Should Firing Squads Replace Lethal Injections? (HBO) 

It took me 7 seconds of thought to figure this out. You don't need somebody with the title professor that study capital punishment to get your answer. Beheading with a large blade that is attached to a machine would work for another bandage slapped on society. Yes...firing squad would be better. I am glad the system and even to an extend society doesn't value philosophers anymore , it's a fun show to watch and laugh at , don't worry it's about to get much better.

VICE News It makes sense to me if the hit you in the head with more than one round

The most humane, effective, easiest and cleanest way to execute someone is by asphyxiation using any type of pure gas. Carbon Monoxide (CO) gas is best as it attaches to the hemoglobin in the blood more readily than oxygen. Any gas will work as long as it blocks oxygen from entering the blood stream. Within 2 breaths you lose consciousness and in minutes you're history. I took 2 breaths of helium joking around and nearly blacked out. It was painless.

Cheaper too

Pa doesn't do death penalty alot it's vary rare as a Pennsylvanian I lived here my whole life aka 14 years so its rare in pa to get it you need a baddddd thing to haplen

i think you missed the point sir. the video isn't about whether or not he deserved it. he is just shown as an example. the motive of the video is more a demonstration of the effectiveness in with death penalties is cared out in the USA today, (sry bad English not native and dyslexic)

I think you missed the point of the comment...

Alan Heath I don't agree with how the brother is going around town showing pics of his executed brother trying to build sympathy against the death penalty. whatever the inmate did, let's see pictures of his victims side-by-side at the brother's protests, and see what's fair.

Yea why doesn't vice ask the victims families about how they feel about it? I can appreciate that this guy is sad that his brother is dead but for fuck's sake, if he killed other people in cold blood during a robbery then he damn sight deserved it. Feelings be damned. He didn't take into account the feelings of the people he killed or their families.

Alan Heath supporting war mongering neo cons

Dillon Heller how is a court officer a non human entity?

HellBound he’s just acting like a sovereign citizen don’t listen to him

No a good society would feed him to a giant pit of fire ants...

Sorry, there is no room for sick twisted people like this man. Justice was served🇺🇸

BeaverTerror thank you for those facts man! People need to know this

I'd pick fighting an endless horde of katana wielding robots.

Shit I'd have em load up a .308 or 30-06 with v-max you'd be dead in a matter of seconds.

I'd choose death by Snu-Snu

Arkadiem nah, unga-bunga

unknown man no the first one is a sedative, second is a paralytic then the potassium chloride to stop the heart

What do you mean no one cares about that. The dude who did it was killed......obviously someone cared.

@@gabriellec6863 it’s sarcasm people obviously cared.

@@mystic9806 uhhh yeah....that's my point. That people cared. What part of his comment was sarcasm?

@@gabriellec6863 he is trying to emphasize what the killer’s brother said that ‘my brother didn’t deserve this’ so he is saying that that the victims did not deserve there death but in a sarcastic way

@@mystic9806 yeah..I get that. Lol.

Mythrain Too easy. Gotta be at least a 540, ladder stall, YYR, silent shot

And headshots only

**Executioner does Fortnite dance and teabags corpse**

@@libertyprime1710 A memer mentioning fortnite? How rare.

Nah 1080 Nac

THEMilkSHAIKH and the cost of 35 years in prison?

Martin in the thousands per year.

Martin You're not accounting for the cost of death row, where people can remain for decades.

One Pilot the cost would be the same if they were not on death because the prison still has to house them lol.

metallicaandchimaira Not true. Death row requires higher security than normal prisons and the numerous appeals people on death row go through are more expensive as well. It works out more expensive to keep someone on death row than in a regular prison. I'm opposed to the death penalty for moral reasons most of all, but from a financial standpoint, it doesn't make that much sense, either.

Can reload 9mm for like 10 cents a round. Only need one bullet to kill some one.

Germ .Fish isnt there 3 people in a firing squad?

I thought it was 5 but I suppose you could get away with less.

Jake Paul Yes, but two have blanks.

Tj Moran and you don’t have to train the executor nearly as much

for real. hes showing graphic photos to the public where children are,kinda fucked

He should also show the pictures of his murder victims as well.

@@SORRYBUTYOURENEXT, it's not really illegal, if you don't like it then don't look at it.

@Christian Ball he said showing those pictures is “kinda fucked”, not that it’s illegal. Don’t see how that statement proves he has a 60 iq and low bank account balance

@Christian Ball 558 Subscribers, huh? That's the difference between you and the IQ of mine. And trust me, *Me not that smart.*

No but you have to get past whether the killer is a good person or not. They aren't. But they are alive, many mentally insane, but alive. Making them suffer is pointless if you are about to kill them. If you think about it objectively (which I tend to do), we should strive to make life as painless as possible, and it makes no sense to make another life suffer before death, even if that life belongs to a bad person.

That’s thinking like a sociopath. We are no better then them if we did so

so if someone skull fucks you're dead child you wouldn't want them to get fucking punished?

