@@dezoto6352 Not disappointed, just imparting truth about grammar. "You've to" makes no sense. English is hard enough for ESL students. We shouldn't make it harder.
Interesting way of doing it. I’d have thought you would have just kept track of the turns used to scramble it and undone those, but it looks like it actually uses real rubic’s cube algorithms, which is cool.
Wow! It's the second time I'm noticing your comment in a random video today! Eventhough your shruthi prakash dp is the reason I noticed, I love your comments too! P.S.: I subbed too! Though I don't think you'll ever upload....
@@inasingha I dont think so... It always want to solve itself and undos every move you make.... If you think about an elastic band.. an elastic band always turns the whole way. It remembers which way it turned... This is a mechanic so it remembers the moves you made. It doesn't solve it the traditional way by making a cross and then fix every layer
If this would go in sonic speed you could throw it in the air where it's going to speedcube itself in super badass speed and then catch it solved. Would look absolutely amazing tho
Imagine using this as a prank when ever your buddies try’s too solve it and almost does and looks away for a second too go get a drink it messes itself up again lol
In 4th grade, some time in the 80s, my teacher would ramble about flying cars. She was driving a few of us to get hamburgers, and bumped another car in the drive through. We teased her the rest of the year about women and flying cars. How it was so different. Yes, teachers drove students. We brought our hunting rifles to school, and no one wanted to kill each other.
@GUSTAVO666BR Error1010010101010, it's not bad! It's not bad!!! Also, your name is bad... 😐 You have number 666 inside your name and hundreds of zeros and ones!
What's even more impressive is that it doesn't seem to be reversing the actions that he had done but instead makes its own solution to the answer. Correct me if I'm wrong but I saw 15 moves being made by the person and almost 50 moves by the cube while solving this. Anyway huge props!!
It is NOT just recording and rewinding! Count the moves: 15 or so to scramble (depending on how you could 180 turns); 30+ or so to solve. Very impressive.
Um... That's kind've opposite of effectiveness though... It would be impressive if you spent 30+ moves scrambling it, but it only needed ~15 moves to get back to solved position.
@@Kia044 A self-Solving Rubik's Cube, that is using CFOF is impressive. Yeah, it could be possible to program the Cube, so that it will look for the way, which has the least amount of Moves. But a self-solving Rubik's Cube with the whole Mechanism inside of the Cube is still really impressive.
Key word is _CAN_, as the cube is never more than 18 moves from solved (I count 180 turns as a single move :)). The Thistlethwaite algorithm guarantees to never take more then 52 moves. Various other techniques for solving have their own maximum number of moves. The fact it was NOT just remembering how it got scrambled and unwinding the exact same 15 moves, but _actually_ solving it by _any_ algorithm is what makes it more impressive.
People saying that didn't solve itself and reverse the moves, seriously? Like u don't know how to solve it, and didn't understand what happened, it was an algorithm, the cube used a method called CFOP, don't judge by your zero knowledge of Rubik's cube.
How can you be so sure that it's using the CFOP algorithm and not another one? Also how can you be so sure that it is using an algorithm and not undoing all moves? Did you see the code? I didn't but basing on the interior I'm 100% sure that the cube is recording all rotations because it doesn't have any sensors which will allow it to recognize where which cube and colour is. So for me it's more plausible that it's just undoing all moves.
It computes the pieces positions' by simulating the cube's rotations which it can indeed sense. One could see that it's CFOP because I for example recognized some of the algorithms it used and stages of the solution.
