through wiki i found that the pressure at that altitude is around 77.8hPa other sites even suggest like 43hPa

Turn on subtitles

Lol looks round to me. The curve is slight over a long distance but you can see it fine. To see it conclusively you’d have to travel further to get it in view. Like when Elon musk shot his Tesla roadster into space with his space X rockets. Which was live too so the delusion of cgi doesn’t work as cgi is only possible while editing. Can’t cgi live feed. It’s clearly visible and spherical. The entire flat earth theory is a psy-op. NASA lies to cover up other things, not faking the moon landing. Flat earth was the patsy THEY brought out in “leaked” documents that were on purposely leaked to the public. That’s how propaganda works too. They encountered things up there and that’s what they are hiding...they weren’t alone. And I’m not talking about the Russians. Aldren switched to the medical channel and claimed there were huge ships on the crater’s edge and they were watching them. That transmission was picked up by civilian HAM radio operators on earth. That’s also how they got a signal back to earth...and how it was converted to a land line for those who are weak minded not to understand. I’ve seen that argument also. How dumb are people that they don’t even understand basic technology and how radio waves carry everything. Before now, regular people had the ability to tap into shit like that. And did. Things have changed over the years and have limited the knowledge of the population. I bet no one reading this had a clue how to operate a ham radio. In the 60’s most did because it was taught in schools. Look up the launching of the Tesla roadster and gauge it for yourselves.

@@robrohrke8694 yeah I watched the Tesla being launched. The moon landing in 69 looked more real.

Rob Rohrke bro that shit was soooo fake 🤣 “you ca now tell it’s real because it looks so fake” Elon Musk.........ok Elon

Gravity makes light curve as well

rob barret No, it’s not gravity it’s something else. Gravity does not exist. Closer to Electromagnetism which indeed does hold things in place but gravity no.

rob barret. It's the refraction of the icedome.

@@sp4rtyon Then prove it with marh and science

Windows XP watch. This has been proven over and over again. There is no curvature. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-SgM1XG0mgbE.html

The stratosphere is weird like that, one big temperature inversion.

@@reynirheidbergstefansson2343 thanx..so the Strats started after 15000meters.

Definitely stratospheric by then. Anyways, there are articles on Wikipedia and elsewhere that will give you a much better overview than I can.

www.scienzafisica.it/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/pressione-atmosferica-quote.jpg

Yes Frank, I also noticed that the air temp is -46 @ 10km height then goes around -20 @ 31km of height. And then, boom! Hit the dome. Lol The earth isn't a sphere!

electrified or too hot or whatever. What's your theory smart guy? and who cares now? you've to think out of the box mate

@Southern Fun Amen my friend

Frank Waters because there's a fucking dome

Pas mieux, c'est navrant...

Non mais Galilé était complètement "rond" quand il a pondu sa théorie! 😆🌍

33panther33 Quelle théorie ?

Joël Le Bras Et bien comme quoi la Terre est ronde. Mais à l'époque de l'inquisition, il a bien fallu abjurer.😊

33panther33 Galilée n'a jamais dit que la Terre était ronde. A son époque, on le savait depuis longtemps.

Here ? No one ! Why ? Because we're living in the 21st century, in a world were everybody uses a new thing called the Metric system in stead of the archaic Imperial one :P

Wow

Kkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

Le pilote à sans doute remplis un rapport de "near miss"... Pas la première fois qu'un porteur croise un ballon météo ou autre objet volant (drone personnel) grrrr

Le pilote qui a des centaines d'heure de vol et qui connaît bien ce que c'est qu'un ballon météo. Un jour il oublie complètement ce qu'est un ballon météo et il appel la tour de contrôle. C'est fou seulement les pilotes d'avion oublie ce qu'est un ballon météo

😄😄😄😄👍👍👍👍👍👍😁😁😁😁😁

Mais aussi des plateaux oui

Non c'est juste un fake complet (l'avion)

oh ! par magie la caméra suit le mouvement de l'avion ! incroyable !!!