Rosez Of course I would want them to be punished. Who the hell wouldn't. There are two issues with that question. For one, I'm not saying that they shouldn't be punished, I'm saying we need to carefully consider how they are punished. Secondly, if my child gets skull fucked, then my opinion of the person who did it is legally irrelevant. I would be very biased at that point. That's why we don't let vigilantes enforce the law in this country.

RundownOyster your opinion isn’t irrelevant. Why do you think there are victim family impact statements before sentencing.

hes also not accounting for the fact that his brother felt 0 pain in death. the shock of impact would have protected him from pain until he died. its the most humane way to go. sudden. but humane. i hope the families feel peace knowing that hes gone. and I hope that his own family finds peace knowing he didnt suffer

Who cares his brother died instantly no pain idk what is with all the fuss

You have to realize that everyone has feelings, unless you’re a psychopath lacking empathy. It’s easy to be angry at this, but imagine seeing your brother laid out like that, regardless of the fact his brother was a terrible person and a murderer he probably still loved him.

Also, you don’t just shoot someone in the head and not feel unless you literally are incapable of remorse

It would hurt to see someone you grew up with your whole life full of holes and lifeless even if they did horrible things to other people.

benada83 put him down

Yes I do actually.

narek hardnock yes and I’d rather it cost less than lethal injection

That's pretty weird tbh. Why does letting the state do your killing make you any better?

Kaon there's a huge difference between killing innocent people and guilty evil monster. They lost there right, there not the victim and never will be.

I SAW IT 😂😂

hey yeah you are right one of the employees there is watching simpsons

Yeah good spot.

Jacob Kiser exactly

Why would he? He isn't responsible for someone else's actions, his brother is responsible for his own actions. The guy was probably just as shocked to even know his brother would do such a thing. The families grieve for their lost loved ones.. And may they find peace from their sorrow. Mind you, no one is saying to let a murderer roam free, but why is it wrong to feel sympathy for your own brother, flesh and blood, being blown apart?

Rongeli An I feel sympathy according to state sanctioned murderer yeah it was an execution

Rongeli An Agreed.

He probably did. It’s such a complex horrible situation and I feel bad for him, but the govt should understand his feelings are biased. I would be mad at my brother for putting me through that.

You forgot that it had to be humane

Can’t be cruel and in humane

Somebody Somewhere too far

They'll bleed internally to death. That's horrible.

Buzzfed It’s honestly not that bad yes some of it is cringeworthy stuff but the most of it is actually rather fascinating

He probably meant the way this guy was killed. I cannot judge the laws of another state, the court has made it's decision but I think firing squads are just a bit more... gross.

LMAO I know. I wanted to give him some Prep H wipes for his goddamn butthurt.

@@beebster_v1 look up what he did. There was no compassion for his victims who probably suffered unimaginable pain. Next to that a well-placed shot is an act of Mercy in my opinion.

@@ashley-cn3rz i do not deny in any way what he did. I just personally think that killing him in anesthesia would be an act of mercy.

@@beebster_v1 yes it would be, I'm just conflicted with whether or not it should be shown

He's a victim o f his own murderous brother

And being inhumane back fixes it how?

Pete Smyth Personally I feel that once you’ve committed homicide you forfeit the right to humanity.

But its not about revenge its about justice.

I think you fundamentally misunderstand our justice system.

Fox His victims died just as quickly. They were shot in the head.

Fawkes4387 lmao!!

Say what? Where was this shown?

Clanton Blaylock ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-lfsMMVgIToA.html

Yes

Fawkes4387 tht things scRry

Cheaper, faster, more effective, so why not? I mean, people thought the electric chair was more humane than firing squad, and look how that turned out.

Why don’t they use guillotine? I feel that would be the fastest

chris nemat the brain will still be active

Parnilli K Benally For like 20 seconds and it will be in shock. Better than 2 minutes after firing squad

Advocatus Diaboli That's just not true. There are been many many many instances showing that to not be true. I'm not saying firing squad is the way. But acting like the current injection is perfect is stupid and uneducated.

While I don’t have much sympathy for the murderer themselves, I do see that innocent family members can’t just hate the criminals guts. For all we know the family never would have known what they were capable of and always saw the murderer as a good person. None of that means that the innocent care nothing at all about the victim/s. They just never saw a monster until that day. It’s a complicated psychology that is hard to understand.

Justice is not about revenge. By that logic we end up with justifying all sorts of crazy acts like torture. The families are not justifying the actions, they are objecting to the taking of another’s life. You’re conflating the two things.

@@ShePassedAway Right, youtube comments are full of simple minded idiots.

I don't you watched the entire clip.

Can we get 5000 subscribers with no videos? That makes it okay to turn the squad to murderers?

Eye for an eye

city untill everybody is blind. Interesting to see that the US is on a level with China and other undemocratic countries

Eye for an eye makes the whole world blind

+Douwe Huysmans would you prefer feeding and housing a serial killer until he dies ?

sharks should also be a choice.

