Тёмный

See why the 4% RULE is more of a GUIDELINE than a rule... 

Playing with FIRE
Подписаться 27 тыс.
Просмотров 32 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

28 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 33   
@PlayingwithFIREco
@PlayingwithFIREco 3 года назад
JL "The FI Godfather" Collins breaking down the "guideline" behind the 4% rule. As always, do what's comfortable for you and always check in on your financial situation to ensure you're adapting appropriately.
@Captain_FI
@Captain_FI 3 года назад
YES! The OG (original Godfather) of personal finance! Love that this is sticking hahahaha
@simmonds3930
@simmonds3930 2 месяца назад
The study was based entirely on US Markets. Another study was done using markets outside of the US and it found that a safe withdrawal rate was 1-3%. So if anyone outside of the US is watching this you may want to be more conservative unless you're invested 100% in US markets.
@whodey2112
@whodey2112 3 года назад
I owe this man a beer for changing my life when it comes to investing.
@jonpalmer925
@jonpalmer925 3 года назад
You and me both, dude.
@PlayingwithFIREco
@PlayingwithFIREco 2 года назад
Ditto
@EvolvedBonobo
@EvolvedBonobo 5 месяцев назад
In that case, you owe him much more than a beer, mate! 🍺🤣
@jaynelson8304
@jaynelson8304 Год назад
Bill Bengen is the first to design this study and name it. And it was actually 4.15% and NEVER failed! Hence the 4% SAFE withdrawal rate. I know, I know, past performance doesn't guarantee future results. But we've had some pretty drastic markets (think great depression or the stagflation of the 70s) and 4% survived.
@BrokeMillionaire1
@BrokeMillionaire1 3 года назад
🐐
@PlayingwithFIREco
@PlayingwithFIREco 3 года назад
Absolutely. 🔥
@richguest
@richguest Год назад
I'm liking the 4% guide incorporated with the dynamic spending strategy.
@YourFrienjamin
@YourFrienjamin 6 месяцев назад
He has Jackie Chan's mouth.
@vtheb1299
@vtheb1299 3 года назад
I have a question about inflation: as far as I can see, the FI community assumes a nominal 4% withdrawal rate. But 'adjusting for inflation' seems to mean that over the years, one withdraws more and more than 4% of the nominal FI number in order to keep up with increasing costs. How can this be calculated correctly in the long run? Also, if you determine a FI number and have a, say, 15-y timeline to reach it, in 15 yrs inflation will already have kicked in. Shouldn't that FI number change too, to reflect that?
@PlayingwithFIREco
@PlayingwithFIREco 3 года назад
The 4% rule goes like this... If you can get an average of 7% returns on your investments, and assume 3% inflation (widely excepted avg), you have 4% of the annual gains left to live off of in perpetuity. The Trinity Study made this loose formula a "safe" assumption to use as a guideline for financial planning. Obviously, all these numbers can fluctuate from year to year, but these are farily safe assumptions to plan against a 30 yr horizon (though it might take you only 15 years to reach your "FI number"). So, in your example, the 15 years of inflation are already built into the equation.
@aantebajocabecon
@aantebajocabecon 3 года назад
I agree that it is not very clear. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that in practice it works as follows: If you need e.g. 40K/year and have already (x25) 1 million saved, the first year of retirement you withdraw 40K, the second 41.2K (assuming a 3% inflation), and so on. I agree on your second point, which is rarely mentioned. The FI number you set out at the beginning is a bit of a rough goal, which you will have to adjust after 15 years. Another item I don't understand is how to account for taxes in your FI number, which can vary a lot across countries...
@vtheb1299
@vtheb1299 3 года назад
@@PlayingwithFIREco thanks for the reply! You lost me at the first sentence "u assume 7% gains and 3% inflation and 4% is left to live off of". What about the 3%?
@Deltron6060
@Deltron6060 3 года назад
@@vtheb1299 7-3=4
@christenford3864
@christenford3864 3 года назад
@@vtheb1299 the 3% is the widely accepted rate if inflation.
@Pieter2360
@Pieter2360 2 года назад
Good one. Vanguard published a really good paper on this topic in June 2021. Highly recommended it, as there’s so much confusion on this topic.
@EvolvedBonobo
@EvolvedBonobo 5 месяцев назад
Title and authors of said paper, please? 🙏
@Pieter2360
@Pieter2360 5 месяцев назад
@@EvolvedBonobo title is : “Fuel for FIRE: updating the 4% rule for early retirees”, Vanguard, June 2021.
@monke204ah
@monke204ah 2 года назад
I have a question about the withdrawal. Let's say you have 1 mil and you withdraw 3% at the start of retirement. 15 Years later its at 4 mil but you are only withdrawing 40k per year. Can you basically reset your withdrawal system and then start withdrawing 120k per year or would you then go broke?
@shashankchaudhary6917
@shashankchaudhary6917 5 месяцев назад
Look at the portfolio value at the beginning of the year and withdraw 4 percent of the value and keep it in bank. You can safely so this for next 30 years and then you will go broke.
@fabs4564
@fabs4564 4 месяца назад
3:15
@hallpaintandbody7717
@hallpaintandbody7717 3 года назад
2nd 🔥
@PlayingwithFIREco
@PlayingwithFIREco 3 года назад
🔥🔥🤙
Далее
Bearwolf - GODZILLA Пародия Beatrise
00:33
Просмотров 78 тыс.
The Rise of the Stealth Wealth Community
10:42
Просмотров 104 тыс.
JL Collins: The Art of Buying Freedom, Not Things!
5:22
Something Terrible Is Happening To Boomers
15:22
Просмотров 1,4 млн
The 4% Rule Explained [Video #1]
11:08
Просмотров 18 тыс.