@UCm2bcun3HbUTKzLM7up_zqg il y a 3 cameras (voir description), dont au moins une qui fixe le bas et l'autre le ballon. Je doute fort qu'il y ait une caméra commandée car ça suppose une utilisateur derrière pour regarder pendant tout l’ascension les caméras et ayant la possibilité de les contrôler à distances. De plus si c'est le cas, la caméra est posée sur le côté de la "boite jaune" (voir 1:10), hors une rotation ici n'est pas possible sans rencontrer un obstacle, surtout que cette boite tourne dans le sens opposé au déplacement supposé de la caméra. On m'a déjà proposé un stage pour lancer un ballon sonde. Le type de caméra est du genre fixe pour un ballon sonde. Surtout que si on contrôle la caméra, il faut un 2eme communicateur car il faut aussi recevoir les données T°, pression et autre... Ca complique pas mal de chose alors que normalement on ne s'attend pas à vouloir la contrôler. Enfin, comme le poste très bien une autre personne plus bas, la pression indiquée est proche de l'absurde. Va voir par toi même car il détaillera mieux que moi pour ça

@@frozentime-mif7213 Hello. étrange, mon com à disparu... bon.. Sans doute y a t'il un gyroscope à bord ? pour contrôler de façon précise ce genre de mouvement, ça ne me semble pas déconnant. EDIT : Après, c'est peut être du Fake, mais je ne vois pas trop l’intérêt sur une vidéo de ce type.

Exelente video es el mejor y muy real con varias cámaras es marabilloso como se ve la Tierra y el horizonte espano que lente uzaron desde afuera no se ven estrallas bravo!! Muchachos !! Les felicito!

The cube

Yeah...the Firmament

Watch others then. They do not 'hit something', the balloon will burst due to expansion. Some get to over 114,000 feet.

Please use the metric system for serious science.

N'importe quoi...!!! La vraie question est comment l'horizon est a niveau plat aucune courbature pour çeux qui pensent que la terre est ronde...!!?🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

Ditto. Dodgy being so close though...I thought launches would need clear airspace.

Nice little curvature we see :)

Yes, incredible view on our globe earth 👌

good question!

That's video taken from a passenger in another plane. (Cut away to cut away) (no pan and tilt on the balloon)

There wasn't only 1 camera duh

Prove it

@@WebmsJU It's pretty obvious at this point. look for yourself

No my friend. I Work in Norway and its 6 mounths night and 6 mounths day

Must be mutch Higher to see round earth

@@PauloOliveira-td5te I understand that this balloon does not prove anything. I have investigated and understand the mechanics of both models. And I believe that the globe model is a lie.

Literally everywhere

In the weather ballon

10:50 or 11:08 Do you need glasses to see?

​@@magnorocruz Thank you GoPro for the fisheye lens curvature. :-) Shhhh....The Earth is Flat!!

@@nunomigueldamotapereiragon8203 the fish eye would be well evidenced when the balloon left the ground, as nothing appears because only the above would give that effect? haha ha

la terre est plate

From their pov that would've been a correct statement :o)

lol

Probably just another weather balloon. Pffft

John Bull† Wick the atmosphere is part of the globe, otherwise we would have crazy stong winds

Can someone explain to me the science behind the atmosphere and how it travels the same speed as the rotation of the earth? Genuine question, I cannot seem to find the answer to this. Thanks!

@@Zackychan if you are right how you could expan the wind come from north to south and from east to wist.....why the wind is not part of the glob......how could you belive in the earth move with speed 1800 k. Have no efect in this huge alttiute

@@levarbutler7032 ask nassa how their rokkit get out from this speed of the earth to the space and how it come back to the earth....its fake man

Stupot I wanna know as well!

YES I noticed that too.

Pascal R. Voir les fautes n'est pas très amusant, non.

Pascal R. Effectivement, je n'en reviens pas du nombre d'ignares qui apparaissent à travers ces commentaires..... Pauvre monde !

Tu l'as connais toi la focale qu'ils ont utilisé ? Nan, alors avant de parler des autres, ferme tout simplement ta grande gueule.

Ravez Franck Les fautes, tu te crois en classe 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Pauvre français.

Goulet Abruti, tu ne comprend donc pas qu'à force de considérer que l'orthographe et la grammaire sont sans importance, il en découle une perte totale (ou partielle) de sens. J'ai pour ma part lu souvent sur les réseaux des phrases tellement mal foutues avec tellement de fautes qu'on ne comprends tout simplement pas ce qu'elles signifient . Ma solution: je prononce à voix haute ce qui est écrit pour en découvrir phonétiquement le sens ...lamentable ! ! Hé oui, c'est à ça que ça sert l'école, apprendre à se comprendre .....comme tu dis: pauvre français que tu trouves normal de massacrer .....

Wtf hors sujet vous êtes partout les soldats propagandistes même quant on vous cherche pas