Avocado Gaming But wasn't that changed due to people's opinions in the first place? It's obvious that when it comes to your own choice, someone will get into your business.

what about euthanasia roller coaster? i'd choose that

noose I'm loving these replies, so far plenty of them have been just interesting ways to get executed. A new take on "your final meal"

What if you were to be executed by playing VR Darksouls, maximum 5 lives.

Does his brother think the way the store clerk died was humane? I believe an eye for an eye. We need to send a message to these criminals To prevent further ruthless murdering. I don't believe in us taxpayers paying for their incarceration. If they are guilty without a doubt, put a bullet in their heads

If u live by the sword u die by it he actually said he lived by the gun and wished to be killed by it

Enclave Radio Man 24 cents a pop

i think you meant

Unfortunately is still cost over 1 million dollars just to get him to execution day

Enclave Radio Man well i mean that’s the bullet cost when everything comes together I’m talking abt leagal fees,guns,people who are signed up,legal actions... it ends up costing the state millions

I'm getting Paul Harrell vibes from this comment

educational use thats why, vice is best friends with youtube trust

Yeah, unbelievable - I reported it.

I definitely would have liked warning even if it was for shock value

StaticStrike IKR

Welcome to America

You’re not wrong but still it does hurt if you’re family died.

He didn’t say it wouldn’t

Feelings and emotions should always make way for logic.

What does him being killed do for the families? Bring back their dead relative?

The brother didn't do anything wrong tho

The hanging method has its own challenges, as one has to factor in the prisoner's weight, the length of the rope, etc. Otherwise, you get situations where the prisoner strangles to death (which can take a REALLY long time) or where the prisoner's head pops off (which can be REALLY traumatizing for anybody watching and/or cleaning up) or where the rope breaks and the prisoner doesn't die at all (which can be REALLY complicated, legally speaking).

RandomName Last Name does it say justin Y. Then?

Lol i was eating pizza,tasted better after i learned what he did

tintinismybelgian you’re supposed to have a bag on their head.. and the people watching are supposed to not be pussies

This man was found guilty of multiple murders. False imprisonment is a reality, that's why death row inmates sit in prison for years and years before actually being executed. There's time to go over everything and double, triple, quadruple check that this inmate is guilty.

@@baileyhellmuth5526 And yet there has been plenty of executions where new evidence has shown that they were not guilty after their deaths. Especially against people that are outcasts or looked down upon by society.

@@krabbcake8371 think about it this way most if those false executions were way back then. That means no way to get fingerprinted, no technology that we have now. If you break into some ones house and murder them there's not much you can do if you don't have a witness. You can't search for DNA is fingerprints. Usually outcast or scums commit murder. Scums and outcast were usually the first ones to be looked at. If there's no witnesses what are they going to do.

Not just falsely convicted but unfairly convicted too. Unless you are pedophile, child killer, mass murderer, serial killer then you shouldn't be on the death row.

@@ihadtodancetosurvive1824 That's an awfully short list.

It feels bad not immoral, we must all do things we dislike.

Star Cherry maybe dont do it at all?

Nitrogen suffocation (all copied and pasted from the internet) According to the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, in humans, "breathing an oxygen deficient atmosphere can have serious and immediate effects, including unconsciousness after only one or two breaths. The exposed person has no warning and cannot sense that the oxygen level is too low." Also, Physiologically inert gases (those that have no toxic effect, but merely dilute oxygen) are generally free of odor and taste. As such, the human subject detects little abnormal sensation as the oxygen level falls. This leads to asphyxiation (death from lack of oxygen) without the painful and traumatic feeling of suffocation

@@de0509 neat

some people deserve to die for what they did that way a mass murderer cant weasel his way out of prison

TrendSource fr a warning would have been nice 😂😂

Yhea, they could have warned

TrendSource lol snowflake

Tom Smyth being shocked by photos of a gory death being suddenly displayed without warning doesn't make you a "snowflake" dumbass

burritoking180 Fr 😂😂

Honestly if i were a death row inmate id want to go by firing squad. Both more satisfying for the family of the victims and even though i dont really care for death tow inmates it lets you say something cool before you die like “alright lets do this”

Correct. So was the murder. Did the victim deserve such a violent end? You live by the gun you die by the gun. That's justice.

Daniel Revas This is the problem with the American prison system. You handle executions based on your own revenge feelings. It's barbaric.

Aski i believe criminals should be treated the same way they treated their victims.

