@@RosalesFilmss and the kid jokingly said “VAR” after the second yellow and he then got a yellow? that was absurd, i’d understand if it was a professional game but wtf ref, sort yourself out
Which play are you asking about for a red card? The elbow at 4:00 certainly should have been. It would be extremely difficult to catch with the 2 referee system though. Angles and distances are all wrong.
@@RosalesFilmss if that was his second yellow, then yes it should be a red. First was the elbow, and that was the second. Between 2 seasoned (it looked like to me because they did a decent job) not sure how the missed it.
@@holmj12 wow, I missed that one. Good catch. Certainly an attempt to strike. It's funny that there is no reaction to that one. In this game (and most others) I think you have to go with a send off. An elbow directed at the head, with force, and the ball gone....
Class of '79. Come on Matadors. #10...IT'S CALLED PASSING! You are not Messi. You are MESSY. Stop trying to be a thug. Be a leader by passing and playing smart. You lead by your actions and direction "captain". Does anyone on the team want to consider what they are doing off the ball? What you do without the ball is as important as what you do WITH it. Triangulate. Move to open space. Overlap and please RELEASE the damn ball instead of trying to show off your non existant dribble. Coach...Sit the "Messi" imposters until they decide that moving to open space and creating options is a better way to go. Play with your heads up and move the ball. You might become the next Steele Canyon. Red card to Foothills #7 for the elbow and to the Foothills keeper for the intentional take down in the box.
Just because the ball makes contact with the hand/arm doesn't automatically make it a handling offense. Good no call, arm was always in a natural position and also think of the situation what if the hand/arm wasn't there? In this case it would have hit the player's side.
@@jorgecatalan788 let's assume the play does hit the arm (it is close though) Just because the ball makes contact with the hand/arm doesn't automatically make it a handling offense. Good no call, arm was always in a natural position and also think of the situation what if the hand/arm wasn't there? In this case it would have hit the player's side.
@@RosalesFilmss I think the refs (accidentally?) gave the yellow card to #10 gray because he is the player that ended up with the ball before red took it. Even though #7 was the player who continued to dribble the ball after the whistle (thus delaying the restart) maybe they confused the number. Especially because later when the ref confidently explains to the coaches of red the situation and the coaches seem accept the explanation (edit: nvm coach continues to argue) that is my only reasonable guess other than they didn't properly keep track of numbers on their paper.
If you are referring to the Keeper foul at about 11 min, it is a yellow card. It wasn’t exactly DOGSO and the player never got the chance to shoot at goal. Yellow Card and PK. That was the correct call. Side note: Team red is lucky at that point to not be down to eight men. They have continuously played like a Sunday League team many of their dads probably play in. Lots of arm and shirt grabs, cheap elbow pushes to the back, and flopping at literally every physical challenge. White is the better team, but as their coach was annoying and was shown yellow for it, they too start coming into challenges too hard and reckless. So they now feel like victims because they start getting called for minor infractions more often and are playing frustrated. The game dynamic is shifting and it’s not being controlled by the coaches and parents screaming for imaginary cards and penalties. The refs have to blow the whistle more and the flow of the game stalls.
@@RosalesFilmss, all I can see from the video is a ref holding the card in his hand, but it wasn’t raised at any player, until the player in red mouthed off. So it isn’t clear if a card was actually awarded. It’s a picky distinction, but the official action is to stand with the card raised and indicating a player. And I didn’t see the player directed off the field, so it’s possible there was no yellow card.
@@kevv4842, I am a referee. I am qualified in FIFA and the slightly different High School rules. So, yeah, my assessment is accurate according to the rules of the game.
@@andrewsmith9174 the far side referee does raise his yellow card above the head in the direction of gray #7 and #10 (8:21). #7 does end up leaving the field seeming to confirm it was indeed his second yellow. Maybe the refs meant to give it to #10 gray for picking up the ball and holding on to it (unlikely) maybe the refs says #10 last with the ball but meant to give the card to #7 for continuing to dribble the ball after the whistle (possibly) or most likely didn't record the correct numbers/lost track of numbers with the other yellow cards given. Though you would have thought the refs would have remembered #7 for throwing the elbow (that should have been a straight red for violent conduct)