Should we be worried about technology? 

We Should have always been worried about our social evolution, specifically the lack of it…so many are addicted to war, conflict, and consumerism/materialism…

I don't fear technology. I fear the people controlling it and creating it without input from the people who will be affected by that technology.

I find it unsettling that you're treating people's mistrust of tech as the problem that needs to be solved, rather than emphasising the various dangers with technology, like surveillance and dishonest electioneering, as problems that needs to be solved.

I guess, as a gen Z we've never been afraid of technologies and, at some point, this whole situation is out of our minds, it's still really weird to see how one technology replaces another one or how saving the world literally means creating more devices, softwares and so on.

I love the Economist, very happy with my subscription and this YT content!

"Technology has no agency" AI: hold my beer!

"The solution to tech-related problems often involve more or better tech." OR self-examination of our addiction to consumption, as well as reevaluating the hubris that humans are not bound by nature. Technology is making us less connected to what it means to be human. But hey, trying to engineer our way out means greater returns to capital, eh Economist?

The Jetson's lore shows they developed that technology and elevated living because that had destroyed the surface of Earth. Not the best route.

Not technology , social media is what we should be worried about.

Technology isn't neutral. There are some technologies more dangerous than others. As McLuhan would says : The medium is the message.

This is really a great video. Quite a balanced view on technology and nice little history on technology over the years, to demonstrate the points 👍

Social media is dangerous

no, but we should definitely fear those who are today controlling technology

200 years from now, new philosophies will emerge to teach a way of life without depending on AI technology, these philosophies will evolve into new religions after 500 years.

It’s not misinformation but information you don’t like.

The future of Technology is integration between humans and AI also technology will allow us to build stuff at a faster rate and transform the 3rd world countries but there is a double edged sword with this

No, technology is there to help us and make our life easier while some people uses technology for wrongdoings.

It all comes down on HOW you use technology. You can use it for the better or for the worse. And to my fellow technology pessimistic viewers… if you think technology is bad for humanity, then stop using it, and more ironically, to comment your negative points of view on this technological social media platforms.

Very well presented. Perfecting technology must be more significant to speed of innovation. Hassle free migration of brains to countries where innovation is encouraged must be facilitated. 👍

I think there is a significant risk when artificial intelligence is used without regulation and without control.

Why no concerns on the addictive tendency of social media?

Maaan, these animation are insane! The Economist - you 🤘

Yes and no Tech is great but sometimes tech can fail

Technologies make economic & social activities rich, policies keeping them sound. They are the two wings of civilization. Technologies amplify the possibility & dangerousness of the human species. Policies maximize the former, minimizing the latter. Technologies can be seen as tools for changing natural & social environments, policies as an adaptation to these environments. I hope we can improve wealth creation & distribution, our abilities & their utilization with new techs & comprehensive policies.

Cool stuff - well done Shira & journalists!

I didn't learn the answer to the question. How did this video answer it?

Anyone who’s afraid of tech should live with the Amish community

Basically, history repeats itself. Similar things which happened in the industrial revolution have been becoming. And we know that this cannot be prevented. I want to believe it is very likely that we can give direction to technology to save the world.

This is a great topic. HIGHLY important for us nowadays.

Frankenstein was written 203 years ago, and we still don't have a better metaphor for our relationship with science & technology

Of course, technology is optimal and reliable, as long as it is used in a responsible, progressive and ethical manner with the purpose of improving aspects of human daily life, without affecting or transgressing its nature

I'm mostly bored by technology.

no, however not depend on technology either

Interesting video. Thank you.

who edited this video? The graphics are amazing. Please tag your workers.

Lets be honest, virtual reality is way impressive than flying cars

Technology has 2 sides of economic... part of production, maximum productivity, efficient time and input, maximum output (positive)... Change from labour to machine, so unemployment increasingly (negative)...

Thank you for the video and I will be sharing this with friends

A great video, I agree entirely. Thank you, The Economist!

You are amazing. Thank you for such thought-provoking videos revealing the truth of our reality.

I'm against that Cyberpunk-like dystopian future where advanced technology is integrated into every aspect of society, and corporations wield significant power. My posts highlight the negative consequences of a hyper-technological world on the human condition. Looking at the current state of the world it is safe to say that in the future, it is possible that certain aspects of the human experience could be diminished or altered, potentially resulting in a loss of some elements we consider integral to our societies. There are a few potential ways in which the human aspect of society could be affected in a Cyberpunk future. For example, in a highly technologized and corporate-dominated world, there may be a risk of dehumanization, where people are reduced to mere cogs in the machinery of society. Human interaction, empathy, and compassion may be diminished as individuals become more isolated and detached from one another. Another example is stratification and inequality. There would be this vast gap between the wealthy elite and the impoverished masses. This socioeconomic disparity could exacerbate existing inequalities and lead to a loss of social cohesion and solidarity. Also we can already see the loss of privacy and autonomy. Advanced surveillance technologies and pervasive connectivity could further erode personal privacy and individual autonomy. Constant monitoring and data collection might make it challenging to maintain personal agency and freedom of thought. Also the dependency on technology. While technological advancements can enhance our lives, an excessive reliance on technology may lead to a loss of self-sufficiency and critical thinking skills. If technology becomes integral to every aspect of life, society might become vulnerable to disruption and control by those who control the technology. As well as cultural homogenization, In a Cyberpunk-like future, corporate influence would dominate cultural expression, potentially resulting in the loss of diversity and individuality. This could lead to a more homogeneous society, devoid of the rich tapestry of human cultural experiences. But, we need to realize that the future is not predetermined, and societies are shaped by the choices we make collectively. While there are concerns about the potential loss of the human aspect of society, it's a cautionary tale rather than an inevitable outcome. How we navigate the integration of technology into our lives and how we address issues such as inequality, privacy, and autonomy will ultimately determine the future direction of our societies.