The Patriot We do not live in the stone age anymore. Every human deserves a second chance. Think about this: You get a new neighbour, but oh oh. He was just released from prison. You can choose one criminal that will live next to you. Who do you choose? A) A criminal that has been locked in a cell, and treated with nothing but disrespect. B) A criminal that got an education, learned to cook food and regrets what he did. The obvious answer is B. The american justice system has to stop focusing on revenge. Yes, it feels good, but out justice system cannot be run by emotions. We have to make sure that society keeps running optimally, which is impossible if we ruin our criminals, instead of making them functioning, tax paying member of our society. If you're actually interested, I recommend some of these clips about the norwegian justice system. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-jDjISR5OHa4.html&t ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-KPVPKEdCAwo.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-wgHdGr4aQoU.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-a7TfBLvw4FY.html&t (This one is a full lenght documentary)

Aski Your rebuttal is flawed. You are talking about a criminal that has been reformed through a recognizance of their own ways. They decided they were going to become a contribution to society instead of continuing to carry out acts of crime. People who kill here and get the death penalty get it because they thought about it or did it heinously. It wasn't some person that accidentally struck and killed someone by running them over with a car. These people who get the death penalty get it because they are a drain on our taxation system to continue to support their life in a prison cell otherwise they would just go out and kill again. Those people are psychopathic and have no regard or remorse for life. If you were sentenced the death penalty here, i trust that the justice system was justified in that conviction. The justice system is not a revenge, it is there to replace the justice that a person of revenge would take. Get it straight.

Aski so a child rapist should be able to teach daycare by your rebuttal? Obviously we are not in the Stone Age but honestly these criminals often commit even more crimes upon release as well as when they remain in prison are detrimental to our nations tax system which could be money spent on something else like education or all of these social services that liberals teach. I’m all for executing these people honestly we should go back to hanging them instead of shooting them

Hanging was always fast and effective. And public hanging deterred other criminals. It's a perfect system.

Except that hangings could also go wrong, where the neck wouldn't snap but you'd instead choke to death. In modern times, death by nitrogen asphyxiation would be the fastest, cheapest, and most humane.

@@ElusiveTy I don't see how that is a factor, honestly. Maybe the convict should've thought about how he was going to die before committing crimes.

Gaelan Brewer Maybe the person next to him was innocent. Maybe the person next to that guy was innocent

Too slow for the observer maybe, if everything goes right you just go out within seconds without feeling anything.

I agree

Why? Is the famiy of a criminal worthless and without rights just because he is his brother? Are you insane or something?

I mean it's his brother obv he would care about his brother more than the victims its only natural

@@peteraugust5295 I don't care

You wouldn’t laughed if that was your brother

@@DilipKrJha-yb6nv WE, do not care

two wrongs don't make a right, We make ourselves more like his brother by killing him.

Alexander Colon the prisoner gets books, tv, meals, the chance to see loved ones and family, a view of the sky, warm showers, the opportunity to meet and connect with other people. The chance to grow, and tell others that they love them, and the chance to atone and make amends to those they have wronged to lesser degrees. The murder victim gets none of that. Justice demands, you take a life, you pay with your own.

Europa: That's not as many in the modern age as we think, but every single one is still a tragedy.

Strongly disagree

Falstad007 if you don't have siblings you won't understand

The DEA has killed many innocents! They must be executed!

@richards0406 47 Constitution says no.

@richards0406 47 In your opinion.

Seagle what do you consider "innocents"?

Seagle 1.how does killing someone make anything better? 2. What about those who are in innocent and sit on death row? Shouldn't we then also kill those who execute, soldiers who killed civilians, cops that shot unarmed people etc. ?

TheCptCoy best comment

In other news... Water.. Wet!

He said it was a coping method. What would you do if someone you grew up with ur whole life was killed like that and saw the photos? Just ignore it. I mean you can say that but no one will fucking believe you.

Christian Kerr That doesn’t make it not murder.

The law is simple, you kill someone and you can face death, you don't get to decide someone else can die and then live the rest of your life in a prison cell protected by guards and given a decent life. And don't say it isn't decent, you get free food, water, bedding, medical care, and are cared for through ANYTHING that happens to you.

It's stupid for you to say that. He didn't tell his brother to kill innocent people.

yeah it terrible, what his brother did, and to us hes a monster. i have no sympathy for the man, but for his brother i can empathize. we all love somebody, and to realize that your flesh and blood was a murderer would be devastating. to then see his corpse filled with holes would destroy anybody

marcellbuscemi x

the main problem is on the way he was killed, not the fact that he was killed

marcellbuscemi his brother wasn’t murdered he’s punished fool

hmm.... very dumb comment bro, do you understand what you said? You're satisfied because the brother of a criminal feels bad... Imagine (really hope never happens to you btw) if they do the same with someone from your family... how would you feel? are you gonna continue to see your state the same as before? i don't think so bro.... see, even is isn't you the person who pulls the trigger, all people ALL people of that state are responsible of the death of that persone. Solution time: LIFE SENTENCE so none gonna have bloody hand and prisoner gonna work to gain his life till he die

Iss993 ITA thats the problem with people man ! They never seem to realise the ‘what if’ scenario ! I mean okay the criminals deserve it and no matter what, the victim’s families can never be repaid. While the criminal deserves it, even then, his close family members will always feel grief and regret at their close one’s death !

