I always thought it was interesting that SMT ideology-representatives tend to do the opposite of what they claim their ideals to be. Jonathan speaks of empathy and mutualism, but perpetuates genocide, sacrificing his authentic love for others for the malappropriated heuristic of superficial peace. Walter speaks of egalitarianism and material disposession, but pursues a world defined by violent heirarchy, sacrificing his authentic advocacy for the underpriveledged in the favor of granting social mobility to a few. Isamu relied on the support of his friends and patrons in order to create the world of Musibi. Chiaki was only able to survive long enough to create the world of Yosuga because she avoided conflict. Hikawa struck out against the Gaeans and destroyed the entire world in order to achieve Shijima's perfect expression of collective will.
@@ReverofEnola But even if it is my first playthrough I felt like I've played before... Maybe it is because I watched too many smt iv videos and stuff (?) haha