Quite curious. No mention of the potential use of technology by bad actors nor the existential risks they may pose. Was that intentional?

Nice video.

Worried about politic instead

The Tesla robot will be fine.

Ok so forgive me for sounding redundant but does this mean that um something like technology is a double edged sword? ... im taking notes.

If implemented ethically, technology is the best. We can not deny the progress and comfort it brought to our lives these past centuries.

It’s a problem when it threatens stability. People like new opportunities but no 40 year old with 20 years in an industry and 2 degrees wants to hear that their industry and job have become obsolete. People don’t mind improving technology but not if it means that you are displaced overnight just when you are in need of the most stability in your life as you are likely raising a family and have a great deal of responsibility. What do you do with a 50 something person making 150k? Are you going to retrain them for their last 10 years in the workforce? Are they going to be willing to start at the bottom at age 53? Technology exists to improve our lives. Innovation must consider the nature of human existence otherwise there will be a backlash.

It is rethorical question. !!!

Informative

I wonder why THE ECHONOMIST is worried about people not having a jab

İt depend on how People use tecnology

Wow, a actual video and not just a link to a article behind a paywall … I'm going to watch this more than once to celebrate. _[yes I'm being petty and sArCaStIC]_

Yes.

Really? I expected more from The Economist. The question, granted as suggested by your opening shot, is, "Should we be worried about ourselves?" (Yes, obviously. We cant be trusted, cause... hmmmm... Civilization and its Discontents).

not much we can / we could do.

I am looking forward in the development of technology, but athe same time also am i worried about that. Basically i am excited to get all the information.

amazing

What year is it? 1984.

Nombers don't lie

A balance btw embracing and fear

Who was that guy of mit (quotation about nationalism).

Has anything been nothing but good?~ If it isn't technology, we'd still find ways to self-destruction. Might as well embrace techonology while limiting the damage along the way.

YES WE SHOULD BE WORRIED. WHEN THE NEXT GENERATION WILL NEVER KNOW A MOMENT OF PRIVACY.

Technology is evil.

Technology will cost you your freedom and render your humanity redundant

Big yes..

Something tells me the Economist is not very critical about any secondary effects of vaccines...hmm

Why are they giving some bs history lesson.

I feel like this is saying we should be balanced and nuanced, but the historical examples show that people were usually excited about technology thinking it would lead to some utopian future and then it never turns out that way and we become pessimistic. It honestly seems like we should just stay a little more on the pessimistic skeptical side with big new technological advancements because they always seem to come with problems just as big or even bigger than the solutions.

I'm here for the clip at 2:46 and thats all.

Stupidity is the enemy, not technology.

I’m just here for the comments

We need to use technology the will help to adapt us to the disruptive effects of warming planet not to control us through disinformation.

There is flying cars, is just that they can fly just once

So is it any wonder people are afraid of technology

Our desicion makers implement ing the wrong solutions ...

I guess everyone interested in this topic will enjoy the short story "The voice of the dolphins" by one of the fathers of the nuclear era, Leo Szilard

Whenever you see the question “should we fear x” answer is always no. There is nothing to fear, you will die and be judged by the Lord. It is coming and the sooner you accept that the sooner you will find peace Saint and sinner alike. A machine may make your life miserable, sorrow is the lot of some. Machines or no machines we cannot avoid unpleasantness, try to be wise, avoid and find ways to endure pain and toil. If you are fortunate you will find ways but some people are doomed to a bitter life. Loving others is a balm for a sore soul.

The usual economist: baseless speculations and totally unproven claims.

Where does The Economist talk about the depreciation of technology purchased by consumers? But if we buy more junk they add it to GDP. What is NDP? Can economists do algebra?

And insulting me in the process

Thanks for stealing my stuff

solve a problem to gain more problems!

I saw blockchain and web 3 all over the video.

Jesus is king 👑🥰🥰❤️❤️🙏🏿💯💯😇😇

Funny they mentioned flying, because Concord was faster. If it was someone from really recent past they would have a lot of questions on why we didn't advance as much. 4:02 "deeply unpopular" this is the first time I heard this, I've never known how others felt about them. I would love to see a source for this 4:56 not without government intervention, which is universal access to education.

Imagine someone complaining about technology on the internet.

Worry only about the technology that improves nuclear weapons.

Aren't you getting a little old for clickbait, Economist? "Are robots coming for our pension checks?" "Will our robot overlords force us to breed?"

Why is the "misinformation" only about vaccines??

So luke smith's channel in a nutshell

Should we be afraid of the economiss? I’m not worried just petrified, cringe worthy click bait everyday from these fools

Add companies after technology on your title, and that’s the answer.

Has technology made us feel happier?

Why would I fear technology I can play Fortnite and see biggy booba and assy assy.

This is a reason why people don't want to be vaxinated because of some with lipid nanoparticles not sure about having nano bots are going to do on the latter basis

All we worry about is cringe content on social media platforms

British accent

Soooooo, this video is about vaccines, NOT technology.