@@ismaeelrossan2728 Death is imminent to every immortal being. Murderers deserve death even if they didn't die out naturally. They KILLED someone innocent who probably was a mother, a child, a caring father or loving sibling and it also messed up their family members. It's a traumatizing situation for them to lose someone they love the most! So what you sow is what you reap! When you kill someone innocent who has done you no harm you too deserve to die no matter what your family thinks. The same pain is deserved to be felt by the murderer and his family too. The fact that he's a murderer says alot about his wrong upbringing by the ones who raised him as well as his own actions that he's done over the period of his life time. So executioning him means both families suffer on equal measures. Ofcourse, the pain will be unbearable for the murderer's family too but his/her conscious action to kill someone INNOCENT without emotion and mercy deserves no mercy.

Ivy A. Vaz yes I totally agree with you on this ! Mercy should not be shown to these people since they never had or showed it in the first place ! While the murderer’s family will probably feel saddened (most of them) , it does not change the fact that this man who was executed totally deserves it ! To rob someone’s life is a deceitful and unforgivable sin IMO ! Mercy should not be shown to these people ! Treating them as a human being with the rest of us itself seems overly cared for !

@@ivyvaz well, if you think soo... 👀

Because cruel punishments are unconstitutional.

Yep, every time I hear people try to make it seem wrong to execute bad people who commit serious violent crimes I always ask what about their victims' rights?

Elisa Mastromarino I couldn’t have said it better myself, you wanna date?

I have to disagree. Killing people for killing people is like trying to right a wrong with a wrong. What we should be doing is giving people rehabilitation and correcting them so they can be a part of society once more. Even if a loved one of mine was murdered, I'd still say that the murderer deserves to be rehabilitated and brought back into society, because killing him wouldn't be righting a wrong, it would just make it even wronger.

Justice is an abstract concept. For some, it would be justice to kill shoplifters or jaywalkers. Abduction and murder, however, are fairly straightforward. In a sense, cops are, in fact, state-sanctioned abductors, as they are taking people by threat of potentially lethal force. Most would agree, however, that this is necessary to some extent to maintain order in our society. Likewise, executioners are committing state-sanctioned murder, as they are taking the life of another person outside of self-defense. Some people, again, believe this is a necessary facet of a society that wishes to maintain order. On this point, I must disagree. There is always the option to keep killers in prison. To kill them as retribution serves only to soothe the crying of the families of victims by creating another grieving family, and at an enormous cost to the public.

William Mendes Humbane No way! Once you have went down that dark path of taking another life, it becomes nothing but easier for them to commit the same act again.

People use to get the death penalty for all kinds of thing, like stealing a horse at one time. Not really a heinous crime so I have to disagree with that. Execution is simply state sanctioned murder. this isn't to say that the criminal isn't a bad person, just that stooping to the level of the murderer isn't going to fix the problem.

James Strader Well in 2018 I doubt anyone in the US is gonna get the death penalty for doing something like stealing a horse. 99% of the time people only get the death penalty if they've killed people, raped people, or raped children. To me that's the more merciful route. Ask anyone that has life in max security prison and they will all tell you they'd rather get the death penalty. It's not gonna fix the problem, you're right. But it helps the families of the victims get some kind of justice and the people that are being killed don't even want to be alive anymore anyways. Solitairy confinement makes people insane. To me that is much less humane than the death penalty.

Xiola DuBose , the horse was simply to show how cheap people's lives are to others. Obviously that wouldn't happen now, I appreciate that you are more articulate than the guy that originally responded to my response. I still think it's time for this archaic practice to be replaced, nations like Norway have less crime/murders than the US and don't allow life sentences, executions or solitary confinement. It's time to look for new solutions to fix our justice system, not new ways to kill.

They’re bringing the death penalty to drug dealers

i really don't wish that in the near future your loved ones are raped and butchered by a madman and all they got him is free food and accomodation that unironically literally paid by your taxpayer money. I really hope i'm not seeing you changed heart in that ironic way all of sudden, but know that people who are family of these murderers victims already feel like that so don't wait for those things happened to you first before you can put your mind in their shoes. just sayin tho.

If it messes you up to kill somebody, then don't do it.

loads of people are completely detached from everything, they can do it.

They choose like 4-5 people and they are behind a partition type thing and the guns are already aimed at the inmate all they have to do is pull the trigger. Also I think only two guns have live ammo in them so nobody knows who actually shot the kill shot. My brother worked at the Utah State prison and told me this is how it's done.

I think it's like one gun has a blank, and all of them are shooting live ammos. There is way more than 2 bullets in that picture that's for sure

komorebi木漏れ日 Well the guy who made the machine probably feels guilt and so does the operator

Dude no...Holy shit you monster

Fear America we're trying to kill them quickly not make them suffer

Fear America nigga you a ice cold ass nigga. Damn nigga

The 8th Amendment states that cruel and unusual punishment is not allowed 🤣

lol ^

Duchess only in the best case

Duchess Stirling archer

they actually use 4

A knife is reusable :)

The only problem with that is that someone has to be on the other end pulling the trigger. No one should ever have to or want to be that person...

Jacob R If my mom killed someone, I’d be hurt that she would do it, but she would get what’s coming to her regardless.

"His brother was a human being". Yeah, let me catch u writing this if u were one of his victims. His brother was a cold-blooded monster.

@@primekrunkergamer188 he was still his brother. It would be devastating to see your brother full of holes after hs execution, monster or not. I don't think people realise that this is a punishment for randy's family as well.

Why should the families of criminals be made to suffer when they aren't party to the crime? The families of criminals are just as innocent as the families of victims; neither deserves to have a loved one taken away. To murder a murderer does nothing to bring back the victim. If the goal is to punish the criminal, we have a whole penal system dedicated to that end. All extra killing does is create another permanently broken family.

BeanSand agreed. We have no more right to take a life than the murderer has. The death penalty has no place in the modern world and the US should do what most developed countries have already done and abolish it.

No. Keep the death penalty.

BeanSand By your logic, we shouldn't put anyone in prison, because by doing so the families of the criminals would be suffering, i.e. a child will lose his or her father, a wife will lose her husband. There comes a point where you draw the line and enact punishment that is fit to the crime committed, not anymore nor any less. Everything is jolly in your la la land, but in the real world we have things called deterrents that keep people from doing terrible things to each other.

nygeek64 and we have no evidence to believe the death penalty deters crime. In fact the states where capital punishment is in use generally have a higher crime rate than those without.

then they'll complain ammo manufacturers are lobbying for it

I'd vote for them being covered in molasses, strung up, then bring wild pigs or farmed pigs in. No one pulls a trigger. Pigs get fed. Circle of life.

Lusion except gas is expensive and dosent actually work very well*

Tony Brion Normal decomposition by bacteria is still circle of life.

Jon Smith I am curious as to how the hell was the gas chamber even invented as an execution method?

That's only in Ohio though

It’s fake dude lmao, The Onion type shit

@@jojobateria23 What are you talking about? It's the most legit story out there *BRO* . This dude is trippin.

Bobby Bush lmao

It’s the most painless way to kill someone my guy lol

Same that never happens

The corner also released morgue photos of Ted Bundy after he was executed too

The vast majority of the cost of capital punishment is not in the method of execution itself, but rather the associated legal costs. (deathpenaltyinfo.org/costs-death-penalty)

9mm bullet? lol. You would have needed a much bigger bullet than that to cause those wounds. I bet they used close to a 50 cal.

Public hanging! Yayyy !!! Much better entertainment than RU-vid vids.

So it 16 cents or .16 cents?

Those bullet holes were not caused by any 9mm lol

Justin Y. For once, I kinda agree with the commie

The onion!

@mike cafamo r/woooosh

😂😂 that video is a fake tho

@@PabloEscobar-gu8sd r/woooosh

welcome to hell they should give them pre set options in that case. But the whole point of execution is dehumanization. They lose their ability to make the choice

pretty sure that they do sometimes or in certain states

What if he/she chooses "old age"?

When you commit a crime and become a prisoner you forfeit most of your rights. After all the innocent people that this man murdered didnt get to choose how they died, so why should he get to?

@@abreknoxcho damn straight

yeah, not like there is many cases in which afterwards they figured out he was innocent. Because obviously a jury court can not fail haha

Think about the shooter, and the psychological impacts it would have of killing someone straight in the head. That is also why they use entire squads, because then the pain of murder is shared and dulled. Would you rather shoot a man straight in the face as he's crying or have people do it with in a humane and simple shot to the chest. Both ways are fairly quick and way less painful that any other forms of execution.

I think it would be possible to attach some kind of button/wire system to a gun's trigger which would then be simultaneously pressed by multiple executioners, but with only one being real, that way nobody knows who delivered the fatal head-shot.

because the head would be blown off or at least look messy

they don't want mess their face by shooting on their head, because their body would be returned to their family for the funeral

Because it's not clinical to blow someone's head up and give them a closed casket funeral. Criminal or no, unless they have no family, the body doesn't stay in prison and get burned or anything after an execution.

Amen!

Yup

The cheapest way is to drop the criminal to a river full of crocodiles. Or send them to North Korea border, where the North Korean soldiers will shoot him for free. The only they need to pay is a plane ticket.

Thank you, sir

pinoy426 atleast the US is a 1st world country not like he philippines we know how to handle our country dont decide for others

Daywalker777r well I would say yes but if it is particularly brutal then that could actually mess with a “normal” person’s mind as well all know that murderer’s are often mentally ill to some point

But who would be the person to, say, cut up the actual criminal with a chainsaw?

Mobile Mayhem invent a robot

You going to volunteer to choke someone to death while ass raping them? Cut someone up and eat them? The problem is anyone who volunteers is as big a piece of shit as the person who committed the crime.

MD Supreme if my family killed a person for no reason they arent my family anymore.

I feel bad for the taxpayers who spend more on a death penalty prisoner than it would cost for life with no parole.

The criminal's families are hypocrites.

So Tim, you wouldn't accept a cop, soldier or hangman in your family?

MD Supreme I hear you on that. I consider the family is going to grieve no matter what, knowing their child or sibling conducted a heinous act, perhaps they will be at ease knowing they will not commit them anylonger. Is it more humane to die in the hands of the state than by the hands of the state? I would hope the criminal would be met with a chance of redemption of their character then put to death.

Gator Guy You expect his own brother to stand against him? My brother would be last person I'd let down in front of anyone. He's the only person I can ever rely on, I trust him more than I trust myself.

Chicken Fight I’m not saying he should stand against his own brother at all. His brother is trying to end capital punishment because his brother went out that way. He’s not thinking about the other family that was the victim and lost there family member . If my brother killed people I know that he’s going to face consequences for that crime. I would be by his side but stay neutral after the fact . (Why ) both families had a lost for no reason,

LMAO

Lol 360 no scoped

aikam007 Lmaoooo

Victory .Studios Across the map lmfao

it was a killing not a murder. there's a difference.

well what makes you any better than the murderer at that point huh?

Exotic Gaming 1 I'm not the one carrying out the execution 2 The person I'm advocating execution for has murdered innocent people. He got a better treatment than his multiple victims. Do you believe that there is no moral distinction between killing an innocent person and killing a murderer? Is it immoral to put a kidnapper in prison? What about confiscating stolen goods from a theif?

No shit, he can still protest it if he thinks of it as inhumane.

So according to you, murder is justified? So, after the murder is carried out by the state, the legislators in support of the death penalty and the people who carried it out should also be killed. I just applied your logic against you.

How can taking anyone's life be justified, such a sad world we live in

If everybody "got what they deserved" this would be a different world. Dont judge so harshly.

Steward Appiagyei He murdered someone - he should have to be shot non lethally for every person he murdered, and then shot in the head

He murdered several people

Yeah, there's people who do fucked up thing and others want to be human to them? Just look at the two parents that are convicted of torturing 19 people, including their children.

Damnatio Memoriae Says Ned who lost his head lol

Please don't abuse commas like that. They don't like it.

Damnatio Memoriae You cannot be the judge and executioner, the same way that you cannot be judge and jury.

Piet Andersen judge and jury is different from judge and executioner

Why do you think that?

Tzaron you mean the money going to kill them? The appeals process of death row and administrative costs far outweigh that of feeding and housing a prisoner over a lifetime

@@KufLMAO Yeah lol its genuinely hilarious how many people say what this guy said when a single execution is more expensive than holding someone in life for prison.

@@plugshirt1762 dawg this was 4 years I think the death penalty is frickin sweet now *SLAMS TABLE* BRING ME MORE CRIMINAL SKULLS GRUG

2002 dial up connection He literally was murdered by the state.

lmao you mean put down by the state.

lol, seriously. Vice pushing an agenda? YUP.

Pigeonboyy Caligula killed by*

sanforce An agenda? Not killing people is an agenda now? Go back to thinking you're a real tough guy because you had a 11 kill streak on CoD. Hopefully your dad gets wrongfully put on Death Row and see how you feel about it. I had a loved exonerated by the hard work of the California Innocence Project and DNA evidence... the state was about to kill an innocent man! But who am I kidding... your dumbass probably thinks the government can do no wrong because Trump is making 'Merica great again.

So your point is?

@@blackham7 his point is that why should they kill him humanly after all the things he did to his victim/victims

@@decent6942 Because the 8th amendment protects his right for a humane death

it's called compassion....

Locking people in jail is inhuman. Let's be compassionate and fvcking free them all.

Wouldn't it be ironic if what you were eating was the same thing Gardner ate for his last meal?

some sense

anton levay Death itself is neither violent nor brutal, murder is. Mit is an ongoing conflict what to do with people who kill people and take everything they have. I actually agree with both sides, that death penalty is a way to "get rid" of subjects who do nothing but literally destroy other peoples lives but I also understand that it is a really rough way to say that a state may decide about others lifes itself. Either way, this video is about the way of killing those not about the moral conflict, and I think as long death penalty is a thing it should be instantly which is quite simple with a gun as you can see often enough in great America

anton levay Well said, sire.

I mean if someone killed like 3 people it really wouldn’t be that bad if he got killed cause he took those lives so now it’s his turn

Most serial killers kill themselves to avoid prison, death is just escape for them. There should be no replacement of which death they choose, just a ban on capital punishment. The extreme should only be solitary confinement and some medicine if that person is too fucked in the head.. We are no North Korea, 1 in 25 killed through this process are innocent !! Death to whom? Why? All these questions shows why this process is undemocratic to the core.

It’s all fun and games until your neck get stuck in the middle of the blade

Augustus Mussolini haha

Sack Deck YES

This guy knows what's up.

Augustus Mussolini reports say Obama ordered some 12k of them for FEMA right before he left office. So don't worry, they are.

"Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." - Barack Hussein Obama. also 4.1% of people on death row are innocent and also and eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind, and revenge feels good until you regret it. basically no you're just factually wrong about your opinion.

Two wrongs don't make a right. We make ourselves more like the murderer by killing him.

Alexander Colon but it is justified. That is the difference. Many of these murderers just do it for game.

metallicaandchimaira But not as many as most think at first. True psychopathy is rare and irredeemable wrongdoing nearly as rare, if existent.

Alexander Colon rare but they put a population of those kind of people in one place, which makes it a lot more dangerous. I have looked into some of these death row cases and the crimes are so heinous they deserve it. Tell me, would you have one of these inmates live in your house?

J Kerfont I think indoors will be better if they build a bigger room with drainage on each corner.

Kynney what’d be the point in cleaning? Just change the blade ever so often.

They aren’t actually painless, the neck is very tough and often takes a while before it is cut through all the way

white.noise you do understand how sharp guillotines are? They are a one shot thing, we aren't using axes here

con: you're concious minutes after the execution.

Maybe a clean bullet just through the head...

Yeah. Why do they waste so many bullets?

It’s got a stark beauty, doesn’t it ? ☺️

Richardezer Scrooge In order for that to happen, it would have to be an extremely high powered firearm. The brain would also still transmit pain for approvingly 12 seconds after being shot, basically before he goes completely brain dead. Even though the bullet will damage the brain severely it will not have an impact on the nervous system unless hit on the correct spot, it is still an inhumane death.

It would make sense for gas chamber with carbon monoxide that may not be the quickest but it is a painlessway

i like

Burton L send all of them over to crushit channel and let his press sort them out

8th amendment...

Gladiatorial games would bring in so much tax money.

George Carlin?

You're sick

Most people forget the rest of the phrase An eye for an eye… makes the whole world blind

@@dominicgunderson no he isn't

Well he's not too far off for a few philosophical reasons I wont get into.

Hanging.

Guillotine

idosyncraticArticulation [IA] you don’t want cyanide it is fast but gruesome and extremely painful for those short few seconds

Amen

not doing it at all

Thank you Lucas, someone with a fucking brain.

The deterrence argument is so stupid. If the consequences are the only thing preventing you from killing someone, you're pretty messed up internally.

I believe it could give people traumas and nightmares when they see people dying in front of them

@Jarrod Lamp I understand. But people who are no killers or don't intend to kill might find it disturbing.

@@stephenmystery8313 So messed up people should therefore not be deterred? You should think it through lol

Europa H2O Alien that's y u need torture method like in the old ages like the brasin bull or cut someone in half or pore them hot metal so that no one else does stupid shit and then problem solved y u think it worked so good before it used to be get in line or be checked daym back then sucked immagine going threw one of those tortured methods and it would suck even more if the gov let the family choose which to use

OG Flyer if guilt is certain. Death is just.

Europa H2O Alien it would serve justice. If you take a life and your guilt is certain, you pay with your own.

Gustavo45 GGG honestly fully support this you don’t deserve to live life in prison with free food showers and a bed or the death penalty it’s way too easy torture should be the only option for murderers

No I don't, my post was very concise, if they don't have overwhelming evidence of guilt, they should get life in prison, I even agreed with the sentence given to Charles Manson, because they couldn't actually put him at the scene for any of the murders committed by his group.

how do you know that? a murder can range from a quick shot to the head or through the heart, to a long torture session to get information

Mattron I don’t want to get into an argument, but the point wasn’t about how long they suffered.

Mattron Would it make you happy if I removed that part?

The point is that the victim didn't get to choose how they die, so the murderer should have that right revoked as well.

Capital punishment is about administering death, not suffering.

Justice isn't about feelings you prick.

@@ryancalhoun2910 it's entirely about feelings lol

@@MichaelGallagher97 No it isn't. Justice is about making sure people pay consequences for what they do.

@@ryancalhoun2910 "people pay consequences" Yes so the victims FEEL justice and in theory the criminal FEELS regret/remorse

@@MichaelGallagher97 No

takes too damn long.

cyanide pill -instant humane painless.....but actually bann it all

"painless"

whatthefuck cyanide is one of the worst ways you can die...

It must be impractical somehow, if it's not being used.

Not if its a fat inmate

Then youll have to pay for spatulas to scrape it

That's medieval

Boba Fett You can buy those at the 99 cent store and so wacko would prob volunteer to do it or at least buy more rope 🤣🤣🤣

narek hardnock I don’t think you understand that mass murderers would look at that like “oh I can go kill 20 people and I’ll only go to jail for the rest of my life it’s not that bad, they’ll feed me and clothe me, I don’t have to die no matter what I do ! :)” that’s just dumb, your argument was maybe okay when people were being hung for being “witches” lmao come on get outta gere

what about rapists. i don't think they could legally do that

yeah but for execution this would work

gogos1073 lmao

but what about child rapists

Shruti Sinha I agree

Exactly...

Because you need a moral high ground, if you don't have that, who are you to judge anyone ? An eye for an eye makes the whole world go blind

its real justice

Le gens u already have the moral high ground? He killer innocent people. Thats A LOT more morally wrong then killing killers. So right of the bat, we are like 10 times as moral as the killer. So moral high ground? CHECK.